file-13798764132

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

o which it belongs as the most important in the tone-unit. In this case, intonation works to focus attention on a particular lexical item or syllable. This has been called the accentual function of intonation.

iii)The listener is better able to recognise the grammar and syntactic structure of what is being said by using the information contained in the intonation; for example, such things as the placement of boundaries between phrases, clauses or sentences, the difference between questions and statements, and the use of grammatical subordination may be indicated. This has been called the grammatical function of intonation.

iv)Looking at the act of speaking in a broader way, we can see that intonation can signal to the listener what is to be taken as "new" information and what is already "given", can suggest when the

speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

709

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

portant in the tone-unit. In this case, intonation works to focus attention on a particular lexical item or syllable. This has been called the accentual function of intonation.

iii)The listener is better able to recognise the grammar and syntactic structure of what is being said by using the information contained in the intonation; for example, such things as the placement of boundaries between phrases, clauses or sentences, the difference between questions and statements, and the use of grammatical subordination may be indicated. This has been called the grammatical function of intonation.

iv)Looking at the act of speaking in a broader way, we can see that intonation can signal to the listener what is to be taken as "new" information and what is already "given", can suggest when the

speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

707

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

rtant in the tone-unit. In this case, intonation works to focus attention on a particular lexical item or syllable. This has been called the accentual function of intonation.

iii)The listener is better able to recognise the grammar and syntactic structure of what is being said by using the information contained in the intonation; for example, such things as the placement of boundaries between phrases, clauses or sentences, the difference between questions and statements, and the use of grammatical subordination may be indicated. This has been called the grammatical function of intonation.

iv)Looking at the act of speaking in a broader way, we can see that intonation can signal to the listener what is to be taken as "new" information and what is already "given", can suggest when the

speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

707

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

ation may be indicated. This has been called the grammatical function of intonation.

iv) Looking at the act of speaking in a broader way, we can see that intonation can signal to the listener what is to be taken as "new" information and what is already "given", can suggest when the

speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

707

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

matical function of intonation.

iv) Looking at the act of speaking in a broader way, we can see that intonation can signal to the listener what is to be taken as "new" information and what is already "given", can suggest when the

speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

708

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

tical function of intonation.

iv) Looking at the act of speaking in a broader way, we can see that intonation can signal to the listener what is to be taken as "new" information and what is already "given", can suggest when the

speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

706

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

the listener what is to be taken as "new" information and what is already "given", can suggest when the speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

702

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

nd what is already "given", can suggest when the speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of

response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

705

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

what is already "given", can suggest when the speaker is indicating some sort of contrast or link with material in another tone-unit and, in conversation, can convey to the listener what kind of response is

expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

701

The attitudinal function has been given so much importance in past work on intonation that it will be discussed separately in this chapter, although??it should eventually become clear that it overlaps

considerably with the discourse function. In the case of the other three functions, it will be argued that it is difficult to see how they could be treated as separate; for example, the placement of tonic stress is closely linked to the presentation of "new" information, while the question/statement distinction and the indication of contrast seem to be equally important in grammar and discourse. What seems to be common to accentual, grammatical and discourse functions is the indication, by means of intonation, of the relationship between some linguistic element and the context in which it occurs. The fact that they overlap with each other to a large degree is not so important if one does not insist on defining watertight boundaries between them.

The rest of this chapter is concerned with a critical examination of the attitudinal function. 95.9 The attitudinal function of intonation

Many writers have expressed the view that intonation is used to convey our feelings and attitudes: for example, the same sentence can be said in different ways, which might be labelled "angry", "happy", "grateful",f marking intonation, however, the mark' (black type) indicates a stressed syllable in a high head and the mark , indicates a stressed syllable in a low head. In practice this is not usually found confusing as long as one is aware of whether one is marking stress levels or intonation, and the colour difference helps to distinguish them. When the high and low marks ' and , are being used to indicate intonation, it is no longer possible to mark two different levels of stress within the word. However, when looking at speech at the level of the tone-unit we are not usually interested in this; a much more important difference here is the one between tonic stress (marked by underlining the tonic syllable and placing before it one of the five tone-marks) and non-tonic stressed syllables (marked ' or , in the head or • in the tail).

an convey to the listener what kind of response is expected. Such functions??are examples of intonation's discourse function.

790