- •The scope of lexicology and the key notions of the word studies
- •It is the relation between the notion named and the name itself.
- •2. Links with other branches of linguistics
- •3. The theoretical and practical value of lexicology
- •Methods of lexicological research
- •The Word as a Linguistic Unit. The Semantic Sstructure of the Word
- •2. Meaning and notion. Types of meaning.
- •3. The elements of the semantic structure. Polysemy.
- •4. The change of meaning
- •Intralinguistic relations of words, thematic groups. The theory of semantic fields
- •1. Homonyms as words with different meanings. Classifications of homonyms.
- •2. Sources of homonymy. Homonymy and polysemy.
- •1. Homonyms as words with different meanings. Classifications of homonyms
- •2. Sources of homonymy. Homonymy and polysemy
- •2. Sources of synonymy
- •3. Euphemisms
- •4. Other types of paradigmatic relations
- •5. Antonyms.
- •2. Classification of the vocabulary according to the period of time.
- •2. Etymological classification of the vocabulary
- •3) Unassimilated loan words or barbarisms: hos d`oeuvres.
- •1) The classification according to the part of speech.
- •Lexicalisation
- •Native affixes
- •2. Compound words
- •Semi-affixes
- •Classification of compounds
- •3. Shortenings
- •I.V. Arnold [] speaks about so-called minor types of lexical oppositions, to which she referred Sound interchange, Distinctive stress, Sound imitation.
- •4. Conversion
- •Conversion in present-day English
- •Partial conversion
- •Substantivation
- •1. The notion of phraseology. The main properties of pharaseological units.
- •2. Classifications of phraseological units
- •1. The notion of phraseology. The main properties of pharaseological units.
- •2. Classifications of phraseological units
- •Structural classification of phraseological units
- •I. Methods of lexicological research
- •II. The Word as a Linguistic Unit. The Semantic structure of the Word
- •(S)Мыркин в.Я. Чувственно-иконическое значение слова//Филологические науки.- 2005-№ 5.
- •(S) Сидорова т.А. Взаимосвязь членимости, производности и мотивированности внутренней формы слова.// Филологические науки. – 2006-№1.
- •(S)Виноградов в.В. Об омонимии и смежных явлениях/Введение в языкознание: Хрестоматия. – м.: Аспект Пресс, 2000.
- •Stylistic classification of the vocabulary.
- •(S)Добросклонская т.Г. Роль сми в динамике языковых процессов// Вестник мгу Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация.№5.- 2005.
- •6.(S)Сердобинцева е.Н. Речевые характеристики профессиональной лексики // Филологические науки. – 2006-№3.
- •1. The morpheme and types of morphemes. Derivation
- •2. Compound words.
- •(S)Зеленин а.В. Дезаббревиация в русском языке//вя2005№1.
- •Кочарян ю.Г. Аббревиация кА лингвистический феномен//Вестник мгу Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация.№3.- 2007.
- •(S)Смирницкий а.И. Лексикология английского языка. – м.: Изд-во мгу, 1998. – 260 с .- с.48-135. Additional
- •4. (S)Кунин а.В. Курс фразеологии английского языка. – Дубна: Феникс, 1996 – 381 с., с. 8 – 28; 46-98; 212 – 241; 339-364.
- •1.Lexicography
- •2.Variants of English
Lexicalisation
A.I. Smirnitsky speaks about one more way of word formation, which is called lexicalisation of functional affixes. It happens when one of the forms, usually the plural form of the noun gets another meaning and becomes a new word: look – looks, colour – colours etc. The new word is normally characterized by deficiency of paradigm in comparison with the original word. Lexicalisation is typical of abstract nouns. Sometimes adjectives can be also lexicalised low – lower.
Productive and non-productive affixes
Both suffixes and prefixes are classified according to their productivity into productive and non-productive affixes.
Productive affixes are those affixes which are used to form new words in the period in question. The proof of productivity is the existence of new words coined by these means. The productive affixes are: suffixes-noun(er,ing, ness, ism, ist, ance); adjective (y, ish,able, less), adverb (ly), verb (ize, ate; prefixes (un, re, dis). The non-productive: noun- th, hood; adjective (ly, some, en,ous; en).
The productivity should not be confused with frequency, which means the existence in the vocabulary of a great number of words containing a certain morpheme.
An affix may lose its productivity and then be revived for a new spell of active word-formation: the suffix -dom. For a long period of time it was non-productive but then about 200 abstract nouns were coined with its help: boredom, serfdom, slavedom. A similar fate befell the suffix -ship.
There are also suffixes on which opinions differ. Some authors, for instance, consider -ment and -ation-tion-sion-ion productive, others class them as non-productive.
The term dead suffixes is used for suffixes disclosed by etymological analysis but having no relevance for the present state of the language. As a rule they are combined with bound stems. A few examples are: -lock (wedlock), -nd (friend),-red (hatred), etc.
The etymology(origin) of affixes
From the point of view of origin affixes are subdivided into 2 main classes: the native affixes and the borrowed affixes. Native affixes are those that existed in English in the Old English period or were formed from Old English words.
The term borrowed affixes is not very exact as affixes are never borrowed as such, but only as parts of loan words. To enter the morphlogical system of the English language a borrowed affix has to satisfy certain conditions. The borrowing of the affixes is possible only a)if there a great number of words containing this affix b) if its meaning and function are definite, and if its structural pattern corresponds to the structural patterns already existing in the language.
If these conditions are fulfilled the foreign affix may even become productive and combine with native stems or borrowed stems within the system of English vocabulary like –able- Lat “-abilis” in such words as laughable or unforgettable.
Native affixes
Part of speech |
Affix |
Word(example) |
Noun-forming |
er ness ing dom hood ship |
Worker Coldness Feeling Freedom Chidhood friedship |
Adjective-forming |
Ful Less Y Ish Ly En some |
Joyful Careless Cozy Childish Lonely Wooden tiresome |
Verb-forming |
en |
redden |
Adverb-forming |
ly |
carefully |
Latin affixes
Part of speech |
Affix |
Word(example) |
Noun-forming |
Ion tion |
Communion, opinion Relation, temptation |
Adjective-forming |
Able Ate Ant Ent Or Al ar |
Curable, detestable Accurate, desperate Arrogant, important Absent, convenient Minor, senior Final, cordial Familiar, solar |
Verb-forming |
Ate Ute Ct(rare) D(e) Prefix-dis |
Appreciate, congratulate Attribute, contribute Act, connect Divide, include Diable, disagree |
French affixes
Part of speech |
Affix |
Word(example) |
Noun-forming |
Ance Ence Ment Age ess |
Arrogance, hindrance Patience, intelligence Development, appointment Courage, village Actress, lioness |
Adjective-forming |
ous |
Curious, serious |
Verb-forming |
Prefix-en |
Enable, enslave |
Hybrids
Words that are made up of elements derived from two or more different languages are called hybrids. English contains thousands of hybrid words.
There is an established pattern that could be represented as English stem+ -able, e.g. answerable, eatable, likable, usable. The root is English and the suffix is derived from the Latin -abilis and borrowed through French. There is a variant with the native negative prefix un-: un-+ English stem+ -able: unanswerable, unbearable, unforeseeable.
Speaking about word-building we also speak about a special type of word, called splinters(осколочные элементы).They are the result of clipping the end or the beginning of a word and producing other words on the analogy with the previous word: mini from moniature- miniplane, minicar; other splinters are: maxi, bio, agri, mobile, rama(panorama), holic(workaholic), post, pre etc.