- •General remarks
- •1.2. Comparative method and “genetic” hypothesis
- •1.3. Neogrammarian movement
- •1.4. Methods of historical linguistics
- •1.5. Modern views of language evolution
- •Family Tree Theory
- •Indo-European Family of Languages
- •Indo-European Family of languages
- •Proto-Language. The Evolution of Proto-Germanic
- •Historical Sources of Germanic Tribes and Dialects
- •Geographical distribution. Dialect geography
- •Classification of Germanic languages
- •1.1. Germanic consonant system
- •1.1.1. The First Consonant Shift (Grimm’s Law)
- •1.1.2. The Second Consonant Shift
- •1.1.3. The Third Consonant Shift
- •1.1.4. Other consonant changes
- •2.1. Germanic vowel system.
- •2.1.1 Independent changes.
- •2.1.2 Assimilative changes. Vowel mutation / Umlaut
- •2.1.3 Other vowel changes.
- •1.1. The Word-Class Noun
- •1.1.1. Structure of a Noun in Germanic
- •1.1.2. Grammatical categories of a Noun in Germanic
- •1.2. The Rise of Article
- •1.3. The word-class adjective
- •1.4. The word-class verb
- •1.4.1. Morphological classification of old Germanic verbs
- •1.4.2. Evolution of grammatical categories
- •Reading material Basic
- •Additional
- •1.1. Runes and their origin
- •1.2. Wulfila’s Gothic alphabet
- •1.3 Introduction of the Latin alphabet
- •Additional
- •1. Etymological layers of Old Germanic vocabulary
- •1.1. Native words
- •1.2. Loan words
- •1.3. Ways of word-formation
- •Reading material Basic
- •Historical Background
- •Vandalic
- •[Edit] History and evidence
- •[Edit] Alphabet
- •[Edit] Sounds
- •[Edit] Vowels
- •[Edit] Consonants
- •[Edit] Stops
- •[Edit] Fricatives
- •[Edit] Nasals and approximants and other phonemes
- •[Edit] Accentuation and Intonation
- •[Edit] Morphology [edit] Nouns
- •[Edit] Pronouns
- •[Edit] Verbs
- •[Edit] Gothic compared to other Germanic languages
- •[Edit] Gothic and Old Norse
- •[Edit] Examples
- •[Edit] Notes From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •Vandalic language From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •Burgundian language (Germanic) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •Goths From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Etymology
- •[Edit] Proto-history [edit] Jordanes
- •[Edit] Jordanes and Orosius
- •[Edit] Pliny
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] Archaeology
- •[Edit] Languages
- •[Edit] Symbolic legacy
- •[Edit] See also
- •[Edit] Footnotes From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Change] Other websites
- •Visigoths From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Division of the Goths: Tervingi and Vesi
- •[Edit] Etymology of Tervingi and Vesi/Visigothi
- •[Edit] History
- •[Edit] War with Rome (376–382)
- •[Edit] Reign of Alaric I
- •[Edit] Visigothic kingdom
- •[Edit] Visigothic religion
- •[Edit] Visigothic culture
- •[Edit] Law
- •[Edit] Non-Balti kings
- •Ostrogoths From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- •[Edit] Divided Goths: Greuthungi and Ostrogothi
- •[Edit] Etymology of Greuthungi and Ostrogothi
- •[Edit] Prehistory
- •[Edit] History [edit] Hunnic invasions
- •[Edit] Post-Hunnic movements
- •[Edit] Kingdom in Italy
- •[Edit] War with Rome (535–554)
- •[Edit] Ostrogothic culture
- •2.: Visigoths and ostrogoths — ( p. 8 ) - Edward Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, vol. 2 [1776]
- •The origin of the goths; and the gothic history of jordanes — (
- •Germany
- •The story of the Goths and Romans is well known. The Visigoths ...
- •1.2 Peculiarities of the East Germanic subgroup
- •9.3 Gothic and Germanic
- •Reading material Basic
- •Additional
- •10. North Germanic Languages
- •10.1 Historical background. Division into East Scandinavian and West
- •10.2. East Scandinavian subgroup
- •10.2.1. Danish
- •10.2.2. Swedish
- •10.3. West Scandinavian Subgroup
- •10.3.1. Norwegian
- •10.3.2. Icelandic
- •10.3.3. Faroese
- •10.4 Simple sentence in Scandinavian languages
- •Additional
- •11. West germanic languages
- •11.1 Historical background
- •11.2 Peculiarities of West-Germanic subgroup
- •11.3. Frisian
- •11.4. Dutch
10.4 Simple sentence in Scandinavian languages
The chief principle of Scandinavian word order in a simple sentence is to put a verb in the second or the first position : OIcel. Hallgerði var sagt vig Kols ”Hallgerth was told about Kol’s murder”. The principle was not established in the 4th - 7th centuries. It had become a rule by the 9th century.
The main difference between old Scandinavian and modern Scandinavian languages is the frequency of the first and second positions of a verb in a simple sentence.
In old Scandinavian languages the verb (predicate) was usually put before the subject. It could follow the conjunction ok: OSw. oc sculu sva allir taka “and all should accept”. Also, the verb was put first in case there was no subject in a sentence: OIcel. batnaði honum “he is getting better”. In a narrative, in a sequence of sentences, the verb was put in the first position, too: OIcel. skiljask Þeir “at that moment they parted”.
By the end of the old period the first position of a verb had been preserved, like in modern languages, only in the main clause of a complex sentence, which immediately follows the subjunctive clause, and in compound conditional sentences which were introduced without any conjunction.
Two other possibilities were an interrogative sentence without a question word, and an imperative sentence.
During the old period the position of other members of a sentence was fixed as well.
Unlike modern Scandinavian languages, in old Scandinavian manuscripts we find an indirect object not only after, but also before a direct object; an adjective could be put before and after the noun it determined; the genetive noun could stand before or after the noun it determined.
It should be noted that even in the old period Danish had word order which was very much alike modern rules. on the contrary, Icelandic still reveals old traces.
The main tendency in syntactical change was the development of analytical syntactical means. As a result, more frequent use of prepositions and pronouns has been registered in the course of time. Also, sentences without a subject got out of use. Cf..: OIcel. rignir “it is raining”, mik lystir “I want”. These structures without a subject were substituted by the structures with a subject. As a formal subject, OSw. þet, ODan. thær were used. The formal subject appeared in Danish in the 14th century; it is widely used a century later. In modern Scandinavian languages a formal subject is less frequent in Icelandic and it is widely used in Danish. Swedish and Norwegian are close to the Danish model than to the Icelandic one.
Reading material
Basic
Жлуктенко Ю.О., Яворська Т.А., op. cit., c.39-43, 50-51.
Rastorguyeva T.A. A History of English, op. cit., p.29-31.
Стеблин-Каменский М.И. История скандинавских языков. -М.-Л.: Ан СССР, 1953.
Additional
Аракин В.Д. Сопоставительная типология скандинавских языков. - М.: Высшая школа, 1984.
Вессен Э. Скандинавские языки. - М., 1949.