In male humans it is assumed that the striated

9.

Wimpissinger TF, Tschabitscher M, Feichtinger H, et al.

muscle fibers of the pronounced anterior part of

Surgical anatomy of the puboprostatic complex with

the sphincter disperse below the puboprostatic

special reference to radical perineal prostatectomy. BJU

Int. 2003;92:681-684

ligaments. It is still unclear if striated muscle

10.

Young HH. The radical cure of cancer of the prostate.

fibers communicate with the structures of the

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1937;64:472-484

bladder neck. In females it could be demon-

11.

Fritsch H, Lienemann A, Brenner E, et al. Clinical anat-

strated that parts of the striated external sphinc-

omy of the pelvic floor. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol.

ter could only be found in the two distal thirds

2004;175(III-IX):1-64

of the urethra.2,3,7,11,13,14,16,17,38-40

12.

Nakajima F, Takenaka A, Uchiyama E, et al. Macroscopic

and histotopographic study of the deep transverse

perineal muscle (musculus transversus perinei profun-

Summary

dus) in elderly Japanese. Ann Anat. 2007;189:65-74

13.

the female. Anat Rec. 1983;205:223-232

Oelrich TM. The striated urogenital sphincter muscle in

Knowledge of the anatomy of the lower urinary

14.

Oelrich TM. The urethral sphincter muscle in the male.

Am J Anat. 1980;158:229-246

tract was substantiated by comprehensive inves-

15.

Shafik A, Sibai OE, Shafik AA, et al. A novel concept for

tigations long ago.Over time,many consolidated

the surgical anatomy of the perineal body. Dis Colon

findings have been refuted and then recognized

Rectum. 2007;50:2120-2125

16.

TA S, Delancey JO. Structure of the perineal membrane

again. Current urological treatments are based

in females: gross and microscopic anatomy. Obstet

on these anatomical conclusions. It has been

Gynecol. 2008;111:686-693

shown that while some irrevocable facts have

17.

Wallner C, Dabhoiwala NF, Deruiter MC, et al. The ana-

been substantiated in several fields of urological

tomical components of urinary continence. Eur Urol.

anatomy, extensive exploration is still taking

2009;55(4):932-943

place. Especially the complex sphincter mecha-

18.

Schilling D, Horstmann M, Nagele U, et al. Cystectomy in

nism in both females and males as well as the

women. BJU Int. 2008;102(9 Pt B):1289-1295

19.

Baader B, Baader SL, Herrmann M, et al. Autonomic

pelvic neuroanatomy are examples of these

innervation of the female pelvis.Anatomic basis. Urologe

interesting research subjects. Only functional

A. 2004;43:133-140

studies will validate whether these upcoming

20.

Baader B, Herrmann M. Topography of the pelvic auto-

new aspects of anatomy will also lead to better

nomic nervous system and its potential impact on surgi-

treatment outcomes for our patients.

21.

cal intervention in the pelvis. Clin Anat. 2003;16:119-130

Di Gangi Herms AM, Veit R, Reisenauer C, et al.

Functional imaging of stress urinary incontinence.

References

Neuroimage. 2006;29:267-275

22.

Ghoneim MA, Abol-Enein H. Lymphadenectomy with

cystectomy: is it necessary and what is its extent? Eur

1. Toellner R. Illustrated History of Medicine. Salzburg,

Urol. 2004;46:457-461

Austria: Andreas & Andreas; 1986

23.

Sievert KD, Hennenlotter J, Laible I, et al. The peripros-

2. Benninghoff D. Anatomy. München, Germany: Urban &

tatic autonomic nerves-bundle or layer? Eur Urol.

Fischer Verlag; 2003

2008;54(5):1109-1117

3. Netter FH.Atlas of Human Anatomy.Stuttgart,Germany/

24.

Corvin S, Schilling D, Eichhorn K, et al. Laparoscopic

New York: Thieme; 1997

sentinel lymph node dissection – a novel technique for

4. Otcenasek M, Baca V, Krofta L, et al. Endopelvic fascia in

the staging of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2006;49: 280-285

women: shape and relation to parietal pelvic structures.

25.

Dorschner W, Biesold M, Schmidt F, et al. The dispute

Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:622-630

about the external sphincter and the urogenital dia-

5. Shapiro E, Hartanto V, Perlman EJ, et al. Morphometric

phragm. J Urol. 1999;162:1942-1945

analysis of pediatric and nonhyperplastic prostate

26.

Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Michl U, et al. Nerve dis-

glands: evidence that BPH is not a unique stromal pro-

tribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur Urol.

cess. Prostate. 1997;33:177-182

2007;51:105-110; discussion 110-101

6. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al. Intrafascial

27.

Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A, et al. Topographical

nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical pros-

anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantifi-

tatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;53:931-940

cation and computerised planimetry. Eur Urol.

7. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, et al.

2008;54:353-361

Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur

28.

Gil-Vernet JM. Prostate cancer: anatomical and surgical

Urol. 2007;51:629-639

considerations. Br J Urol. 1996;78:161-168

8. Van Ophoven A, Roth S. The anatomy and embryological

29.

Heidenreich A, Ohlmann CH, Polyakov S. Anatomical

origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers: a medico-historical

extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergo-

debate. J Urol. 1997;157:3-9

ing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52:29-37