Литература на иностранных языках

136. Aleinikoff Alexander. International Law, Soveregnty, and American Constitutionalism: Feflection on the Customary International Law Debate// American Journal of International Law. 2004. Vol. 98. № 1. P. 91—108;

137. Alford P. Roger. Misusing International sources to interpret the Constitution // American Journal of International Law. 2004. Vol. 98. № 1. P. 57—69;

138. Alston Philip and Crawford James. The Future of UN Humah Rights Trety Monitoring / Cambridge Universaty Press, 2000;

139. Antonio La Pergola and Patric Del Duca. Community Law, International Law and the Italisn Constitution // American Journal of International Law. 1985. Vol. 79. № 3. P. 598—621;

140. Akehurst’s Modern introduction to International Law: seventh revised edition/ red. by P. Malahczuk. — London, Taylor and Francis Group, 2004;

141. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd et al. v. Australia et al., House of Lords, judgment of 26 October. 1990. — International Legal Materials 29 (1990), 671;

142. Brower N. Charles and Nupman W. Michael. Cort-ordered provisional measures under the New York Convention// American Journal of International Law. 1986. Vol. 80. № 1. P. 24—42;

143. Burnes Andrew and Charlesworth Hilary. Federalism and the International Legal Order: recent developments in Australia // American Journal of International Law. 1985. Vol. 79. № 3. P. 622—640;

144. Charney Jonathan I. Universal International Law // American Journal of International Law. 1993. Vol. 87. № 4. P. 529—551;

145. Currie John H. Public International Law. — Ontario, Irwin Law Inc., 2001;

146. Damrosch Lori Fisler. Politics across borders: nonintervention and nonforcible influence over domestic affairs// American Journal of International Law. 1989. Vol. 83. № 1. P. 1—50;

147. Delaume R. Georges. ICSID Arbitration and the Courts // American Journal of International Law. 1983. Vol. 77. № 4. P. 784—803;

148. Edmundson William A. An Introduction to Rights/ Cambridge Universaty Press, 2004;

149. Elias T. O. The doctrine of Intertemporal Law // American Journal of International Law. 1980. Vol. 74. № 2. P. 285—307;

150. Falk R. The Role of Domestic Courts in the Interantional Legal Order / Syracuse: Syracuse Universaty Press, 1964;

151. Goldklang Jack M. House Approves Proposal Permitting ICJ to Advise Domestic Courts // American Journal of International Law. 1983. Vol. 77. № 2. P. 338—340;

152. Hansen Stephen A. Economic, Social & Cultural Rights: Terminology and Potential Violations/ American Association fpr the Advancement of Science, 2000;

153. Henkin Louis. May the President violate customary International Law? //American Journal of International Law. 1986. Vol. 80. № 4. P. 913—937;

154. International decisions // American journal of International Law. 1998. № 2. Vol. 92;

155. International decisions // American journal of International Law. 1998. № 1. Vol. 92;

156. International decisions // American journal of International Law. 1997. № 4;

157. International decisions // American journal of International Law. 1998. Vol. 92. № 1;

158. International decisions //American journal of International Law. 1998. Vol. 92. № 2;

159. International decisions // American journal of International Law. 1998. Vol. 92. № 3. P. 503-538;

160. International decisions //American journal of International Law. 2000. Vol. 94. № 4. P. 707-758;

161. International decisions //American journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 95. № 1. P. 162-212;

162. International decisions //American journal of International Law. 2002. Vol. 96. № 1. P. 198-236;

163. Jackson H. John. Status of Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems: a Policy Analysis // American Journal of International Law. 1992. Vol. 86. № 2. P. 310—340;

164. John R. Crook. The 2003 Judicial Activity of the International Court of Justice/ / American Journal of International Law. 2004. Vol. 98. № 2. P. 309—317;

165. Koh Harold Hongju. International Law as part of our Law // American Journal of International Law. 2004. Vol. 98. № 1. P. 43—57;

166. Kirgis L. Frederic. Restitution as a Remedy in U. S. Courts for Violations of Internatioonal Law // American Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 95. № 2. P. 341—348;

167. Leigh Monroe. International Criminal Law and the Role of Domestic Courts // American Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 95. № 1. P. 120—131;

168. Lillich B. Richard and Hannum Hurst. Linkages between International Human Rights and U. S. Constitutional Law // American Journal of International Law. 1985. Vol. 79. № 1. P. 158—163;

169. Lukashuk I. I. The Principle Pacta Sunt Servanda and the Nature of Obligation Uhder International Law // American Journal of International Law. 1989. Vol. 83. № 3.. P. 513—518;

170. Maier Harold. G. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction at a Crossroads: an Intersection between Public and Privat International Law // American Journal of International Law. 1982. Vol. 76. № 2. P. 280—320;

171. Meesern M. Karl. Antitrust jurisdiction under Customary International Law // American Journal of International Law. 1984. Vol. 78. № 4. P. 783—810;

172. Mehren B. Robert and Kourides P. Hicholas. International arbitrations between states and forfign privat parties: the Libian Nationalisation Cases// American Journal of International Law. 1981. Vol. 75. № 3. P. 476—552:

173. Meron Theodor. On a hierarchy of International Human Rights // American Journal of International Law. 1986. Vol. 80. № 1. P. 1—23;

174. Mullerson R.A. Sources of International Law: New Tendencies in Soviet Thinking // American Journal of International Law. 1989. Vol. 83. № 3. P. 494—512;

175. Murphy D. Sean. Legal Regulation of Use of Force// American Journal of International Law. 2002. Vol. 96. № 1. P. 23ы258;

176. Neuman L. Gerald. The Uses of International Law in Costitution Interpritation // American Journal of International Law. 2004. Vol. 98. № 1. P. 82—90;

177. Paust Jordan J. Agora. May the President violate castomary International Law? Federal Statutes, Executive Orders and «Self-Executing Custom»// American Journal of International Law. 1987. Vol. 81. № 2. P. 371—390;

178. Paust Jordan J. Agora. Self-executing treaties// American Journal of International Law. 1988. Vol. 82. № 4;

179. Ramsey D. Michael. International Materials and Domestic Rights: Reflections on Atkins and Lawrence// American Journal of International Law. 2004. Vol. 98. № 1. P. 69—82;

180. Riesenfeld Stefan A. The Doctrine of Self-Executing Treaties and U.S. v. Postal: Win at any Price?// American Journal of International Law. — 1980. — Vol. 74. № 4. P. 892-904;

181. Reisman, W. Michael. International Law after the Cold War//American Journal of International Law. 1990. Vol. 84. № 4. P. 859—866;

182. Reisman W. Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law // American Journal of International Law. 1990. Vol. 84. № 4. P. 866—876;

183. Schabas William A. An introduction to the International Criminal Court. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, 2004;

184. Singer Michael. The Act of State Doctrine on the United Kingdom: an Analysis, wnth comparisons to United States Practice // American Journal of International Law. 1981. Vol. 75. № 2. P. 283—323;

185. Sperduti G. Dualism and Monism: A Cofrontation to be Overcome / 3 Ital / Y.B. Int’l L. 31, 1977$

186. Watson J. S. The Limited Utility of International Law in the Protection of Human Rights // American Journal of International Law. — 1980. Proceedings of the 74th aanual meeting;

187. Weil Prosper. Towards Relative Normativity in International Law// American Journal of International Law. 1983. Vol. 77. № 3. P. 413—4420.