Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Vascular_Surgery__Cases__Questions_and_Commentaries__Third_Edition.pdf
Скачиваний:
25
Добавлен:
21.03.2016
Размер:
18.54 Mб
Скачать

406

C.P. Gibbons

 

 

used intraoperatively. Subcutaneous heparin is used postoperatively but not preoperatively as systemic heparinisation is used routinely on aortic clamping. [Q6: A, B, C, F]

In cases where a prosthetic graft has been exposed in the groin or the tissues overlying a femoral anastomosis are deficient, a local muscle flap is wise to protect the new femoral anastomosis. [Q8: D] A sartorius rotation flap may be used provided the graft does not extend in front of the inguinal ligament as in femoral-femoral or axillofemoral grafts.44,45 Gracilis and rectus abdominis flaps or omental pedicles have also been described.4651 A rectus femoris flap is very quick and easy to prepare and will cover any femoral anastomosis with ease.38 In occasional localised low-grade graft infections with exposure of the prosthesis in the groin, a simple muscle flap may be successful without excision of the graft but there is a high rate of recurrent infection.

Despite the magnitude of the procedure, graft replacement with femoral vein gives excellent results with reported mortalities in the region of 10%, amputation rates of 10% and no reinfection. Possible complications include anastomotic haemorrhage, iliac venous thrombosis, limb swelling, seroma, intestinal obstruction and wound infection. Limb swelling usually occurs but is rarely excessive and is easily controlled by elevation provided the profunda femoris vein is preserved and the popliteal vein is not harvested below the knee. Since the deep veins have been excised, lower limb DVT is unlikely. Wound and graft infection or anastomotic haemorrhage is similarly infrequent provided adequate antibiotic cover is used. [Q9: A, D, E, F, G]

Routine duplex surveillance of the aortofemoral vein grafts is wise as late graft stenosis due to intimal hyperplasia is common.38 [Q10: C]

References

1. Seeger JM. Management of patients with prosthetic graft infection. Am Surg. 2000;66: 166-167.

2. Yeager RA, Porter JM. Arterial and prosthetic graft infection. Ann Vasc Surg. 1992;5: 485-491.

3. Naylor AR, Hayes PD, Darke S on behalf of the Joint Vascular Research Group. A prospective audit of complex wound and graft infections in Great Britain and Ireland: the emergence of MRSA. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21:289–294.

4. Nasim A, Thompson MM, Naylor AR, et al. The impact of MRSA on vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;22:211-214.

5. Murphy GJ, Pararajasingam R, Nasim A, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in vascular surgical patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001;83:158-163.

6. Selan L, Pasariello C. Microbiological diagnosis of aortofemoral graft infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14(Suppl A):10-12.

7. HicksRJC,GreenhalghRM.Thepathogenesisofvasculargraftinfection.EurJVascEndovasc Surg. 1997;14(Suppl A):5-9.

8. Calligaro KD, Veith FJ, Schwartz ML, et al. Are Gram-negative bacteria a contraindication to selective preservation of infected prosthetic arterial grafts?. J Vasc Surg. 1992;136:337-345.

9. Orton DF, LeVeen RF, Saigh JA, et al. Aortic prosthetic graft infections: radiologic manifestations and implications for management. RadioGraphics. 2000;20:977-993.

39  Aortofemoral Graft Infection

407

 

 

10.Spartera C, Morettini G, Petrassi C, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of aortic graft healing, perigraft fluid collection, and graft infection. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1990;4:69-73.

11.Liberatore M, Iurilli AP, Ponzo F, et al. Aortofemoral graft infection: the usefulness of 99mTc- HMPAO-labelled leucocyte scan. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14(Suppl A):27-29.

12.Almgren B, Eriksson I. Local antibiotic irrigation in the treatment of arterial graft infections. Acta Chir Scand. 1981;147:33-36.

13.Morris GE, Friend PJ, Vassallo DJ, et al. Antibiotic irrigation and conservative surgery for major aortic graft infection. Vasc Surg. 1994;20:88-95.

14.Voboril R, Weberova J, Kralove H. Successful treatment of infected vascular prosthetic grafts in the groin using conservative therapy with povidone-iodine solution. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18:372-375.

15.Nielsen OM, Noer HH, Jorgensen LG, Lorentzen JE. Gentamicin beads in the treatment of localised vascular graft infection – long term results in 17 cases. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1991;5:283285.

16.Holdsworth J. Treatment of infective and potentially infective complications of vascular bypass grafting using gentamicin with collagen sponge. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81:166170.

17.Bandyk DF, Novotney ML, Johnson BL, et al. Use of rifampicin-soaked gelatin-sealed polyester grafts for in situ treatment of primary aortic and vascular prosthetic infections. J Surg Res. 2001;95:44-49.

18.Naylor AR. Aortic prosthetic infection. Br J Surg. 1999;86:435–436. Hayes PD, Nasim A, London NJM, et al. In situ replacement of infected aortic grafts with rifampicin-bonded prostheses: The Leicester experience (1992–1998). J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:92–98.

19.Zegelman M, Gunther G. Infected grafts require excision and extra-anatomic reconstruction. Against the motion. In: Greenhalgh RM, ed. The evidence for vascular and endovascular reconstruction. London: WB Saunders; 2002:252-258.

20.Batt M, Magne JL, Alric P, et al. In situ revascularization with silver-coated polyester grafts to treat aortic infection: early and midterm results. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:983-989.

21.Hardman S, Cope A, Swann A, et al. An in vitro model to compare the antimicrobial activity of silver-coated versus rifampicin-soaked vascular grafts. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18:308-313.

22.Sardelic F, Ao PY, Taylor DA, Fletcher JP. Prophylaxis against Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular graft infection with rifampicin-soaked, gelatin-sealed Dacron. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;4:389-392.

23.Earnshaw JJ, Whitman B, Heather BP, on behalf of the Joint Vascular Research Group. Twoyear results of a randomized controlled trial of rifampicin-bonded extra-anatomic Dacron grafts. Br J Surg. 2000;87:758–759

24.Vogt PR, Brunner-LaRocca HP, Lachat M, et al. Technical details with the use of cryopreserved arterial allografts for aortic infection: influence on early and midterm mortality. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:80-86.

25.Verhelst R, Lacroix V, Vraux H, et al. Use of cryopreserved arterial homografts for management of infected prosthetic grafts: A multicentre study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2000;14:602-607.

26.Noel AA, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ Jr. United States Cryopreserved Aortic Allograft Registry. Abdominal aortic reconstruction in infected fields: early results of the United States cryopreserved aortic allograft registry. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:847-852.

27.Teebken OE, Pichlmaier MA, Brand S, et al. Cryopreserved arterial allografts for in situ reconstruction of infected arterial vessels. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:597-602.

28.Gabriel M, Pukacki F, Dzieciuchowicz L, et al. Cryopreserved arterial allografts in the treatment of prosthetic graft infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:590-596.

29.Kieffer E, Gomes D, Chiche L, et al. Allograft replacement for infrarenal aortic graft infection: early and late results in 179 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1009-1017.

408

C.P. Gibbons

 

 

30.Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Hernandez JJ, Moore WS. Long-term results following surgical management of aortic graft infection. Arch Surg. 1991;126:507-511.

31.Yeager RA, Taylor LM Jr, Moneta GL, et al. Improved results with conventional management of infrarenal aortic infection. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:76-83.

32.Seeger JM, Pretus HA, Welborn MB, et al. Long-term outcome after treatment of aortic graft infection with staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal. Surgery. 2000;32:451-459.

33.Clagett GP, Valentine RJ, Hagino RT. Autogenous aortoiliac/femoral reconstruction from superficial femoral-popliteal veins: feasibility and durability. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:255-270.

34.Gordon LL, Hagino RT, Jackson MR, et al. Complex aortofemoral prosthetic infections: the role of autogenous superficial femoropopliteal vein reconstruction. Arch Surg. 1999;134:615-621.

35.Nevelsteen A, Lacroix H, Suy R. Autogenous reconstruction with lower extremity deep veins: an alternative treatment of prosthetic infection after reconstructive surgery for aortoiliac disease. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22:129-134.

36.Daenens K, Fourneau I. Nevelsteen a ten-year experience in autogenous reconstruction with the femoral vein in the treatment of aortofemoral prosthetic infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25:240-245.

37.Brown PM, Kim VB, Lalikos JF, et al. Autologous superficial femoral vein for aortic reconstruction in infected fields. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13:32-36.

38.GibbonsCP,FergusonCJ,FligelstoneLJ,EdwardsK.Experiencewithfemoro-poplitealveins as a conduit for vascular reconstruction in infected fields. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25:424-431.

39.Coburn M, Ashworth C, Francis W, et al. Venous stasis complications of the use of the ­superficialfemoralandpoplitealveinsforlowerextremitybypass. JVascSurg.1993;17:10051009.

40.Wells JK, Hagino RT, Bargmann KM, et al. Venous morbidity after superficial femoralpopliteal vein harvest. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:282-291.

41.Modrall JG, Sadjadi J, Ali AT, et al. Deep vein harvest: predicting need for fasciotomy. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:387-394.

42.Nevelsteen A, Baeyens I, Daenens K, et al. Regarding “Deep vein harvest: predicting need for fasciotomy”. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:403.

43.Becquemin JP, Qvarfordt P, Kron J, et al. Aortic graft infection: is there a place for partial graft removal? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14(Suppl A):53-58.

44.Sladen JG, Thompson RP, Brosseuk DT, Kalman PG, Petrasek PF, Martin RD. Sartorius myoplasty in the treatment of exposed arterial grafts. Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;1:113-117.

45.Galland RB. Sartorius transposition in the management of synthetic graft infection. EurJVasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23:175–177. Gomes MN, Spear SL. Pedicled muscle flaps in the management of infected aortofemoral grafts. Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;2:70–77.

46.Thomas WO, Parry SW, Powell RW, et al. Management of exposed inguinofemoral arterial conduits by skeletal muscular rotational flaps. Am Surg. 1994;60:872-880.

47.Meland NB, Arnold PG, Pairolero PC, Lovich SF. Muscle-flap coverage for infected peripheral vascular prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:1005-1011.

48.Calligaro KD, Veith FJ, Sales CM, et al. Comparison of muscle flaps and delayed secondary intention wound healing for infected lower extremity arterial grafts. Ann Vasc Surg. 1994;8: 31-7.

49.Illig KA, Alkon JE, Smith A, Rhodes JM, et al. Rotational muscle flap closure for acute groin wound infections following vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004;18:661-668.

50.ColwellAS,DonaldsonMC,BelkinM,OrgillDP.Managementofearlygroinvascularbypass graft infections with sartorius and rectus femoris flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:49-53.

51.Morasch MD, Sam AD 2nd, Kibbe MR, et al. Early results with use of gracilis muscle flap coverage of infected groin wounds after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1277-1283.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]