- •16.6.4.6. Interpretation tests
- •16.6.4.7. Correction tests
- •16.6.4.8. Free-response tests
- •16.7. Conclusions
- •17. Teaching English in the primary classroom
- •17.1. Identifying priorities and their implications
- •17.2. Natural capacities and instincts children bring to the classroom
- •17.2.1. Children’s ability to grasp meaning
- •17.2.2.Children’s creative use of limited language resources
- •17.2.3. Children’s capacity for indirect learning
- •17.2.4. Children’s instinct for play and fun
- •17.2.5. The role of imagination
- •17.2.6. The instinct for interaction and talk
- •17.3. Attitude goals and content goals
- •17.3.1. High priority of attitude goals
- •17.3.2. The special nature of language
- •17.3.3. The significance of the way we check understanding
- •17.3.4. The significance of the way we treat mistakes
- •1 7.3.5. Making language exercises into real exchanges
- •17.3.6. Teaching language lessons in the target language
- •17.4. Realistic English as the intended product
- •17.4.1. Stimulation vs. Settle down activities
- •17.4.2. Mental engagement and actual occupation
- •17.4.3. Choosing the style to suit the mood
- •17.4.4. Keeping the lesson simple
- •17.4.5. Reusing materials
- •17.4.6. Reusing a core of ideas
- •17.5. Conclusions
- •18. Special techniques for problem classes
- •18.1.2.1. An initial presentation lesson for understanding only
- •18.1.2.2. Presenting a new structure with one verb only
- •18.1. Dealing with weak classes
- •18.1.1. Limitations of aims and objectives
- •18.1.2. Simplification of material
- •18.1.2.1. An initial presentation lesson for understanding only
- •18.1.2.2. Presenting a new structure with one verb only
- •18.1.3. Tighter control over learner production
- •18.2. Dealing with large classes
- •18.2.1. Teaching room
- •18.2.2. Group work
- •18.2.3. The English corner and the English walls
- •18.2.4. Blackboard
- •Station
- •18.3. Dealing with mixed ability classes
- •18.3.1. Flexible grouping arrangements
- •18.3.2. Dictation
- •18.3.3. Reading comprehension
- •18.3.4. Writing
- •18.3.5. Drama
- •18.4. Disruptive behaviour
- •18.4.1. Causes of discipline problems
- •18.4.1.1. The teacher
- •18.4.1.2. The students
- •18.4.1.3. The institution
- •18.4.2. Action in case of indiscipline
- •18.5. Conclusions
- •Glossary
- •Bibliography
17.4.2. Mental engagement and actual occupation
At the risk again of oversimplifying for the sake of clarity, we can identify two main types of involvement which could be described roughly as mental engagement and actual occupation.
The children are already fairly familiar with the words. They have already practised repeating the words after the teacher and are now able to produce the words by themselves if the teacher just holds up the cards without saying anything. Now comes the meaningful practice.
Guessing: To practise ‘going to’ + places
The teacher gives the cards to one child who holds them so that the other children cannot see which card is at the top of the pile.
The teacher starts the guessing:
Teacher: Are you going to the library?
Child: No.
Teacher: Are you going to the post-office?
Child: No.
The rest of the class joins in the guessing. When someone guesses correctly, another child chooses a card and the guessing process starts again.
In order to do this activity the children have to remember which five places are on the cards. They have to recall and produce the phrases and they have to work out by the process of elimination which card their classmate must have chosen. So they have to think. The activity also engages their emotions. It is fun. They are eager to choose right. In this form then, the activity is mentally engaging in several ways. That is why children respond to it so well and why similar activities are very effective and popular.
This kind of mental and emotional engagement contrasts with actual occupation. Compare the guessing activity with what happens when we ask children to copy out a list of words. Copying is not mentally engaging. It is true that the children have to concentrate in order to copy accurately, but they do not have to think very hard. Copying is involving in a different way. It is actually occupying. Each child is physically doing something. It is also usually an activity where all the children in the class are simultaneously doing something. This contrasts with the guessing activity when only one child is speaking at a time, although we tend to think of it as a ‘whole class’ activity because the teacher leads it from the front. Again it will help to make yourself a list, this time of types of work which create engagement and those which actually occupy the learners.
Mentally engaging |
Actually occupying |
Games Puzzles Imagining Competitions Talking about themselves ... |
Reading aloud Writing Drawing Repetition ... |
When we identify these stir/ settle or involvement elements in this way we have much more chance of avoiding a language lesson which is too rowdy or one which is too soporific. We thus have a way of making sure through positive action that the need for an interactive classroom does not automatically lead to restless and silly behaviour, even when the classes are big. This is so because the teacher can choose a style of work that in terms of its stir/ settle potential suits a particular class or occasion. The teacher is also in a position to increase children’s involvement by adapting activities so that, if possible, they offer both mental engagement and actual occupation, preferably of the whole class at the same time.