Добавил:
shahzodbeknormurodov27@gmail.com Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Practical Urology ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
27.08.2022
Размер:
25.91 Mб
Скачать

515

BladdEr cancEr

if resection was performed using PDD. Residual

Another important prognostic factor, besides

tumor rates varied from 25% to 53.1% for white

stage, is grade. The 1973 World Health Organi-

light resection and 4.5–32.7% for PDD-assisted

sation (WHO) grading system is most commonly

resection.18-20 The benefit of PDD in terms of

used for this.23 This system discriminates well

progression rates and survival still has to be

differentiated (G1), moderately differentiated

established in larger randomized trials.

(G2),and poorly differentiated (G3) UCC.In 2004,

 

the WHO and International Society of Urological

Immediate Postoperative Intravesical

Pathology (ISUP) published a new grading sys-

tem in an attempt to reduce the interobserver

Chemotherapy

variability, frequently encountered in the 1973

Administration of a single intravesical instilla-

system.24 This system differentiates between pap-

illary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant

tion of chemotherapy after TUR decreases the

potential (PUNLMP) and low-grade or high-

risk of tumor recurrence by 39% in patients

grade UCC. The PUNLMP lesions lack the cyto-

with Ta or T1 bladder cancer and is therefore

logical features of malignancy, but the cells do

recommended in all patients with NMIBC.21

show a papillary configuration. Until the system

Mitomycin C (MMC) and Epirubicin are most

is validated by more clinical trials, it is recom-

commonly used and are comparable with regard

mended to use it together with the 1973 system.

to efficacy. Timing is important though; the

The two systems are compared in Fig. 37.2.

instillation should preferably be administered

 

within 24 h following TUR. In case of bladder

Re-TUR

perforation or extensive TUR, it should not be

administered due to the risk of local and sys-

It has been demonstrated that bladder tumors

temic complications. The rationale behind the

may be understaged based on the specimen

immediate postoperative instillation is to eradi-

obtained from the initial TUR25 and there is a

cate microscopic tumor left behind or to destroy

substantial risk of residual tumor after the ini-

circulating tumor cells that could implant at

tial TUR.17 To improve pathologic accuracy and

sites where the urothelium has been damaged,

to increase local tumor control, a second or re-

both factors that are believed to be responsible

TUR can be performed.25 Re-TUR should be

for early recurrences.

considered in case of incomplete first resection,

 

Pathology

for example, in multiple or large tumors or when

muscular tissue was not present in the pathol-

Pathologic stage is one of the most important

ogy specimen. Furthermore, it is recommended

in case of high grade Ta or any T1 bladder

prognostic factors for bladder cancer. Accurate

tumor(s).10 Preferably, the re-TUR should be

staging is therefore essential, since this highly

performed 2–6 weeks after the initial TUR. It

influences patient management. The 2002

has been shown that by doing so,the recurrence-

TNM classification proposed by the Union

free survival can be increased.26

International Contre le Cancer (UICC) is the

 

most frequently used system for staging of

 

bladder cancer (Table 37.1).22 Stage Ta, T1, and

NMIBC and Risk Groups

Tis (CIS) are grouped as NMIBC, whereas

stages T2, T3, and T4 are grouped as muscle-

 

invasive bladder cancer. The old terminology

After primary treatment, approximately 15–70%

of “superficial” bladder cancer suggests a non-

of patients with NMIBC will develop recurrent

aggressive biology and should be avoided since

disease in the first year and 7–40% will progress

some NMIBCs do behave aggressively. CIS is a

to muscle-invasive disease in the first 5 years.

flat, high-grade noninvasive UCC and is a

Many studies have been conducted to identify

highly malignant entity. Of all primary UCCs,

prognostic factors for recurrence and progres-

approximately 70–80% presents as NMIBC and

sion to muscle-invasive disease in patients with

the remainder as muscle-invasive disease.

NMIBC, with sometimes conflicting results. The

Among the NMIBC, 70% present as Ta lesions,

EORTC-GU group has conducted a multivariate

20% as T1, and 10% as CIS.

analysis on prognostic factors in 2,596 patients

516

Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE

Table 37.1. 2002 tnM classification of urinary bladder cancer

Primary tumor (t)

 

 

tX

Primary tumor cannot be assessed

t0

no evidence of primary tumor

ta

noninvasive papillary carcinoma

tis

carcinoma in situ:“flat tumor”

t1

tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue

t2

tumor invades muscle

 

t2a

tumor invades superficial muscle (inner half)

 

t2b

tumor invades deep muscle (outer half)

t3

tumor invades perivesical tissue

 

t3a

Microscopically

 

t3b

Macroscopically

t4

tumor invades any of the following: prostate, uterus, vagina, pelvic wall, abdominal wall

 

t4a

tumor invades prostate, uterus, or vagina

 

t4b

tumor invades pelvic wall or abdominal wall

regional lymph nodes (n)

 

regional nodes are those within the true pelvis; all others are distant lymph nodes.

nX

regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed

n0

no evidence of regional lymph node metastasis

n1

Metastasis in a single lymph node 2 cm or less in greatest dimension

n2

Metastasis in a single lymph node, more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension;

 

or multiple lymph nodes, none greater than 5 cm in greatest dimension

n3

Metastasis in a lymph node, more than 5 cm in greatest dimension

distant metastasis (M)

 

 

MX

distant metastasis cannot be assessed

M0

no evidence of distant metastasis

M1

distant metastasis

Source: Reprinted from AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook, 6th ed, p. 369.

with primary NMIBC in order to develop tables to calculate the risk of recurrence and progression in an individual patient.27 This analysis revealed that the most important prognostic factors for recurrence were number of tumors, tumor size, and prior recurrence rate, whereas the most important prognostic factors for progression were stage, presence of concomitant CIS, and grade. A scoring system was developed based on these six factors, in order to calculate the total scores for recurrence and progression

in an individual patient (Table 37.2). These total scores correspond to a certain risk for recurrence and progression at 1 and 5 years (Table 37.3). Based on these risk tables, low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups can be defined (last column of Table 37.3). These individualized risk tables can help the urologist in making management decisions. However, these risk tables have not yet been validated externally. Furthermore, 20% of patients from the analysis initially received no treatment, less than

517

BladdEr cancEr

PUNLMP

 

Low grade

 

High grade

WHO 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grade 1

 

Grade 2

 

Grade 3

WHO 1973

Figure 37.2. Histologic spectrum of Ucc, comparison of the WHo 1973 and WHo 2004 grading systems.

Table 37.2. Eortc risk tables for nMiBc: weights used to calculate the recurrence and progression scores

Factor

Recurrence

Progression

number of tumors

 

 

single

0

0

2–7

3

3

³8

6

3

tumor size

 

 

<3 cm

0

0

³3 cm

3

3

Prior recurrence rate

 

 

Primary

0

0

£1 recurrence/year

2

2

>1 recurrence/year

4

2

t category

 

 

ta

0

0

t1

1

4

cis

 

 

no

0

0

yes

1

6

grade

 

 

g1

0

0

g2

1

0

g3

2

5

total score

0–17

0–23

10% received an immediate instillation of chemotherapy, a re-TUR was not performed in high-risk patients, and BCG was given without maintenance instillations. Therefore, the predicted recurrence and progression rates of the risk tables might be higher compared to current clinical practice.

Who Needs Adjuvant Therapy

in NMIBC?

The need for adjuvant intravesical instillations depends on the patient’s risk of recurrence and progression to muscle-invasive disease. In patients with a low risk of recurrence and progression, no further adjuvant treatment is recommended following one immediate adjuvant instillation following TURB. In patients with a high risk of progression, that is, those with a high-grade tumor or CIS, further adjuvant treatment with intravesical immunotherapy is recommended.For the remaining intermediate-risk patients, either further intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy is recommended.10,28

Intravesical Chemotherapy

Adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy reduces the risk of recurrence with 14–26%, but not the risk of progression or survival.29 There are no differences in efficacy between the available intravesical chemotherapeutic agents whereas side-effects are mostly mild and transient (Table 37.4). Despite the large amount of research on adjuvant

518

Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE

Table 37.3. Eortc risk tables for nMiBc: probability of recurrence and progression according to total score

Recurrence score

Prob recurrence 1 year (95% CI)

Prob recurrence 5 years (95% CI)

Risk group

0

15% (10–19%)

31% (24–37%)

low

1–4

24% (21–26%)

46% (42–49%)

intermediate

5–9

38% (35–41%)

62% (58–65%)

intermediate

10–17

61% (55–67%)

78% (73–84%)

High

Progression score

Prob progression 1 year (95% CI)

Prob progression 5 years (95% CI)

Risk group

0

0.2% (0–0.7%)

0.8% (0–1.7%)

low

2–6

1.0% (0.4–1.6%)

6% (5–8%)

intermediate

7–13

5% (4–7%)

17% (14–20%)

High

14–23

17% (10–24%)

45% (35–55%)

High

intravesical chemotherapy, the optimal dose, schedule, and duration of treatment have not yet been determined. It seems that long-term instillations, for example, during more than 1 year, only outperform short-term instillations when an immediate postoperative instillation was not administered.35

Intravesical Immunotherapy

Intravesical administration of bacille CalmetteGuérin (BCG), a live attenuated strain of Mycobacterium bovis, causes an inflammatory immunologic response in patients with NMIBC.36 In bladder cancer patients at high risk of tumor recurrence, intravesical BCG instillations reduce recurrence risk significantly (31% reduction compared to MMC). In patients at low risk of recurrence, this effect was not observed.37 In all patients with CIS,Ta,and T1 bladder cancer,BCG instillations reduce the risk of progression to muscle-invasive disease equally (a reduction of 37% in the odds of progression), but only when a form of maintenance instillations has been given.38 Compared to intravesical chemotherapy, BCG induces greater toxicity37 (Table 37.4). Of all patients receiving BCG instillations, approximately 11% have to stop treatment due to mild side effects (irritative bladder symptoms, hematuria) and approximately 5% due to severe side effects (fever, BCG-induced lung infection, liver toxicity, sepsis).32 The optimal dose of BCG has not yet been defined, nor the optimal schedule of

instillations. An induction course of 6 weekly instillations is advised, but the maintenance schedules vary widely. The South-West Oncology Group proposed maintenance schedule of 3 weekly instillations at3,6,12,18,24,35 and 36 months is generally used. BCG is indicated in patients at high risk of progression and is the first-line treatment in patients with CIS. In intermediate-risk patients either BCG or chemotherapy can be administered.10

Immediate Cystectomy and CIS

Cystectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with CIS not responding to adequate BCG treatment.10 The timing of cystectomy remains a challenge and is still controversial. There are no prospective trials comparing immediate cystectomy with BCG, but for some patients immediate cystectomy will be overtreatment.39 Immediate cystectomy after TUR as primary treatment option for CIS patients is advised especially in case of concomitant highgrade papillary tumors.

New Developments: Intravesical

Chemotherapy

Gemcitabine, a chemotherapeutic agent applied systemically for muscle-invasive disease, has been studied for intravesical instillation in patients with NMIBC. The drug is well tolerated

519

BladdEr cancEr

Table 37.4. overview of side effects of the most common used intravesical chemoand immunotherapeutic agents

Intravesical agent

Side effects

Incidence

Recommendations for management

Epirubicin30

chemical cystitis

13–56%

consider anticholinergics, if severe postpone

 

 

 

instillation

Mitomycin c30,31

chemical cystitis

3–40%

consider anticholinergics, if severe postpone

 

 

 

instillation

 

Eczema-like desquamation of

4–16%

careful cleaning of hands/genitalia after

 

the skin (mainly palms,

 

voiding (prevention)

 

soles, perineum, chest, face)

 

stop further instillations

 

 

 

Bcg30,32-34

Local:

 

 

 

Bcg-induced cystitis

6–95%

consider acetaminophen and anticholinergics ,

 

 

 

postpone instillation and consider

 

 

 

prophylactic ofloxacina

 

Bacterial cystitis

26%

antibiotics, postpone instillation

 

Urinary frequency

31%

consider anticholinergics or prophylactic

 

 

 

ofloxacina

 

Macroscopic hematuria

1–40%

Postpone instillation until hematuria resolves

 

contracted bladder

<1%

stop further Bcg, hydrodistention

 

Systemic:

 

 

 

Fever (³39°c)

2–17%

antipyretics, postpone instillation until

 

 

 

resolution of symptoms consider Bcg dose

 

 

 

reduction + prophylactic inHb

 

influenza-like symptoms

23%

antipyretics, postpone instillation until

 

 

 

resolution of symptoms

 

skin rash and/or joint pain

0.3–3.3%

antihistamins and/or nsaids, postpone

 

 

 

instillation until resolution of symptoms,

 

 

 

consider Bcg dose reduction + prophylactic

 

 

 

inHb

 

Bcg-induced lung infection

<1%

Hospitalization, fluids, inHb, rFPc and

 

 

 

ethambutold for at least 6 months. stop

 

 

 

further Bcg

 

liver toxicity

<1%

Hospitalization, fluids, inHb, rFPc and

 

 

 

ethambutold for at least 6 months. stop

 

 

 

further Bcg

 

Bcg sepsis

<1%

Hospitalization, inHb, rFPc and ethambutold for

 

 

 

at least 6 months, prednisolone. stop

 

 

 

further Bcg

aofloxacin: 200 mg.

binH (isoniazid): 300 mg once daily.

crFP (rifampicin): 600 mg once daily.

dEthambutol: 1,200 mg once daily.