Добавил:
shahzodbeknormurodov27@gmail.com Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Practical Urology ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
27.08.2022
Размер:
25.91 Mб
Скачать

533

ProstatE cancEr

intraurethral delivery systems for prostaglandin

genitourinary toxicity. Thus, most centers today

E, and/or vacuum erection devices for rehabili-

use a minimum of 75 Gy for 3D conformal tech-

tation of erectile function following radical

niques, with an expectation of increased efficacy

prostatectomy, although evidence for this prac-

and minimal increase in toxicity.

tice remains sparse.

 

Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (Robot-

Assisted)

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy has rapidly grown as a surgical treatment for prostate cancer. For example, among Medicare beneficiaries, the laparoscopic approach was used in over 30% of cases in 2005, as compared with only 12% of cases in 2003.37 Reports of short-term outcomes (<12 months) from expert centers suggest similar oncologic efficacy to the open approach, but longer-term data on biochemical recurrence and prostate cancer mortality are lacking. One claims-based analysis suggests that salvage radiation therapy is more common following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy, although at high-volume centers the risk for salvage therapy was similar between the open and laparoscopic approach.37 Functional outcomes (continence and potency) have not been well documented using validated instruments comparing subjects to baseline status, and thus further investigation of this approach to radical prostatectomy is needed.

EBRT

Radiation therapy of all types uses high-energy particles (typically photons) to damage cellular DNA and induce apoptosis in cancer cells. One of the oldest techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer is external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Most institutions today use 3D conformal EBRT or intensity modulated radiation therapy (see below). 3D conformal EBRT uses CT images to create a high-dose treatment volume which conforms to the target shape (e.g., the prostate). Use of 3D conformal techniques allows greater radiation dose to the prostate while minimizing toxicity. For example, a recent randomized trial demonstrated that the use of 79.2 Gy of conformal therapy instead of 70.2 Gy resulted in a 49% decrease in biochemical failure rates.38 The use of 78 Gy in multi-institutional trials has been associated with only a 3% incidence of significant acute gastrointestinal/

IMRT

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) uses nonuniform beam densities and multileaf collimation techniques to provide an even higher dose to the target while minimizing toxicity to surrounding structures. In recent series, doses between 81 and 86.4 Gy have been administered with late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity in less than 1% of patients, while achieving good biochemical recurrence-free rates. IMRT is more labor-intensive than 3D conformal EBRT, but is rapidly becoming the standard of care at many institutions.

Brachytherapy

Implantation of interstitial radioactive elements offers the potential for targeted high-dose radiation to the prostate while minimizing exposure of surrounding tissues to radiation. The current approach to brachytherapy utilizes transrectal ultrasound-guided placement of radioactive elements in a template to maximize radiation exposure to the prostate. Because of rapid falloff in radiation dose beyond the prostate, brachytherapy is most suitable for low-risk or highly selected intermediate-risk patients. In addition, large prostate glands (>60 g) may be difficult to optimally treat. Patients with intermediateor high-risk disease may also be treated with a combination of brachytherapy with EBRT. To date, little data exists regarding the advantage of brachytherapy with EBRT as compared with conformal EBRT alone in the treatment of intermediateand high-risk disease.

Treatment for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer (T3, T4)

Treatment for locally advanced prostate cancer necessitates a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach, frequently involving urologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. The most commonly applied approaches include external beam radiation therapy combined

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

534

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE

with androgen-deprivation therapy, and radical

prostate tissue remains. The AUA Prostate

prostatectomy.

 

 

 

 

Cancer Guidelines panel systematic review

 

 

 

 

 

 

noted significant variability in definitions of

EBRT with ADT

 

 

 

 

biochemical recurrence following radical pros-

 

 

 

 

tatectomy, but endorsed the standard of PSA

 

 

 

 

 

 

The physiologic

rationale

for

combining

>0.2 ng/mL as representing biochemical failure,

although not necessarily a threshold to initiate

androgen-deprivation therapy with radiation

androgen-deprivation

therapy.39 Many clini-

therapy is a potentially synergistic effect on

cians regard a PSA level >0.4 ng/mL following

prostate cancer

cells. Androgen deprivation

radical prostatectomy as an indication for inter-

likely increases

apoptosis in

the

irradiated

vention (ADT), following appropriate staging

field, and may also delay or prevent the devel-

evaluations. Tumor grade, time to PSA recur-

opment of metastatic disease. Clinical support

rence after surgery, and PSA doubling time are

for these hypotheses is provided by the results

associated with the risk of prostate cancer mor-

of two randomized controlled trials (RTOG

tality, and may be used to risk stratify those

85–10 and EORTC), which suggests that imme-

patients who may potentially benefit from early

diate ADT with EBRT results in better out-

intervention following

a biochemical recur-

comes than EBRT

alone, among

men with

rence.40 A large, retrospective cohort study dem-

locally advanced or high-risk prostate cancer.

onstrated

reduced

incidence

of

metastatic

Furthermore, secondary analyses of additional

disease among high-risk (Gleason sum >7 or

trials (i.e., RTOG

85–31) suggest

that early

PSADT <12 months) men initiated on ADT for

indefinite ADT improves outcomes as com-

PSA recurrence following radical

prostatec-

pared with EBRT alone.

 

 

 

 

tomy.41,42 However, definitive data regarding the

 

 

 

 

 

 

Radical Prostatectomy

 

 

benefit of early versus delayed androgen depri-

 

 

vation in this setting is lacking. Men with short

Radical prostatectomy, with or without ADT, is a

PSA doubling times (<15 months) appear to be

at higher risk for disease-specific

mortality.

43

reasonable option

for locally

advanced (T3)

 

Randomized trials are needed in this area to

prostate cancer. Well-differentiated T3 prostate

further define the role of ADT for PSA recur-

cancers have a disease-specific survival follow-

rence among men at higher risk for prostate

ing radical prostatectomy of approximately 76%.

cancer death.

 

 

 

 

 

Androgen-deprivation therapy may improve

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

outcomes following radical prostatectomy in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

this group, although further research is required

PSA Recurrence Following Radiation

 

to clearly define the role of androgen depriva-

Therapy

 

 

 

 

 

 

tion for locally advanced disease following radi-

 

 

 

 

 

 

cal prostatectomy.

 

 

 

The 1996 consensus definition for PSA recur-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

rence following radiation therapy is three con-

Treatment for Recurrence

secutive increases in PSA, with the time of

failure defined as halfway between the first rise

Following Definitive Local

in PSA and the prior measurement.As with PSA

recurrence

following

radical

prostatectomy,

Therapy

 

 

 

 

rapidly rising PSA

is

a harbinger of more

 

 

 

 

aggressive disease and shorter time to distant

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSA Recurrence Following Radical

metastasis. Androgen-deprivation therapy is

most commonly used to treat PSA recurrence

Prostatectomy

 

 

 

 

following radiation therapy. Salvage surgery has

 

 

 

 

 

 

a very high complication rate, and a significant

Undetectable PSA levels are expected following

risk of incontinence, and is therefore rarely per-

radical prostatectomy, thus PSA is potentially a

formed. Cryotherapy of the prostate is a rela-

very sensitive marker for disease recurrence.

tively new option to treat postradiation PSA

However, some patients may develop very low

recurrence, so long-term data on outcomes is

levels of PSA following prostatectomy if benign

lacking.