- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgements
- •Table of contents
- •Executive summary
- •Introduction
- •Purpose and scope
- •Structure of the report
- •Definitions
- •Classification of rail transport services
- •Key parameters
- •Data sources
- •References
- •1. Status of rail transport
- •Highlights
- •Introduction
- •Rail transport networks
- •Urban rail network
- •Conventional rail network for passenger and freight services
- •High-speed rail network
- •Rail transport activity
- •Passenger rail
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •What shapes rail transport?
- •Passenger rail
- •Freight rail
- •Rail transport and the energy sector
- •Energy demand from rail transport
- •Energy intensity of rail transport services
- •GHG emissions and local pollutants
- •Well-to-wheel GHG emissions in rail transport
- •Additional emissions: Looking at rail from a life-cycle perspective
- •High-speed rail
- •Urban rail
- •Freight rail
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Rail network developments
- •Rail transport activity
- •Passenger rail
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •Implications for energy demand
- •Implications for GHG emissions and local pollutants
- •Direct CO2 emissions
- •Well-to-wheel GHG emissions
- •Emissions of local pollutants
- •References
- •3. High Rail Scenario: Unlocking the Benefits of Rail
- •Highlights
- •Introduction
- •Motivations for increasing the role of rail transport
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •Trends in the High Rail Scenario
- •Main assumptions
- •Rail network developments in the High Rail Scenario
- •Rail transport activity
- •Passenger rail in the High Rail Scenario
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail in the High Rail Scenario
- •Implications for energy demand
- •Implications for GHG emissions and local pollutants
- •Direct CO2 emissions in the High Rail Scenario
- •Well-to-wheel GHG emissions
- •Investment requirements in the High Rail Scenario
- •Fuel expenditure
- •Policy opportunities to promote rail
- •Passenger rail
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional and high-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •Conclusions
- •4. Focus on India
- •Highlights
- •Introduction
- •Status of rail transport
- •Passenger rail
- •Urban rail
- •Conventional passenger rail
- •High-speed rail
- •Freight rail
- •Dedicated freight corridors
- •Rail transport energy demand and emissions
- •Energy demand from rail transport
- •GHG emissions and local pollutants
- •Outlook for rail to 2050
- •Outlook for rail in the Base Scenario
- •Context
- •Trends in the Base Scenario
- •Passenger rail
- •Freight rail
- •Implications for energy demand
- •Implications for GHG and local pollutant emissions
- •Outlook for rail in the High Rail Scenario
- •Key assumptions
- •Trends in the High Rail Scenario
- •Passenger and freight rail activity
- •Implications for energy demand
- •Implications for GHG and local pollutant emissions
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Acronyms, abbreviations and units of measure
- •Acronyms and abbreviations
- •Units of measure
- •Glossary
The Future of Rail
Opportunities for energy and the environment
IEA 2019. All rights reserved.
In India, urban transport is regulated at the state level, with states and union territories in charge of planning and developing urban transport systems. For urban metro systems, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) is in charge of central regulation and planning, while states, cities or private entities (in some cases jointly) are in charge of operations and business development. MoR is in charge of safety and standards issues.
The National Transport Development Policy Committee (NTDPC) of India has suggested Page | 134 organisational reforms in IR in the interest of sustaining economic growth in India (NTDPC, 2014). It has recommended an institutional separation of the policy, regulatory and management roles that are currently performed by the Railway Board. The recommended structure would give competence on policy development to the MoR, while a new authority would be responsible for technical regulations and a corporation would be in charge of
operation and management (MoR, 2015).
IEA 2019. All rights reserved.
Status of rail transport
Between 2000 and 2016, passenger activity (measured in passenger-kilometres) on India’s railways increased by 200% and freight activity (in tonne-kilometres) by 150% (Figure 4.2). Despite growing more slowly than rail activity growth, track length has increased and tracks have been upgraded to permit higher speeds and heavier axle load operation. As of 2017, approximately 22 million passengers and 3 million tonnes (Mt) of goods were moved by conventional rail every day (Indian Railways, 2018b), using a fleet of nearly 11 500 locomotives (over 6 000 diesel and nearly 5 400 electric locomotives, the remainder being steam-powered), nearly 55 500 conventional passenger coaches and 278 000 freight wagons.
Although growth in recent years has been impressive, road passenger and freight activity has increased at a faster pace and, as is occurring in many other countries, competition from aviation has been intensifying (NTDPC, 2014). The result has been a gradual decrease in the share of rail in passenger and freight activity (Figure 4.2).
Figure 4.2 Evolution of passenger and freight rail transport activity and share in transport sector in India, 2000-17
1 500 |
|
|
Passenger activity |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
800 |
|
Freight activity |
1.2 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
km-passengerBillion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indexshareModal |
km-tonneBillion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indexshareModal |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1 200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
||
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
2000 |
2005 |
2010 |
2015 |
2017 |
|
|
2000 |
2005 |
2010 |
2015 |
2017 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Evolution of modal share (2000=1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: IEA based on Indian Railways (2018b) and MoRTH (2017).
Key message • Passenger and freight railway activity in India has steadily increased over time, but at a slower rate than transport by other modes, decreasing the rail modal share.
One reason for the decline in modal share is that the rail network in India has undergone limited expansion over the last 60 years (Planning Commission, 2013). Whereas the total length of national road highways increased by 75% between 2000 and 2015 (MoRTH, 2017), while rail