Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Crack the Case. D. Ohrvall

.pdf
Скачиваний:
27
Добавлен:
29.03.2016
Размер:
10.22 Mб
Скачать

Clark & Gable Shoes

I

Pack: 008 page 7 of 29

Interviewer Fact Sheet

Case Question: Clark & Gable Shoes, a $300M shoe manufacturer and retailer, has a 70-year tradition of Case Question: Clark & Gable Shoes, a $300M shoe manufacturer and retailer, has a 70-year tradition of

making fine men’s dress shoes. In the last two years sales have been gradually slipping, mainly due to the making fine men’s dress shoes. In the last two years sales have been gradua ly slipping, mainly due to the

business casual trend and C&G’s lack of less formal shoes. To fill the gap in its product line and put some business casual trend and C&G’s lack of less formal shoes. To fi l the gap in its product line and put some

energy into the brand, C&G enlisted Luigi, a well known, avant garde Italian design firm. After six months of energy into the brand, C&G enlisted Luigi, a well known, avant garde Italian design firm. After six months of

sales, management wants to review the results of the ten shoes in their Everyday Style line and eliminate four sales, management wants to review the results of the ten shoes in their Everyday Style line and eliminate four

“dogs” to make way for Luigi’s second wave of shoes. Management wants you to recommend which six styles of “dogs” to make way for Luigi’s second wave of shoes. Management wants you to recommend which six styles of

shoes to keep and to discuss the implications of eliminating four. shoes to keep and to discuss the implications of eliminating four.

A Few Tips from David

A Few Tips from David

This case is very straight forward: look at the data and eliminate four out of ten products. It requires a quick ability to integrate data from many sources.

Star candidates build a logical solution quickly.

Since most people will have not trouble coming up with a recommendation, push hard to understand the flaws in the logic. At the end ask, “If you had to eliminate two more, which ones would you pick.”

IntroIntroFactsFacts

(Tell(Te lthetheCandidateCandidateififAsked)Asked)

Revenue targets: None. Management is more interested in knowing how the launch of these ten shoes compares to previous successful launches. The second wave of Luigi designed shoes is certain.

Distribution channels: All shoes are sold through C&G’s stores, catalogs or online store. For this case, the focus will be on the new line and how it is performing, not on improving the distribution channels. Not using third party retailers means that more profit will hit C&G’s bottom line.

Cost structure: Not a focus of this case. The main discussion around costs will center on why some shoes cost more to make than others, resulting in lower gross margins.

Competitors: Most have casual lines. C&G is a laggard.

Suppliers, government and legislation:

No issues.

On-Track Indicators

Focused on finding the “dogs” – looks to understand which shoes are the worst performers

Pulls out insights – identifying four shoes to eliminate is not very hard. Moving to insights and implications about the future is more difficult.

Creative – asks about and discusses new opportunities to increase revenue

KeyKeyInsightsInsights

(Do(DoNotNotTellTe lthetheCandidate)Candidate)

Product elimination: Eliminating the following four shoes is the best solution for Clark & Gable: Everyday Camel, the Sierra, the Randy and Neuman.

Gross Margin: The four eliminated shoes do represent 1/3 of gross margin from 6 months, which is less than the 4/10 they would provide if all 10 shoes were equal.

Unit Sales – All previous successful new product launches have had one critical element in common; baseline sales of 2,950 units over the first 6 months. The four shoes above do not meet this threshold.

Product Appeal – These 4 shoes have not shown much appeal with our most loyal customers.

Product Line Gaps – After removing the products, there will be a gap in the offering, namely the “beach” category.

Off-Track Indicators

Creativity first – thinks and talks primarily about loyal customer reaction to the product rather than focusing on the data

Avoids the math – to gain insights from the data, you must round numbers and do some “quick and dirty” calculations

Avoids putting a stake in the ground–

After making an an initial cut of some shoes, you can look at the implications. You need the stake first.

Purchase additional cases and the book Crack the Case: How to Conquer Your Case Interviews at www.consultingcase.com. 008 - Clark & Gable Shoes 7 Copyright © 2004 Turtle Hare Media

Clark & Gable Shoes

I

Case at a Glance

Pack: 008 page 8 of 29

Part

A

 

Typical Case

Interviewer

Candidate

 

Questions &

Questions &

 

Flow

 

Comments

Answers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Present main

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

question. Candidate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Candidate takes notes,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

takes notes, asks for a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

asks for a minute, forms

 

minute, forms a plan and

 

~0:01 min.

 

a plan and presents it.

 

presents it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer any basic fact

2questions. These may come up after you read the question or later.

 

 

 

“Tell me more about

Clear connections

 

Ask for clarification if

 

between each part of the

 

 

this area (you choose).

 

 

plan and an

 

necessary. Be sure to

 

What are you thinking

 

 

understanding of how

3

make him explain

 

about here.” or “Tell

 

each part contributes to

 

anything you do not fully

 

me how the parts of

 

 

the whole. Solid logic on

 

understand.

 

your structure link to

 

 

how this plan will get

 

 

 

each other.”

 

 

 

some answers.

 

 

 

 

Data &

Answers to

Provide

See Intro Facts on the Interviewer Fact Sheet.

No data. Ask questions about his approach.

 

 

 

"What is the most

 

"Looking at historical

 

Give the candidate

 

 

 

efficient way to

 

results would be a start. I

 

Handout A. Ask, "Which

 

 

 

determine which

 

would want to know how

 

products have

 

 

 

products are going to

 

products have performed

 

contributed the most in

 

 

 

succeed long term?"

 

in terms of sales and

 

terms of gross margin

 

 

 

 

 

volume."

 

dollars?"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let the candidate start

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

where he likes. To solve

 

 

 

 

 

Give the candidate

 

the case he will need

 

 

 

We might be able to

 

Handout C, historical

 

data on units, revenue

 

"What role would

 

understand sales

 

product launches. Ask,

 

and gross margin. Your

 

 

 

 

 

historical data play?"

 

patterns or see which

 

"What can you infer

 

main goal with giving this

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

products did well over a

 

about previous launches

 

case is to eventually get

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

long period of time.

 

and their ability to

 

all 4 slides in front of the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

succeed."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

candidate. Only then will

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

you test his ability to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

synthesize all the facts

 

 

 

 

 

Give the candidate

 

into the right answer.

 

"How would you gather

 

"You could do follow-up

 

 

 

 

 

Handout B, purchases of

 

Here are four typical

 

 

 

 

 

data around

 

polls or surveys.

 

highly loyal customers.

 

paths with prompting

 

 

 

 

 

preferences for certain

 

Another way might be

 

Ask, "How does this data

 

questions you can give

 

 

 

 

 

product types over

 

customer satisfaction

 

align or disagree with

 

(only if necessary). In

 

 

 

 

 

others?"

 

results."

 

other information you

 

general just keep asking,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

may have?"

 

"What else would you

 

 

 

 

 

 

look at?"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"We need to have a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Give the candidate

 

 

 

"What other

 

variety of styles to

 

 

 

 

 

appeal to the most

 

Handout D, qualitative

 

 

 

considerations do you

 

 

 

 

 

 

important customers.

 

description of the product

 

 

 

need to account for

 

 

 

 

 

 

We don't want to cut

 

lines. Ask, "Where is our

 

 

 

when reducing a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

product line weak and

 

 

 

 

products that appeal to

 

 

 

 

product line?"

 

 

 

 

 

 

important customer

 

strong today."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

segments."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase additional cases and the book Crack the Case: How to Conquer Your Case Interviews at www.consultingcase.com. 008 - Clark & Gable Shoes 8 Copyright © 2004 Turtle Hare Media

Clark & Gable Shoes

I

Case at a Glance

Pack: 008 page 9 of 29

 

 

Typical Case

 

Interviewer

 

Candidate

Data &

 

 

 

 

Questions &

 

Questions &

Answers to

 

 

 

 

 

Flow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

Answers

Provide

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assess now how well

 

 

 

"I would focus on actual

 

 

 

 

he can integrate the

 

 

 

units sold and revenue."

 

 

 

 

 

"Now that you have all

 

 

 

information.

 

 

or

 

Answer the questions

 

 

At this point, the

 

the data, how do you

 

“I think that the decision

 

 

5

 

 

 

and keep pushing the

 

candidate should have

 

link it together and

 

would be based revenue

 

 

 

 

 

candidate to select the 4

 

 

received all four slides

 

determine which ones

 

and gross margin as well

 

 

 

 

 

 

shoes.

 

 

either through your

 

to cut?"

 

as the type of niche the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

prompting or direct

 

 

 

shoe type fills.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part

questions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insight Checkpoint (Redirect the discussion to these areas if necessary)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• Company Philosophy: Clark & Gable has tough standards, shown by its willingness to “cut bait” or

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~0:12 min. eliminate new product lines only after 6 months of data. Given their long, successful history they must

 

 

 

 

 

 

have some kind of insight into the timing and data necessary to make such quick decisions.

 

Units and Gross Margin: Unit sales and gross margin percentages vary widely, but revenue is roughly in the same range for the ten products. About 7 of the 10 shoes provide gross margin dollars of over $100 each. (Handout A)

Historical Success: All shoe lines that succeeded in the last 25 launches exceeded unit sales of 2952 in their first six months. (Handout C)

Customer Feedback: Loyal customers indicate that 4 shoes tend to be not liked as much: Neumann, the Randy, the Berks and Everyday Camel.

Style: Most of the products are focused on the office casual, club and hip factor styles. Removing certain products may leave holes in the portfolio.

The candidate needs to integrate these insights into a selection process. Staying data driven is the best course of action so the candidate should calculate the bottom line implication of his choice. A good

6conclusion will make sense mathematically and logically. If he is struggling to make a firm

Part

selection, ask “Which four shoes would you

 

 

 

 

 

B

recommend removing and why?” Followed by,

 

 

 

 

 

“What would be your immediate next steps.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Math Zone – Solving for Product Sales Required to Meet Investor Demands

 

 

Rounded

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Use a logic rule to make your selection. In this case sticking to

Shoe

~GM $

UNITS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totals (K)

 

 

 

 

 

the unit sale requirements is a good method. Four shoes do not

 

 

 

 

 

EC

100

1200

120

 

 

~0:15 min.

make the historical cut-off of 2952 for the first 6 months. Knowlton

 

 

P

150

3300

500

 

 

is close enough and carries a large GM dollar contribution so

 

 

 

 

 

 

SULT

75

3500

260

 

 

 

 

 

 

you would probably want to keep it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

75

2900

220

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Check the downside. From a total, 6 month gross margin dollar

K

100

2950

300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

comparison, these four are good choices. Neuman rivals several

SIE

125

1500

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

D

100

3200

320

 

 

 

 

 

 

others that were not selected, but loyal customers do not like it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

B

100

3150

315

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Consider the gaps. Beach will not be covered with these choices.

R

75

1420

110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Next steps should include reviewing the portfolio coverage.

N

100

2450

250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase additional cases and the book Crack the Case: How to Conquer Your Case Interviews at www.consultingcase.com. 008 - Clark & Gable Shoes 9 Copyright © 2004 Turtle Hare Media

Clark & Gable Shoes

I

Handout Guide

Pack: 008 page 10 of 29

A

6 Month Results

Revenue/GM per Unit and Units Sold in 6 Months

Product Name

 

 

Units Sold

Everyday

1,200

Camel

Pierceton

3,300

 

Sulton

3,500

 

Breakers

2,900

 

Knowlton

2,950

 

The Sierra

1,500

 

Dulsulty 3,200

Berks 3,150

The Randy

 

 

 

 

 

1,420

 

 

 

 

Gross Margin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neuman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

0

50

100

150

200

250

 

 

Revenue and Gross Margin in US$

Predicted Purchases of “Highly Loyal” Customers

Revenue and Gross Margin in US$

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B 40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Definitely

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Will Not

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Highly Likely

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Will Purchase

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsure

0

R

B

D

S

K

B

S

P

EC

N

 

 

 

Product Name

 

 

 

 

Historical Profile of Last 25 Launches

Shaded bars indicate shoe lines that succeeded

Unit Sales Over 6 Months

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,415

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,133

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,913

3,911 3,980

 

 

3,493

 

 

3,609

3,572

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,363

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,243

 

 

 

3,346

 

3,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,000

2,952

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

2,725

 

 

2,771

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,647

 

2,636

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,441

 

 

 

 

 

2,328

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,212

 

2,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

25 59 91

21 57

1

24

16 83 43

7

79

9

72 63 22 68 26 38 70

 

 

Product Number

Weak

 

Wear

 

Medium

Office

More

“Hip”

Casual

Formally Beach

Clubs Factor

Strong

 

 

 

Neuman

 

 

 

The Randy

 

 

 

Berks

 

 

 

Dulsultry

D KnowltonThe Sierra

Breakers

Sulton

Pierceton

Everyday

Camel

Candidates: Do you have any sales data? Interviewer: Here’s what we know about the six

month launch in terms of unit volume. Revenue and gross margin per shoe are also shown.

You Might Ask: Which products are contributing the most in gross margin dollars?

Main Insight: Revenue per shoe varies quite a bit, but a majority of the shoes contribute $100 in gross margin per sale.

Candidate got the insight?:

 

Yes

 

No

Candidate: Do customers like the products? Interviewer: We polled our most loyal customers

with pictures and prices of each new shoe. Here’s what they said.

You Must Ask: Which shoes seem to be most disliked? Which ones are the favorites?

Main Insight: Three shoes rated poorly: Neuman, The Randy, and Everyday Camel. People either loved or hated Berks.

Candidate got the insight?:

 

Yes

 

No

Candidate: Do we have any historical benchmarks for product launches?

Interviewer: C&G has tracked their last 25 launches.

You Might Ask: What can you infer from the data about the minimum required for success?

Main Insight: Previous launches that succeeded all had sales of at least 2,952 units in their first six months.

Candidate got the insight?:

 

Yes

 

No

Candidate: Do you have any descriptions of the shoes and how they differ?

Interviewer: Here is a qualitative style map. This depicts the niche each shoe fills.

You Must Ask: What would be the implications of removing the shoes you are considering eliminating?

Main Insight: Gaps will occur as a result of removing some shoes. Wave 2 from Luigi will need to fill these gaps.

Candidate got the insight?:

 

Yes

 

No

Purchase additional cases and the book Crack the Case: How to Conquer Your Case Interviews at www.consultingcase.com. 008 - Clark & Gable Shoes 10 Copyright © 2004 Turtle Hare Media

Unit Sales

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]