Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Opni_gotovy.docx
Скачиваний:
43
Добавлен:
08.03.2016
Размер:
121.55 Кб
Скачать

30. Consider the features of conclusions stating based on the results of research work.

Рассмотрите особенности формулирования выводов по результатам научно- исследовательской работы.

The planning of scientific research

1) the formulation of the problem or the theme of the scientific research,

2) the definition of the object and the subject of the study,

3) the definition of aims and tasks of the researches,

4) the interpretation of the basic concepts,

5) the formulation of the working hypotheses.

The object of study is social phenomenon or process, which consists a contradiction and creates problem situation. The object of study answers the question: what is considered?

The subject of the study is the most significant a property, a party, a feature of the object that should be studied.

Criteria for evaluating the reliability of the results of the validation results of research. criteria theoretical study. Result of a theoretical study - theory , concept , or any theoretical constructs - design must meet the following criteria for all branches of scientific knowledge : 1. objectivity ; 2 . fullness 3. consistency 4. interpretability 5. verifiability 6. reliability.

Structural components of the research work

Work structure should be as follows: title page; content; introduction; head of the main body; conclusions; list of references ; App .

The title page is the first page of research and filled according to certain rules . In the upper field, the full name of the institution on the basis of which the investigation is carried out . The middle field is given the title of the work , which is made without the word "theme" and is not in quotation marks . After the title indicate the type of scientific - research work. Below, closer to the right edge of the cover sheet, the surname, first name artist and then fixed surname, name, patronymic of the head, his academic title (if available) and position . In the bottom field specifies the location of the institution and year of writing work.

Content is placed on the second page. It provides the names of chapters and sections on the pages indicated, from which they start.

Chapters and paragraphs are numbered in a multilevel system , that is denoted by digital numbers containing all stages of their number and column headings which they are subject . The introduction and conclusion are not numbered.

In the introduction, the problem is fixed, the relevance, the practical significance of the study, defined the object and subject of research; specify the purpose and objectives of the study ; briefly lists the methods of work. All of the above components of administration should be interconnected with each other.

An important point in this paper is the formulation of a hypothesis that should be scientifically sound logical, it is probable assumption requiring special proof for its final approval as a theoretical position. Scientific hypothesis is considered consistent if it meets the following requirements:

does not include too many positions;

contains no unambiguous terms;

goes beyond the simple registration of facts is their

explanation and prediction , arguing specifically new thought, idea ;

testable and is applicable to a wide range of phenomena ;

does not include value judgments ;

has the right stylistic design.

By methodical recommendations on the implementation of written works ( projects) must meet the following mandatory requirements :

1 ) They should be available to students ( replicated , located in the department and in the library) ;

2) they must be specified :

- Goals and objectives of the work ( project);

- Contents of the sections , their number ;

- Formulas and calculation tables ;

- Criteria for assessing the current performance of work ( project) and protection , related to the specific profession or discipline;

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]