Добавил:
shahzodbeknormurodov27@gmail.com Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Practical Urology ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Скачиваний:
12
Добавлен:
27.08.2022
Размер:
25.91 Mб
Скачать

535

ProstatE cancEr

Treatment for Advanced Prostate

3 week course of docetaxel.45 Data regarding the

 

 

Cancer

 

use of bisphosphonates in androgen-independent

 

prostate cancer are conflicting, although a phase

 

 

III trial of zoledronic acid demonstrated a reduc-

Androgen-Deprivation Therapy

tion in skeletal-related events, but no improve-

ment in quality of life. There is not a well-defined

 

 

Deprivation of androgen stimulation is central

role for zoledronic acid in men with androgen-

to the first-line management of advanced (e.g.,

dependent prostate cancer, although these men

metastatic) prostate cancer. Several methods

are at higher risk for osteoporosis. Oral bisphos-

exist for androgen deprivation, including bilat-

phonates may be a consideration in these patients,

eral orchiectomy, LHRH agonists, and androgen

although level I evidence is lacking in this clinical

receptor blockade (antiandrogens). With the

setting.

rise of potent LHRH agonists and antiandro-

 

gens, surgical castration has rapidly been

Summary

tion of choice in this setting. LHRH agonists,

replaced by medical castration as the interven-

 

such as goserelin and leuprolide cause a decline

Treatment of prostate cancer is an enterprise

in testosterone levels by interfering with the

which mandates careful understanding of dis-

normal pulsatile secretion of LHRH. However, a

ease characteristics (aggressive versus indolent)

transient rise in testosterone occurs with initi-

as well as underlying patient health status.

ation of these agents, so nonsteroidal antian-

Quality-of-life considerations should also play

drogens (i.e.,

flutamide or bicalutamide) are

an important role in counseling patients regard-

frequently administered prior to initiation of

ing treatment options. Many treatment options

LRHR agonists. Conflicting data exist over

are available for the patient at all disease stages,

whether combined androgen blockade (LHRH

and clinicians should be familiar with these

agonist plus

a nonsteroidal antiandrogen)

options to enhance patient care.

improves outcomes. The most recent American

 

Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines

References

note that consideration of combined androgen

 

blockade may be considered instead of mono-

 

therapy with an LHRH agonist.44 For metastatic

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, and Ward E. Cancer statistics,

disease, initiation of immediate ADT, rather

2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277

than symptom-onset ADT, offers no overall sur-

2. Ries L, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer

vival advantage due to an offset of increased

Statistics Review, 1975–2004. Bethesda, MD: National

prostate cancer-specific survival by a decrease

Cancer Institute; 2007

in overall mortality.44 Thus, ASCO does not spe-

3. Quinn M, Babb P. Patterns and trends in prostate cancer

cifically endorse early initiation of ADT,although

incidence, survival, prevalence and mortality Part II:

individual countries. BJU Int. 2002;90:174

this may be considered for men at high risk

4. Quinn M, Babb P. Patterns and trends in prostate cancer

based on PSA kinetics or other parameters.44

incidence, survival, prevalence and mortality Part I:

 

 

international comparisons. BJU Int. 2002;90:162

Chemotherapy for Androgen-

5. Bratt O. Hereditary prostate cancer: clinical aspects.

J Urol. 2002;168:906

Independent Prostate Cancer

6. Bratt O, Damber JE, Emanuelsson M, et al. Hereditary

prostate cancer: clinical characteristics and survival.

Somemenwithmetastaticprostatecancerdevelop

J Urol. 2002;167:2423

7. Zheng SL, Sun J,Wiklund F, et al. Cumulative association

progressive disease on androgen-deprivation

of five genetic variants with prostate cancer. N Engl J

therapy, which has been termed androgen-

Med. 2008;358:910

independent prostate cancer. While many treat-

8. Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, et al. The influ-

ment options exist in this area (i.e., second-line

ence of finasteride on the development of prostate can-

hormonal therapy), the most definitive evidence

cer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:215

9. Lippman SM, Klein EA, Goodman PJ. Effect of selenium

supports the use of docetaxel-based chemoth-

and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other can-

erapy. Randomized controlled trials suggest a

cers: the selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial

2–3 month survival advantage with the use of a

(SELECT). JAMA. 2009;30(1):39-51

536

Practical Urology: EssEntial PrinciPlEs and PracticE

10.Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, et al. Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. JAMA. 2005;294:66

11.Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2239

12.Etzioni R, Penson DF, Legler JM, et al. Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:981

13.Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, et al. Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:868

14.de Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, et al. Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer. 2002; 97:237

15.de Koning HJ, Liem MK, Baan CA, et al. Prostate cancer mortality reduction by screening: power and time frame with complete enrollment in the European Randomised Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial.Int J Cancer. 2002;98:268

16.Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, et al. The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:251S

17.Prostate cancer early detection. Practice guidelines in oncology. NCC Network. 2007. Published online by NCCN. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_ gls/PDF/prostate_detection.pdf

18.Andriole GL, Grubb RL III, Buys SS, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1310

19.Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320

20.Lu-Yao G, Stukel TA, Yao SL. Prostate-specific antigen screening in elderly men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1792

21.Scales CD Jr, Curtis LH, Norris RD, et al. Prostate specific antigen testing in men older than 75 years in the United States. J Urol. 2006;176:511

22.Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, et al. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006;296:2336

23.Deras IL, Aubin SM, Blase A, et al. PCA3: a molecular

urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome.

J Urol. 2008;179:1587

24.Sokoll LJ, Ellis W, Lange P, et al. A multicenter evaluation of the PCA3 molecular urine test: pre-analytical effects, analytical performance, and diagnostic accuracy. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;389:1

25.American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Chicago, IL: American Joint Committee on Cancer; 2002

26.Partin AW, Yoo J, Carter HB, et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to pre-

dict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 1993;150:110

27.Partin AW, Kattan MW, Subong EN, et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA. 1997;277: 1445

28.Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, et al. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium. Urology. 2001;58:843

29.D’Amico AV, Moul J, Carroll PR, et al. Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2163

30.D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969

31.Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1499

32.Albertsen PA, Hanley JA, Fine J. 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:2095-2101

33.D’Amico AV, Chen MH, Roehl KA, et al. Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:125

34.D’Amico AV,Renshaw AA,Sussman B,et al.Pretreatment PSA velocity and risk of death from prostate cancer following external beam radiation therapy. JAMA. 2005;294:440

35.Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol. 2007;177:2106

36.Burnett AL, Aus G, Canby-Hagino ED, et al. Erectile function outcome reporting after clinically localized prostate cancer treatment. J Urol. 2007;178:597

37.Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, et al. Utilization and out-

comes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2278

38.Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294:1233

39.Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American urological association prostate guidelines for localized prostate cancer update panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007;177:540

40.Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2005;294:433

41.Moul JW, Wu H, Sun L, et al. Early versus delayed hormonal therapy for prostate specific antigen only recur-

rence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:S53

537

ProstatE cancEr

42.Moul JW, Wu H, Sun L, et al. Early versus delayed hormonal therapy for prostate specific antigen only recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2004;171:1141

43.Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Death in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: prostate-specific antigen doubling time subgroups and their associated contributions to allcause mortality. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1765

44.Loblaw DA, Virgo KS, Nam R, et al. Initial hormonal management of androgen-sensitive metastatic, recurrent, or progressive prostate cancer: 2006 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1596

45.Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351: 1502-1512