Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Yepiskoposyan Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor.pdf
Скачиваний:
14
Добавлен:
24.03.2021
Размер:
26.51 Mб
Скачать

218

Manganese dioxide deposits are common at Azokh 1 in agreement with a karstic damp environment. The presence of manganese deposition is related to envi-

ronmental condition characterized by high wet, mildly alkaline and oxidizing (López-González et al. 2006). Manganese dioxide is insoluble and tends to form crusts and coatings in caves (Karkanas et al. 2000).

Histology

We have followed sample preparation methods described by Fernández-Jalvo et al. (2010a) and criteria to identify microscopic focal destruction (MFD). The histological modication according to Hackett (1981) is divided into Wedl and Non-Wedl foci (i.e. Hacketts linear longitudinal, lamellate and budded foci). Hackets non-Wedl MFD is associated with the activity of bacteria. Bacterial attack can be recognized in the BSE-SEM (backscattered electron mode SEM) as a brighter rim (i.e. more compact and dense bone mineral) that is reprecipitation of amorphous hydroxylapatite surrounding the MFD destructive foci (small pores and thin channels 0.12.0 microns in diameter). The Oxford Histological Index established by Hedges et al. (1995) from OHI 5 unmodied histology to OHI 0 with no original features identiable, was used to characterize the general histological preservation of the bone. Tunnelling between 5 and 15 microns is usually assigned to fungal activity following Wedl (1864) and named Wedl tunnelling(see also Trueman and Martill 2002; Jans et al. 2002; Jans 2005).

Results

Skeletal Element Representation

Of the 1879 fossils examined from Azokh only 462 fossils (24.6%) could be taxonomically or anatomically identied due to the high frequency of breakage in the sample (Table 10.1).

With regard to family (Fig. 10.1) or order taxonomic identications (Fig. 10.2), Unit I differs from the other units with a higher percentage of Bovidae. Unit I is associated with a fumier (manure hearth) from occupation of the cave by people who entered with livestock (Fernán- dez-Jalvo et al. 2010b). In contrast Units II to V are Pleistocene in age and have a predominance of cave bear in the mammalian fauna. Among these Pleistocene deposits, Units II and III are similar to each other and slightly

M.D. Marin-Monfort et al.

%Az,percentage

 

 

%Az

24.6

21.4

54.0

100.0

10.3

48.33

31.0

10.4

fossils per unit.

 

Total

NR

462

402

1015

1879

193

908

582

196

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

number of

 

 

%t

23.3

19.8

57.0

29.1

15.1

60.8

20.9

3.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

to the total

 

Unit Vm

NR

80

68

196

344

52

209

72

11

percentage referred

 

 

%t

30.2

21.5

48.3

9.2

6.4

55.2

29.1

9.3

 

Vu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

partial

 

Unit

NR

52

37

83

172

11

95

50

16

number of remains(fossils). %t,

 

Unit III

NR %t

52 36.4

43 30.1

48 33.6

143 7.6

3 2.1

76 53.2

51 35.7

13 9.1

1. NR,

 

 

%t

24.6

20.3

55.1

55.9

9.6

41.4

35.2

13.7

Table 10.1 Fossil identications from each fossiliferous unit of Azokh referred to the total number of fossils (1879) from Azokh1

Levels of identication Units

Unit I Unit II

NR %t NR

Taxonomic 20 11.8 258

Anatomic 41 24.1 213

Unidentied 109 64.1 579

Total (%Az) 170 9.1 1050 Fossil size

Fossil size <2 cm 26 15.3 101

Fossil size 25 cm 93 54.7 435

Fossil size 510 cm 39 22.9 370

Fossil size >10 cm 12 7.1 144

 

 

10 Taphonomy and Site Formation of Azokh 1

219

Fig. 10.1 Percentages of different families identied from each stratigraphic unit from Azokh 1 (obtained from the number of remains, NR)

Fig. 10.2 Percentage of macromammal orders (Carnivora, Perisodactyla and Artiodactyla) from Azokh 1 stratigraphic units (obtained from the number of remains, NR)

Table 10.2 Levels of identication. NR, number of remains; NISP, number of identied specimens; MNE, minimum number of elements; MNI, minimum number of individuals

 

Unit I

Unit II

Unit III

Unit Vu

Unit Vm

NR

170

1050

143

172

344

NISP

54

417

81

85

133

MNE

39

280

61

71

95

NISP:NR

0.3

0.4

0.6

0.5

0.4

MNE:NISP

0.7

0.7

0.8

0.8

0.7

MNI Carnivores

0

9

4

5

6

MNI Ungulates

10

10

4

7

11

different from Units Vu and Vm, which have higher abundances of taxa other than ursids. The classication by size of mammals in Azokh 1 gives percentages of 36.93% for the large sized animals, 25.55% for medium sized and 13.41% for small sized (24.11% could not be assigned to any of these size classes). The size classication by units shows a higher abundance of medium sized animals in Units I, Vu and Vm, while Units II and III have higher percentages of large sized mammals (cave bears).

The minimum number of identied elements (MNE) is lower than the number of fossils (NR) or the number of identied specimens (NISP) because of the high degree of breakage, which restricts their identication to skeletal element (Table 10.1). This table also includes indices comparing NISP/NR and MNE/NISP that, according to Lyman (1994), provide an indication of completeness. These indices are low showing the high breakage rates of these fossil assemblages. The minimum number of individuals is also given in Table 10.2, with carnivores and ungulates shown separately.

Skeletal elements that could be anatomically identied provide a total percentage in Azokh 1 of 7% for vertebrae, 6.6% for ribs, 6.8% for isolated teeth, 4.5% for phalanges 3.8% for metapodials with the rest of the skeleton elements below 2%. Hyoid bone and baculum, which are uncommon in fossil sites, have been recovered from Units II and III. Comparing skeletal abundances of anatomical elements per unit, most fossils could only be assigned to indeterminate long bones (non-assigned to fore or hind limbs). This is

220

M.D. Marin-Monfort et al.

Fig. 10.3 Relative abundances (Ri) of major cranial and postcranial elements identied from ve stratigraphic units of Azokh 1

common to all units, and next most abundant in all units are axial elements, particularly of juvenile individuals. Units Vu and Vm have greater numbers of cranial elements compared with other units. Main anatomical skeletal elements of bears and large, medium and small sized animals have been compared per stratigraphic unit (Fig. 10.3) showing an uncommon pattern of human occupation. Small sized animals may be transported complete, but in general the proportion of these animals in most units is low. Similarly, medium and large sized animals are less abundant and less well represented when compared to bears at this part of the cave.

Ages of individuals could be identied in many cases, and there is a high predominance of adults in all units of Azokh 1. Based on dental elements, Ursus spelaeus is the only taxon that has a range of ages, with adults, juveniles and old individuals in Units II and Vm. This could suggest that in these two levels the cave was occupied by female bears with their young (Kurten 1958; Andrews and Turner 1992), while at other levels, where only adult specimens have been found, the evidence may suggest that males only were living in the cave, but the interpretation is complicated both by the low numbers of individuals in all units (Table 10.2), and by the fact that cut marks are present on

10 Taphonomy and Site Formation of Azokh 1

221

Fig. 10.4 Shape categories established by Blott and Pye (2008) showing the different shapes: elongation, atness and sphericity. These diagrams represent orthogonal dimensions of fossils from Units I to Vm of Azokh 1. The ratio between width (D2) and length (D1) is shown on the vertical axis and the ratio between thickness (D3) and width (D2) on the horizontal axis. These diagrams characterize predominance of fossil shapes selected by hydrology or gravitational agents. In Azokh 1 the shape of the fossils are randomly dispersed in all categories indicating the absence of fossil shape selection. Black circles: unidentied fossil bone fragments; grey circles: large sized animals; white circles: medium and small sized animals.

222

Table 10.3 Correlation through Rho Spearman between the structural bone density and the relative abundance of different skeletal elements of fossils from each unit of Azokh1

 

Density

Large sized

 

 

 

Density

Medium sized

 

 

 

Density

Small sized

 

 

 

 

bison

Ri

 

 

 

 

cervid

Ri

 

 

 

 

sheep

Ri

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unit I

Unit II

Unit III

Unit Vu

Unit Vm

 

Unit I

Unit II

Unit III

Unit Vu

Unit Vm

 

Unit I

Unit II

Unit III

Unit Vu

Unit Vm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mandible

79.0

0.0

42.9

12.5

0.0

8.3

61.0

12.5

10.0

16.7

50.0

0.0

62.0

20.0

14.3

0.0

21.4

20.0

Vertebrae

62.0

3.1

13.4

3.1

3.1

0.5

30.0

1.8

6.4

1.2

3.6

1.4

26.0

1.4

2.0

0.9

0.5

0.7

Rib

57.0

1.4

3.6

0.7

1.4

0.9

40.0

1.0

8.5

2.6

2.6

1.5

37.0

1.5

2.2

1.0

1.1

3.1

Scapula

50.0

0.0

28.6

25.0

0.0

0.0

49.0

25.0

10.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Pelvis

55.0

0.0

42.9

25.0

0.0

0.0

49.0

0.0

20.0

0.0

33.3

20.0

49.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.0

Humerus

48.0

25.0

35.7

12.5

0.0

0.0

63.0

12.5

10.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

42.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

7.1

10.0

Radius

62.0

0.0

35.7

12.5

12.5

8.3

68.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

57.0

0.0

7.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

Ulna

69.0

0.0

28.6

25.0

0.0

0.0

45.0

0.0

10.0

16.7

0.0

10.0

28.0

10.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10.0

Femur

45.0

25.0

57.1

0.0

12.5

0.0

57.0

12.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

36.0

10.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.0

Tibia

76.0

0.0

28.6

12.5

0.0

0.0

74.0

12.5

10.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

59.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

14.3

0.0

Carpal/

51.0

0.0

19.2

6.7

2.9

1.3

81.0

3.9

1.5

1.3

2.6

1.5

65.5

0.0

2.2

0.0

0.0

0.8

Tarsal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metapodial

61.0

0.0

85.7

43.8

25.0

8.3

73.0

12.5

15.0

8.3

25.0

20.0

67.5

5.0

7.1

0.0

3.6

5.0

Phalanx

42.0

8.3

41.7

8.3

14.6

9.7

39.0

0.0

1.7

6.9

0.0

2.5

42.3

0.8

1.2

1.0

0.0

3.3

r Spearman

 

0.61

0.17

0.23

0.31

0.07

 

0.40

0.05

0.21

0.01

0.13

 

42.53

0.57

0.30

0.41

0.03

P-level

 

0.03

0.58

0.44

0.30

0.82

 

0.17

0.88

0.49

0.97

0.67

 

0.27

0.04

0.32

0.17

0.93

.al et Monfort-Marin .D.M