- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •4. Fill in the blanks with words from the text.
- •6. Translate the following sentences in writing paying attention to underlined words and emphatic constructions.
- •7. Arrange the following words in pairs of synonyms.
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •4. Fill in the blanks with the words from the text.
- •5. Agree or disagree with the following statements.
- •6. Translate the following sentences in writing into Russian paying attention to different functions of the verb «to be».
- •7. Translate the following sentences in writing into Russian:
- •10. Read the text and render its content in Russian:
- •1. Read and translate the text
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •4. Fill in the blanks with the words from the text.
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •3. Find the beginning for the following endings.
- •4. Fill in the blanks with words from the text.
- •5. Find in the text the definitions of the meanings of the following words. Translate them into Russian in writing.
- •6. Translate the following sentences in writing paying attention to the underlined words and constructions.
- •3. Complete the following sentences.
- •4. Fill in the blanks with the words from the text.
- •5. Find in the text the definitions of the following terms.
- •6. Translate the following sentences in writing paying attention to the underlined words and constructions.
- •8. Compare the system of checks and balances of the us with that of Russia. Pay attention to the differences in these systems. The plan below may be helpful.
- •2. Answer the following questions.
- •3. Complete the following sentences.
- •4. Insert the English equivalents used in the text.
- •9. Read the text and answer the following questions:
- •Political Parties
- •12. Read the article and do the tasks that follow it:
- •13. Answer the following questions:
- •14. Agree or disagree with the following:
- •16. Review the article.
- •17. Read and translate the article:
- •20. Answer the following questions:
- •21. Find in the article the facts to prove that:
- •II. Answer the following questions:
- •III. Complete the following sentences:
- •IV. Find in the text the facts to prove that:
- •VII. Could you give any examples from history or your personal experience when «the rule of law» works? do you support the idea that «the law is the highest judge»?
- •VIII. Read the following item and render its idea in russian:
- •X. Answer the following questions:
- •Xl agree or disagree with the following statements:
- •XII. Divide the text into logical parts, make up an outline of the text and speak on the text in accordance with your outline. Word study
- •I. Give russian equivalents for:
- •Word study
- •Word study
- •Authority
- •The state
- •Word study
- •Word study
- •Word study
- •The philosophical tradition
- •The empirical tradition
- •Word study
- •Word study
- •The Evolution of Pluralism
- •Word study
- •Word study
- •Word study
- •Text III
- •Text IV
- •In children (by Christine Russell)
- •Text VI
- •Text VII
- •Word study
- •Text VIII
- •Postmodern tv (by Steven Connor)
Word study
I. GIVE RUSSIAN EQUIVALENTS FOR THE FOLLOW ING ENGLISH WORDS:
To strive; vogue; to take up; mainstream; to draw upon; credential; to lack; proliferation; to suit; to constrain; scope; entity; obsession; to incline; to discard; to contaminate; to compete; to stand for; to revive.
II. GIVE ENGLISH EQUIVALENTS FOR: Движущая сила исторического развития; с точки
зрения доказательства; поведение избирателей; отвернуться от традиции нормативной политической мыс-
329
Учебное пособие для философов и политологов
ли; неподдающиеся эмпирической проверке сущности; вызывать сомнение; через механизм всенародных выборов.
III. ARRANGE THE FOLLOWING WORDS IN THE PAIRS OF SYNONYMS.
scope notion
to attempt to diminish
to uncover sphere
to predict to disclose
to test to try
to reduce important
concept to forecast
significant to verify
IV. TRANSLATE THE FOLLOWING SENTENCES INTO RUSSIAN PAYING ATTENTION TO THE ADJECTIVES WITH THE SUFFIX «-ABLE» MEANING «THAT CAN OR MAY BE DONE».
1. It was a dirty road and was usable only six months a
year.
All this was understandable.
A person with a sense of humour is a lovable and
loving person.
It may be advisable to go there.
They used only quantifiable data.
V. FIND SENTENCES WITH THE SAME ADJECTIVES IN THE TEXT AND TRANSLATE THEM IN WRITING.
VI. DISCUSSION
Science, scientism
Science (from the Latin scientia, meaning 'knowledge') is a field of study that aims to develop reliable explanations of phenomena through repeatable experiments, observation and deduction. The 'scientific method', by which
330
Part II
Political science
hypotheses are verified (proved true) by testing them against the available evidence , is therefore seen as a means of disclosing value-free and objective truth. Karl Popper (1902-1994), however, suggested that science can only falsify hypotheses, since 'facts' may always be disproved by later experiments. Scientism is the belief that the scientific method is the only source of reliable knowledge, and so should be applied to fields such as philosophy, history and politics, as well as the natural sciences. Doctrines such as Marxism, utilitarianism and racialism are scientistic in this sense.
VII. LOOK THROUGH THE TEXT «RECENT DEVELOP MENTS» AND MAKE UP AN OUTLINE.
VIII. GIVE A SUMMARY OF THE TEXT
IX. LOOK THROUGH THE TEXT AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. WORDS GIVEN BELOW AND NOTES MAY BE HELPFUL.
Recent Developments
Amongst recent theoretical approaches to politics is what is called formal political theory, variously known as 'political economy', 'public-choice theory' and 'rational-choice theory'. This approach to analysis draws heavily upon the example of economic theory in building up models based upon procedural rules, usually about the rationally self-interested behaviour of the individuals involved. Most firmly established in the USA, and associated in particular with the so-called Virginia School, formal political theory provides at least a useful analytical device which may provide insights into the actions of voters, lobbyists, bureaucrats and politicians, as well as into the behaviour of states with-in the international system. This approach has had broadest impact on political analysis in the form of what is called institutional public-choice theory.
331
Учебное пособие для философов и политологов
By no means, however, has the rational-choice approach to political analysis been universally accepted. While its supporters claim that it introduces greater rigour into the discussion of political phenomena, critics have questioned its basic assumptions. It may, for instance, overestimate human rationality in that it ignores the fact that people seldom possess a clear set of preferred goals and rarely make decisions in the light of full and accurate knowledge. Furthermore, in proceeding from an abstract model of the individual, rational-choice theory pays insufficient attention to social and historical factors, failing to recognize, amongst other things, that human self-interested-ness may be socially conditioned, and not merely innate. As a result, a variety of approaches have come to be adopted for the study of politics as an academic discipline. This has made modern political analysis both richer and more diverse. To established normative, institutional and behavioural approaches have been added not only rational-choice theory, but also, more recently, feminism and discourse theory. In particular, political philosophy and political science are now less likely to be seen as distinct modes of enquiry, and still less as rivals. Instead, they have come to be accepted simply as contrasting ways of disclosing political knowledge. Notes:
Discourse: Human interaction, especially communication; discourse may disclose or illustrate power relationships.
impact - influence rigour - точность innate - врожденный rival - соперник
What new theoretical approaches emerged?
Where was rational — choice theory developed?
What does it provide?
How do the supporters estimate it?
332
Part II
Political science
Why do critics question its basic assumptions?
What other new theories emerged?
What conclusion does the author come to?
X. IN CONCLUSION SUM UP THE MAIN APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF POLITICS.
UNIT VIII
I. READ AND TRANSLATE
Can the Study of Politics Be Scientific?
Although it is accepted that the study of politics should be scientific in the broad sense of being rigorous and critical, some have argued, as has been pointed out, that it can be scientific in a stricter sense, that is, that it can use the methodology of the natural sciences. This claim has been advanced by Marxists and by positivist social scientists, and it was central to the 'behavioural revolution' of the 1950s. The attraction of a science of politics is clear. It promises an impartial and reliable means of distinguishing 'truth' from 'falsehood', thereby giving us access to objective knowledge about the political world. The key achieving this is to distinguish between 'facts' (empirical evidence) and 'values' (normative or ethical beliefs). Facts are objective in the sense that they can be demonstrated reliably and consistently; they can be proved. Values, by contract, are inherently subjective, a matter of opinion.
However, any attempt to construct a science of politics must confront three difficulties. The first of these is the problem of data. For better or worse, human beings are not tadpoles that can be taken into a laboratory or cells that can be observed under a microscope. We cannot get 'inside' a human being, or carry out repeatable experiments on human behaviour. What we can learn about individual behaviour is therefore limited and superficial. In the absence
333
Учебное пособие для философов и политологов
of exact data, we have no reliable means of testing our hypotheses. The only way round the problem is to ignore the thinking subject altogether by subscribing to the doctrine of determinism. One example would be behaviourism (as opposed to behaviouralism), the school of psychology associated with John B. Watson (1878-1958) and B.F. Skinner (1904-90). This holds that human behaviour can ultimately be explained in terms of conditioned reactions or reflexes. Another example is 'dialectical materialism', the crude form of Marxism that dominated intellectual enquiry
in the USSR.
Secondly, there are difficulties that stem from the existence of hidden values. The idea that models and theories of politics are entirely value-free is difficult to sustain when examined closely. Facts and values are so closely intertwined that it is often impossible to prize them apart. This is because theories are invariably constructed on the basis of assumptions about human nature, human society, the role of the state and so on that have hidden political and ideological implications. A conservative value bias, for example, can be identified in behaviouralism rational-choice theories and systems theory. Similarly, feminist political theories are rooted in assumptions about the nature and significance of gender divisions.
Thirdly, there is the myth of neutrality in the social sciences. Whereas natural scientists may be able to approach their studies in an objective and impartial manner, holding no presuppositions about what they are going to discover, this is difficult and perhaps impossible to achieve in politics. However politics is defined, it addresses questions relating to the structure and functioning of the society in which we live and have grown up. Family background, social experience, economic position, personal sympathies and so on thus build into each and every one of us a set of preconceptions about politics and the world around us. This means that scientific objectivity, in the sense of absolute
334
Part II
Political science
impartiality or neutrality, must always remain an unachievable goal in political analysis however rigorous our research methods may be. Perhaps the greatest threat to the accumulation of reliable knowledge thus comes not from bias as such, but from the failure to acknowledge bias, reflected in bogus claims to political neutrality.
II. ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.
What is the reason of the attraction of a science of politics?
Do any scientists question the claim that politics can be scientific in a stricter sense?
Where do they see the key to achieving objective knowledge about politics?
Who believes that politics can be scientific?
What difficulties do political scientists face?
Why does the problem of data arise?
Where do the scientists see the way round the problem?
Where does the second difficulty stem from?
What is the third difficulty?
10. When does the author see the greatest threat to the accumulation of reliable knowledge about politics?
III. CONTRADICT THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS:
The study of politics has nothing to do with the methodology of the natural sciences.
The science of politics gives an access to subjective knowledge about the political world.
While constructing a science of politics one never confronts any difficulties.
The doctrine of determinism is the only rational theory whenever we treat the problems of political science.
The models and theories of politics are entirely value- free.
The idea of neutrality very ideally pertains to politi cal science.
335
Political science
Part
IV. FIND IN THE TEXT SOME FACTS TO PROVE
THAT:
1. The study of politics can be scientific in a stricter
sense.
2. Any attempt to construct a science of politics must
confront three difficulties.
3. Politics addresses questions relating to the structure and functioning of the society.
DIVIDE THE TEXT INTO LOGICAL PARTS AND MAKE UP AN OUTLINE OF THE TEXT.
FIND IN THE TEXT PARTICIPLES AND GERUNDS AND TRANSLATE THE SENTENCES INTO RUSSIAN.
VII. TRANSLATE THE FOLLOWING DEFINITION OF «DETERMINISM» INTO ENGLISH.
Determinism — убеждение, что действия человека и его выбор полностью обусловлены внешними факторами. Детерминизм полагает, что свободная воля — это миф.