Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Книги по МРТ КТ на английском языке / MR Cholangiopancreatography Atlas with Cross-Sectional Imaging Correlation - L Van Hoe Dirk Vanbeckevoort Koen Mermuys We.pdf
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
05.10.2023
Размер:
37.07 Mб
Скачать

Gallbladder and Cystic Duct

194

4 Gallbladder and Cystic Duct

4.1 Normal Anatomy and Variants

# 92 Gallbladder

KEY FACTS: ANATOMY (GORE ET AL. 1994)

The gallbladder is located in a fossa on the lower surface of the liver between the right and left lobes

Normal wall thickness: < 2–3 mm

Divided into four parts: fundus, body, infundibulum, and neck

KEY FACTS: VARIANTS

Location (e.g.,may be intrahepatic,suprahepatic, retroperitoneal)

Content: sludge (calcium bilirubinate granules and cholesterol crystals), commonly found during prolonged fasting and hyperalimentation (Fig. 92a, b)

Classification of septa:

Longitudinal septum (= duplication; 1 in 3000 to 1 in 12000);

Isolated transverse septum

Phrygian cap: 2%–6% of population, kinking/folding of fundus and sometimes septum; Fig. 92c, d)

Size (“cholecystomegaly” vs. “microgallbladder”)

KEY FACTS: MRI (BRET AND REINHOLD 1997)

Signal intensity of gallbladder content:

T2: hyperintense

T1: variable, depending on the composition and concentration of bile (higher signal intensity in patients fasting for several hours; Demas et al. 1985)

The normal gallbladder wall is thin and hypointense relative to retroperitoneal fat on non-fat-suppressed snapshot T2weighted MR images

Signal intensity of sludge (Fig. 92a, b):

T1: hyperintense

T2: slightly hypointense (differential diagnosis with stones: shape)

References

Bret P, Reinhold C (1997) MRI of the gallbladder. In: Rossi P (ed) Biliary tract radiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 59–69

Demas BE, Hricak H, Moseley M et al. (1985) Gallbladder bile: an experimental study in dogs using MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy. Radiology 157 : 453–455

Freeny PC, Stevenson GW (1994) Margulis and Burhenne’s alimentary tract Radiology, 5th edn. Mosby, St Louis

Gore RM, Ghahremani GG, Fernbach SK (1994) Gallbladder: anomalies and anatomic variants. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, Laufer I (eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1621–1635

Hakansson K, Christoffersson JO, Leander P et al. (2002) On the appearance of bile in clinical MR cholangiopancreatography. Acta Radiol 43 : 401– 410

4 Gallbladder and Cystic Duct 195

a

b

c

d

Fig. 92 a, b. Sludge. a T1and b T2-weighted images showing sludge in dependent portion of the gallbladder. c, d Phrygian cap. c Projective image showing folding of fundus with larger diameter of

the distal part and presence of a septum (arrowheads). d Axial T2-weighted image showing septum (arrows). Note higher signal intensity of bile within the fundus

196 4.1 Normal Anatomy and Variants

#93 Cystic Duct

Related topics: #27, 28 (intrahepatic bile ducts, variant anatomy), #82, 83 (extrahepatic duct, complications after cholecystectomy)

KEY FACTS: ANATOMY

Average diameter: 1.8 mm

Average length: 2–4 cm

Course: classically serpiginous with tight S-shaped bends

Location:

Distal part usually posterior to the common bile duct (95%)

May run parallel to the common hepatic duct for a short distance

In 10%, the two ducts have a long parallel course

Insertion: the point at which the cystic duct joins the bile duct is quite variable (Shaw et al. 1993) (Fig. 93a):

Upper part of bile duct (including left or right hepatic duct): ± 30%

Middle part: ± 60%

Lower part: ± 10%

KEY FACTS: MRI

Small,tubular fluid-containing structure between the gallbladder and bile duct

Usually easily recognized due to its characteristic location and “folded” appearance

Identification of anatomic variants (high and low insertion, long parallel course) is important if (laparoscopic) cholecystectomy is planned (see #52, 82, 83) (Fig. 93b, c)

References

Schulte SJ (1994) Embryology, normal variation, and congenital anomalies of the gallbladder and biliary tract. In: Freeny PC, Stevenson GW (eds) Marqulis and Burhenne’s alimentary tract radiology. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1251–1274

Shaw MJ, Dorscher PJ, Vennes JA (1993) Cystic duct anatomy: an endoscopic perspective. Am J Gastroenterol 88 : 2102–2106

Silvis SE (1995) The normal bile duct. In: Silvis S, Rohrmann C, Ansel H (eds) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Igaku-Shoin, New York, pp 168–192

Turner MA, Fulcher AS (2001) The cystic duct: normal anatomy and disease processes. Radiographics 21 : 3–22

4 Gallbladder and Cystic Duct 197

a

b

Fig. 93. a Variations in the insertion of the cystic

 

duct. 1, “classical lateral insertion; 2, long parallel

 

course; 3, medial (spiral) insertion; 4, low insertion;

 

5, insertion at bifurcation; 6, in right hepatic duct.

 

(From Schulte S.J. 1994, with permission). b Projec-

 

tive MR image showing high insertion of the cystic

 

duct in an aberrant right hepatic duct (arrow).

 

c Projective MR image showing extremely low inser-

 

tion of the cystic duct (arrowheads), near the vate-

c

rian sphincter complex