Добавил:
shahzodbeknormurodov27@gmail.com Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Practical Urology ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
27.08.2022
Размер:
25.91 Mб
Скачать

369

BEnign Prostatic HyPErPlasia (BPH)

its advantages and disadvantages.HoLEP proved

7.

Rhodes T, Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ, Roberts RO, Guess

to be effective in the management of very large

 

HA, Lieber MM. Longitudinal prostate growth rates dur-

prostates but usually requires bladder irrigation

 

ing 5 years in randomly selected community men

 

40–79 years old. J Urol. 1999;161:1174-1179

for

a few hours. PVP

can be performed in

 

8.

Bosch JL, Hop WC, Niemer AQ, Bangma CH, Kirkels WJ,

patients on anticoagulants and antiaggregants,

 

Schroder FH. Parameters of prostate volume and shape

requires no bladder irrigation, and can be per-

 

in a community based population of men 55-74 years

formed as a day case although proper debulking

 

old. J Urol. 1994;152:1501-1505

of large prostates remains a challenge.

9.

McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, et al. The

 

 

 

 

 

long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combina-

 

 

 

 

 

tion therapy on the clinical progression of benign pros-

Conclusions

 

 

 

tatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2387-2398

 

 

10.

Teh GC, Sahabudin RM, Lim TC, et al. Prevalence of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

symptomatic BPE among Malaysian men aged 50 and

The management of patients with LUTS due to

 

above attending screening during prostate health aware-

 

ness campaign. Med J Malays. 2001;56:186-195

BPH evolved significantly over the last 2 decades

11.

Abrams P. New words for old: lower urinary tract symp-

with the use of pharmacological treatment and

 

toms for “prostatism”. BMJ. 1994;308:929-930

the

introduction

of

combination therapy.

12.

Frymann RJ, Abrams PA. Current diagnosis in the man-

Following the use

of

pharmacotherapy, the

 

agement of men with lower urinary tract symptoms. In:

 

Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughn ED, Wein A, eds. Campbell’s

number of surgical procedures performed in

 

 

Urology Updates, Vol 1. Philadelphia: Saunders, Co.;

BPH patients dropped dramatically. Patients

 

 

2000:1-17

now tend to receive surgery at an older age and

13.

Abrams P, Chapple C, Khoury S, Roehrborn C, de la

the average prostate volume tends to be larger.62

 

Rosette J; International Scientific Committee. Evaluation

The morbidity of BPH surgery was significantly

 

and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in older

reduced because of the introduction of bipolar

14.

men. J Urol. 2009 Apr;181(4):1779-87

and laser surgery. Notwithstanding all the tech-

Poulsen AL, Schou J, Puggaard L, Torp-Pedersen S,

 

Nordling J. Prostatic enlargement, symptomatology and

nological developments, proper knowledge of

 

 

pressure/flow evaluation: interrelations in patients with

the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract dys-

 

 

symptomatic BPH. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl.

function and a correct diagnosis remains the

 

1994;157:67-73

mainstay for a successful treatment of patients

15.

Nielsen KK, Nordling J, Hald T. Critical review of the

suffering from LUTS.

 

 

diagnosis of prostatic obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn.

 

 

 

 

 

1994;13:201-217

 

 

 

 

16.

Mochtar CA, Kiemeney LA, Laguna MP, et al. Prognostic

References

 

 

 

role of prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume for

 

 

 

the risk of invasive therapy in patients with benign pro-

 

 

 

 

 

static hyperplasia initially managed with alpha1-block-

1. Chapple C,TubaroA.Current Therapy of Benign Prostatic

 

ers and watchful waiting. Urology. 2005;65:300-305

 

Hyperplasia. London: Martin Dunitz Ltd.; 2000

17. Hong SJ, Ko WJ, Kim SI, Chung BH. Identification of

2. Bosch JL, Hop WC, Kirkels WJ, Schroder FH. Natural his-

 

baseline clinical factors which predict medical treatment

 

tory of benign prostatic hyperplasia: appropriate case

 

failure of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an observational

 

definition and estimation of its prevalence in the com-

 

cohort study. Eur Urol. 2003;44:94-99; discussion 99-100

 

munity. Urology. 1995;46:34-40

18.

McNeill AS, Rizvi S, Byrne DJ. Prostate size influences

3. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of

 

the outcome after presenting with acute urinary reten-

 

terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from

 

tion. BJU Int. 2004;94:559-562

 

the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International

19.

Roehrborn CG, Bartsch G, Kirby R, et al. Guidelines for

 

Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21: 167-178

 

the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyper-

4. Logie J, Clifford GM, Farmer RD. Incidence, prevalence

 

plasia: a comparative, international overview. Urology.

 

and management of lower urinary tract symptoms in

 

2001;50:642

 

men in the UK. BJU Int. 2005;95:557-562

20.

de la Rosette JJ, Alivizatos G, Madersbacher S, et al. EAU

5. Gades NM, Jacobson DJ, Girman CJ, Roberts RO, Lieber

 

guidelines on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Eur

 

MM, Jacobsen SJ. Prevalence of conditions potentially

 

Urol. 2001;40:256-263; discussion 264

 

associated with lower urinary tract symptoms in men.

21.

Kaplan SA. Update on the American urological associa-

 

BJU Int. 2005;95:549-553

 

 

tion guidelines for the treatment of benign prostatic

6. Thomas AW, Cannon A, Bartlett E, Ellis-Jones J, Abrams

 

hyperplasia. Rev Urol. 2006;4(8 suppl):S10-S17

 

P. The natural history of lower urinary tract dysfunction

22.

Boyle P, Robertson C, Lowe F, Roehrborn C. Meta-

 

in men: minimum 10-year urodynamic follow-up of

 

analysis of clinical trials of permixon in the treatment of

 

untreated bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int. 2005;

 

symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology.

 

96:1301-1306

 

 

 

2000;55:533-539

370

Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE

23.Tacklind J, MacDonald R, Rutks I, Wilt TJ. Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD001423; 2009

24.Roehrborn CG, Siami P, Barkin J et al.: The Effects of Combination Therapy with Dutasteride and Tamsulosin on Clinical Outcomes in Men with Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 4-Year Results from the CombAT Study. Eur Urol. 2010; 57: 123-131

25.Roehrborn CG, Schwinn DA. Alpha1-adrenergic receptors and their inhibitors in lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2004;171: 1029-1035

26.Michel MC. Potential role of a1-adrenoceptor subtypes in the aetiology of LUTS. Eur Urol Suppl. 2002;1:5-13.

27.Kortmann BB, Floratos DL, Kiemeney LA,Wijkstra H, de la Rosette JJ. Urodynamic effects of alpha-adrenoceptor blockers: a review of clinical trials. Urology. 2003;62:1-9

28.Andersson KE. The concept of uroselectivity. Eur Urol Suppl. 1998;33:7-11

29.Kirby RS, Andersen M, Gratzke P, Dahlstrand C, Hoye K. A combined analysis of double-blind trials of the efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin-gastrointestinal therapeutic system, doxazosin standard and placebo in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2001;87:192-200

30.van Kerrebroeck P, Jardin A, Laval KU, van Cangh P. Efficacy and safety of a new prolonged release formulation of alfuzosin 10 mg once daily versus alfuzosin 2.5 mg thrice daily and placebo in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. ALFORTI Study Group. Eur Urol. 2000;37:306-313

31.Wilt TJ, Howe RW, Rutks IR, MacDonald R. Terazosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD003851; 2002

32.Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Nelson D. Tamsulosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms compatible with benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review of efficacy and adverse effects. J Urol. 2002;167:177-183

33.Milani S, Djavan B. Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: latest update on alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists. BJU Int. 2005;95(suppl 4): 29-36

34.Djavan B, Marberger M. A meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol. 1999;36:1-13

35.Narayan P,Tunuguntla HS.Long-term efficacy and safety of tamsulosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol. 2005;7(suppl 4):S42-S48

36.Na YJ, Guo YL, Gu FL. Clinical comparison of selective and non-selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonists for bladder outlet obstruction associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia: studies on tamsulosin and terazosin in Chinese patients. The Chinese Tamsulosin Study Group. J Med. 1998;29:289-304

37.Lee E, Lee C. Clinical comparison of selective and nonselective alpha 1A-adrenoreceptor antagonists in benign prostatic hyperplasia: studies on tamsulosin in a fixed dose and terazosin in increasing doses.Br J Urol.1997;80: 606-611

38.Barendrecht MM, Koopmans RP, de la Rosette JJ, Michel MC. Treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: the cardiovascular system. BJU Int. 2005;95(suppl 4):19-28

39.Wilson JD, Griffin JE, Russell DW. Steroid 5 alphareductase 2 deficiency. Endocr Rev. 1993;14:577-593

40.Russell DW, Wilson JD. Steroid 5 alpha-reductase: two genes/two enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:25-61

41.Randall VA. Role of 5 alpha-reductase in health and disease. Baillières Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;8:405-431

42.Andersson S, Berman DM, Jenkins EP, Russell DW. Deletion of steroid 5 alpha-reductase 2 gene in male pseudohermaphroditism. Nature. 1991;354:159-161

43.Gormley GJ, Stoner E, Bruskewitz RC, et al. The effect of finasteride in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia the finasteride study group. N Engl J Med. 992;327:1185-1191

44.Debruyne FM, Jardin A, Colloi D, et al. Sustained-release alfuzosin, finasteride and the combination of both in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. European ALFIN Study Group. Eur Urol. 1998;34:169-175

45.Lepor H, Williford WO, Barry MJ, et al. The efficacy of terazosin, finasteride, or both in benign prostatic hyperplasia veterans affairs cooperative studies benign prostatic hyperplasia study group. N Engl J Med. 1996;335: 533-539

46.Kirby RS,Roehrborn C,Boyle P,et al.Efficacy and tolerability of doxazosin and finasteride, alone or in combination, in treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: The Prospective European Doxazosin and Combination Therapy (PREDICT) trial. Urology. 2003;61:119-126

47.Kaplan SA, McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, et al. Combination therapy with doxazosin and finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and a baseline total prostate volume of 25 ml or greater. J Urol. 2006;175:217-220; discussion 220-221

48.Crawford ED, Wilson SS, McConnell JD, et al. Baseline factors as predictors of clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men treated with placebo. J Urol. 2006;175:1422-1426; discussion 1426-1427

49.Gormley GJ, Ng J, Cook T, Stoner E, Guess H, Walsh P. Effect of finasteride on prostate-specific antigen density. Urology. 1994;43:53-58; discussion 58-59

50.Lowe FC, Batista J, Berges R, et al. Risk factors for disease progression in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH): a systematic analysis of expert opinion. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005;8:206-209

51.Lee JY, Kim HW, Lee SJ, Koh JS, Suh HJ, Chancellor MB. Comparison of doxazosin with or without tolterodine in men with symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction and an overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2004;94:817-820

52.Abrams P, Kaplan S, De Koning Gans HJ, Millard R. Safety

and tolerability of tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder in men with bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. 2006;175:999-1004; discussion 1004

53.Kaplan SA, Roehrborn CG, Rovner ES, Carlsson M, Bavendam T, Guan Z. Tolterodine and tamsulosin for treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2319-2328

371

BEnign Prostatic HyPErPlasia (BPH)

54.Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, Peters PC. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol. 1989; 141:243-247

55.Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) – incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006;50:969-979; discussion 980

56.Hon NH, Brathwaite D, Hussain Z, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostate resection with PlasmaKinetic vaporization of the prostate: physiological changes, early complications and long-term followup. J Urol. 2006;176: 205-209

57.Boyle P, Robertson C, Vaughan ED, Fitzpatrick JM. A meta-analysis of trials of transurethral needle ablation for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int. 2004;94:83-88

58.Wagrell L, Schelin S, Nordling J, et al. Three-year followup of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP

for clinical BPH: a prospective randomized multicenter study. Urology. 2004;64:698-702

59.Vesely S, Knutson T, Damber JE, Dicuio M, Dahlstrand C. TURP and low-energy TUMT treatment in men with LUTS suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction selected by means of pressure-flow studies: 8-year follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25:770-775

60.Hoffman RM, MacDonald R, Monga M, Wilt TJ. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy vs transurethral resection for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2004;94:1031-1036

61.Naspro R, Bachmann A, Gilling P, et al. A review of the recent evidence (2006–2008) for 532-nm photoselective laser vaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1345-1357

62.Vela-Navarrete R, Gonzalez-Enguita C, Garcia-Cardoso JV, Manzarbeitia F, Sarasa-Corral JL, Granizo JJ. The impact of medical therapy on surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a study comparing changes in a decade (1992–2002). BJU Int. 2005;96:1045-1048