- •1. Formulate the basic approaches for the definition of the concepts of science and scientific knowledge. Сформулируйте основные подходы к определению понятий наука и научное знание.
- •2. Identify the features of science. Сформулируйте отличительные признаки науки.
- •3. Relate the science as a system, its features and structure. Расскажите о науке как
- •4. Consider the development of science. Рассмотрите процессы развития науки.
- •5. Formulate the goals and objectives of science. Сформулируйте цели и задачи науки.
- •6. Relate about the subjects and objects of science. Расскажите о субъектах и объектах науки.
- •7. Consider the classification of sciences. Рассмотрите классификацию наук.
- •8. Relate the characteristics of modern science. Расскажите о характерных особенностях современной науки.
- •9. Relate the aims and objectives of the researches and their classification on various
- •10. Formulate the basic requirements for scientific research. Сформулируйте основные
- •11. Relate the forms and methods of scientific research. Расскажите о формах и методах научного исследования.
- •12. Examine the theoretical level of research and its main elements. Рассмотрите теоретический уровень исследования и его основные элементы.
- •13. Consider the level of empirical research and its features. Рассмотрите эмпирический уровень исследования и его особенности.
- •14. Relate the stages of research. Расскажите об этапах научно-исследовательской работы.
- •15. Relate the correct organization of research work. Расскажите о правильной организации научно-исследовательской работы.
- •16. Relate the methodology of scientific knowledge and its levels. Расскажите о методологии научного знания и ее уровнях.
- •17. Consider the methods, techniques and procedures of scientific knowledge. Рассмотрите методы, способы и методики научного знания.
- •18. Examine the classification of scientific methods of cognition. Рассмотрите
- •19. Consider the general logical, theoretical and empirical methods of research. Рассмотрите общелогические, теоретические и эмпирические методы исследования.
- •20. Relate the features of the formulation of research issue. Расскажите об особенностях формулирования темы научного исследования.
- •21. Specify the criteria applicable to the issue of scientific research. Сформулируйте
- •22. Relate the problem statement of research and its stages. Расскажите о постановке проблемы исследования и ее этапах.
- •23. Consider the features of determining of the goals and objectives of the study. Рассмотрите особенности определения целей и задач исследования.
- •24. Relate the planning of scientific research. Расскажите о планировании научного исследования.
- •26. Describe the subjects and objects of scientific study. Охарактеризуйте субъекты и объекты научного исследования.
- •27. Interpretation of the basic concepts used in the research work. Интерпретация основных понятий, используемых в научно-исследовательской работе.
- •28.Relate the development of the plan of research and its kinds. Расскажите о разработке плана научно-исследовательской работы и его видах
- •29. Consider peculiarities of the analysis of theoretical and experimental studies. Рассмотрите особенности проведения анализа теоретико-экспериментальных исследований.
- •30. Consider the features of conclusions stating based on the results of research work.
- •31. Consider the concepts of information and scientific information. Рассмотрите понятия информация и научная информация.
- •32. Consider the properties of scientific information. Рассмотрите свойства научной
- •33. Formulate the basic requirements for scientific information. Рассмотрите основные требования, предъявляемые к научной информации.
- •34. Relate the sources of scientific information and their classification on various
- •35. Relate the working with sources of information. Расскажите о работе с источниками информации.
- •36. Relate the Universal Decimal Classification. Расскажите об универсальной
- •37. Relate the features of bookwork as a source of scientific information. Расскажите об особенностях работы с книгой как источником научной информации.
- •38. Рассмотрите особенности ведения записей при работе с источниками научной информации.
- •39. Holographic analysis as a method of processing of scientific information.
- •40. Content analysis as a method of processing of scientific information. Контент анализ
- •41. Critical analysis as a method for processing scientific information. Критический
- •42. Comprehensive (complex) analysis as a method for processing scientific information. Комплексный анализ как метод обработки научной информации.
- •43. Review analysis as a method of processing of scientific information. Обзорный
- •44. The method of analysis as a method for processing scientific information. Метод анализа как метод обработки научной информации.
- •45. The method of deconstruction as a method of treatment of scientific information.
- •46. Axiomatic method as a method of treatment of scientific information. Аксиоматический метод как метод обработки научной информации.
- •47. Method of apperception as a method of treatment of scientific information. Метод апперципирования как метод обработки научной информации.
- •48. Diachromatic method as a method of treatment of scientific information. Диахроматический метод как метод обработки научной информации.
- •49. Aspect (facet) analysis as a method of processing of scientific information. Аспективный анализ как метод обработки научной информации.
- •50. Hermeneutical analysis as a method of treatment of scientific information.
- •51. Systems analysis as a method for processing scientific information. Системный анализ как метод обработки научной информации.
- •52. Functional analysis as a method for processing scientific information.
- •53. Relate the features of patent research. Расскажите об особенностях патентных исследований.
- •54. Consider the sequence of work in the conducting of patent research. Рассмотрите последовательность работы при проведении патентных исследований.
- •55. Consider the process of implementing of the research work and its stages.
- •56. Relate the effectiveness of research. Расскажите об эффективности научных исследований.
- •57. Consider the main types of efficiency of scientific research. Рассмотрите основные виды эффективности научных исследований.
- •58. Relate the cost-effectiveness of the implementation of research developments. Расскажите об экономической эффективности от внедрения научно-исследовательских разработок.
- •59. Consider the evaluation of the effectiveness of research. Рассмотрите оценку эффективности исследований.
- •60. Consider the basic structural elements in the design of research work. Рассмотрите основные структурные элементы при оформлении научно-исследовательской работы.
- •61.Consider the basic ways to write text on the results of research work. Рассмотрите основные способы написания текста по результатам научно-исследовательской работы.
- •62. Consider the language and style of scientific and technical language. Рассмотрите язык и стиль научно-технической речи.
- •63. Consider the basic requirements for the design of tables, charts, formulas and references according to gost 7.32-2001.
- •64. Consider the basic requirements for the writing, design and defend of abstracts and reports on the results of research work.
- •65. Consider the basic requirements for the writing, design and defend of course assignment on the results of research work.
- •66. Consider the basic requirements for the writing, design and defend of master thesis.
- •67. Consider the characteristics of the organization of work in the research groups. Рассмотрите особенности организации работы в научном коллективе.
- •68. Relate the integration of science in the educational process. Расскажите об интеграции науки в учебном процессе.
21. Specify the criteria applicable to the issue of scientific research. Сформулируйте
критерии, предъявляемые к теме научного исследования.
To evaluate the effectiveness of research use different criteria:
• Fundamental theoretical studies difficult to estimate the quantitative performance criteria.
• Usually we can use only quality criteria :
• possibility of wide application of research results in various fields the national economy;
• novelty phenomena;
• contribution to the defense capabilities of the country;
• priority of national science;
• industry, which can be initiated applied research;
• wide international recognition of work;
• fundamental monograph on the subject, and their citation scientists from different countries.
The effectiveness of applied research evaluated various quantitative criteria.
About the effectiveness of any research can be judged on their completion and implementation when they start to pay off for the national economy.
The effectiveness of the scientist evaluate various criteria: publication, economic, novelty designs, cited of work, etc.
The publication criteria characterize the overall operations - total number of publications, their total in the printed sheets, the number of monographs, textbooks, teaching aids.
As an economic criterion used factor productivity scientist.
The criterion of novelty of research - is the number of patents.
Criterion quoting of a scientist is a number of citations of his published works.
Main characteristic works of the researchers is their relevance, the theoretical novelty, conceptual, conclusiveness, prospects and the opportunity to put the results into practice, when considering applied research should be evaluated primarily by their practical relevance and importance, the possibility of introducing in practice, the effectiveness of the results. For scientific research here is valuable novelty, relevance and effectiveness.
Economic efficiency is characterized by pronounced in cost savings Metrics in social production, services that are derived from the use of the results and to compare them with the costs of the study.
Scientific and technical efficiency characterizes the rate of new scientific knowledge, intended for further development of science and technology.
Social efficiency is to increase the living standards of the people, the development of health, culture, science and education, improving environmental conditions, etc.
These species the efficiency of scientific research are interrelated and influence each other .
Specificity of high school, versatility and diversity of forms pose special requirements for assessing the effectiveness of its activities as a whole, and research.
When evaluating the performance of the researchers should take into account the full range of activities associated with higher school scientific activities: conducting studies themselves, training of doctors and candidates of science and patent - license work, publishing, research work of students.
We should consider the concept of so-called scientific potential of the university, as it plays a significant role in the organization of scientific research and the delivery of results. Level scientific potential of highereducation depends not only on the current structure of the teaching staff , the scientific information and material and technical provision of the university, but also on the optimal organization of scientific system of targeted interaction of all these features.
The problem of evaluating the effectiveness of scientific activity has two aspects , as a higher education institution can be viewed as educational and scientific center