- •Учреждение образования «высший государственный колледж связи» «чтение и перевод технических текстов по специальности ткс»
- •Часть I
- •Введение
- •Unit 1 (17) Antennas
- •17.1 Types of antennas
- •17.1.1 Antennas used in communications
- •17.2 Basic properties
- •17.3 Generic antenna types
- •17.3.1 Radiation from apertures
- •1 Learn the words & word combinations:
- •2 Read & translate the text (orally) 17.1 – 17.3.2:
- •3 Find Russian equivalents:
- •4 Find English equivalents:
- •5 Answer the questions:
- •17.3.2 Radiation from small antennas
- •17.3.3 Radiation from arrays
- •17.4 Specific antenna types
- •17.4.1 Prime focus symmetric reflector antennas
- •17.4.1.1 Parabolic reflectors
- •17.4.1.2 Aperture fields and radiation patterns
- •17.4.1.3 Gain of reflector antennas
- •1Learn the words & word combinations:
- •2 Read & translate the text (orally) 17.3.2 – 17.4.1:
- •3 Find Russian equivalents:
- •4 Find English equivalents:
- •5 Answer the questions:
- •17.4.2 Dual symmetric reflector antennas
- •17.4.3 Offset reflectors
- •17.4.4 Horn feeds for reflector antennas
- •17.4.4.1 Rectangular or square horns
- •17.4.4.2 Small conical horns
- •17.4.4.3 Multi-mode conical horns
- •17.4.4.4 Conical corrugated horns
- •17.4.4.5 Array feeds
- •1 Learn the words & word combinations:
- •2 Read & translate the text (orally) 17.4.2 – 17.4.4:
- •17.5.2 Earth station antennas
- •1 Learn the words & word combinations:
- •2 Read & translate the text (orally) 17.5.1 – 17.5.2:
- •17.5.3.2 Spot beams
- •17.5.3.3 Multiple beams
- •17.5.3.4 Shaped beams
- •17.5.4 Vhf and uhf communications
- •17.5.5 Hf communications
- •1 Write out the words and word combinations which are still unknown to you and learn them. Unit 2 (20) Frequency division multiplexing
- •20.1 Fdm principles
- •20.2 History
- •20.3 Fdm hierarchy
- •20.3.1 General considerations
- •20.3.2 Channel bandwidth
- •20.3.3 Group and supergroup
- •20.3.4 Higher order translation
- •2 Read & translate the text (orally) 20.1 – 20.3.4:
- •3 Find Russian equivalents:
- •4Find English equivalents:
- •5 Answer the questions:
- •20.4 Frequency translation
- •20.4.1 Ring bridge modulator/demodulator design considerations
- •20.4.1.1 Carrier compression.
- •20.4.1.2 Carrier and signal suppression
- •20.5 Carriers
- •20.5.1 Carrier frequency accuracy
- •20.5.2 Carrier purity
- •20.6.2 Line equipment pilots
- •20.6.2.1 Regulation pilots
- •20.6.2.2 Frequency comparison pilots
- •1 Learn the words & word combinations:
- •2 Read & translate the text (orally) 20.4 – 20.6
- •3 Find Russian equivalents:
- •4. Find English equivalents:
- •5. Answer the questions:
- •20.7 Noise contributions
- •20.7.1 Definitions
- •20.7.2 Psophometric weighting
- •20.7.3 Thermal noise
- •20.7.4 Noise due to unlinearity
- •20.7.4.1 Single channel load
- •20.7.4.2 Multichannel load
- •20.7.4.3 Unlinearily characterisation
- •20.7.4.4 Determination ofunlinearity noise from a multichannel load
- •20.7.4.5 Approximate value for the weighted intermodulation noise contribution
- •20.7.4.6 Weighted noise power in pWOp
- •20.7.4.7 Determination of unlinearity noise using spectral densities
- •1 Learn the words & word combinations:
- •2 Read & translation the text (orally) 20.7:
- •20.9 Overload
- •20.9.1 Overload measurement.
- •20.9.1.1 Harmonic/intermodulation products
- •20.9.1.2 Gain change
- •20.10 Hypothetical reference system
- •20.10.1 Noise contributions
- •20.10.2 Line sections
- •1 Learn the words & word combinations:
- •2 Read & translate the text (orally) 20.8 -20.10:
- •20.11.2 Multichannel load increase
- •20.11.3 Compandor noise advantage
- •20.11.4 Attack and decay time
- •20.11.5 Usage of companders
- •20.12 Through connections
- •20.12.1 Through connection filter
- •20.13 Transmultiplexers
- •20.13.1 Synchronisation
- •20.13.2 Pcm alarms
- •20.14 Repeatered cable line equipment
- •20.14.1 Pre-Emphasis
- •20.14.2 Thermal noise
- •20.14.3 Regulation
- •20.14.3.1 Regulation range
- •20.14.4 Power feeding
- •«Чтение и перевод технических текстов по специальности ткс»
- •Часть I
17.4.2 Dual symmetric reflector antennas
The performance of a large reflector antenna can be improved and the design made more flexible by inserting a sub-reflector into the system, Figure 17.9. There are two versions, the Ca.ssegrain, where the subreflector is a convex hyperboloid of revolution placed on the inside of the parabola focus, and a Gregorian where a concave elliptical subreflector is placed on the outside of the parabola focus. In symmetric reflectors the Cassegrain is more common because it is more compact, but the electrical performance is similar for both systems.
The advantages of the dual reflectors are:
The feed is in a more convenient location.
Higher performance feeds can be used because the subtended angle is such that wide aperture diameter feeds are needed.
Spillover past the subreflector is directed at the sky which reduces the noise temperature.
The depth of focus and field of view are larger.
The study of the radiation characteristics and the efficiency of dual reflectors is similar to that for the prime focus reflector. Analysis of the radiation patterns depends partly on the size of the subreflector. If it is small then physical optics or GTD must be used on the subreflector. The main reflector is usually large so geometric optics is adequate.
The limiting factor to obtaining high efficiency in a standard parabola is the amplitude taper across the aperture due to the feed pattern and the space loss in the parabola (i.e. the illumination efficiency). By shaping the surfaces of a dual reflector antenna it is possible to increase the efficiency and produce a more uniform illumination across the aperture. A well known method to produce a high efficiency Cassegrain symmetric reflector antenna is due to Galindo and Williams (Galindo, 1964; Williams, 1965). It is a geometric optics technique in which the shape of the subreflector is altered to redistribute the energy more uniformly over the aperture. Then the shape of the main reflector is modified to refocus the energy and create a uniform phase across the aperture. After this process the reflector surfaces are no longer parabolic and hyperbolic. The method works well for large reflectors. For small or medium size reflectors geometric optics is not adequate and physical optics including diffraction must be used at least on the subreflector.
17.4.3 Offset reflectors
In recent years the growth in communication systems has led to a tightening in the radiation pattern specifications and the consequent need to produce reflectors with low far-out sidelobes. Symmetric reflectors cannot be made to have low sidelobes because of the inherent limitations caused by scattering from the feed and feed supports. This blockage loss can be entirely eliminated with the offset reflector, Figure 17.10, which consists of a portion of a parabola chosen so that the feed is outside the area subtended by the aperture of the reflector. The projected aperture is circular, though the edge of the reflector will be elliptical. The removal of the blockage loss also means that smaller reflector antennas can be made efficient which has led to their widespread use as DBS receiving antennas.
In addition to the unblocked aperture, the offset reflector has other advantages, (Rudge, 1986, Page 185; Rahmat-Samii, 1986). The reaction of the reflector upon the primary feed can be reduced to a very low order so that the feed VSWR is essentially independent of the reflector. Compared to a symmetric paraboloid, the offset configuration makes a larger F/D ratio possible which in turn enables a higher performance feed to be used. The removal of the feed from the aperture gives greater flexibility to use an array of feeds to produce multiple beams or shaped beams.
The offset reflector antenna also has some disadvantages. It is much more difficult to analyse and design due to the offset geometry and it is only with the advent of powerful computers that this has become feasible. The lack of symmetry in the reflector means that when a linearly polarised feed is used, a cross-polarised component is generated by the reflector surface. When circular polarisation is used, a cross-polarised component does not occur but the offset surface causes the beam to be 'squinted' from the electrical bore-sight. Lastly the construction of the offset reflector is more difficult. However if the reflectors are made by fibreglass moulding this is not really significant. Also the structural shape can be put to good use because it is convenient for deployable configurations on satellites or transportable earth stations.