Добавил:
shahzodbeknormurodov27@gmail.com Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Practical Urology ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
27.08.2022
Размер:
25.91 Mб
Скачать

87

imaging of thE UPPEr tracts

Figure 5.36. mri t2 maximum intensity projection (miP) image showing bilateral ureteric obstruction in a patient with underlying locally invasive endometrial carcinoma.

Problems associated with ureteric stents include occlusion, irritation of the bladder, and encrustation.

Renal Trauma

Blunt accident-related abdominal trauma accounts for the majority of renal injuries. Penetrating injuries are less common. Renal injury can also occur iatrogenically during percutaneous, endourological, or open surgical procedures.

The kidneys are afforded some protection by the lower most ribs which overlie the posterolateral aspects of the renal upper poles. Ectopic kidneys, such as pelvic or horseshoe kidney and pathologically enlarged kidneys are at greater risk of injury.

Renal injuries vary in severity and can range from relatively minor requiring conservative management only to life-threatening injuries due to hemorrhagic shock (Table 5.7).Hematuria is a common feature of renal trauma but may be absent particularly in cases of ureteropelvic or renovascular injury.

Imaging is indicated following renal injury in the presence of macroscopic hematuria or microscopic hematuria with associated hypotension.

Table 5.7. the american association for the surgery of trauma

classification of renal injury

grade 1

cortical contusion, urological studies

 

normal

grade 2

non-expanding perirenal hematoma –

 

confined to retroperitoneum.

 

superficial cortical laceration < 1 cm,

 

without urinary extravasation

grade 3

cortical laceration > 1 cm but no

 

urinary extravasation

grade 4

cortical lacerations involving the

 

collecting system

 

main renal artery or vein injury with

 

contained hemorrhage

grade 5

shattered kidney

 

avulsion of the renal hilum with

Figure 5.37.

nephrostomy drain: Pigtail lies within the renal pelvis.

devascularized kidney

 

 

 

88

 

 

 

 

 

Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE

The majority (over 90%) of renal injuries are

obtained 5-20 minutes following contrast injec-

classified as minor and can be managed conser-

tion if there is concern regarding injury to the

vatively. Open exploration and possible nephre-

collecting system.

ctomy is indicated in patients with persistent

CT accurately demonstrates parenchymal lac-

life-threatening hemorrhage16.

erations which are identified as hypoattenuating

Ultrasound can detect renal subcapsular

areas or perfusion defects within the renal cortex

hematomas and has a high sensitivity for demon-

(Fig.5.38).Major lacerations extend into the renal

stration of intraperitoneal blood. However, it is a

medulla and may involve the collecting system.

relatively poor test for detecting renal lacerations

Subcapsular and perinephric hematoma can

and is therefore of limited value for the assess-

be recognized as a high attenuation collection

ment of patients with suspected renal injury.

adjacent to the renal cortex.

IVU can identify injuries involving the renal

Vascular injuries can be serious and life-

collecting system by demonstrating contrast

threatening. Trauma to the renal pedicle can

extravasation. Renal parenchymal injuries how-

result in renal artery occlusion leading to renal

ever are not adequately demonstrated by IVU

infarction (Fig. 5.39). Contrast-enhanced CT

and its role has largely been replaced by CT.

demonstrates abrupt occlusion of the renal

Contrast-enhanced CT is the imaging modal-

artery with non-enhancement of the kidney

ity of choice for assessment of renal trauma and

indicating renal infarction. More serious inju-

can help differentiate between those injuries

ries can result in avulsion of the renal pedicle

that can be managed conservatively from those

leading to catastrophic hemorrhage.

that require surgical intervention.

AV fistula or pseudoaneurysm formation can

Major renal trauma is frequently associated

occur following penetrating renal trauma

with injuries to the chest and other abdominal

(Fig. 5.40). Angiographic studies with a view to

organs. CT can detect a wide range of intra-

therapeutic embolization may be necessary in

abdominal injuries and the study can be

these types of injury.

extended to include the thorax if required.

Major renal trauma is frequently associated

Post iv contrast studies are obtained to iden-

with injuries to the chest and other abdominal

tify renal cortical laceration, vascular injuries

organs. CT can detect a wide range of intra-

and haematoma formation. These can be sup-

abdominal injuries and the study can be

plemented by delayed excretory phase images

extended to include the thorax if required.

Figure 5.38. grade 3 injury involving left kidney demonstrating

Figure 5.39. non-enhancing right kidney as a result of trau-

a cortical laceration and retroperitoneal hematoma.

matic infarction.

89

imaging of thE UPPEr tracts

Figure 5.40. catheter angiography demonstrating renal artery pseudoanurysm (a) following penetrating renal injury with subsequent successful therapeutic embolistaion (b).

References

1.Dyer RB, Chen MYM, et al. Intravenous urography: technique and interpretation. RadioGraphics. 2001;21: 799-824

2.Nolte-Ernsting C, Cowan N. Understanding multislice CT urography techniques – Many roads lead to Rome. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2670-2686

3.Royal College of Radiologists. Making the Best Use of a Department of Clinical Radiology. 6th ed. London: RCR; 2007

4.European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Guidelines on Contrast Media. Version 7.0 2008

5.American College of Radiologists. Manual on Contrast Media. Version 6. 2008. www.acr.org

6.Coll DM, Smith RC. Update on radiological imaging of renal cell carcinoma. BJU International. 2007;99:12171222

7.Anderson EM, Murphy R, et al. Multidetector computed tomography urography (MDCTU) for diagnosing urothelial malignancy. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:324-332

8.Silverman SG, Gann YU. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology. 2006;240(1):6-22

9.Fowler K, Locken J. US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology. 2002;222:109-113

10.10 Smith RC, Coll DM. Helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of ureteric colic. BJU Int. 2000;86 (Suppl 1):33-41

11.Talner L, Vaughan M. Nonobstructive renal causes of flank pain: findings on non-contrast helical CT (CT KUB). Abdom Imaging. 2003;28(2):210-216

12.Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA. Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology. 2004;231:365-371

13.Stunnell H, Buckley O, et al. Imaging of acute pyelonephritis in the adult. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1820-1828

14.Webb JAW. Ultrasonography and Doppler studies in the diagnosis of renal obstruction. BJU Int. 2000;86 (Suppl 1):25-32

15.Leyendecker JR, Barnes CE. MR Urography techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2008;28:23-46

16.Heyns CF. Renal Trauma – Indications for imaging and surgical exploration. BJU Int. 2004;93:1165-1170