Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
BAYLIS. Globalization of World Politics_-12 CHA...doc
Скачиваний:
28
Добавлен:
23.11.2019
Размер:
2.21 Mб
Скачать

Questions

1. Do you think that the three theories involved in the inter-paradigm debate cover all the main issues in contemporary world politics?

2. Why do the post-positivist theories reject positivism?

3. What does it mean to say that the main difference between theories is whether they are explanatory or constitutive?

4. Are the issues dealt with in the neo-neo debate the central ones in today's globalized world?

5. Do you agree with Robert Keohane when he says that the reflectivist approaches need to develop testable hypotheses, to compete with those provided by rationalism, if reflec-tivism is to be taken seriously as a theoretical approach?

6. Is normative theory anything more than an optional extra for the study of world politics?

7. Do you find J. Ann Tickner's reformulation of Hans Morgenthau's six principles of realism a convincing demonstration of the need to include female perspectives on world politics?

8. Do you agree with Robert Cox that theory is always for someone and for some purpose?

9. What are the main implications of historical sociology for the study of world politics?

10. What might adopting a genealogical approach, such as that proposed by Richard Ashley, do for our understanding of world politics?

11. Do you think that Alexander Wendt's social constructivism succeeds in bridging the gap between rationalism and reflectivism?

12. Which of the main alternatives discussed in this chapter do you think offers the best

Guide to further reading

There are many books dealing with contemporary international theory. A very good survey is pro­vided by S. Burchill and A. Linklater et al. Theories of lnternational Relations (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996). A more dated but very good coverage of the three theories of the inter-paradigm debate is P. R. Viotti and M. V. Kauppi International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism 2nd ed. (New York: Macmillan, 1993). For two sets of essays on contemporary theory see K. Booth and S. Smith (eds.), International Relations Theory Today (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995) and S. Smith, K. Booth and M. Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996). On the neo-neo debate see D. Baldwin (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993) and C. Kegley (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge (New York: St Martin's, 1995). On reflectivist approaches, see, for normative theory, C. Brown International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992) and M. Frost Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996); for feminist theory see M. Zalewski 'Feminist Theory and International Relations', in M. Bowker and R. Brown (eds.), From Cold War to Collapse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), C. Enloe Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (London: Pandora, 1989) and The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War (Berkeley: California University Press, 1993), and J. J. Pettman Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics (St Leonards: Allen & Unwin, 1996); for critical theory see R. Cox with Sinclair, T., Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996); and A. Linklater Beyond Realism and Marxism (London: Macmillan, 1990); for historical sociology see M. Mann The Sources of Social Power, vol. i (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986) and The Sources of Social Power, vol. ii (Cambridge).

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]