Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
BAYLIS. Globalization of World Politics_-12 CHA...doc
Скачиваний:
28
Добавлен:
23.11.2019
Размер:
2.21 Mб
Скачать

Questions

1. Why is security a 'contested concept'?

2. Why do traditional realist writers focus on national security?

3. What do neo-realist writers mean by 'structure'?

4. What is meant by the 'security dilemma'?

5. Why do states find it difficult to co-operate?

6. What do you understand by the terms 'contingent realism' and 'mature anarchy'?

7. Do you find 'liberal institutionalism' convincing?

8. Why might democratic states be more peaceful?

9. Why do you think collective security arrangements failed in the past?

10. How do 'constructivist', 'critical security theory, and 'feminist' views about international security differ from those of 'neo-realists'?

11. Do you think ideas and discourse influence the way states behave?

12. Is the tension between national and global security resolvable?

Guide to further reading

B. Buzan's People, States and Fear (London: Harvester, 1983) provides an excellent starting point for the study of national and International security. The book is written largely from a neo-realist perspective.

Michael Joseph Smith's study of Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1986) covers the development of what has been described as classical realism and discusses some of the major thinkers in the field. Kenneth Waltz provides an overview of neo-realism in his article 'Realist Thinking and Neorealist Theory', in the Journal of International Affairs, 44:1 (1990).

For a very interesting alternative view see Alexander Wendt, 'Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Polities', in International Organization, 46:2 (1992). This article gives a very useful analysis of the 'Constructivist' perspective. See also Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). A very useful broader evaluation of different theoretical positions is contained in N. J. Rengger, Inter­national Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory? (London: Routledge, 2000)

In their study Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe (London: Pinter, 1993) Ole Waever, Barry Buzan, Morten Kelstrap, and Pierre Lemaitre develop the new concept of 'Societal Security'. This provides an original perspective for studying the kind of non-state aspects of security which have affected Europe in the post-cold war period.

Very useful discussions about the changing nature of security can be found in Ronnie D. Llpschutz (ed.), On Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), C. Bremerton and G. Ponton (eds.), Global Politics: An Introduction (Oxford, Blackwell, 1996); T. Terriff, S. Croft, L. James, and P. Morgan, Security Studies Today (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999); K. Krause and M. C. Williams, (eds.), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (London: UCL Press, 1997); and S. Lawson (ed.), The New Agenda for Global Security: Cooperating for Peace and Beyond (St Leonards: Allen and Unwin,1995).

For a discussion of different theoretical approaches to security and some of the contemporary debates about security studies see Steve Smith, 'The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies: Conceptualising Security in the Last Twenty years', Contemporary Security Policy, 20:3 (Dec. 1999).

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]