Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Книги по МРТ КТ на английском языке / MRI for Orthopaedic Surgeons Khanna ed 2010

.pdf
Скачиваний:
18
Добавлен:
05.10.2023
Размер:
35.56 Mб
Скачать

250 IV Spine

F G

 

Fig. 10.22 (Continued) (F) A midline sagittal re-

 

constructed CT image shows anterior osteophyte

 

formation but no substantial canal stenosis. (G) A

 

parasagittal reconstructed CT image (obtained at

 

the same level as C) shows ossification of the pos-

 

terior longitudinal ligament extending from C3-C4

 

to C5-C6. (H) An axial CT image (obtained at the

 

same level as D) shows that what appears to be a

 

disc protrusion on MRI is actually a focal region of

H

ossification.

di erentiation lies in the fact that anterior decompression

ral foramina (Fig. 10.23). Spinal stenosis can develop from

for patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal

congenital or acquired causes (Table 10.3); patients can also

ligament tends to be di cult and is associated with higher

develop degenerative stenosis superimposed on preexisting

rates of durotomy and bleeding, and therefore surgeons may

congenital stenosis (Fig. 10.24).

prefer to proceed with posterior decompression even though

Foraminal stenosis may be caused by a disc herniation or

the primary compression is located ventral to the spinal cord.

uncovertebral or facet joint hypertrophy. Central canal ste-

 

nosis is most often caused by a combination of two or more

Spinal Stenosis

of the following (Fig. 10.25):

The term spinal stenosis describes the compression of the

• Disc bulge or herniation

neural elements in the spinal canal, lateral recesses, or neu-

• Uncovertebral joint osteophyte formation

10 The Cervical Spine 251

A

 

B

C

 

D

Fig. 10.23 Artist’s sketches showing four types of disc herniations in the cervical spine: (A) central, (B) posterolateral, (C) lateral recess, and

(D) foraminal.

Table 10.3 Acquired and Congenital Factors Associated with Spinal Stenosis

Type

Factor

Acquired

Intervertebral disc pathology

 

Uncovertebral joint hypertrophy

 

Facet joint hypertrophy

 

Ligamentous (ligamentum flavum hypertrophy/

ossification, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, di use idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis)

Spondylosis

Metabolic Postinflammatory Spondylolisthesis Postoperative Neoplastic

Congenital Idiopathic with short pedicles Skeletal growth disorders Down syndrome Achondroplasia Mucopolysaccharidosis Scoliosis

Ligamentum flavum hypertrophy

Facet arthrosis

Thickening, calcification, or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament or other structures

On MRI, central canal stenosis is characterized by compression of the thecal sac, best seen on the sagittal and axial T2-weighted images. Such images provide a “myelographic e ect,” in which the CSF is seen as bright signal anterior and posterior to the spinal cord on sagittal images and circumferentially around the spinal cord on axial images. E acement, discontinuity, or displacement of this CSF space is seen in patients with focal and concentric spinal stenosis.

The degree of central canal stenosis can range from mild encroachment on the ventral subarachnoid space to severe compression and flattening of the spinal cord with myelomalacia. MRI findings may correspond to the severity and duration of the compression.45 Early changes of spinal cord compression can be seen as cord edema (high signal areas on T2-weighted images); progressive compression may cause spinal cord necrosis and atrophy (Fig. 10.26), cystic degeneration, and syrinx formation (low signal on T1-weighted and high signal on T2-weighted images).45

252 IV Spine

A B

 

Fig. 10.24 Degenerative upon congenital ste-

 

nosis. (A) A sagittal T1-weighted image shows a

 

developmentally shortened AP dimension of the

 

spinal canal. (B) A sagittal T2-weighted image

 

shows a small disc bulge at the C4-C5 level that

 

causes spinal cord signal abnormality, represent-

 

ing spondylotic myelomalacia (arrow). (C) An axial

 

T2-weighted image shows the moderate to severe

C

central canal stenosis.

Given that the great majority of cervical spine MRI stud-

of the CSF column and spinal cord compression, whereas the

ies are obtained to evaluate for the presence, location, and

parasagittal images allow for visualization of lateral recess

degree of degenerative cervical spinal stenosis, one should

and foraminal stenosis (Fig. 10.27). The information from

have a systematic approach to the evaluation of these stud-

these images should be correlated with that from the axial

ies. The authors’ suggested approach for the evaluation of

images, which show the same pathology in an orthogonal

a cervical spine MRI study (see Chapter 3) includes a criti-

plane.

cal evaluation of the degree of spinal cord and nerve root

There are several objective measures of cervical spinal

compression on the sagittal, parasagittal, and axial T2-

stenosis. Relative stenosis is defined as an AP canal diameter

weighted images. The midline sagittal T2-weighted images

of <13 mm, and absolute stenosis is defined as an AP canal

provide a global view of the levels and degree of e acement

diameter of <10 mm. The Torg or Pavlov ratio is calculated

 

 

10 The Cervical Spine

253

 

Facet joint

Uncovertebral

 

 

 

hypertrophy

 

Disc

Midline posterior

spurring

 

Posterior longitudinal

vertebral ridging

 

 

 

lig.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facet joint

 

 

 

 

 

 

hypertrophy

Facet joint

 

 

 

 

 

 

hypertrophy

 

 

 

 

 

Ligamentum flavum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

 

 

 

hypertrophy

 

 

 

 

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spinal cord

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posterior longitudinal stenosis

Ligamentum flavum

Uncovertebral

 

 

lig.

hypertrophy

spurring

Midline posterior

 

 

Facet joint

vertebral ridging

 

 

hypertrophy

C

 

D

 

 

 

Fig. 10.25 Illustrations of various potential contributors to cervical spinal stenosis: central disc bulge, facet joint hypertrophy, and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy. (A) An axial view showing central

by dividing the AP canal diameter by the AP vertebral body diameter, with a ratio <0.8 defined as stenotic.53 This ratio is often used to evaluate for congenital stenosis in athletes. Although such definitions are well known, most clinicians and radiologists tend to grade the degree of spinal stenosis using the terms mild, moderate, and severe, as well as gradations such as moderate–severe. The authors tend to use the following terms and definitions (Figs. 10.28 and 10.29):

Mild—stenosis occupying less than one third of normal canal dimension in which the ventral and dorsal CSF spaces are partially e aced by disc bulging, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, and facet arthropathy; no mass e ect on the cord

Moderate—stenosis occupying between one and two thirds of normal canal dimension; findings similar to those of mild stenosis but with compression and minimal flattening and deformity of the spinal cord

stenosis. (B) An axial view showing foraminal stenosis. (C) A lateral view showing central stenosis with cord compression. (D) A 3D view showing foraminal stenosis.

Severe—stenosis occupying more than two thirds of normal canal dimension, with advanced stenosis with very pronounced flattening and deformity of the spinal cord that is obvious on both sagittal and axial T2weighted images

Occipitocervical Stenosis

Occipitocervical stenosis is not typically degenerative; it can occur secondary to congenital and developmental processes, such as Arnold Chiari malformation and cranial settling, in patients with RA. Other nontraumatic causes of occipitocervical stenosis and instability include occipital, C1, and C2 dysplasia and anomalies; Down syndrome; and tumors. Because of the complexity of the occipitocervical junction, normal relationships are defined using landmarks originally described on conventional radiography.54,55 Many of these

254 IV Spine

C

 

Fig. 10.26 Spinal cord atrophy. (A) A sagittal T2-weighted

 

image showing moderate-severe stenosis at C4-C6, with

 

resultant atrophy of the spinal cord at the level of C5 and

 

regions of cord edema proximal and distal to the region of

 

atrophy. (B) A sagittal T1-weighted image showing a seg-

 

ment of low signal intensity within the spinal cord from

 

C4-C5 to C6-C7. (C) An axial T2-weighted image at the C4-C5

A, B

level showing atrophy of the spinal cord and indistinct mar-

gins between the spinal cord and the surrounding CSF.

 

relationships and lines have now been extrapolated for use

Associated with spina bifida aperta and myelome-

with MR and CT imaging and can be used to diagnose and

ningocele

quantify the degree of basilar invagination and cranial set-

Not usually associated with atlantooccipital assim-

tling (Table 10.4; Fig. 10.30).

ilation or basilar invagination60

 

• Type III

Chiari Malformations

Defined as herniation of the hindbrain into a high

cervical encephalocele

Chiari malformations result in a caudal migration of the cer-

Occurs rarely60,61

 

ebellar tonsils to and through the foramen magnum with

RA

resultant occipitocervical stenosis. Although many such

malformations are minor, incidentally noted findings, ad-

RA is a systemic disease that causes inflammation of syno-

vanced lesions can produce symptoms, and thus may benefit

vial joints. The synovial joints develop pannus secondary to

from a neurosurgical evaluation and eventual suboccipital

erosion of supporting ligamentous structures and the asso-

decompression. Three types of Chiari malformations have

ciated instability.60,62,63 In the cervical spine, this condition

been described56,57:

may a ect the craniocervical junction as well as the subaxial

• Type I (Fig. 10.31)

cervical spine, as described below.60,62–65 Most commonly,

Defined as a defect in the cerebellum with a down-

atlantoaxial instability develops secondary to erosion of the

ward displacement of the tonsils >5 mm below the

ligaments at the occipitocervical junction.62,63 As the disease

plane of the foramen magnum58,59

progresses, erosion of the lateral masses of C1, the occipital

Associated with basilar invagination in 50%, atlan-

condyles, and facets of C2 occurs, resulting in cranial set-

tooccipital assimilation in 10%, and Klippel-Feil

tling.60,62,63 As the odontoid process begins to occupy a rela-

syndrome in 5%58,59

tively more rostral position, it compresses the brainstem and

• Type II

vertebrobasilar system. This pathologic process is postulated

Results from dysgenesis of the hindbrain60

by some as the etiology of sudden death in those with ad-

Involves herniation of the inferior cerebellar ver-

vanced RA.60,62,63,66 It is important to note that in contrast

mis, fourth ventricle, and medulla

to other disorders, the C1 arch migrates with the skull base

10 The Cervical Spine 255

A–C

Fig. 10.27 Cervical stenosis. (A) A midline sagittal T2-weighted image shows multilevel degenerative disc disease with mild spondylolisthesis at C3-C4 and thickening of the posterior longitudinal ligament at multiple levels. There is focal thickening of the ligamentum flavum at the C5-C6 level (arrow). (B) A parasagittal T2-weighted image obtained several millimeters lateral to the midline shows e acement of the ventral CSF space and moderate stenosis at the C4-C5

to lie in a more caudal position.60 In some cases, it has been reported to be as inferior as the C2-C3 disc space.60,62,63,67 Two studies reported on the use of MRI to measure the space available for the cord as a technique for predicting recovery after cervical stabilization for patients with RA and atlantoaxial instability.62,63 A cord space, or space available for the cord, of >14 mm on MRI was associated with better clinical outcomes than was a space of <10 mm, which was associated with a poor prognosis.62,63 Flexion–extension MRI is particularly useful for evaluating patients with RA and specifically those with instability at the occipitocervical junction and suboccipital cervical spine (Fig. 10.32), especially because supine extension MRI does not account for the commonly occurring subluxations in such patients that are exaggerated with movement. Similar information can be obtained by combining the information obtained from a static (conventional) MRI study and flexion–extension cervical spine radiographs (Fig. 10.10).

level (arrow) from osteophyte formation and thickening of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Similar, but less severe, changes are seen at the C5-C6 level (arrowhead). (C) A parasagittal T2-weighted image obtained farther laterally in the plane of the neuroforamina shows severe foraminal stenosis at the C4-C5 level (arrow) and moderate foraminal stenosis at the C5-C6 level (arrowhead).

MRI can detect pannus formation in the cervical spine well before conventional radiographic signs become evident. In addition, involvement of the facet joints (inflammation, edema, and fusion) may be detected on MRI. Patients with RA may also present with a rheumatoid discitis that manifests as increased T2-weighted and decreased T1-weighted signal in the disc. The substantial di erences between imaging and clinical features of RA in the spine have been documented and are well known.68,69

Infectious Conditions

The treatment of spinal infections continues to be a challenge despite advances in imaging, diagnostic testing, and antimicrobial therapy. A delay in diagnosis is common because spinal infections often have an early indolent course and early symptoms may be nonspecific (neck pain, muscle

256 IV Spine

A B

C D

Fig. 10.28 Grading of cervical stenosis: mild to moderate-severe. (A) A sagittal T2-weighted image showing minimal spondylolisthesis at C4-C5 with moderate stenosis at this level. (B) An axial T2-weighted image at the C5-C6 level showing mild stenosis secondary to a central disc bulge (arrow), ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (arrowhead), and facet arthropathy (asterisk). (C) Axial T2-weighted image at the

spasm), leading to a misdiagnosis of more common spinal ailments (e.g., muscle strain, degenerative disease). Spine infections may involve the vertebral body, posterior elements, intervertebral discs, epidural space, subdural space, subarachnoid space, or the spinal cord.

C4-C5 level shows moderate stenosis secondary to more substantial central disc bulge (arrow), ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (arrowhead), and facet arthropathy (asterisk). (D) Axial T2-weighted image (di erent patient) showing moderate-severe stenosis at the C5-C6 level as a result of even greater central disc bulge (arrow) and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (arrowhead).

Cervical Vertebral Osteomyelitis and Discitis

Infections of the cervical spine account for approximately 10% of spine infections and are less common than thoracic (approximately 40%) or lumbar (approximately 50%) spine

10 The Cervical Spine 257

B

A C

Fig. 10.29 Grading of cervical stenosis: severe. (A) A sagittal T2weighted image showing severe stenosis at the C3-C4 level and moderate to moderate-severe stenosis at the C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 levels. (B) An axial image at the C3-C4 level shows very severe stenosis with complete obliteration of the CSF space and compression of the spinal cord to an AP diameter of 2 mm secondary to a cen-

infections.70 Anatomic di erences between the cervical and thoracolumbar spine (smaller canal diameter, intervertebral discs, and epidural space, and a vast venous plexus) may allow cervical spine infections to have a more aggressive and rapid progression that requires expedited treatment.71 In general, the clinical presentation of vertebral osteomyelitis and discitis has variable signs and symptoms, including fever (approximately 50% of the time), weight loss, and neck or back pain, that do not vary with activity level. Neurologic symptoms may vary based on the level of spinal involvement, spinal cord compression, spinal instability, or deformity.17,18,70–73 Neurologic deficits secondary to spinal

tral disc bulge and severe ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (arrow).

(C) An axial T2-weighted image at the C4-C5 level showing severe (but less severe than in B) stenosis with compression and deformity of the spinal cord with minimal CSF seen in the lateral recesses bilaterally. (Images courtesy of Mesfin A. Lemma, MD.)

infection are more common in patients more than 50 years old and in those with comorbidities such as diabetes, RA, and immunodeficiency.17,70

Bacterial inoculation of the spine may occur through hematogenous seeding, direct inoculation, or contiguous spread from local infection. Staphylococcus aureus is the most commonly cultured organism causing cervical osteomyelitis and discitis.70,74 It is found in 50% to 65% of culture-positive cases and accounts for >80% of pediatric spinal infections.74 Gramnegative infections (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas, Proteus) may occur after genitourinary infections. Immunocompromised patients are susceptible to infections with atypical

258

 

IV Spine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 10.4 Occipitocervical Junction: Anatomic Relationships, and

nuclear scintigraphy in identifying vertebral osteomyelitis.71

 

 

Lines for Use with MRI, CT, and Conventional Radiographs

 

Infectious spondylitis may present with findings such as

 

 

 

Eponym

Parameters

Pathology

low T1-weighted signal with or without high T2-weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

signal (high signal is often more evident on fat-suppressed

 

 

 

Wackenheim’s

Tangent drawn along

Dens should be

 

 

 

T2-weighted or STIR images); increased T2-weighted signal

 

 

 

clivus

the superior surface

below the line.

 

 

 

baseline

of the clivus

 

 

 

within the intervertebral disc; contrast enhancement in the

 

 

 

Clivus canal

Angle formed between

Normal ranges are

disc, subchondral marrow, and epidural space; erosion of

 

 

 

angle

Wackenheim’s line

180 degrees in

end plates; epidural fluid collections; paraspinous soft-tissue

 

 

 

 

and the posterior

extension to

abnormalities; and posterior element involvement17,71,73,75

 

 

 

 

vertebral body line

150 degrees in

(Fig. 10.33). Unfortunately, these imaging characteristics

 

 

 

 

 

flexion; an angle

 

 

 

 

 

are the same as those of many spine pathologies, includ-

 

 

 

 

 

of <150 degrees

 

 

 

 

 

is considered

ing neoplastic disease. One can di erentiate infection from

 

 

 

 

 

abnormal.

other processes a ecting the vertebral body bone marrow by

 

 

 

Chamberlain’s

Between the hard

Protrusion of the

noting that the epicenter of the former pathology tends to be

 

 

 

line

palate and the

dens >3 mm

at the intervertebral disc. Conversely, neoplastic processes

 

 

 

 

opisthion

above this line

tend to have their epicenters within the vertebral body, and

 

 

 

 

 

is considered

the edema tends not to cross the intervertebral disc. In

 

 

 

 

 

abnormal.

 

 

 

 

 

addition, the vertebral end plate may have an irregular ap-

 

 

 

McRae’s line

Basion to the opisthion

Protrusion of the

 

 

 

pearance because of infectious destruction, and disc height

 

 

 

 

 

dens above this

 

 

 

 

 

loss or collapse may occur with progressive infection. On

 

 

 

 

 

line is abnormal.

 

 

 

McGregor’s

From the hard palate

Odontoid process

gadolinium-enhanced images, disc enhancement is an es-

 

 

 

sential factor for the diagnosis of discitis, and enhancement

 

 

 

line

to the most caudal

rising >4.5 mm

 

 

 

 

point on the midline

above this line

of the vertebral subchondral bone may indicate a well-

 

 

 

 

occipital curve

is considered

established and chronic infection.17,71,73

 

 

 

 

 

abnormal.

In comparison with other bacterial infections, Mycobac-

 

 

 

Ranawat

Distance between

Measurement of <15

 

 

 

terium tuberculosis infection of the spine has some distinct

 

 

 

criterion

the center of the

mm in males and

di erences:

 

 

 

 

pedicle of C2 and

<13 mm in females

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

the transverse axis

is abnormal.

• Intervertebral discs are damaged less or completely

 

 

 

 

of C1

 

 

 

spared and may not show signal enhancement on T2-

 

 

 

Welcher’s

Tangent to the clivus

The normal range

 

 

 

weighted images.71

 

 

 

basal angle

as it intersects a

is 125 to 143

• Tuberculous spondylodiscitis is a slow-growing pro-

 

 

 

 

tangent to the

degrees; platybasia

 

 

 

 

cess that often results in marked collapse of the verte-

 

 

 

 

sphenoid bone

exists when the

 

 

 

 

 

basal angle is >143

bral bodies.

 

 

 

 

 

degrees.

• Subligamentous spread of infection is often observed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• Telescoping of one vertebral body disc into an adjacent

 

 

bacteria, such as Aspergillus, Candida, Nocardia asteroides,

level may be seen.

 

 

Gadolinium-enhanced MRI also is essential for monitor-

 

 

and Mycobacterium. Pseudomonas infections may occur in

 

 

intravenous drug abusers. Children with sickle cell disease

ing the e cacy of treatment of vertebral infection.76 With

 

 

may develop spine infections secondary to Salmonella.

appropriate treatment of the infection, a regression of the

 

 

 

Isolated discitis is common in the pediatric population be-

T2-weighted signal hyperintensity is observed.73 Scar for-

 

 

cause vascularity extends through the cartilaginous growth

mation within the intervertebral disc is seen as a region

 

 

plate into the nucleus pulposus, allowing direct deposition

of low signal intensity. A region of mottled signal inten-

 

 

of bacteria into the disc center. In adults, blood vessels reach

sity may also develop within the area of previous infection

 

 

only the annulus fibrosus, limiting bacterial deposition to

with associated contrast enhancement. Over time, osteo-

 

 

the vertebral body metaphysis and end plate. In adult in-

phytic bridging may occur, followed by segmental fusion.73

 

 

fections, intervertebral disc destruction may occur through

It should be noted, however, that a lack of improvement on

 

 

bacterial proteolytic enzyme infiltration.

MRI and even deterioration of MRI features in the setting of

 

 

 

MRI is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis

clinical improvement do not necessarily indicate failure of

 

 

and evaluation of spinal infections and for monitoring the

treatment.77,78

 

 

response to treatment.71 High sensitivity (96%), specificity

In the postoperative patient, evaluation for cervical spine

 

(93%), and accuracy (94%) have been reported for the MRI

infection may be complicated by the normal enhancement of

 

diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis.51 MRI is more sensitive

the uninfected disc. MRI findings of infection in a postopera-

 

 

than conventional radiographs or CT and more specific than

tive patient include contrast enhancement of the subchon-

10 The Cervical Spine 259

Wackenheím

McRae

Occiput

Chamberlain

Hard

McGregor

palate

Ranawat

Fig. 10.30 Lines and measurements for evaluation of basilar invagination.

dral bone and marrow adjacent to the infected disc.71 Graft material and native vertebra should not enhance within the first few days after spinal surgery. After several months, graft enhancement occurs, but it is often less intense and less uniform than that caused by infection. Bone graft usually has high signal intensity on T2-weighted images during the first postoperative year, and the signal gradually decreases with time as the bone graft is vascularized and fused.71 An enhancing mass adjacent to the graft or a graft dislodgment is a sign of potential infection.71

Fig. 10.31 A sagittal T1-weighted image of the brain and upper cervical spine shows inferior migration of the cerebellar tonsils (arrow) below the level of the foramen magnum compatible with a type 1 Arnold Chiari malformation.

Epidural Abscess

A spinal epidural abscess is a collection of purulent material outside the dura mater. An epidural abscess is usually associated with vertebral osteomyelitis, and direct extension from an adjacent infected vertebral body is the most common source for an epidural abscess.71 Epidural abscesses are less common in the cervical spine than in the thoracic or lumbar spine and may be located anterior or posterior to the spinal cord.71 Multiple spinal segments are usually involved (most commonly, C4 to C7).71