- •Foreign Language Department language of science
- •Tyumen - 2002
- •Кафедра Иностранных Языков Язык Науки
- •Тюмень-2002 contents
- •Программа разработана
- •Раздел 1
- •Требования по видам речевой коммуникации
- •Виды чтения:
- •Языковой материал
- •Английский язык
- •Французский язык
- •Содержание и структура кандидатского экзамена по иностранному языку
- •Рекомендуемая структура экзамена
- •Раздел 2
- •Методические указания
- •К программе кандидатского экзамена
- •По иностранному языку
- •Английский язык
- •Немецкий язык
- •Французский язык
- •My biography and research work
- •New Webster’s Dictionary definitions
- •Expressions for summarizing or annotating
- •Основные разделы реферата текста
- •Text work: lexis and expressions for oral and written presentation
- •Texts for synopsis on arts and culture
- •Sample sinopsi of the texts
- •It is underlined that Constable's finances were in a bad way for a long time. Constable had to paint portrait commissions though he was a landscape-painter.
- •In the end the article reports the way Constable was elected to full membership of the Royal Academy.
- •It is underlined that portraiture was the heart in British painting in that period.
- •It's interesting to note that a reason of the Hogarth creative activity was his rivalry other painters who lived the same period.
- •In the end the author reports that Hogarth won recognition of Society. He was appointed Sergeant-Painter to the King. It was an honorary and privileged position.
- •In the end the author points out that in the opinion of Reynolds Gainsborough was an outstanding painter and was very good at forming all the parts of a picture together.
- •In conclusion it's interesting to note that Turner was a landscape-painter and especially he tried to convey the dramatic possibilities of natural phenomena.
- •In the end the author underlines that Reynolds was a gifted man not only in the field of painting. He delivered his annual Discourses to the students of the Academy and he founded the Literary Club.
- •1. The concept of culture
- •2. The development of social responses
- •3. Attachment and loss
- •4. Isolated monkeys
- •5. Deprivation in human infants
- •6. Long-term influences
- •7.The socialisation of the infant
- •8. Theories of child development
- •Freud and psychoanalysis
- •Personality development
- •Criticisms
- •The theory of g.H.Mead
- •9. Piaget: cognitive development
- •10. The stages of cognitive development
- •Criticisms
- •12. Connections between the theories
- •Texts on philosophy
- •Western Philosophical Concepts of God
- •Renй Descartes (1596-1650)
- •Tне infinitive
- •Bare Infinitive
- •Exercises
- •Exercises
- •Infinitive in parenthetical phrases
- •The gerund
- •I regret telling him about it.
- •I am fond of reading.
- •Exercises
- •Participle I
- •Asking that question he did not want to offend me
- •Perfect
- •I hate you talking like that.
- •It being a hot day, they went to the river.
- •Exercises
- •Participle II
- •If asked he always helped me.
- •When did you have your hair cut?
- •I want the letter posted at once. Exercises
- •Russian-english dictionary
9. Piaget: cognitive development
The influence of Jean Piaget’s work has been not far short of that of Freud. Born in Switzerland in 1896, Piaget spent most of his life directing an institute of child development in Geneva. He published an extraordinary number of books and scientific papers, not just on child development, but on education, the history of thought, philosophy and logic. He continued his prodigious output right up to his death in 1980.
Although Freud gave so much importance to infancy, he never studied children directly. His theory was developed on the basis if observations made in the coursse of treating his adult patients in psychotherapy. Mead did not study children’s behaviour either, working out his ideas in the context of philosophical discussion. Piaget, by contrast, spent most of his life observing the behaviour of infants, young children and adolescents. He based mush of his work on the detailed observation of limited numbers of individuals, rather than studying large samples. None the less, he claimed his major findings to be valid for child development in all cultures.
10. The stages of cognitive development
Piaget placed great emphasis on the child’s ability actively to make sense of the world. Children do not passively soak up information, but select and interpret what they see, hear and feel in the world around them. From his observations of children and the numerous experiments he conducted on their ways of thinking, he concluded that human beings go through several distinct stages of cognitive development – that is, learning to think about themselves and their environment. Each stage involves the acquisition of new skills and depends on the successful completion of the preceding one.
The first stage is the sensorimotor, which lasts from birth up to about age two. Until aged about four months, an infant cannot differentiate itself from the environment. For example. The child does not realize that its own movements cause the sides of its cot to rattle. Objects are not differentiated from persons, and the infant is unaware that anything exists outside the range of its vision. As research we have already looked at shows, infants gradually learn to distinguish people from objects, coming to see that both have an existence independent of their immediate perceptions. Piaget calls this early stage sensorimotor because infants learn mainly by touching objects, manipulating them and physically exploring their environment. The main accomplishment of this stage is that by its close the child understands its environment to have distinctive and stable properties.
The next phase, called the pre-operational stage, is the one to which Piaget devoted the bulk of his research. This stage lasts from age two to age seven, when children acquire a mastery of language and become able to use words to represent objects and images in a symbolic fashion. A four-year-old might use a sweeping hand, for example, to represent the concept ‘aeroplane’. Piaget terms the stage pre-operational because children are not yet able to use their developing mental capabilities systematically. Children in this stage are egocentric. As Piaget uses it, this concept does not refer to selfishness, but to the tendency of the child to interpret the world exclusively in terms of its own position. She or he does not understand, for instance, that others see objects from a different perspective from her or his own. Holding a book upright, the child may ask a picture in it, not realizing that the person sitting opposite can only see the back of the book.
Children at the pre-operational stage are not able to hold connected conversations with someone else. In egocentric speech, what each child says is more or less unrelated to what the previous speakers said. Children talk together, but not to one another in the same sense as adults. During this phase of development, children have no general understanding of categories of thought that adults tend to take for granted: concepts such as causality, speed, weight or number. Even if the child sees water poured from a tall, thin container into a shorter, wider one, he or she will not understand that the volume of water remains the same – concluding that there is less water, because the water level is lower.
A third stage, the concrete operational period, lasts from ages seven to eleven. During this phase, children master abstract, logical notions. They are able to handle ideas such as causality without much difficulty. A child at this stage of development will recognize the false reasoning involved in the idea that the wide container holds less water than the thin, narrow one, even though the water levels are different. She or he becomes capable of carrying out the mathematical operations of multiplying, dividing and subtracting. Children by this stage are much less egocentric. In the pre-operational stage, if a girl is asked ‘How many sisters have you?’, she may correctly answer ‘one’. But if asked, ‘How many sisters does your sister have?’ she will probably answer ‘nont’, because she cannot see herself from the point of view of her sister. In the concrete operational stage the child is able to answer such a question correctly with ease.
The years from eleven to fifteen cover what Piaget calls the formal operational period. During adolescence, the developing child becomes able to grasp highly abstract and hypothetical ideas. When faced with a problem, children at this stage are able to review all the possible ways of solving it and go through them theoretically in order to reach a solution. The young person at the formal operational stage is able to understand why some sorts of questions are trick ones. To the question ‘What creature are both poodles and dogs?’/ the child might or might not be able to give the correct reply (the answer is ‘poodles’), but he or she will understand why this answer is right and appreciate the humour in it.
According to Piaget, the first three stages of development are universal; but not all adults reach the formal operational stage. The development of formal operational thought depends in part on processes of schooling. Adults of limited educational attainment tend to continue to think in more concrete terms and retain large traces of egocentrism.