Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
M.Jeschke - Handbook of Burns Volume 1 Acute Burn Care - 2013.pdf
Скачиваний:
66
Добавлен:
21.03.2016
Размер:
8.25 Mб
Скачать

Critical care of thermally injured patient

cess during the first week and reinforces endogenous antioxidant and immune defenses [14].

Major trace element deficiencies have been shown to occur since the 1970s [14]. They are largely explained by the early exudative losses [15, 16]. Copper, which plays an essential role in collagen synthesis, wound repair, and immunity, is strongly depleted in burns [14]: this is unique among medical conditions. Early trace element supplementation is associated with improved wound healing, decreased protein catabolism, decreased pulmonary infection, and shortened ICU stay [15]. Therefore special attention should be given to all patients receiving enteral/ parenteral nutrition. Trace element and vitamin contents of enteral/standard parenteral nutrition are insufficient to cover the increased requirements after major burns. Based on balance studies, early antioxidant trace elements are delivered intravenously at CHUV for 8 to 30 days depending of burn size; the same adult solution is adapted to children per m2 [95]. The trace elements are delivered in addition to basal micronutrient requirements.

into the interstitial space. Serotonin and bradykinin will cause the persistence of this phenomenon during the first 18–24 hours. Due to the loss of plasma, a steep increase in hematocrit is observed. Edema formation follows a biphasic pattern: an early rapid phase and a slower increase during the next 12–36 hours [6]. A slow resolution of the increased permeability will start between 8–12 hours depending on the burn size. During this resolution phase the extravasated plasma proteins and resuscitation fluids will remain sequestered in extra-vascular spaces of non-burned and burned soft tissue. Edema formation exceeds the capacity of the lymph vessels to evacuate fluid. The speed of the edema progression will depend on the quality of the resuscitation: a rapid early delivery of large amounts of resuscitation fluids increases the edema formation and worsens the compromised local microcirculation, worsening ischemia in the injured tissues. The important fluid and protein shifts will modify the capillary hydrostatic (P) and colloid oncotic (CO) pressures of the Starling equation further compromising transmicrovascular fluid flux (Jv).

Fluid and cardiovascular management beyond 24 hours

The observation of an important hemo-concentra- tion after major burns goes back to the late 19th century, but its pathophysiology only became apparent during the 20th century. Shock was recognized early on as a predominantly hypovolemic state, but we now know that shock is a complex process of cardiocirculatory dysfunction which fluid resuscitation alone cannot cure. Immediately after injury inflammatory shock mediators are released from the burned skin. These include histamine, serotonin, bradikinin, nitric oxide, lipid peroxides, prostaglandins, derived oxygen and nitric oxide free radicals, thromboxane, cytokines (interleukins and TNF), and platelet aggregating factor with the subsequent coagulation cascade. The response is proportional to the injury, and systemic effects of these mediators will become obvious with burns exceeding 20–25% TBSA [65]. The massive histamine release will cause the early increase in permeability of local and systemic capillaries initiating a massive capillary leak enabling large molecules such as albumin to escape

Jv = Kf ((Pc-Pif ) – d (COPp – COPif ))

The capillary filtration coefficient (Kf ) increases immediately after burn injury, but does not explain the rapid edema formation [65]. In the interstitial fluid, hydrostatic pressure and oncotic pressure will both increase, while in the capillaries hydrostatic pressure and oncotic pressures decrease become negative, constituting a suction force. Delta, the osmotic reflection coefficient, indicates the relative permeability to proteins: the increased permeability is measurable until 8–12 hours post injury. All this causes increase osmolarity of the extravascular compartment.

Myocardial dysfunction has been repeatedly demonstrated both in humans and animals. Neuroendocrine responses will contribute to the worsening of the hemodynamic condition, by increasing cardiac afterload due to the massive release of endogenous norepinephrine and epinephrine. This is further complicated by the decrease in preload due to the hypovolemic state. Oxygen free radicals and lipid peroxides also play an important role. In burns > 40% BSA intrinsic contractile defects are ob-

205

M. M. Berger et al.

served, which are partly reversed by fluid resuscitation and antioxidants [47]. Troponin I increases in a large proportion of the patients with major burns reflecting intrinsic tissue damage.

Edema in non-burned tissue occurs to some degree in burns affecting 10% TBSA, and is largely explained by the circulating histamine and chemokines. All tissues and organs are affected including the lungs, the splanchnic organs, and the brain.

In addition to the capillary leek, fluid is losses can directly be attributed to the wound exudates (1–2 liters per 10% BSA during the first 24 hours, decreasing thereafter until closer of the wound) and the evaporation. These losses include plasma proteins (30g of protein/10% TBSA/day), minerals (P, Mg) and trace elements (mainly Cu, Se, Zn).

The principles of burn fluid resuscitation were developed in the early fifties. Exudates and edema fluid were shown to be isotonic, containing same amounts of electrolytes and protein as plasma. The development of Parkland formula was based on studies on hemodynamic effects of various regimes, using different proportions of colloids and crystalloids [103]. No single fluid resuscitation formula has proven to be superior, and the Parkland formula has

Table 1. Criteria for assessment of under and over-resusci- tation

Under-resuscitation

Over-resuscitation

Oliguria > 0.3 ml/kg/h

Polyuria > 1.0 ml/kg/h

Hemoglobin

Decreasing PaO2/FiO2, pul-

> 180g/l (Ht > 55%)

monary edema

Natremia

Increasing PAPO / PVC

> 145 mmol/l

 

Cardiac index

Rapidly increasing cutaneous

> 2 L/min/m2

edema

SvO2 > 55%

Fluid delivery > Ivy index (fluid

 

delivery > 250 ml/kg BW)

plasma lacate

Intra-abdominal P > 20 mmHg

> 2 mmol/l

Intra-abdominal hypertension

or increasing

leading to

base excess

acute renal failure, splanchnic

> –5 mmol/l

ischemia, transformation of 2°to

or decreasing

3° burns, compartment syndrome

 

in limbs ( need for fasciotomies),

 

venous return with hemodynamic

 

failure

since remained the most used due to its simplicity. Interestingly, the colloid part of the formula has somehow become forgotten. While under-resusci- tation was the problem in the mid-20th century, overresuscitation has become a major issue since the 90’s [80] with a host of complications: “fluid creep” has become a recognized as a problem over the last decade [87] resulting in general swelling of all organs. Several complications results from this lack of control: abdominal compartment syndrome with renal failure (the most severe) [51], intestinal swelling with ileus, conversion of intermediate burns into deep burns (secondary ischemia), worsening gas exchanges and increasing length of mechanical ventilation [46], and prolonged ICU and hospital length of stay. Today the “Parkland formula” should only be considered as a guide to initiate resuscitation and not absolute fluid requirements.

These complications have forced us to rethink the true aims of resuscitation, which are to stabilize and restore hemodynamic status as soon as possible and to ensure tissue perfusion and oxygenation. In major burns the tools include a combination of fluids (crystalloids and colloids after 8–12hrs), which aim to restore the circulating “volume”, and inotropic and vasopressive agents. Fluids alone are not able to restore adequate tissue perfusion. Invasive cardiovascular monitoring can be used to refine resuscitation, but in absence of such tools a cautious restrictive attitude towards fluids and tight clinical supervision are essential. The initial resuscitation should aim to maintain organ perfusion: urinary output 0.5 ml/hour, lack of tachycardia, maintenance of MAP, normal lactate, and normal base excess will generally reflect this global condition. Nevertheless, one should be cognizant of the difficulty of monitoring the splanchnic compartment.

Among fluids, isotonic crystalloids remain the basic tool. Several burn resuscitation formulae were developed in the 70s, aiming at minimizing fluid delivery and the subsequent edema, which worsens outcomes and further complicates patient care. Hypertonic saline has been studied but the results have been conflicting and currently it’s not part of the mainstay of treatment given the significant increase in acute renal failure [49]. Nevertheless, whatever the formula, the fluid used must contain Na in sufficient concentration to deliver about 0.5 mmol/

206

Critical care of thermally injured patient

kg/%TBSA by 48 hours to prevent water intoxication associated with hypotonic fluids.

Several strategies aimed at reducing edema formation have been proposed, and actually overlap some of those proposed for the control of oxidative stress: 1) topical application of local anesthetic lidocaine/prilocaine cream has some effect in experimental conditions, 2) anti-histamine drugs in the early phase have not reduced the edema formation, 3) use of colloids in fluid resuscitation has proven some efficacy, and 4) antioxidants and particularly vitamin C in high doses.

Early permissive hypovolemia has recently been advocated and seems to reduce organ dysfunction [5], possibly through reduction of organ edema formation and its associated intracellular dysfunction. In the 21st century resuscitation should be guided by the hemodynamic response, and the application of the Parkland formula (even though it’s widely used) should be of historical note.

Upon admission to the ICU, one of the important roles for any intensivist in charge of caring for the thermally injured patient is to ensure hemodynamic stability and to provide restrictive control of fluid balance after the initial resuscitation (which is frequently over-enthusiastic). It begins with reducing the fluid infusion rate as soon as the patient is admitted to the ICU. In the larger burns ( > 40% BSA) this may require some invasive monitoring, and the use of a vasopressor agent such as norepinephrine to maintain tissue perfusion; a mean arterial pressure of 60 mm Hg will generally be sufficient.

Cardiovascular monitoring requirements will depend on the extent of injury and the presence of inhalation injury. An arterial catheter will generally be required for arterial pressure monitoring in patients with burns > 20% TBSA or in those patients requiring intubation due to inhalation injury or burns to face and neck. Blood gas determinations will in addition enable monitoring of arterial lactate and evolution of acid-base status. With increasing severity of burn injury and in elderly patients > 60 years, information about cardiac output becomes necessary. The PiCCO (pulse contour cardiac output) arterial catheter along with a central venous line enables determination of cardiac output without the risks inherent to a pulmonary catheter. Moreover, Holm et al. recently demonstrated that

using the PiCCO for “volume targeted resuscitation” could be more deleterious than the Parkland formula, resulting in increased fluid delivery, worsened oxygenation and prolonged intubation time [46]. The pulmonary catheters may be used in massive burns only or in patients with major cardiopulmonary co-morbidities. Trans-esophageal echocardiography is a further tool that enables a rapid diagnostic workup of the unstable patient [36].

Hemodynamic findings in early invasive cardiovascular monitoring will be variable. Massive burns are generally associated with cardiogenic shock even in the youngest patients, and will invariably be present in elderly during the first 24 hours. The etiology includes increased afterload caused by high levels of stress hormones, direct depression of myocardium by cytokines and lipoperoxides, intravascular hypovolemia with low preload and vasoplegia. The management of shock may require a combination of dobutamine and norepinephrine, in doses titrated to target (cardiac inde× 2.5–3 l/m2, mean arterial pressure >60 mm Hg). Epinephrine will rarely be required. The aim is to restore normal cardiac output, but certainly not supra-normal values or any surrogate of “normal” preload values. Whatever the measurement method used, normal filling pressures should not be the objective goal, as this strategy causes over-resusci- tation and its multitude subsequent complications [3, 5, 45, 51, 80]. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring is therefore recommended in the burns involving more than 30% TBSA.

After 36–48 hours, the patients generally become spontaneously hyperdynamic. In case of extensive burns, some vasoplegia caused by the massive cytokine release may require norepinephrine (2–10 mcg/min) to permit reducing fluid delivery. Indeed by 24 hours, the fluid delivery should be drastically reduced, to about 30–40% of that infused during the first 24 hours, and the solutions switched to hypotonic, sodium free-poor solutions, in combination with albumin (in case of hypoalbuminemia > 20g/l), or fresh frozen plasma (in case of clotting disorders). The international controversy regarding albumin delivery in critically ill patients has severely complicated burns resuscitations [2]; administration should not be completely liberal, but a very restrictive attitude complicates resuscitation. Albuminemia < 20g/l should certainly be corrected

207