Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
N.Katkhouda - Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery - 2010.pdf
Скачиваний:
106
Добавлен:
21.03.2016
Размер:
39.36 Mб
Скачать

Selected Further Reading

147

Franklin ME Jr, Dorman JP, Pharand D (1994) Laparoscopic surgery in acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4(4):289–296

Gandhi AD, Patel RA, Brolin RE (2009) Elective laparoscopy for herald symptoms of mesenteric/internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5(2):144–149

Greig JD, Miles WF, Nixon SI (1995) Laparoscopic technique for small bowel biopsy. Br J Surg 82(3):363

Husain S, Ahmed AR, Johnson J, Boss T, O’Malley W (2007) Small-bowel obstruction after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Arch Surg 142(10):988–993

Lange V, Meyer G, Schardey HM et al (1995) Different techniques of laparoscopic end-to- end small-bowel anastomoses. Surg Endosc 9(1):82–87

Lee IK, Kim do H, Gorden DL, Lee YS, Jung SE, Oh ST, Kim JG, Jeon HM, Kim EK, Chang SK (2009) Selective laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction using CT guidance. Am Surg 75(3):227–231

Nagle A, Ujiki M, Denham W, Murayama K (2004) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 187(4):464–470

Posta C (1996) Surgical decisions in the laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction: report on two cases. J Laparoendosc Surg 6(2):117–120

Slutzki S, Halpern Z, Negri M, Kais H, Halevy A (1996) The laparoscopic second look for ischemic bowel disease. Surg Endosc 10(7):729–731

Waninger I, Salm R, Imdahl A et al (1996) Comparison of laparoscopic handsewn suture techniques for experimental small-bowel anastomoses. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6(4):282–289

Yau KK, Siu WT, Law BK, Cheung HY, Ha JP, Li MK (2005) Laparoscopic approach compared with conventional open approach for bezoar-induced small-bowel obstruction. Arch Surg 140(10):972–975

Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Matthews BD, Heniford BT (2007) The laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 194(6):882–887

Selected

Further

Reading

Inguinal Hernia 10

Repair

 

 

 

 

The understanding and recognition of the anatomy of the preperitoneal space is

General

Considerations

essential to the performance of a safe and effective laparoscopic hernia repair (Fig. 10.1).

and Surgical

The five important landmarks are as follows:

Anatomy

1.

Pubic tubercle and Cooper’s ligament.

 

2.

External iliac vein.

 

3.

Medial umbilical ligament and the inferior epigastric vessels as they come off the

 

 

external iliac vessels.

 

4.

Vas deferens.

 

5.

Cord vessels.

 

Along with the iliopubic tract, these landmarks define the three spaces associated with groin hernias (Fig. 10.2):

1.Indirect inguinal hernia: lateral to the inferior epigastric vessels.

2.Direct inguinal hernia: medial to the inferior epigastric vessels and lateral to the border of the rectus abdominus muscle within the triangle of Hesselbach.

3.Femoral hernia: under the iliopubic tract, medial to the iliac vein, and lateral to Cooper’s ligament.

All three spaces should be covered by an appropriate size mesh. They are no different from the hernia spaces seen in the traditional open anterior approach (Fig. 10.3).

There are several dangerous areas of dissection with the laparoscopic repair. The “triangle of doom” is located between the vas deferens medially and the gonadal vessels

N. Katkhouda, Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery,

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74843-4_10, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

150

Chapter 10 Inguinal Hernia Repair

Fig. 10.1 Anatomy of the preperitoneal space (right side)

Fig. 10.2  Hernia spaces

General Considerations and Surgical Anatomy

151

Fig. 10.3 Hernia spaces as seen from the anterior approach

laterally. The external iliac vein and artery are found in this triangle. There is another dangerous space at the superior aspect of the internal ring where the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve enters the spermatic cord (Fig. 10.4). It is hazardous to apply electrocautery in this area because of the risk of injury to the nerve. Electrocautery is usually applied when raising the peritoneal flap at the beginning of the transabdominal preperitoneal operation, and the dissection should start 1 cm above the internal ring.

There is another dangerous zone inferior to the iliopubic tract and lateral to the gonadal vessels, the “triangle of pain,” where one can find the genitofemoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves.Stapling in this area may injure either of these nerves.Together, the area between the vas deferens medially and the iliopubic tract superiorly and laterally constitutes “the square of doom,” where staples or electrocautery should NEVER be applied to avoid irreversible nerve injury (Fig. 10.5).

152

Chapter 10 Inguinal Hernia Repair

Fig. 10.4   Lateral nerves of the groin

Fig. 10.5 Square of doom, delineated by the vas deferens medially and the inguinal ligament  lateral and superiorly

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]