Добавил:
shahzodbeknormurodov27@gmail.com Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Practical Urology ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
27.08.2022
Размер:
25.91 Mб
Скачать

357

HEmatUria: EvalUation and managEmEnt

Computed Tomography (CT)

 

 

significant proteinuria or hypertension).

CT with contrast delivers optimal visualization

Serum immunological investigations are indi-

cated if there is a suspicion of an underlying

of the urinary

anatomy while a noncontrast

immunological cause of renal disease-related

CT is useful if renal calculi are suspected.42-44

hematuria.

 

 

 

 

Ideally, several CT phases should be used includ-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ing (1) noncontrast phase to detect stones, (2)

 

 

 

 

 

portal venous and arterial phases for renal

Nonurological/Intrinsic Renal Causes of

lesions, and (3) excretory phase for intraluminal

Hematuria

 

 

 

 

pathology (UCC of the ureter or renal pelvis).45,46

 

 

 

 

However, a CT is more expensive and carries a

Intrinsic nephrological causes

of hematuria

higher radiation exposure than an IVU or USS,

should be considered if urological investigations

and thus should be used with caution when

fail to identify pathology. Nephrological causes

looking for disease in patients with a low inci-

are more common in younger patients and those

dence. The replacement of both USS and IVU by

with proteinuria or hypertension. Frank hema-

CTU is becoming more widely adopted.

 

 

turia and concomitant upper respiratory tract

 

 

 

 

Retrograde Urogram Studies

 

 

infection could suggest glomerulonephritis and

 

 

it is often appropriate to refer these patients for

Retrograde studies usually require anesthesia

renal assessment rather than delay with urologi-

cal investigations.

 

 

and involve direct cannulation of the ureteric

 

 

It is important to measure the patients’ blood

orifice with retrograde injection of contrast

pressure during their hematuria clinic consul-

media under

radiological

screening.

This

tation, and

the

urinalysis

should investigate

investigation is particularly

useful for

the

the presence of proteinuria, while urine should

evaluation of equivocal filling defects seen on

be sent for

formal microscopy in order to

an IVU, and it may be combined with upper

investigate

the

presence

of

urinary casts.

urinary tract endoscopy in order to obtain cel-

Patients with proteinuria on dipstick urinaly-

lular brushings or histology of suspicious

sis should have urine sent for protein:creatinine

upper tract lesions. This procedure is highly

ratio (PCR) or albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR)

invasive and should be reserved for selected

measurement and their glomerular filtration

cases of hematuria with a sufficient index of

rate (creatinine clearance) measured. Further

suspicion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

nephrological evaluation may include a renal

 

 

 

 

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

 

 

biopsy in order to identify an intrinsic renal

 

 

cause of hematuria.

 

 

An MRI of the pelvis is indicated if a solid-

 

 

 

 

 

appearing bladder cancer is visualized at the

Intractable Hematuria

 

time of flexible cystoscopy in order to provide

 

radiological staging information. Ideally, the

Patients with advanced urological malignancy

MRI should be performed prior to the transure-

thral resection of an invasive-looking bladder

and following radiotherapy may develop intrac-

tumor. If the MRI is performed after transure-

table hematuria leading to anemia and clot

thral resection, an interval of at least 4 weeks is

retention. Various palliative options are avail-

required between the resection and the MRI

able to try and ease the hematuria including a

scan in order to prevent inaccurate radiological

“toilet” transurethral resection of their tumor,

upstaging of the bladder mass as a result of

palliative radiotherapy for malignancy, radio-

changes occurring as a result of the surgical

logical internal iliac embolization or intravesi-

resection.

 

 

 

cal instillation of chemicals such as alum or

 

 

 

 

formalin. Palliative cystectomy may be per-

Additional Tests and Renal Biopsy

 

 

formed as a last resort for intractable hematuria

 

 

in selected patients. Transurethral resection may

A renal biopsy is indicated when there is evi-

also be helpful to reduce hematuria due to

dence of renal parenchymal disease (such as

advanced prostate cancer. Patients with renal

358

Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE

tumors causing intractable hematuria may be

2.

Khadra MH et al.A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients

successfully

palliated

with

radiotherapy or

 

with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice.

radiological embolization. Hematuria following

 

J Urol. 2000;163(2):524-527

3.

Nishikawa Y et al. Clinical assessment of patients with

radiotherapy should always be investigated with

 

microscopic hematuria pointed out by mass screening

cystoscopy, as in these patients there is an

 

examination. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1992;38(6):647-651

increased risk of malignancy.

 

4.

Grossfeld GD, Carroll PR. Evaluation of asymptomatic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

microscopic hematuria. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25(4):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

661-676

Loin Pain Hematuria Syndrome

5.

Grossfeld GD et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic micro-

 

Association best practice policy–part II: patient evalua-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

scopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological

The term “loin pain hematuria syndrome” is

 

tion, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy,

 

nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology. 2001;

given to describe a condition whereby patients

6.

57(4):604-610

experience loin pain associated with hematuria,

Grossfeld GD et al. Asymptomatic microscopic hematu-

 

ria in adults: summary of the AUA best practice policy

but in whom no identifiable cause is found. The

 

 

recommendations. Am Fam Physician. 2001;63(6):

condition is commoner in women than men and

 

1145-1154

may

persist

for

many

years. No pathological

7.

Briganti E, McNeil J, Atkins R. The epidemiology of dis-

cause is found following full hematuria investi-

 

eases of the kidney and urinary tract: an Australian

 

perspective. Report to the Board of the Australian

gations including renal biopsy and angiography.

 

 

Kidney Foundation [online]. http://www.med.monash.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

edu.au/epidemiology/general_info/disease_kidney.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

html. 2001

Follow-Up for Patients with

8.

Ritchie CD, Bevan EA, Collier SJ. Importance of occult

 

haematuria found at screening. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed).

Hematuria in the Absence of

 

1986;292(6521):681-683

9.

Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Investi-

Demonstrable Pathology

 

gation of asymptomatic microscopic haematuria in

 

adults. www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign17.pdf. 1997

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.

McDonald MM, Swagerty D, Wetzel L. Assessment of

Some patients with a negative initial urologi-

 

microscopic hematuria in adults. Am Fam Physician.

 

2006;73(10):1748-1754

cal evaluation eventually develop significant

 

11.

Sokolosky MC. Hematuria. Emerg Med Clin North Am.

urological or renal disease; therefore, patients

 

2001;19(3):621-632

with

negative

initial

investigations require

12.

Cohen RA, Brown RS. Clinical practice. Microscopic

adequate follow-up, usually in a primary care

 

hematuria. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(23):2330-2338

13.

U.S. Preventive Series Task Force. Guide to Clinical

setting. This follow-up is important if the

 

Preventive Series. Alexandria, VA: International Medical

patient has risk factors for the development of

 

Publishing; 1996

urological47 or renal pathology. Patients with

14.

Sultana SR et al. Microscopic haematuria: urological

microscopic hematuria should undergo repeat

 

investigation using a standard protocol. Br J Urol. 1996;

urinalysis and

referral to a

renal physician

 

78(5):691-696; discussion 697-698

15.

Benbassat J et al. Symptomless microhaematuria in

should be considered if the patient develops

 

schoolchildren: causes for variable management strate-

hypertension, significant proteinuria or evi-

 

gies. Q J Med. 1996;89(11):845-854

dence of renal insufficiency. The development

16.

Renal Association and British Association of Urological

of macroscopic hematuria in a patient who has

 

Surgeons. Joint consensus statement on the initial

 

assessment of haematuria. 2008

previously been evaluated for microscopic

 

17.

Khan MA, Shaw G, Paris AM. Is microscopic haematuria

hematuria warrants referral back to the urolo-

 

a urological emergency? BJU Int. 2002;90(4):355-357

gist for further investigations, while patients

18.

Schroeder GL et al. A side by side comparison of cytol-

with

ongoing

macroscopic

hematuria also

 

ogy and biomarkers for bladder cancer detection. J Urol.

should be considered for rereferral for addi-

 

2004;172(3):1123-1126

19.

Friedman GD et al. Can hematuria be a predictor as well

tional investigation.

 

 

 

 

 

as a symptom or sign of bladder cancer? Cancer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5(12):993-996

References

 

 

 

20.

Mazhari R, Kimmel PL. Hematuria: an algorithmic

 

 

 

 

2002;69(11):870, 872-874, 876 passim

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

approach to finding the cause. Cleve Clin J Med.

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.

Feld LG et al. Hematuria: an integrated medical and sur-

1. Rodgers MA et al. Diagnostic tests used in the investiga-

 

gical approach. Pediatr Clin N Am. 1997;44(5):1191–1210

tion of adult haematuria: a systematic review. BJU Int.

22.

Rockall AG et al. Haematuria. Postgrad Med J. 1997;73

2006;98(6):1154-1160

 

 

 

(857):129-136

359

HEmatUria: EvalUation and managEmEnt

23.Connelly JE. Microscopic hematuria. In: Black ER, Tape TG, Panzer RJ, eds. Diagnostic Strategies for Common Medical Problems. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians; 1999:518-526

24.Hiatt RA, Ordonez JD. Dipstick urinalysis screening, asymptomatic microhematuria, and subsequent urological cancers in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994;3(5):439-443

25.Budman LI, Kassouf W, Steinberg JR. Biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2008;2(3):212-221

26.Pode D et al. Noninvasive detection of bladder cancer with the BTA stat test. J Urol. 1999;161(2):443-446

27.Nasuti JF et al. Utility of the BTA stat test kit for bladder cancer screening. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999;21(1):27-29.

28.Walsh IK et al. The BTA stat test: a tumor marker for the detection of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. Urology. 2001;58(4):532-535

29.Chahal R et al. Evaluation of the clinical value of urinary NMP22 as a marker in the screening and surveillance of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Eur Urol. 2001;40(4):415-420; discussion 421

30.Ponsky LE et al.Screening and monitoring for bladder cancer: refining the use of NMP22. J Urol. 2001;166(1):75-78

31.Zippe C, Pandrangi L, Agarwal A. NMP22 is a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer. J Urol. 1999;161(1):62-65

32.Akaza H et al. Evaluation of urinary NMP22 (nuclear matrix protein 22) as a diagnostic marker for urothelial cancer – screening for urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria. NMP Study Group. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1997;24(7):837-842

33.Miyanaga N et al. Urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 as a new marker for the screening of urothelial cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria. Int J Urol. 1999; 6(4):173-177

34.Miyoshi Y, Matsuzaki J, Miura T. Evaluation of usefulness of urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) in the detection of urothelial transitional cell carcinoma. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2001;47(6):379-383

35.Oge O et al. Evaluation of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) as a tumor marker in the detection of bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol. 2001;32(3):367-370

36.Paoluzzi M et al. Urinary dosage of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) like biologic marker of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC): a study on patients with hematuria.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1999;71(1):13-18

37.Vasanthakumar V et al. A study to assess the efficacy of chemoprophylaxis in the prevention of endoscopyrelated bacteraemia in patients aged 60 and over. Q J Med. 1990;75(278):647-653

38.Koss LG et al. Diagnostic value of cytology of voided urine. Acta Cytol. 1985;29(5):810–816

39.Jaffe JS et al. A new diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of microscopic hematuria. Urology. 2001;57(5): 889-894

40.Jamis-Dow CA et al. Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;198(3):785-788

41.Sutton JM. Evaluation of hematuria in adults. J Am Med Assoc. 1990;263(18):2475-2480

42.Gray Sears CL et al. Prospective comparison of computerized tomography and excretory urography in the initial evaluation of asymptomatic microhematuria. J Urol. 2002;168(6):2457-2460

43.Sourtzis S et al. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(6):1491-1494

44.Luchs JS et al. Utility of hematuria testing in patients with suspected renal colic: correlation with unenhanced helical CT results. Urology. 2002;59(6):839-842

45.Igarashi T et al. Clinical and radiological aspects of infiltrating transitional cell carcinoma of the kidney. Urol Int. 1994;52(4):181-184

46.Buckley JA et al. Transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a retrospective look at CT staging with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;201(1):194-198

47.Carson CC III, Segura JW, Greene LF. Clinical importance of microhematuria. J Am Med Assoc. 1979;241(2): 149-150