Gas SIR CDI 9th edition
.pdfSection 10. |
|
LIFESAVING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
Ref. |
Crew Knowledge and Proficiency |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|
|
The Inspector will interview various members of the crew to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seek evidence of knowledge and proficiency. The purpose of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the interview is to ensure that personnel can demonstrate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sufficient depth of knowledge and familiarity with the policies, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
procedures, and equipment on-board, as laid down in their job |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
description. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.1 |
|
All crew members familiar with their Lifeboat station and |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
muster duties, as applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.2 |
|
All officers are aware of Lifeboat, liferaft and/or rescue boat |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
launching and recovery procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.2 |
|
This includes the correct use and maintenance of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as fitted, including load/unload release mechanisms and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proper arrangement of the hydrostatic release mechanism. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.3 |
|
All personnel are familiar where lifebuoys are located and Man |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
Overboard procedure |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.4 |
|
Personnel are familiar with the use of the other Lifesaving |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
|
appliances/equipment carried |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2.4 |
|
This question is intended to cover any other area questioned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by the inspector not covered by the questions in this chapter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If answered No, the inspector should note the issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
identified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coppola |
|
by |
Massimiliano |
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 131 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 11. |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
Ref |
Environmental Protection |
|
Yes |
|
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|
||||
11.1.1 |
|
An approved Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
SI |
|
||
|
|
(SMPEP) and/or Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(SOPEP), as required, is available on board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
11.1.1 |
MARPOL I |
Approved Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Reg 37 |
(SMPEP) are required for all vessels of 400 grt and over which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
MARPOL II |
are certified to carry Noxious Liquid Substances. In answering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
this question, inspectors should ensure that the SMPEP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Reg 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
contains updated lists of coastal state contacts (latest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
quarterly update). Vessels carrying Annex 1 cargoes may |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
combine the required SOPEP with the SMPEP. Emergency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
procedures should be harmonized with those listed in 7.1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
and must be in hard copy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If Yes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.2 |
MARPOL I |
There are records to indicate that the training drills, as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
||
|
Reg 26 |
required, are carried out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
11.1.3 |
|
Vessel has appropriate Vessel Response Plans (VRP) and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
SI |
|
||
|
|
Marine Firefighting Plan (MFP) for the area it is trading in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
If Yes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.4 |
|
There are records to indicate that VRP & MFP training |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
I |
|
||
|
|
drills are carried out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.3 - 4 |
|
The vessel may be required to have a Vessel Response Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
to meet the requirements of port States or other entities in its |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Coppola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trading area. Examples include Panama, the US, and certain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
states within the US. If the vessel does not trade in these |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
areas, the question should be noted as NA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
11.1.5 |
|
Company procedures for spill clean up, including operational |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
SI |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
spills, are available |
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.5 |
SOPEP 2.5.2 |
The Plan should outline the procedures for safe removal of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
MEPC54(32) |
material spilled and contained on deck. This may be through |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
the use of on-board resources or by hiring a clean-up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Res MEPC. |
company. The Plan should provide guidance to ensure proper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
86(44) |
disposal. Operational spills, if contaminated with cargo or oil, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
disposal must be recorded in the cargo or oil record book. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
only |
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
11.1.6 |
Information |
The ship has a IPP NLS certificate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NS |
SI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
11.1.9 |
STCW A-1/14 |
There are CompanyPurchasedprocedures covering the use of oil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
||
11.1.7 |
Responsible officers are familiar with the requirements for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
I |
|
|||
|
2.1.2 |
compliance with MARPOL Annex II, including disposal of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
NLS residues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.8 |
|
The Cargo Record Book is on board and appears correct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
||
|
|
and up to date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dispersant overside |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.10 |
|
There are Company procedures for the use of detergents in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
||
|
|
the Engine Room |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.10 |
|
Procedures should outline dangers and consequences of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
using detergents in the engine room, with respect to disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
through the oily water separator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.11 |
MARPOL |
An Oil Record Book Part 1 (Machinery Spaces) is on board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
||
|
Annex II Reg |
and appears correct and up to date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 132 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 11. |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
Ref |
Environmental Protection |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
11.1.12 |
IMO Res. |
The Ballast Water Record Book appears correct and up to |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
A.868 |
date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.13 |
Marpol Annex |
The following appear correct and up to date: Garbage Record |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
V Reg 9.3 |
Book is maintained up to date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.8-13 MARPOL I, II,
and V
BLG.1/Circ.
25
11.1.14MARPOL V Reg 9.2
11.1.15MARPOL I Ch.3. Reg. 14
11.1.16
11.1.17
11.1.17MARPOL 1 Reg 14 & 15
11.1.18
11.1.18
11.1.19
11.1.19ISGOTT 24.6.1 SSSCL A 8 TSG (C) 5.3.1
Any obvious errors in completion of the MARPOL Record Books will result in a NO answer and details must be entered in the list of observations. The use of pencil or correcting fluid in the completion of MARPOL Record Books should not be considered acceptable. Changes must be struck out with a single line and initialled. If the vessel has identified a missing entry and entered the correction out of date order in the Record Book, it is acceptable as long as it is further explained with a comment in the Record Book.This plan may take the form of a simple flow diagram
For Annex II products, the product name used in the Cargo Record Book must be as listed in the Certificate of Fitness.
There are facilities on board for the separate collection of different garbage categories (plastics, food wastes, other garbage etc.)
There is NO obvious evidence that the oily-water separator is being by-passed Coppola
When in port, the machinery space oily-water separator / oil filtering equipment overboard discharge valve(s) is closed and secured
If the oily water separator is not fitted with an automatic
stopping device, do entriesMassimilianoin the ORB Part 1 indicate that it has not been used in a Special Area
The attachment to the IOPP Certificate will indicate whether or
not the engine room oily-water separator has been fitted with
an approved automatic stopping device. In vessels over
10,000 grt, the oily-water separator should be fitted with an
alarm and an automatic device that will stop the discharge of
any mixture above 15 ppm oil. If the oily-water separator has |
|
not been fitted with an automaticby |
stopping device, the |
inspector mustPurchasedascertain that it has not been used within a These spaces could include the foc'sle space, bow thruster
special area.
The arrangements for the disposal of bilge wells from spaces not serviced by the Engine Room oily-water separator system are adequate
space, storage rooms containing oil, etc. Overboard discharges should be secured ( lashed, sealed, etc.), and appropriate notices posted.
During cargo transfer operations, hoses / arms are properly secured using all available bolt holes
This includes bunkering operations and if used camlocks are correctly fitted and locked
SSI
SI
D I
S SI
RI
RI
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 133 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 11.
Gas
11.1Ref
11.1.20
11.1.20ISGOTT 6.5.1 SSSCL A 14
11.1.21
11.1.22SOLAS IX ISM 10.1
11.1.23
11.1.24ISGOTT 24.7.4 SSSCL A 13 TSG (C) 5.3.1
11.1.25ISM 10.1
11.1.26
11.1.26ISM 10.1
11.1.27
11.1.27BWM Convention IMO Res A.868
11.1.28BWM Convention IMO Res A.868
BWM.2/
Circ.62
11.1.29BWM Convention IMO Res A.868
BWM.2/
Circ.62
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Environmental Protection |
|
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
||
All unused cargo and bunker manifolds, pipelines drains and |
|
|
|
R |
I |
|||
vapour return lines and unused cargo pipeline connections are |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
suitably blanked and/or isolated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
If a vessel has arrangements such as a barge or stern line, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
these lines should be blanked or isolated when not in use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
The stern cargo pipelines should be blanked or isolated |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
forward of the aft accommodation when not in use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
During bunkering operations, suitable spill containment is in |
|
|
|
R |
I |
|||
place under each manifold in use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cargo and bunker manifold spill containment equipment or |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
fittings appear in good condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Arrangements to drain cargo and bunker manifolds appear |
|
|
|
D |
I |
|||
satisfactory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During cargo or bunker transfer operations, all deck scuppers |
|
|
|
R |
I |
|||
appear to be effectively plugged when appropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Suitable and permanent spill containment is fitted around all |
|
|
|
R |
I |
|||
fuel oil, diesel oil and lubricating oil tank vents and in good |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suitable and permanent spill containment is fitted around all |
|
|
|
R |
I |
|||
hydraulic deck machinery and in good condition |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Coppola |
|
|
|
|
|
Wooden bungs are not considered appropriate for use in spill |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
containment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ship has in place a ship-specific Ballast Water |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
Management Plan, approved by the Administration and/or |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Class |
|
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels require a BWMP to meet the requirements of port |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
states or other entities in its trading area. If chlorine or other |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
poisonous gases can be emitted by the BW treatment system, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
or is stored onboard, a risk assessment should have been |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
carried out prior to commissioning the system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
When required, ballast water treatment equipment is installed |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
Purchased |
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
I |
|
If ballast water treatment equipment is installed, the equipment |
|
|
|
appears to be in working order
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 134 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 11. |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
Ref |
Environmental Protection |
|
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
||
11.1.30 |
|
A Company manual contains a policy on energy conservation |
|
|
|
R |
SI |
|||
11.1.30 |
|
Details of this should be evident in company |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
procedures/circulars indicating bunker specification in line with |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ISO standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.31 |
Information |
The ship is fitted with an exhaust gas or waste heat boiler |
|
|
|
NS |
SI |
|||
|
only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.32 |
|
Cargo cooling / heating procedures are available |
|
|
|
R |
SI |
|||
11.1.33 |
|
The Company has procedures for monitoring the |
|
|
|
R |
SI |
|||
|
|
performance of main and auxiliary machinery |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
11.1.33 |
|
There should be evidence that the Chief Engineer carries out |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
on a regular basis, evaluation of the ship’s engine |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
performance against the design performance of the engine. In |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
addition there should be evidence that the ship is required to |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
submit comprehensive engine performance data to the |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Company office for evaluation by a marine superintendent or |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
by the engine’s manufacturer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
11.1.34 |
|
The Company provides energy conservation training to all |
|
|
|
R |
SI |
|||
|
|
crew |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.34 |
|
There should be evidence that the Company provide training |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
programmes in energy conservation. This may be either on |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
board ship or on shore. An on board training programme may |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
consist of specific written material or video presentations. An |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Coppola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on shore training program may form part of Company in-house |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
training seminars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1.35 |
|
The company has procedures for operating |
|
|
|
R |
SI |
|||
|
|
machinery/equipment in a safe and efficient manner |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
11.1.35 |
|
Equipment should be operated in a manner that does not |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
compromise safety. |
|
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 135 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 11. |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
Ref. |
Crew Knowledge and Proficiency |
|
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
||
|
|
The Inspector will interview various members of the crew to |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
seek evidence of knowledge and proficiency. The purpose of |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
the interview is to ensure that personnel can demonstrate |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
sufficient depth of knowledge and familiarity with the policies, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
procedures, and equipment on board, as laid down in their job |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
description. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.1 |
STCW 95 |
Personnel are familiar with their SOPEP/SMPEP and/or VRP |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
A-I/14 2.1.2 |
duties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.2 |
|
Officers are familiar with procedures for the disposal of tank |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
|
washing/ballast containing category X, Y, Z and OS residues |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
11.2.3 |
|
Officers are familiar with the discharge limitations in Special |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
|
Areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.4 |
|
Officers are familiar with the procedures for tank pre-wash |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
|
requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.5 |
|
Responsible personnel are familiar with the use of the stripping |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
|
system |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.2-5 |
STCW 95 A- |
Responsible Officers (i.e. those responsible for a particular |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
I/14 2.1.2 |
requirement) should have detailed understanding of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
regulations and requirements. Other officers should have an |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
awareness of the limitations and requirements of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
regulations and company policies and procedures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
11.2.6 |
MARPOL V |
Personnel are aware of requirements for the collection and |
|
|
|
S |
I |
|||
|
Reg 9.2 |
disposal of garbage |
|
|
Coppola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.7 |
|
Personnel are familiar with other aspects of Environmental |
|
|
|
R |
I |
|||
|
|
Protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2.7 |
|
Personnel should have a basic understanding of the limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
of the disposal of residues overboard. This question is also |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
intended to cover any other area questioned by the inspector |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
not covered by the questions in this chapter. If answered No, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
the inspector should note the issues identified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Purchased |
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 136 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 12. |
|
SECURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Ref |
Security |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
12.1 |
ISPS Code |
There is a designated Ship Security Officer (SSO) on board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
12.2 |
Part A Sec 12 |
Is the SSO aware of his responsibilities as defined in the code. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2ISPS Part 12.2
12.3ISPS
12.4
12.4ISPS
12.5
12.6ISPS BMP
12.7ISPS
12.8
12.8ISPS
Responsibilities of the SSO, as defined in the ISPS Code, shall include but are not limited to:
- Undertaking regular security inspections of the ship to ensure that appropriate security measures are maintained;
- Maintaining and supervising the implementation of the Ship Security Plan (SSP), monitoring the continuing relevance and effectiveness of the Plan, including the undertaking of internal audits and any amendments to the Plan;
- Co-ordinating the security aspects of the handling of cargo and ship’s stores with other shipboard personnel and with the relevant Port Facility Security Officers (PFSO);
- Proposing modifications to the SSP;
- Reporting to the Company Security Officer (CSO) any deficiencies and non-conformities identified during internal audits, periodic reviews, security inspections and verifications of compliance, and implementing any corrective actions;
shipboard personnel, as appropriate; - Reporting all security incidents;
- Enhancing security awareness and vigilanceCoppolaon board; - Ensuring that adequate training has been provided to
- Co-ordinating implementation of the SSP with the CSO and the relevant PFSO;
- Ensuring that any security equipment is properly operated, tested, calibrated and maintained.
Officers and crew are aware of the security level on-board and the meaning of the security level
Massimiliano
A watch is maintained to prevent persons gaining unauthorized access to the ship by
from ashore is controlled.
This should be assessed on Inspector's own experience when boarding shipPurchasedand by observation during the inspection. There must be evidence that boarding of the ship by persons
Personnel assigned for access watch are not involved with cargo operations or other activities that may distract them from security responsibilities
Personnel are aware of steps to be taken to prevent unauthorized access to the vessel in port and at sea
There is a system in place to check visitors against recognised identification documents
A Visitors log is being maintained
The Visitors log should contain time in, name or signature of the visitor and time out.
SSI
SSI
SI
SI
RI
SI
SI
SI
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 137 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 12. |
|
SECURITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Ref |
Security |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
12.9
12.9ISPS Code Part A 10.1
STCW 2010
Shipboard security training has been carried out for all |
S I |
personnel relevant to their duties on-board |
|
From 1-Jan-2014 under revisions to STCW 2010, mandatory |
|
training is required for all crew, as appropriate. |
|
12.10ISPS SOLAS XI-2 Reg 8.2
12.11
MSC-FAL.1/
Circ.3
GCSOS
(Version 2)
12.12MSC-FAL.1/ Circ.3
GCSOS (Version 2)
Security actions taken on-board are done in a way so as to not |
S |
I |
compromise safety |
|
|
The company provides guidance on cybersecurity |
R |
I |
The guidance may be incorporated in the SMS, and should |
|
|
include: |
|
|
- Identification of threats |
|
|
- Identification of vulnerabilities |
|
|
- A risk assessment completed by the company |
|
|
- Protection and protective measures |
|
|
- Contingency plans |
|
|
- Response and recovery from cybersecurity incidents |
|
|
The crew has been trained in company guidelines, policies or |
R |
I |
procedures on cybersecurity |
|
|
12.12 |
There should be evidence that training has been completed. |
||
|
The crew should be aware of threats/vulnerabilities, such as |
||
|
the use of USB sticks, private electronic equipment, and the |
||
|
need for viligence. Personnel should also be aware of and in |
||
|
compliance with any limitations on the use and/or location of |
||
|
use of equipment, and the actions to take if they identify a |
||
|
potential threat to onboard or private equipment.Coppola |
||
|
|
by |
Massimiliano |
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 138 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 13. |
|
HULL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
Ref |
Hull and Superstructure |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|
|
The appearance and maintenance condition of the following |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appears satisfactory: |
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
Hull |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
13.2 |
Hull markings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
13.3 |
Deck areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
13.4 |
Cargo and manifold area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
13.5 |
Superstructure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
13.6 |
Funnel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
13.7 |
Weathertight doors, ports and hatches |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
|
|||||||||
13.8 |
Ballast tank and void space vents and marking |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
13.9 |
Ventilation and fire flaps and marking |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
13.10 |
Sea chest and overboard valves and other penetrations, |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
|
including service marking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.11 |
Catwalks, walkways, handrails, stairways |
|
|
|
|
|
D |
I |
||
13.1-11 |
In assessing the appearance and condition of the hull and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
superstructure the age of the ship should be taken into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
consideration. However the following should not be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
considered satisfactory: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Large areas of contact damage on hull from tugs or jetties. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Damage to fore part due to heavy weather. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Areas of paint work on boot topping or top sides damaged. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Areas of hull and decks showing signs of excessive rusting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Areas of hull showing excessive marine growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Areas of accommodation and funnel showing signs of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
rusting. |
|
Coppola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- General appearance of paint work poor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Outside accommodation decks showing signs of poor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
maintenance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Hull markings such as draught marks, bulbous bow warnings, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
bow thruster warnings, tug push points etc. not clearly marked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Watertight doors, ports and hatches with rubber seals in poor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
condition or missing, securingMassimilianoarrangements damaged or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
missing. |
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Ballast tank and void space vents damaged or corroded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
- Ventilation and fire flaps, seized, damaged or lashed open. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Inspectors are encouraged to provide a general comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
regarding the overall impression of the appearance and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
condition of the vessel. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas |
SIR Page 139 |
Rev. CDI 8/19 |
(C) 2019 Chemical Distribution Institute |
Section 14. |
|
ACCOMMODATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. |
Ref |
Accommodation |
Yes |
No |
N/A |
Cat |
Gp |
|
|
The appearance and housekeeping standard of the following |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(when fitted) meets applicable regulations and appears |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
satisfactory: |
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
ILO |
Bridge |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.2 |
ILO |
Communications room |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
ILO |
Accommodations |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
ILO |
Sanitary facilities |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.5 |
ILO |
Mess Rooms |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.6 |
ILO |
Lounges |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
ILO |
Galley |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
ILO |
Pantries |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
ILO |
Dry stores |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.10 |
ILO |
Refrigerated stores |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.11 |
ILO |
Laundry / drying room |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.12 |
ILO |
Cargo control rooms |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.13 |
ILO |
Offices |
|
D |
I |
|
MLC |
|
|
|
|
14.14 |
ILO |
Self-closing doors/fire doors inside the accomodation |
D |
I |
|
|
MLC |
The following should be recorded as observationsCoppola and |
|
|
|
14.1 - 14 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
discussed with the Master: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Decks in poor state of repair. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Decks showing a general lack of cleaning. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Toilet areas dirty or with fittings broken or missing. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Accommodation lighting poor or not operational. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Furniture and fittings broken or in a poor state of repair. |
|
|
|
|
|
Massimiliano |
|
|
|
|
|
- Poor hygiene standards in galley area. |
|
|
|
|
|
- Stores not tidy. Evidenceby |
of rotting food. Fridge |
|
|
|
|
operating temperatures too high (per the WHO Handbook |
|
|
|
|
|
for Inspection of Ships and Issuance of Ship Sanitation |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates Ch 14.10, frozen food to be maintained at or |
|
|
|
|
|
below -18°C and storage at or below +4 °C). Fridge lights |
|
|
|
|
|
and alarms not working. |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
- Public alleyways used as drying rooms. - Public spaces untidy or used for storage. - Incorrect use of storage spaces.
Inspectors are encouraged to provide a general comment regarding the overall impression of the appearance and condition of accommodation and internal spaces.
|
|
- No unauthorized holdback arrangements on fire doors |
|
|
|
- Self-closing devices on doors not properly operating |
|
|
|
and/or doors not sealing |
|
|
|
Inspectors are encouraged to provide a general comment |
|
|
|
regarding the overall impression of the appearance and |
|
|
|
condition of accommodation and internal spaces. |
|
14.15 |
ILO |
There is a system on-board for the regular inspection of |
D I |
|
MLC |
accommodation, storage and work spaces, including |
|
|
|
|
documentation of the inspection
Copy of Massimiliano Coppola
Gas
Rev. CDI 8/19