Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Археологическая типология

.pdf
Скачиваний:
346
Добавлен:
12.02.2015
Размер:
10.6 Mб
Скачать

De V o r e Irvin. 1968. Comments in

discussion. — In: Binford Sally R. and

Binford Lewis R. (eds. ). New perspectives in archaeology. Chicago, Aldine:

346—349.

 

 

Discussion consecutive a I'expose par

m. J. Doran de la communication

de m.

D. L. Clarke. — In: Archeologie

et calculateurs. Paris, ed. CNRS,

1970:

359—360.

 

 

D o r a n James. 1970. Archaeological reasoning and machine reasoning. — Archeo¬ logie et calculateurs. Paris, ed. CNRS: 57—69.

D o r a n J. E. and H o d s o n F.

R. 1975. Mathematics and computers in

archaeology. Cambridge, Mass.:

Harvard University Press.

D u m o n d D. E. 1974. Some uses of R-mode analysis in archaeology. — Ame¬ rican Antiquity (Washington, D. C. ) 39 (2) pt. 1): 253—270.

D u n n e l l

Robert C.

1971.

Systematics in

prehistory. New

York — London:

The Free Press — Collier — Macmillan.

 

 

 

 

D u n n e l l

Robert C.

1978. Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy. — Ame¬

rican Antiquity (Washington, D. C. )

43 (2): 192—202.

 

 

D u r k h e i m E. and M a u s s

M. 1963.

Primitive classification. London,

Rodney

Needham.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E g g e r s

Hans

Jürgen.

1950. Das Problem

der

ethnischen

Deutung

in der

Frühgeschichte.

In:

Kirchner H. (Hrsg. ). Ur-und Frühgeschichte als

historische

Wissenschaft

(Wahle-Festschrift).

Heidelberg, Carl

Winter:

49—59.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

E g g e r s Hans Jürgen. 1951. Der römische Import im Freien Germanien. Ham¬ burg, Museum für Völkerkunde und Vorgeschichte.

E g g e r s

Hans Jürgen. 1960. Der «Archäologische

Weltatlas»

und

der «Atlas

der Urgeschichte». — Archaeologia Geographica

(Hamburg)

8/9

(1959/60):

1—6.

 

 

 

 

E g g e r t

M. К. Н. 1985. Bespr.: Leo S. Kjejn.

Archaeological

Typology.

Transl. Dole P.... — Bonner Jahrbücher, 185: 541—544.

Ehrich Robert W. (ed. ). 1954. Relative chronologies in Old World archeology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

E v a n s Clifford and M e g g e r s , Betty J. 1957. Formative period cultures in the Guayas Basin, Coastal Ecuador. — American Antiquity (Salt Lake City) 22 (3): 235—246.

F i l i p Jan. 1956. Keltové ve Středni Evropě. Praha, Československa Akad. Věd.

F i l i p Jan. (Hrsg. ). 1966—69. Enzyklopädisches Handbuch zur Urund Frühges¬ chichte Europas. 1—2. Prag, Academia.

F о о t R. G. and W i l s o n D.

M. 1970. The Viking achievements. New York —

 

Washington,

Praeger.

 

 

F o r d

James A.

1952. Measurements of some prehistoric design

developments

 

in the Southeastern states

(Anthropological papers of the American museum

 

of Natural History, vol. 44, pt. 3). New York.

 

F o r d

James A.

1954a. The type concept revisited. — American

Anthropologist

 

(Menasha) 56: 42—53 (reprint. in: Deetz J. (ed. ). 1971.

Man's reprint

 

from the past: 58—72).

 

 

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

417

F o r d James A. 1954b Comment on A. C. Spaulding «Statistical techniques for the discovery of artifact types». — American Antiquity 19: 390—391.

F o r d James A. 1962. A quantitative method for deriving cultural chro¬ nology (Pan American Union technical manual, N 1). Washington.

F r i d r i c h J., К l i m a B. a V a l o c h K. 1968. Systematika pojmu «kultura» v paleolitu. — Archéologicke Rozhledy (Praha) 20: 308—311.

F r i t z John M. and P l o g Fred T. 1970. — American Antiquity (Washington, D. C ) , 35 (4): 405—412.

F u r m á n e k V. 1978. Archeologická kultúra. — Základné metodologické prob¬ lémy a marxistké kategórie v archeológii. Nitra, Archeol. Ustav Ak. Nauk.: 43—47.

G a l t o n Francis 1878.

Composite portraits, made by combining

those of

many

different persons

into a single resultant figure. — Nature

(London

and

New York) 18: 97—100.

 

 

Galton Francis. 1883. Inquires into human faculty and its development. London.

G a n d e r t Otto-Friedrich, 1950. Typostrophismus und Typologie. — In: Kirch¬ ner H. (Hrsg. ). Ur-und Frühgeschgichte als historische Wissenschaft (WahleFestschrift). Heidelberg, Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag: 43—48.

G a r c i a C o o k A. 1967. Analisis tipologico de

artefactos (Publicaciones del

Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia,

12). Mexico.

G e y l Pieter. 1958. Die Diskussion ohne Ende. Auseinandersetzungen mit His¬ torikern. Darmstadt, Gentner.

G i f f o r d

Edward

Winslow.

1939. Typology for Archaeology. — Vigesmosep¬

timo Congresso Internacional de Americanistas. Actas de la Primera sesion,

celebrada en la ciudad Mexico en 1939, 2: 7—11.

G i f f o r d

J a m e s

C. 1960.

The Type-Variety method of ceramic classification

as an indicator of cultural phenomena. — American Antiquity (Washington, D. C. ) 25: 341—347.

G i m b u t a s M. 1973. Battle-axe or cult axe? — Man (London) 8, 73: 51—54.

Ginters W. 1928. Das Schwert der Scythen und Sarmaten im Südrussland (Forgeschichtliche Forschungen, 2, 1). Berlin.

G j e s s i n g Cutorm. 1946. To metodiske problemer. — Viking (Oslo) 10: 123—160.

G l a d w i n Winifred and G l a d w i n Harold S. 1929. The Red-on-Buff culture of the Gila Basin (Medallion papers, N 3). — Globe (Pasadena, Cal. ).

G l a d w i n Winifred and G l a d w i n Harold S. 1934. A method for the desig¬ nation of cultures and their variations. — Globe (Pasadena, Cal. ).

G l o b P. V. 1945. Studier over den jyske Enkeltgravskultur. — Aarbøger for nordisk oldkundighed og historie, 1944. København.

G o g g i n John M. 1949. Cultural traditions in Florida prehistory. — In: Grif¬ fin James W. (ed. ). The Florida Indian and his neighbors. Winter-Park: 13—44.

G o w e r J. C. 1967. A comparison of some methods of cluster ahalysis. — Bio¬ metrics 23 (4): 623—638.

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

418

G r ä s l u n d Bo. 1974. Relativ datering. Om kronologisk metod i nordisk ar¬ keologi (Tor 16). Uppsala.

G r ä s l u n d Bo. 1976a. Relative chronology. Dating methods in Scandinavian archaeology. — Norwegian Archaeological Review 9 (2): 69—83.

G r ä s l u n d Bo. 1976b. Reply to comments on Relative chronology. — Norwegian Archaeological Review 9 (2): 110—126.

G r o w l e t t

J.

A. J., 1986. Culture and conceptualization: The

Oldowan gra¬

dient. — Stone Age prehistory. Cambridge: 2 243—260.

 

G u m m e l

H.

1938. Forschungsgeschichte in Deutschland (Die Urgeschichte

und ihre

historische Entwicklung in der Kulturstaaten der

Welt). Berlin.

H a c h m a n n Rolf. 1951. Besprechung: E. C. G. Graf Oxenstjerna. Die Urhei¬ mat der Goten. — Germania (Berlin) 29 (1/2): 98—101.

H a c h m a n n

Rolf.

1970.

Die

Goten

und

Skandinavien. Berlin,

Walter

de

Gruyter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H a c h m a n m

R.

(Hrsg).

1987.

Studien

zum

Kulturberiff

in

der

Vor-

und

Frühgeschichtsforshung (Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskunde. Bd. 48).

Bonn, Habelt.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H a c h m a n n

Rolf,

K o s s a c k

G. und

K u h n H. 1962. Völker

zwischen Ger¬

manen und Kelten: Schriftquellen, Bodenfunde und Namengut... Neumünster,

Wachholtz.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H a l b w a c h s

Maurice. 1912. La théorie de I'homme moyen. Essai sur Quetelet

et la statistique morale. Paris.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H a l l Edward T.

1959. The silent Language. Garden City, New York, Doubleday.

H a r g r a v e

L.

L.

1932.

Guide

to forty pottery

types from

the

Hopi country

and the San Francisco Mountains, Arizona. Bulletin of North Arizona Museum, 1.

Hausmann Ulrich (Hrsg. ). 1969. Allgemeine Grundlagen der Archäologie. München, С. Н. Beck.

H a w k e s

Christofer F. C.

1973. Innocence retrieval in archaeology. — Anti¬

quity

(Harmondsworth)

47 (187): 176—178.

H e i n z e l i n J. De. 1962. Manuel de typologie des industries lithiques. Bruxelles: Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique.

H e i z e r

Robert F. (ed. ).

1959.

A

guide to archaeological field methods. 3d ed.

 

Palo Alto, Calif., National Press.

 

H e r r m a n n

Joachim.

1965. Archäologische Kulturen und sozialökonomische

 

Gebiete. — EAZ 6: 97—128.

 

 

 

H e r r m a n n

J.

1975.

Die

Ostsee — ein

völkerverbindendes Meer im frühen

 

Mittelalter. — Altertum

(Berlin). 21

(3): 133—142.

H i l l

James

N.

1972.

The methodological

debate in contenporary archaeology:

 

a model. — In: Clarke D. (ed. ). Models in archaeology. London, Methuen:

 

61 — 107.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H i l l

James

N.

and

E v a n s

R.

K. 1972. A model for classification and

 

typology. — In: Clarke D. (ed. ). Models in archaeology. London, Methuen:

 

231—273.

1980.

Cultures

as types? Some elements of classification

H о d s о n

F.

R.

 

theory. — Bulletin

of historical

archeology, 17: 1—10.

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

419

H o l e Frank and H e i z e r

Robert F. 1969. An introduction to prehistoric

archeology. New York,

Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

H о l l о w а у Jr . R. L. 1969. Culture: a human domain. — Current Anthropology (Chicago) 10 (4, pt. II): 395—412.

H o l m q v i s t

W.

1959.

Excavation

at

Helgö. Vol. I. Stockholm, Almqvist

and

Wiksell.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H o l u b o w i c z

W.

1957. О metodzie

wydzielania kultur archeologicznych. —

Pierwsza sesja archeologiczna IHKM PAN (Warszawa — Wroclaw): 81—82.

H y m e s D e l l .

 

1970.

Linguistic

models

in archaeology. — In: Archeologie

et calculateurs. Paris, ed. CNRS: 91 — 120.

 

 

J a c o b s s o n

M.

1990.

Krigarideologi och

vikingatiga

svärdtypologi. (Semina¬

rium 12/9.

1990. Stockholm).

 

 

 

 

 

J a h n Martin.

1953.

Die

Abgrenzung

von Kulturgruppen und Völkern in der

Vorgeschichte. — Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie

der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, phil. -hist. Klasse 99 (3): 14—17.

 

J a n k u h n H.

 

1963.

Haithabu. Ein

Handelsplatz der

Wikingerzeit. 4.

Aufl.

Neumünster,

Wachholts.

 

 

 

 

 

J a n k u h n H. 1974. Zusammenfassende Schlußbemerkungen. — Vorund Früh¬ formen der europäischen Stadt im Mittelalter. Teil II. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck Ruprecht: 305—332.

J a u l i n

B.

1970.

Mesure

de la ressemblance en anarchéologie. — Archéologie

et calculateurs. Paris, ed. CNRS: 343—356.

 

 

J e l i n e k

Arthur J. 1976.

Form, function and

style in lithic

analysis. — In:

С. Е. Cleland (ed. ). Cultural change and continuity. New York, Academic

Press: 19—34.

 

 

 

 

 

J e n n i n g s

J. D.

1957.

Danger Cave. Salt Lake City, University of Utah

Press (Memoirs of the Society

for American

Archaeology,

14).

J o h n s e n

J o n e .

1976. Comments

on Relative

chronology. — Norwegian Ar¬

chaeological Review 9

(2): 105—108.

 

 

J u d d N. M. 1940. Progress in the Southwest. — In: Essays in historical anthro¬ pology (Miscellaneous Collections of the Smithsonian Institution, Washing¬ ton, vol. C): 417—444.

J u r g e n s H., V о g e l C. 1965. Beiträge zur menschligen Typenkunde. Stuttgart.

Kamenetski I. S. 1971. Zur Frage über den Begriff Тур in der Archäologie (VIII Congrés International des sciences préhistoriques et protohistoriques, Belgrade, 1971. Les rerrorts et les communications de la délégation des archéologues de I'URSS). Moscou, Nauka.

K a n t m a n Sönmez. 1969. Essai sur la formation de concept

du

«Type» dans

I'étude du Paléolithigue. — Quartär (Bonn) 20: 69—77.

 

 

 

K e h o e

Alice

B.

1959.

Ceramic affiliations in the Northwestern

plains. — Ame¬

rican Antiquity (Washington) 25 (2): 237—246.

 

 

 

К i d d e r

A. V. 1927. Southwestern archeological conference. — Science 66 (1716):

489—491.

 

 

 

 

 

K i d d e r

A.

V.

1936.

Introduction and discussion. — In:

A.

V.

Kidder and

A. O. Shepard. The Pottery of Pecos. Vol. II (Papers

of the

Southwestern

Expedition, N 7). New Haven.

 

 

 

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

420

K i l i a n Lothar. 1960. Zum Aussagewert von Fundund Kulturprovinzen. — Swiatowit (Warszawa) 23: 41—85.

K i r c h n e r Horst. 1969. Zur Geschichte und Theorie der Typologie-Kritik in der Urgeschichtsforschung. — In: Entwicklung und Fortschritt. W. E. Müh¬ lmann-Festschrift, hrsg. v. H. Reimann und E. W. Müller. Tübingen, J. С. В. Mohr (Paul Siebeck): 3—11.

K l e j n Leo S. 1963. A brief validation of the migration hypothesis with the respect to the origin of the Catacomb culture. — Soviet anthropology and archaeology (New York) 1 (4): 27—36.

K l e j n Leo S. 1970. On trade and culture process in prehistory. Comment. — Current Athropology 11 (2): 169—171.

K l e j n Leo S. 1971. Was ist eine archäologische Kultur? — EAZ 12: 321—345.

K l e j n Leo S. 1973a. Marxism, the systemic approach, and archaeology. — In: C. Renfrew (ed. ). The explanation of culture change. Models in prehistory. London, Duckworth: 691—710.

K l e j n Leo S. 1973b. On major aspects of the interrelationship of archeology and ethnology. — Current Anthropology (Chicago) 14 (3): 311—320.

K l e j n Leo S. 1974a. Kossinna im Abstand von vierzig Jahren. — Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte (Halle — Berlin) 58: 7—55.

K l e j n Leo S. 1974b. Regressive Purifizierung und exemplarische Betrachtung. — EAZ 15 (2): 223—254.

K l e j n Leo S. 1976. Neolithikum Europas als ein Ganzes. — Jahresschrift für mitteldeutsche Vorgeschichte (Halle — Berlin) 60 (Behrens-Festschrift): 9—22.

K l e j n Leo S. 1978. Temporal models in prehistory... Comment on J. В. Stolt¬ man. — Current Anthropology (Chicago) 19 (4): 732—734.

K l e j n Leo S. 1981a. Die Ethnogenese als Kulturgeschichte, archäologisch bet¬ rachtet. Neue Grundlagen. — Beiträge zur Urund Frühgeschichte (CoblenzFestschrift), Teil 1, Dresden: 13—25.

K l e j n

Leo S. 1981b. Ethnos und Kultur im Erevaner Symposium 1978. — EAZ 1.

K l e j n

Leo

S.

1982.

Archaeological typology (BAR International Series 153).

Oxford,

British Archaeological Reports.

K l e j n

Lev

 

S. 1988. Arheološka tipologija. Ljubljana, Studia Humanitatis.

K l u c k h o h n

Clyde.

1939. The place of theory in anthropological studies. —

Philosophy of Science 6: 328—344.

K l u c k h o h n

Clyde.

1940. The conceptual structure in Middle American stu¬

dies. — Hay. С. L. a (eds. ). (eds. ). The Maya and their neighbors. New York: 41—51.

K l u c k h o h n Clyde. 1960. The use of typology in anthropological theory. — In: Wallace A. F. С. (ed. ). Selected Papers from the Proceedings of the Vth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (1956). Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press: 134—140.

K l u c k h o h n Clyde. 1962. The position of Bc51. — In: Kluckhohn Rich. (ed. ). Culture and Behavior: The collected essays of Clyde Kluckhohn. Free Press. New York: 74—87.

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

421

K n a b e n h a u s A. 1919. Die politische Organisation bei den australischen Eingeborenen. Berlin.

K o n o p k a M. 1978. «Kultura archeologiczna» — teoria i praktyka. — Archeolo¬ gia Polski, 23; f. 1: 183—191.

K o r o ś e с Josip. 1957. Kultura in kulturna skupina v predzgodovini. — Archeo¬ loški Vestnik (Ljubljana) 8 (2): 95—98.

K o s s i n n a Gustav. 1896. Die vorgeschichtliche Ausbereitung der Germanen in Deutschland. — Zeitschrift des Vereins für Volkskunde (Berlin) 6 (1): 1 — 14.

K o s s i n n a

Gustav. 1911. Die Herkunft der Germanen.

Zur Methode

der

Siedlungarchäologie (Mannus — Bibliothek, 6). Würzburg,

Kurt

Kabitzsch.

K o z l o w s k i J.

K.

1972. On the typological classification of

stone artifacts. —

Sprawozdania Archeoloniczne, t. 24: 455—466.

 

 

 

 

K r i e g e r

Alex

D.

1944.

The typological concept. — American

Antiquity

(Salt

Lake City) 9 (3): 271—288.

 

 

 

 

K r i e g e r

Alex.

1960. Archaeological typology in theory and

practice. — In:

Wallace A. F. C. (ed. ). Selected papers of the Vth International Congress

of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. Philadelphia, September 1956,

Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press: 141—151.

 

 

 

K r i e g e r

Alex

D.

1962.

Epistemology and archaeological

theory.

Comment

on Lowther. — Current Anthropology 3: 501.

K r o e b e r Alfred L. 1919. On the principle of order in civilization as exemplified by changes of fashion — American Anthropologist (Menasha) 21 (3): 235—263.

K r o e b e r

Alfred

L. 1940. Statistical classification. — American Antiquity (Wa¬

shington) 6 (1): 29—44.

K r o e b e r

A.

L.

1963. Style and civilizations. Berkeley and Los Angeles,

University

of

California Press.

K y t l i c o v á O. 1970. Die Chronologie und Funktion der Depotes. — Actes du VII-e Congress Internationale des Sciences Prehistoriques et Protohistori¬ ques. Prague, 21—27 août 1966. Prague. Bd. 1: 681—684.

L a p l a c e - J a u r e t c h e G. 1957. Typologie analytique. Application d'une nou¬ velle méthode d'étude des formes et des structures aux industries a lames et lamelles. — Quaternaria 4: 133—164.

L a p l a c e George. 1964. Essai de typologie systematique (Annali dell'Universita di Ferrara, n. s., ser. 15, vol. 1, suppl. 2). Ferrara.

L a p l a c e

George.

1966.

Recherches sur

l'origine

et l'evolution des

complexes

leptolithiques. Paris, E, de Boccard.

 

 

 

Le B l a n c

S. A.

1973.

Two points

of logic

concerning data,

hypothesis,

general laws and systems. — In: Redman Ch. L. (ed. ). Research and theory in current archaelogy. New York: 199—214.

L o c h e r J. L. (ed. ). 1971. The world of M. С. Escher. New York, Abrams.

L ü n i n g Jens. 1972. Zum Kulturbegriff im Neolithikum. — Prähistorische Zeits¬ chrift 47: 145—173.

M a c W h i t e

Eoin. 1956. On the interpretation of

archaeological

evidence in

historical

and sociological terms. — American

Anthropologist

(Menasha)

58: 3 — 25 (reprint. in: Deetz J. (ed. ). 1971. Man's imprint from the past. Bos¬ ton, Little, Brown and Co.: 219—246. — Cit. according to this edition).

M a l m e r Mats P. 1962. Jungneolithische Studien (Acta Archaeologia Lundensia, series in 8°, № 2). Bonn-Lund, Habelt-Gleerup.

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

422

M a l m e r

Mats. 1963. Metodproblem inom järnalderns konsthistoria. Bonn-

Lund, Habelt-Gleerup.

 

 

M a l m e r

Mats P. 1967. The correlation

between definitions and

interpre¬

tations of Neolithic cultures in Northwestern Europe. — Palaeohistoria (Gro¬

ningen) 12 (1966): 373—378.

 

 

M a l m e r

Mats P. 1976 Comments on Relative chronology. — Norwegian Archae¬

ological Review 9 (2): 97—104.

 

 

M a r t i n

Paul S. 1971. The revolution in

archaeology. — American

Antiquity

(Washington, D. C. ) 36 (1): 1—8.

 

 

M a r t i n

Paul S. and R i n a l d о John. 1951. The Southwestern co-tradition. —

Southwestern Journal of Anthropology

(Albuquerque) 7: 215—229.

M a u r e M. 1977. Les épées de l'epoque Viking — essai de classification typo¬ logique. — Universitets Oldsaksamling Årbok 1975—76. Oslo: 95—116.

Mc

K e r n

William C. 1933. Local

types and the

regional distribution

of pottery

 

bearing cultures. — Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science

 

25: 84—86.

 

 

 

Mc

K e r n

William C. 1939. The

Midwestern

Taxonomie Method

as an aid

to archaeological culture study. — American Antiquity, 4: 301—313.

M e i n a n d e r

C. F.

1981. The

concept of culture in European archaeological

literature. — Daniel G. E. (ed. ). Towardsa history of archaeology. London:

100—111.

 

 

M e s a r o v i ć

M. D.,

M a c k o

D., T a k a h a r a Y. 1970. Theory of hierarchi¬

cal multilevel systems. New York — London (перев.: Месарович М., Мако Д., Такахара И. 1973. Теория иерархических многоуровневых систем. Москва).

M i l l e r

Sheryl F. 1972. On old

and new concepts of

typology. — Current

Anthropology (Chicago) 13 (1): 139—140.

 

M i l l i e r

C. et T o m a s s o n e R. E.

1970. Méthodes d'ordination et de classifica¬

tion:

leur efficacité et leurs limites. — Archéologie et

calculateurs. Paris,

ed. CNRS: 207—228.

 

 

 

M o b e r g

Carl-Axel. 1969. Introduktion till arkeologi. Stockholm, Natur och

Kultur.

 

 

 

 

 

M o b e r g

С. - A. 1970. Archaeograms and

historical entities. — Norwegian Ar¬

sheological Review 3: 21—24.

 

 

 

M o n t e l i u s

Oscar.

1880—1882. Spännen

från bronsåldern och ur dem när¬

mast utvecklade former. Typologisk studie. — Antiqvarisk Tidskrift för Sve¬

rige 6 (3): 1 — 194.

 

 

 

M o n t e l i u s

Oscar.

1881. Om den

nordiska bronsålderes

Ornamentik och dess

betydelse för frågen om periodens indelning. — Månadsblad 110—113, febr. — maj.

M o n t e l i u s Oscar. 1885. Om tidsbestämning inom bronsåldern med särskild hänsyn till Skandinavien. — Kongl. Vitterhets historie och antiqvitets Aka¬ demiens Handlingar 30, ny följd, 10.

M o n t e l i u s

Oscar. 1891. Den förhistorisefornforskarens metod och material. —

Antiqvarisk Tidskriff för Servige 8-1884

(3): 1—28.

M o n t e l i u s

Oskar. 1900. Typologien eller

utvecklingsläran tillampad på det

menskliga arbetet. — Svenska Fornminnesföreningens Tidskrift (Stokholm) 10 (3): 237—268.

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

423

M o n t e l i u s Oscar. 1903. Die älteren

Kulturperioden im

Orient

und

in Europa.

I. Die Methode. Stockholm, Montelius.

 

 

 

M o r t i l l e t Gabriel de.

1881. Musée préhistorique. Paris.

 

 

 

M o v i u s

H. L, D a v i d

S. N.

С.,

В r i с k e r H. M.,

C l a y

R.

W. 1968.

The analysis of certain major classes of Upper Palaeolithic tools. Pe¬

 

abody Museum, Harvard, bul. 26. Cambridge, Mass.

 

 

 

M o v i u s

H. L. and B r o o k s A.

S.

1971. The analysis of certain major classes

of Upper Palaeolithik tools: Aurignacian scrapers. — PPS 37

(2): 253—273.

M ü h l m a n n Wilhelm E. 1968. Geschichte der Anthropologie. 2. Aufl. Franfkfurt a. M. — Bonn, Athenäum.

M ü l l e r

Sophus.

1876.

Bronzealderens Perioder. — Aarboger

for nordisk Old¬

 

kyndighed og

Historie (Kjobenhavn):

185—312.

 

 

 

M ü l l e r

Sophus.

1884. Mindre Bidrag til den forhistoriske Archaeologis methode.

 

I. Den

svenske Typologie — Aarboger

for nordisk Oldkyndihed

og Historie

 

(Kjobenhavn): 161—216.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M ü l l e r

Sophus.

1897.

Nordische

Altertumskunde. Bd.

I.

Strassburg, Karl

 

J. Trübner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M ü l l e r

Sophus.

1898. De jydske Enkeltgrave fra Stenalderen eller nyeste

 

Undersogelser. — Aarboger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie. II. Raekke,

 

13. bind. Kjobenhavn: 157— 282.

 

 

 

 

 

M ü l l e r - W i l l e

M.

1970.

Bestattung im

Boot. — Offa (Neumünster) 25—26

 

(1968—69).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N a r r

Karl

J. 1971.

Besprechung:

Laplace

1966. — Praehistorishe

Zeitschrift

 

46

(2): 250—255.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N e u s t u p n ý

Evžen.

1958. Evolution in archaeology. — Epitymbion Roman Ha¬

 

ken. Pragae: 4—8.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N e u s t u p n ý

Evžen.

1971. Whither archaeology? — Antiquity

(Harmondsworth)

 

45

(177): 34—39.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N e u s t u p n ý

Jiřy. 1960. Some suggestions concerning archaeological records

 

and archaeological cultures. — Swiatowit

(Warszawa)

23: 31—40.

N i e t z s c h e

 

Friedrich. 1924. Gesammelte Werke. Würzbach, Oehler.

 

N o t t

J.

C.

 

and

G l y d o n

G. R.

1854.

Types of mankind, or ethnological

 

researches. Philadelphia.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

O r t o n Clive.

1978. Is pottery a sample? — In: Cherry John F., Camble Clive

and Shennan Stephen (eds. ). Sampling in contemporary British archae¬

ology (BAR, British series 50. ). Oxford.

 

 

 

 

O t t o

K. -H.

 

1953. Archäologische Kulturen und die Erforschung der konkreten

Geschichte von Stämmen und Völkerschaften. — Ethnographisch-Archäologi¬

schen Forschungen

1: 1—27.

 

 

 

 

 

 

P a l u b i с k a

 

Anna. 1972. О dwoch pojęciach kultury. — Nurt 5.

 

P a l u b i c k a Anna. 1974. Pozytywistyczne oraz instrumentalistyczne ujęcia tzw. kultur archeologicznych. — Studia metodologiczne (Poznań Uniwersitet Mic¬ kiewicza) 12: 91 — 105.

P a r k i n g t o n J. E. 1972. Stone implements as information. — In: The interpre-

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

424

tation of archaeological evidence (The South African Archaeological Society. Goodwin Series, № 1). Claremont, Cape: 10—20.

P a u l s e n

P.

1956. Axt und Kreuz in Nordund Osteuropa.

2. Aufl.

Bonn,

Habelt.

 

 

 

P e i r c e Ch. S.

1958 Collected papers. Vol. I. Cambridge, Mass.

 

 

P e t e r s e n

J.

1919. De norske vikingersverd. En typologisk-kronologisk studie

over vikingetidens vaaben. Kristiania.

 

 

P e t e r s e n

J.

1955. Vikingetidens smykker i Norge. Stavanger,

Stavanger

mus.

P e t r i e Flinders W. 1911. The revolutions of civilization. London and New York, Harper.

P h i l l i p s Philip. 1958. Application of the Wheat — Gifford

— Wasley taxonomy

to Eastern ceramics. — American Antiquity (Salt Lake

City) 24: 117—125.

P h i l l i p s Philip and W i l l e y Gordon R. 1953. Method and theory in American archaeology: an operational basis for culture-historical integration. — Ame¬ rican Anthropologist (Menasha) 55: 615—633.

P i k e K. 1955. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Glendale.

P l о g Fred. 1973. Laws, systems of law, and the explanation of observed vari¬ ations. — In: Renfrew С. (ed. ). The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London, Methuen: 649—661.

Quetelet Adolphe. 1835. Sur l'homme et le développement de ses facultes, ou essai de physique sociale. 2 vols. Paris.

R e e d T. D. 1944. The battle for Britain

in the 5th

century. An essay in Dark

Age history. London, Methuen.

 

 

 

R e i t e r

Paul.

1938.

Rev.

of Colton H.

S. and Hargrave L. L. Handbook

of

Northen

Arizona pottery wares. — American

Anthropologist

(Menasha)

n. s. 40: 480—491.

 

 

 

 

R e n f r e w

Colin. 1969. Trade and culture process

in European prehistory. —

Current Anthropology

(Chicago) 10: 151—169.

 

 

R e n f r e w

Colin. 1972. The emergence of civilization. London, Methuen.

R e n f r e w

Colin, С a n n J. R. and D i x о n

J. E. 1965. Obsidian in the Aegean. —

Annual of the British

School at Athens (London) 60: 225—247.

 

R i n a l d о

John and M a r t i n Paul S. 1941. Review of McGregor J. C. Winona

and

Ridge

Ruin,

pt.

I. — American

Anthropologist (Menasha)

n. s. 43:

654—656.

 

 

 

 

 

 

R o u s e

Irving.

1939.

Prehistory in Haiti;

a study in method (Yale University.

Publications in Anthropology, 21). New Haven, Con.

 

R o u s e Irving. 1954. On the use of the concept of area co-tradition: — American Antiquity (Salt Lake City) 19 (3): 221—225.

R o u s e Irving. 1957. Culture area and co-tradition. — Southwestern Journal of Antropology (Albuquerque) 13: 123—133.

R o u s e Irving. 1960. The classification of artifacts in archaeology. — Ameri¬ can Antiquity (Washington D. C. ) 25 (3): 313—323.

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

425

R o u s e

Irving. 1965 a. The place

of "peoples" in prehistoric research. — Jour¬

nal

of the Royal Anthropological Institute (London) 95 (1): 1—15.

 

R o u s e

Irving. 1965b. Caribbean ceramics: a study in method and in theory. —

In: Ceramics and man. Ed. By Matson F. R. New York, Wenner—Gren

foundation: 88—103.

 

 

 

R o u s e

Irving.

1970.

Classification

for

what? — Norwegian Archaeological

Re¬

view 3: 4—12.

 

 

 

 

R o u s e

Irving.

1972.

Introduction

to

prehistory. A systematic approach.

New

York, McGraw-Hill.

S а с k e t t James R. 1968. Method and theory of Upper Palaeolithic archeology in Southwestern France. — In: Binford Sally R. and Binford Lewis R. (eds). New perspectives in archaeology. Chicago, Aldine: 61—83.

S a c k e t t James R. 1973. Style, function and artifact variability in palaeolithic assemblages. — In: Renfrew C. (ed. ). The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London, Duckworth: 317—325.

S a n g m e i s t e r Edward. 1967. Methoden der Urgeschichtswissenschaft. — Sae¬ culum (Freiburg i. Bc. ) XVIII, 3: 199—244.

S c h i f f e r

M.

В.

1976. Behavioral archeology. New York, Academic Press.

S c h m i d t

E.

F.

1953—1970. Persepolis. Chicago, Ill., I—III.

S c h u c h h a r d t

Carl.

1926. Alteuropa. Eine Vorgeschichte unseres Erdteils.

2. Aufl. Berlin und

Leipzig, de Gruyter.

S e m e n o v S. A. 1964. Prehistoric technology. London, Cory, Adams and MacKay.

S e m e n o v

S.

A. 1970. The forms and functions of

the oldest tools (A

reply

to prof.

F.

Bordes). — Quartär (Bonn) 21: 1—20.

 

 

S h e p p a r d

A.

1957. Ceramics for the archaeologist, Washington, D. C, Carnegie

Inst.

 

 

 

 

 

S h e t e l i g

H. 1933. Vikingeminner i Vest-Europa. Oslo.

 

S m i t h R.

E.,

W i l l e y

G. R. and G i f f о r d J.

C. 1960 The type-variety

concept

as

a basis for the analysis of Maya

pottery. — American

Anti¬

quity (Washington) 25

(3): 330—340.

 

 

S o n n e v i l l e - B o r d e s Denise de. 1966. L'evolution du Paléolithique Supéri¬ eur en Europe Occidentale et sa singnification. — Bulletin de la Société Pré¬ historique Francaise (Paris) 63 (1): 3 — 33.

S o u d s k i Bohumil. 1973. Higher level archaeological entities: models and rea¬ lity. — In: Renfrew C. (ed. ). The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London, Duckworth: 195—207.

S p a r c k - J o n e s Karen. 1970. The evaluation of archaeological classifications. — Archéologie et calculateurs. Paris, ed. CNRS: 245—276.

S p a u l d i n g Albert C. 1953a. Statistical

techniques

for

the discovery of

artifact types. — American Antiquity (Salt

Lake City)

18:

305—313.

S p a u l d i n g Albert С. 1953b. Review of James A. Ford's «Measurements of some prehistoric design developments in the Southeastern States. 1952». — American Anthropologist (Menasha) 55: 589—591.

S p a u l d i n g Albert C. 1954. Reply to Ford. — American Anthropologist (Mena¬ sha) 56: 112—114.

OCR - Портал "Археология России" - www.archeologia.ru

426