Indoor games Outdoor games
Football Cricket
Sensations
Sight Sound Smell
Word formation analysis (Arnold)
Morphemic analysis is limited to stating the number and the type of morphemes.
e.g. “provincial”: 2 morphemes = 1 root “province” + suffix “-ial” => a derived word.
“unencumbered”: 3 morphemes: 1 prefix “un-” + 1 root “cumber” + 1 suffix “-ed” =>
=> a derived word.
“gas-invaded”: 3 morphemes: 2 root (“gas” + “invade”) + 1 suffix “-ed” => a compoud
derivative word
Structural correlation analysis studies the structural correlation with other words, the structural patterns and rules on which words are built.
e.g. spire and “spires” are members of a morphemic opposition. Their distinctive feature is the
suffix “s” as it helps to create the plural form of the noun. Thus this binary opposition
comprises two elements.
unfrock and “unfrocked” are members of a morphemic opposition. Their distinctive feature
is the suffix “-ed” (which meaning is passive) which helps to create a Participle II from the
verb.
Analysis into immediate constituents deals with motivation, i.e. a data the listener has to go by in understanding the segmentation of the word.
e.g. (gas+invade)+ed
friend+ly
Back formation – the derivation of a new word by subtracting a real or supposed affix from existing words through misinterpretation of their structure.
e.g. to buttle < buttler
Phraseology
Classification by Smirnitsky
1. Одновершинные фразеологические единицы имеют только один семантически полнозначный компонент.
e.g. “to make it”
2. Двувершинные и многовершинные фразеологические единицы имеют два или более семантически полновесных компонента.
e.g. “to make a song and dance”
Semantic classification by Vinogradov
A. Phraseological fusions are units whose meaning cannot be deduced from the meaning of
their component parts, the meaning of phraseological fusions is unmotivated at the present
stage of language development (the meaning of the components is completely absorbed by
the meaning of the whole).
e.g. “spick and span”
B. Phraseological unities are expressions the meaning of which can be deduced from the
meanings of the their components (the meaning of the whole is based on the transferred
meanings of the components). These expressions are motivated.
e.g. “bell” – the bear the bell
C. Phraseological combinations are traditional word groups. Word combinations are combined
with their original meaning. The components are limited in the ability to combine with each
other by some linguistic factors.
e.g. “drowned” – to drown one’s sorrows