- •Foreword
- •Contents
- •Contributor Current and Past Positions: Association for Academic Surgery
- •Contributors
- •Academic Surgeons as Bridge-Tenders
- •Types of Surgical Research
- •Going Forward
- •Selected Readings
- •Introduction
- •Preparation Phase
- •Assistant Professor
- •Job Search
- •The First Three Years
- •Career Development Awards (CDAs)
- •Contemplating a Mid-Career Move?
- •Approaching Promotion
- •Associate Professor and Transition to Full Professor
- •Conclusion
- •Selected Readings
- •Introduction
- •Reviewing the Literature
- •Developing a Hypothesis
- •Study Design
- •Selected Readings
- •Introduction
- •The Dual Loyalties of the Surgeon-Scientist
- •Human Subjects Research
- •Informed Consent
- •Surgical Innovation and Surgical Research
- •Conflict of Interest
- •Publication and Authorship
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Sources of Error in Medical Research
- •Study Design
- •Inferential Statistics
- •Types of Variables
- •Measures of Central Tendency and Spread
- •Measures of Spread
- •Comparison of Numeric Variables
- •Comparison of Categorical Values
- •Outcomes/Health Services Research
- •Steps in Outcomes Research
- •The Basics of Advanced Statistical Analysis
- •Multivariate Analysis
- •Time-to-Event Analysis
- •Advanced Methods for Controlling for Selection Bias
- •Propensity Score Analysis
- •Instrumental Variable (IV) Analysis
- •Summary
- •Selected Readings
- •Transgenic Models
- •Xenograft Models
- •Noncancer Models
- •Alternative Vertebrate Models
- •Selected Readings
- •Overview
- •Intellectual Disciplines and Research Tools
- •Comparative Effectiveness Research
- •Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
- •Data Synthesis
- •Overview
- •Intellectual Disciplines and Research Tools
- •Disparities
- •Quality Measurement
- •Implementation Science
- •Patient Safety
- •Optimizing the Health Care Delivery System
- •Overview
- •Intellectual Disciplines and Research Tools
- •Policy Evaluation
- •Surgical Workforce
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •What Is Evidence-Based Medicine?
- •Evidence-Based Educational Research
- •Forums for Surgical Education Research
- •Conducting Surgical Education Research
- •Developing Good Research Questions
- •Beginning the Study Design Process
- •Developing a Research Team
- •Pilot Testing
- •Demonstrating Reliability and Validity
- •Developing a Study Design
- •Data Collection and Analysis
- •Surveys
- •Ethics
- •Funding
- •Conclusions
- •Selected Readings
- •Genomics
- •Gene-Expression Profiling
- •Proteomics
- •Metabolomics
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Selected Readings
- •Introduction
- •Why Write
- •Getting Started
- •Where and When to Write
- •Choosing the Journal
- •Instructions to Authors
- •Writing
- •Manuscript Writing Order
- •Figures and Tables
- •Methods
- •Results
- •Figure Legends
- •Introduction
- •Discussion
- •Acknowledgments
- •Abstract
- •Title
- •Authorship
- •Revising Before Submission
- •Responding to Reviewer Comments
- •References
- •Selected Readings
- •Introduction
- •Origins of the Term
- •Modern Definition and Primer
- •Transition from Mentee to Colleague
- •Mentoring Risks
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Selected Readings
- •The Career Development Plan
- •Choosing the Mentor
- •Writing the Career Development Plan
- •The Candidate
- •Research Plan
- •Final Finishing Points About the Research Plan
- •Summary
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Decisions, Decisions!
- •Mission Impossible: Defining a Laboratory Mission or Vision
- •Project Planning
- •Saving Money
- •Seek Help
- •People
- •Who Should I Hire?
- •Advertising
- •References
- •Interviews
- •Conduct a Structured Interview
- •Probation Period
- •Trainees
- •Trainee Funding
- •Time Is on Your Mind
- •Research Techniques
- •Program Leadership
- •Summary
- •Selected Readings
- •Introduction
- •Direct Evidence
- •Indirect Evidence
- •Burnout
- •Prevention of and Recovery from Work–Life Imbalance
- •Action Plan for Finding Balance: Personal Level
- •Action Plan for Finding Balance: Professional Level
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Time Management Strategies
- •Planning and Prioritizing
- •Delegating and Saying “No”
- •Action Plans
- •Activity Logs
- •Scheduling Protected Time
- •Eliminating Distractions
- •Buffer Time
- •Goal Setting
- •Completing Large Tasks
- •Maximizing Efficiency
- •Get Organized
- •Multitasking
- •Think Positive
- •Summary
- •References
- •Selected Readings
- •Index
Chapter 9. Translational Research and New Approaches 135
Genomics
Genomics involves the study of organisms’ genes including the determination of the entire DNA sequence. Complete genomes have been developed for many organisms including humans. Genomics can be divided into either structural or functional genomics. Structural genomics involves the characterization of the physical nature of whole genomes, and corresponds to the genetic background of organisms. Using high-throughput technologies that allow for the simultaneous determination of a large number of components from a clini- cal sample, one can evaluate the variation of DNA sequence within a population.This enables the systematic study of dis- ease-correlated genomic variations.
Biological variations can vary from a single base change termed a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP), to small insertions or deletions of sequences called indels, to largescale chromosomal translocations. In some instances, individual mutations can produce a disease state as is seen in sickle-cell anemia where a single base change in the b chain of hemoglobin (adenine to thymine) causes the replacement of glutamine with valine.Huntington’s disease is caused by an expansion of the polyglutamine repeat (CAG) in the gene that encodes Huntington protein. The Philadelphia chromo- some is the result of a wholesale translocation in chromosomes 9 and 22, resulting in the production of a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that can lead to chronic myelogenous leukemia.
It is more common that a genomic variation is found to correlate with increased susceptibility to a given disease. First a specific genomic variant is identified in an individual with a disease. When the same variant is identified in another indi- vidual without evidence of the disease, the SNPs can be tested for association with susceptibility to a variety of diseases.
When the frequencies of the genotype are compared in populations of cases and controls, a higher frequency in patients with the disease is thought to be sufficient evidence that the genetic variation is associated with increased risk of disease.
136 D.P. Foley
One example is the mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.Women with both mutations have an 80% lifetime risk of breast cancer compared to 12% lifetime risk in the general population. In some instances prophylactic mastectomies are performed in high-risk patients due this correlation between genomic variation and clinical prognosis.
One example demonstrating the rapid translation of pre- clinical molecular findings in genomic studies into the clinic has been seen in ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) gene inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ALK encodes a tyrosine kinase normally expressed only in neuronal cells. In a rare subset of anaplastic large cell lymphomas, inter- stitial deletion and inversion within chromosome 2p result in fusion of the N-terminal portion of the protein encoded by the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (ELM4) gene with the intracellular portion of the ALK receptor tyrosine kinase. While genetic alterations involving ALK have been seen in other malignancies, thus far, the ELM4-ALK fusion gene appears unique to NSCLC. In less than 3 years after these findings,studies ofALK inhibition yielded dramatic results in patients with NSCLC. In a pretreated population that generally has a 10% response rate to conventional chemo- therapy, treatment with the oral ALK inhibitor, crizotinib, yielded an overall response rate of 55% and an estimated
6-month, progression-free survival rate of 72%.2
Gene-Expression Profiling
Functional genomics involves the overall patterns of gene expression, and the targets of this research are RNA, pro- teins, and metabolites. Functional genomics allows the detec- tion of genes that are turned on and off at a given time based on environmental factors. Transcriptomics consists of the study of all transcribed mRNA species at a given time. Multiplex oligonucleotide or complementary DNA microar- rays are platforms that can be used to determine mRNA abundance of hundreds to thousands of genes simultane- ously. The principles of these technologies involve the
Chapter 9. Translational Research and New Approaches 137
following.Oligonucleotide or complimentary DNAs (cDNAs) for specific mRNA species are immobilized on a surface (glass slide, or nylon membrane). The target mRNA is iso- lated from the sample of interest, converted to cDNA, labeled, and allowed to hybridize to the oligonucleotides or cDNA fixed to the solid surface. The intensity of hybridiza- tion on each probe is proportional to the gene expression level.
To perform array experiments, one needs the probes to detect the RNA, reproducible and sensitive techniques for quantification of RNA levels, and standardization procedures and databases for analysis. Array methods differ based on which probes are used (cDNA or oligonucleotides), the tech- nology used to fix the probes to the solid surface probes, and the labeling technologies for the mRNA targets. When changes of mRNA abundance are identified and they are small in number, the microarray findings can be validated by using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR is more sensitive and is cheaper than using microarrays when smaller numbers of genes are studied.The two techniques are usually used in parallel fashion to validate the findings.
The most difficult aspect of employing microarray tech- nology is not the acquisition of the data but rather the analy- sis.While a detailed discussion of statistical analytical methods used in genome-wide studies is beyond the limitations of this chapter, a few analytical techniques will be discussed.
Clustering is a data mining technique used to group genes having similar expression patterns. Hierarchical clustering and k-means clustering are widely used techniques in microar- ray analysis.The concept is such that genes of similar function areco-expressedtoproduceaspecificphenotype.Hierarchical clustering is a statistical method for finding relatively homog- enous clusters of similarly expressed genes. This clustering consists of two separate phases.A distance matrix containing all of the pair-wise distances between the genes is calculated. Pearson’s correlation or Spearman’s correlation are often used to estimate dissimilarities among genetic clusters.
Analyses are also termed either as supervised or unsupervised. Unsupervised analyses involve analyzing the
138 D.P. Foley
most differentially expressed genes that are clustered to look for patterns. In supervised analysis, the most commonly used analy- sis, samples are grouped prior to analysis using existing knowl- edge and then they are clustered and analyzed. For example, samples are grouped by good or poor prognosis,and then genes are clustered.This approach identifies genes that are potentially linked to prognosis in a training set.
A commonly used statistical method for the analysis of microarrays is SignificanceAnalysis of Microarrays (SAM) that was adapted byTusher et al.3 SAM identifies genes with statisti- cally significant changes in expression by assimilating a set of gene-specific t-tests. Each gene is given a score on the basis of its change in gene expression relative to the standard deviation of repeated measurements for that gene. Genes with a score greater than a predefined threshold are deemed potentially significant.The percentage of such genes identified by chance is the false discovery rate (FDR). In other words, the FDR is the proportion of genes that were wrongly identified by chance as being significant. It is calculated by dividing the median of the number of falsely called genes by the number of genes called significant. In addition, if a preliminary set of expression data are available,SAM can also estimate the number of microarray chips required to reach a defined level of significance.
There are two major areas where functional genomics can impact medicine. One is by identifying molecular markers or differentially expressed genes that may be important in bio- logical functions as their expression differs based on environ- mental and genetic factors.The other application is the ability to identify a signature profile that can be used as a detailed molecular phenotype. These predictors could be comple- mented in the future with changes in structural genetic varia- tions that are identified at the DNA level. For example, with this technology researchers who study trauma biology and sepsis can develop molecular signatures for inflamed tissues and specific cell populations. This technology is currently being used to characterize the progress of disease in patients with trauma, burns, and sepsis. Applications can also extend to tumor biology and identifying those patients who may respond to treatment better than others. In solid organ