- •Milestones of evolution of text linguistics.
- •Text linguistics and adjacent disciplines.
- •3. Syntactics as a linguistic discipline. The difference between language sign and language unit. Relationships between signs: modularity, interaction.
- •4. Syntagmatic/ paradigmatic relations.
- •5. Relations on different language levels.
- •6. Development of valency theory.
- •7. Semantic and syntactic valency of words
- •8. Lexical and grammatical valency of words.
- •9. Reduction and expansion of valency. Optional and obligatory valency. Secondary valency.
- •27. Discourse features
- •28. Discourse and society.
- •Varieties of c.A.:
- •35.Narrative analysis.
- •39. Discourse analysis in the framework of z. Harris.
- •40. Transformational grammatics. Transformation analysis.
- •42.Post-structuralism in France.
5. Relations on different language levels.
Language signs:
-
Segmental;
-
Suprasegmental.
Segmental units consist of phonemes, they form phonemic strings of various status (syllables, words).
Suprasegmental units do not exist by themselves, but are realized together with segm. units & expres different modificational meanings (functions). These are intonation, accents, pauses, patterns of word-order.
Language levels:
1st level – phonemic. It’s formed by phonemes as material elements of the higher levels.
The phoneme has no meaning (so it’s not a sign), its function is to differentiate morphemes and words as material bodies.
-
Phonemes are combined into syllable
-
A syllable is not a sign either.
Types of oppositions of phonemes:
-
Privative, gradual, equipollent
-
Binary (two members)
-
More that binary.
The binary privative opposition is formed by a contrastive pair of members in which one member is characterized by the presence of a certain feature, while the other is char. by the absence of it. [b, d, g – p, t, k] - the feature is voice.
The gradual opposition - … by degree of the feature. [i: - I – e] – the degree of their openness.
The equipollent opposition - the members are distinguished by different positive features. [m] & [b], both bilabial consonants, form and equipollent opposition. [m] being sonorous nasalized, [b] being plosive.
Units of all higher levels of language are meaningful.
2nd level – morphemic. The morpheme I the elementary meaningful part of the word. It is build up by phonemes.it express abstract meaning.
Morphemes: root morphemes; affixes.
The root expresses the concrete material part of the word. Affix – the specificational part of the meaning of the word.
The same opposition as previous.
The binary privative opposition [cat – cats] singular – plural.
The equipollent opposition constitutes a minor type.
The gradual opposition is not generally recognized.
3rd level – lexemic. The word (lexeme) is a directly nominative unit of language. It names things and their relations. Word is built up by morphemes, the shortest word consists of 1 explicit morpheme only.
There are:
-
Notional & functional words;
-
Abstract & concrete words;
-
Synonyms;
-
Antonyms;
-
Hyponyms.
These groups reflect paradigmatic structure of the vocabulary.
4th level – proposemic level (the level of sentences). It includes phrases & sentences.
Notional phrases may be of a stable type & of a free type.
-
The stable type phrases form the phraseological part of the lexicon.
-
The free type – build up in the process of speech on the existing productive models.
The larger unit – sentences.
The particular function of the s. is to name a certain situation (real/unreal).
The supraproposemic level includes groups of sentences, which are united by one micro-topic.
In the printed text these sentence groups very often coincide with a peregreph.
6. Development of valency theory.
The French linguists Tesnierre was the first who use the term valency in linguistics.
According to his theory the verb/predicate performs a unique role in a sentence. Tesnierre insisted on the syntactical character of valency. Syntactic valency was seen as the ability of lexemes to bind a number of other elements in a grammatical construction.
The first edition in 1968 Helbig & Shenkel pioneered a new approach to valency theory. It proposed different levels of valency: logical, semantic, and syntactic.
Logical refers to logical predicates, that formalize a verb’s semantic content.
Semantic restricts predicate arguments to elements with certain semantic properties.
Syntactic defines requirements for the morpho-syntactic realization of arguments. Verbs with equal local and semantic arguments may require different cases.