204
Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE
References |
21. |
changes in renal blood flow in piglets. Pediatr Res. 1970; |
|
|
|
Gruskin AB, Edelmann CM Jr, Yuan S. Maturational |
|
1. |
Dhillon HK. Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the |
|
4(1):713 |
22. |
Chevalier RL, Gomez RA. Response of the reninangio |
||
|
Great Ormond Street experience. Br J Urol. 1998;81 |
|
tensin system to relief of neonatal ureteral obstruction. |
|
(suppl 2):3944 |
|
Am J Physiol. 1988;255(6 pt 2):F10707 |
2. Chung S et al. Diuretic renography in the evaluation of |
23. |
Chevalier RL, Thornhill BA. Ureteral obstruction in the |
|
|
neonatal hydronephrosis: is it reliable? J Urol. 1993;150 |
|
neonatal rat: renal nerves modulate hemodynamic |
|
(2 pt 2):765768 |
|
effects. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995;9(4):447450 |
3. Hafez AT et al. Analysis of trends on serial ultrasound |
24. |
Chevalier RL, Kaiser DL. Chronic partial ureteral |
|
|
for high grade neonatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2002; |
|
obstruction in the neonatal guinea pig I. Influence of |
|
168(4 pt 1):15181521 |
|
uninephrectomy on growth and hemodynamics. Pediatr |
4. Lee RS et al. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of |
|
Res. 1984;18(12):12661271 |
|
|
postnatal outcome: a metaanalysis. Pediatrics. 2006; |
25. |
Chevalier RL, Thornhill BA, Gomez RA. EDRF modu |
|
118(2):586593 |
|
lates renal hemodynamics during unilateral ureteral |
5. Huang WY et al. Renal biopsy in congenital ureteropel |
|
obstruction in the rat. Kidney Int. 1992;42(2): 400406 |
|
|
vic junction obstruction: evidence for parenchymal |
26. |
Greger R. Physiology of renal sodium transport. Am J |
|
maldevelopment. Kidney Int. 2006;69(1):137143 |
|
Med Sci. 2000;319(1):5162 |
6. |
Elder JS et al. Renal histological changes secondary to ure |
27. |
Alexander RT, Grinstein S. Na+/H + exchangers and |
|
teropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 1995;154(2 pt 2): |
|
the regulation of volume. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2006;187 |
|
719722 |
|
(1–2):159167 |
7. Rosen S et al. The kidney in congenital ureteropelvic |
28. |
Wen JG et al. Obstructive nephropathy: an update of the |
|
|
junction obstruction: a spectrum from normal to neph |
|
experimental research. Urol Res. 1999;27(1):2939 |
|
rectomy. J Urol. 2008;179(4):12571263 |
29. |
Stecker JF Jr, Gillenwater JY. Experimental partial ure |
8. Airik R, Kispert A. Down the tube of obstructive neph |
|
teral obstruction. I. Alteration in renal function. Invest |
|
|
ropathies: the importance of tissue interactions during |
|
Urol. 1971;8(4):377385 |
|
ureter development. Kidney Int. 2007;72(12):14591467 |
30. |
Wilson DR. Micropuncture study of chronic obstructive |
9. Airik R et al. Tbx18 regulates the development of the |
|
nephropathy before and after release of obstruction. |
|
|
ureteral mesenchyme. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(3):663674 |
|
Kidney Int. 1972;2(3):119130 |
10. |
BrennerAnantharam A et al. Tailbudderived mesen |
31. |
Tanagho EA. Surgically induced partial urinary obstruc |
|
chyme promotes urinary tract segmentation via BMP4 |
|
tion in the fetal lamb. 3. Ureteral obstruction. Invest Urol. |
|
signaling. Development. 2007;134(10):19671975 |
|
1972;10(1):3552 |
11. |
Miyazaki Y et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 4 regu |
32. |
Olsen L. Renal function in experimental chronic hydro |
|
lates the budding site and elongation of the mouse ure |
|
nephrosis. III. Glomerular and tubular functions in rela |
|
ter. J Clin Invest. 2000;105(7):863873 |
|
tion to renal pelvic volume. Scand J Urol Nephrol. |
12. |
Miyazaki Y et al. Evidence that bone morphogenetic |
|
1976;(suppl 32):513 |
|
protein 4 has multiple biological functions during |
33. |
Josephson S. Experimental obstructive hydronephrosis |
|
kidney and urinary tract development. Kidney Int. 2003; |
|
in newborn rats III. Longterm effects on renal function. |
|
63(3):835844 |
|
J Urol. 1983;129(2):396400 |
13. |
Chevalier RL. Perinatal obstructive nephropathy. Semin |
34. |
Boron WF. Acidbase transport by the renal proximal |
|
Perinatol. 2004;28(2):124131 |
|
tubule. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(9):23682382 |
14. |
Oshima K et al. Angiotensin type II receptor expression |
35. |
Misseri R et al. Inflammatory mediators and growth fac |
|
and ureteral budding. J Urol. 2001;166(5):18481852 |
|
tors in obstructive renal injury. J Surg Res. 2004;119(2): |
15. |
Dunn NR et al. Haploinsufficient phenotypes in Bmp4 |
|
149159 |
|
heterozygous null mice and modification by mutations |
36. |
Sean Eardley K, Cockwell P. Macrophages and prog |
|
in Gli3 and Alx4. Dev Biol. 1997;188(2):235247 |
|
ressive tubulointerstitial disease. Kidney Int. 2005;68(2): |
16. |
Hinman F. Renal counterbalance. Cal West Med. |
|
437455 |
|
1926;24(3):333335 |
37. |
Wada T et al. Gene therapy via blockade of monocyte |
17. |
Taki M, Goldsmith DI, Spitzer A. Impact of age on effects |
|
chemoattractant protein1 for renal fibrosis. J Am Soc |
|
of ureteral obstruction on renal function. Kidney Int. |
|
Nephrol. 2004;15(4):940948 |
|
1983;24(5):602609 |
38. |
Pittock ST et al. MCP1 is upregulated in unstressed |
18. |
Chevalier RL et al. Unilateral ureteral obstruction in |
|
and stressed HO1 knockout mice: pathophysiologic |
|
early development alters renal growth: dependence on |
|
correlates. Kidney Int. 2005;68(2):611622 |
|
the duration of obstruction. J Urol. 1999;161(1):309313 |
39. |
Esteban V et al. Angiotensin II, via AT1 and AT2 recep |
19. |
Mandell J et al. Human fetal compensatory renal growth. |
|
tors and NFkappaB pathway, regulates the inflamma |
|
J Urol. 1993;150(2 pt 2):790792 |
|
tory response in unilateral ureteral obstruction. J Am |
20. |
Koff SA et al. The assessment of obstruction in the |
|
Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(6):15141529 |
|
newborn with unilateral hydronephrosis by measuring |
40. |
Inazaki K et al. Smad3 deficiency attenuates renal |
|
the size of the opposite kidney. J Urol. 1994;152(2 pt 2): |
|
fibrosis, inflammation, and apoptosis after unilateral |
|
596599 |
|
ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int. 2004;66(2):597604 |
205
PathoPhysiology oF rEnal oBstrUction
41.Chevalier RL. Molecular and cellular pathophysiology of obstructive nephropathy. Pediatr Nephrol. 1999;13(7): 612619
42.McVary KT, Maizels M. Urinary obstruction reduces glomerulogenesis in the developing kidney: a model in the rabbit. J Urol. 1989;142(2 pt 2):646651. discussion 6678
43.Peters CA et al. The response of the fetal kidney to obstruction. J Urol. 1992;148(2 pt 2):503509
44.Chevalier RL et al. Recovery following relief of unilateral ureteral obstruction in the neonatal rat. Kidney Int. 1999;55(3):793807
45.Okuda S et al. Influence of age on deterioration of the remnant kidney in uninephrectomized rats. Clin Sci Lond. 1987;72(5):571576
46.O’Donnell MP et al. Age is a determinant of the glomer ular morphologic and functional responses to chronic nephron loss. J Lab Clin Med. 1985;106(3):308313
47.Quinlan MR et al. Exploring mechanisms involved in renal tubular sensing of mechanical stretch following ureteric obstruction. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2008; 295(1):F1F11
48.Alenghat FJ, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction: all sig nals point to cytoskeleton, matrix, and integrins. Sci STKE. 2002;2002(119):PE6
49.Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 1993;260(5111):11241127
50.Klahr S, Ishidoya S, Morrissey J. Role of angiotensin II in the tubulointerstitial fibrosis of obstructive nephropa thy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26(1):141146
51.Chertin B et al. Conservative treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children with antenatal diagno sis of hydronephrosis: lessons learned after 16 years of followup. Eur Urol. 2006;49(4):734738
52.Rosen S, Heyman SN. Difficulties in understanding human “acute tubular necrosis”: limited data and flawed animal models. Kidney Int. 2001;60(4):12201224
53.Lieberthal W, Nigam SK. Acute renal failure II. Experimental models of acute renal failure: imperfect but indispensable. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2000;278 (1):F1F12
54.Mizuguchi Y et al. A novel cellpermeable antioxidant peptide decreases renal tubular apoptosis and damage in unilateral ureteral obstruction. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2008;295(5):F1545F1553
55.Lee RS et al. Temporal variations of the postnatal rat uri nary proteome as a reflection of systemic maturation. Proteomics. 2008;8(5):1097112
56.Decramer S et al. Predicting the clinical outcome of con genital unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in newborn by urinary proteome analysis. Nat Med. 2006;12(4):398400
57.Mostbeck GH, Zontsich T, Turetschek K. Ultrasound of the kidney: obstruction and medical diseases. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(10):18781889
58.Shokeir AA. The diagnosis of upper urinary tract obstruction. BJU Int. 1999;83(8):893900. quiz 900–1
59.Platt JF, Rubin JM, Ellis JH. Distinction between obstruc tive and nonobstructive pyelocaliectasis with duplex
Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(5):997 1000
60.Shokeir AA et al. Renal doppler ultrasound in children with obstructive uropathy: Effect of intravenous normal saline fluid load and furosemide. J Urol. 1996;156(4): 14551458
61.Whitaker RH. Diagnosis of obstruction in dilated ure ters. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1973;53(3):153166
62.Sperling H et al. The Whitaker test, a useful tool in renal grafts? Urology. 2000;56(1):4952
63.Dubovsky EV, Russell CD. Advances in radionuclide evaluation of urinary tract obstruction. Abdom Imaging. 1998;23(1):1726
64.English PJ et al. Modified method of diuresis renog raphy for the assessment of equivocal pelviureteric junction obstruction. Br J Urol. 1987;59(1):1014
65.Upsdell SM, Testa HJ, Lawson RS. The F15 diuresis renogram in suspected obstruction of the upper urinary tract. Br J Urol. 1992;69(2):126131
66.Pais VM, Strandhoy JW, Assimos DG. Pathophysiology of urinary tract obstruction. In: Wein AJ et al., eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006
67.Smith RC et al. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(1): 97101
68.Gentle DL et al. Protease inhibitorinduced urolithiasis. Urology. 1997;50(4):508511
69.ElNahas AR et al. Role of multiphasic helical computed tomography in planning surgical treatment for pelvi ureteric junction obstruction. BJU Int. 2004;94(4): 582587
70.Lawler LP et al. Adult ureteropelvic junction obstruc tion: insights with threedimensional multidetector row CT. Radiographics. 2005;25(1):121134
71.Leyendecker JR, Barnes CE, Zagoria RJ. MR urography: techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2008;28(1):2346. discussion 46–7
72.Karabacakoglu A et al. Diagnostic value of diuretic enhanced excretory MR urography in patients with obstructive uropathy. Eur J Radiol. 2004;52(3):320327
73.Lefort C et al. Dynamic MR urography in urinary tract obstruction: implementation and preliminary results. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31(2):232240
74.Farnham SB et al. Pediatric urological causes of hyper tension. J Urol. 2005;173(3):697704
75.Kinn AC. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: longterm followup of adults with and without surgical treatment. J Urol. 2000;164(3 pt 1):652656
76.Parkhouse HF et al. Longterm outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves. Br J Urol. 1988;62(1):5962
77.Vaughan ED Jr, Gillenwater JY. Diagnosis, characteriza
tion and management of postobstructive diuresis.
J Urol. 1973;109(2):286292
78.Jones DA, George NJ, O’Reilly PH. Postobstructive renal function. Semin Urol. 1987;5(3):176190
79.Nyman MA, Schwenk NM, Silverstein MD. Management of urinary retention: rapid versus gradual decompres sion and risk of complications. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72(10):951956
206
Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE
80.Schlossberg SM, Vaughan ED Jr. The mechanism of unilateral postobstructive diuresis. J Urol. 1984;131(3): 534536
81.Kim SW et al. Diminished renal expression of aquaporin water channels in rats with experimental bilateral ureteral obstruction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12(10): 20192028
82.Frokiaer J et al. Bilateral ureteral obstruction downregu lates expression of vasopressinsensitive AQP2 water
channel in rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1996;270(4 pt 2): F657F668
83.Kim SW et al. Diminished expression of sodium trans porters in the ureteral obstructed kidney in rats.Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2004;96(3):e6776
84.Norregaard R et al. COX2 activity transiently contrib utes to increased water and NaCl excretion in the poly uric phase after release of ureteral obstruction. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2007;292(5):F13221333