- •Is patently not the case. Many of the rules developed in the 20th century
- •In the light of these observations, it is probably better to regard English
- •Instead.9
- •Invention – if a way out of a tight corner has to be found, then it will be found.
- •Inconvenient, he should recognise the force of these considerations. On the
- •Is precisely how such realist judges will want to decide anyway.
- •Inconvenience, precisely because its market-individualism commits it to a
- •In defending the shopkeeper’s choice of customer), it is the principle of termfreedom
- •Intervention in particular cases.
- •Viewed as competitive transactions, are to be subject to rather more regulation
- •In Schuler V Wickman. We can also see this principle at work in regulating
- •V Hyland).
- •Impose an absolute obligation to work 48 hours’ overtime per week on
- •Irrelevant.4
- •In the cases so far considered, the parties are free to decide whether or not to
- •In his judgment in Trentham V Archital Luxfer,12 Steyn lj appears to position
- •It can be converted into a binding contract by the simple response ‘I accept’.
Chapter 1: Sourcebook on Contract Law
contract law principles may state a general rule, very often, the law for the
purposes of employment contracts may differ.
The classical model of contractual relations outlined above works on the
basis of freedom of contract. It assumes the contract arena is a level playing
field on which all participants are equal in terms of bargaining power. But this
Is patently not the case. Many of the rules developed in the 20th century
recognise that individual consumers do not have the same bargaining
strength as a multinational company. The consumer requires protection,
especially in the light of the widespread use by business of the ‘standard form’
contract.3 Some rules towards this end have been developed at common law
but, to a large extent, common law development has been hindered by the
conflict between the needs of consumers and the principle of freedom of
contract espoused in the classical theory.
Even in the field of purely commercial contracts, where the classical theory
appears to have its strongest hold, there are exceptions. What must be
appreciated is that traders operate on an international level and the ancient
law merchant had started to develop before the 19th century classical theory
took hold. In order to cater for the needs of the trading community, some of
the classical rules were modified to take account of established trading
practice. Thus, a number of the rules gathered together under the doctrine of
consideration4 are modified to take account of practices established many
years earlier by the trading community. For example, the rule that
consideration must not be past has no application in relation to bills of
exchange, for the simple reason that to insist on this classical principle would
go against centuries of established trading practice.
In the light of these observations, it is probably better to regard English
contract law as a law of contracts, rather than a law of contract, despite the
existence of a generalised framework of rules which govern most contracts
and with which this book is concerned.
A problem which will be encountered in a number of the following
chapters is that, for one reason or another, a contract may fail. This may be
due to a formation problem5 or there may be present some vitiating element
such as a mistake,6 a misrepresentation7 or an element of actual or presumed
coercion.8 Alternatively, the contract might terminate due to some external
event beyond the control of the parties or due to a breach of contract by one of
the parties. If the contract fails, the terms of the contract may not be available
3
4
5
6
7
8
See Chapter 8.
See Chapter 3.
See Chapters 2 and 3.
See Chapters 2 and 6.
See Chapters 4, 13 and 14.
See Chapters 7 and 14.
2
What is Contract Law All About?
to govern the relationship between the parties. Instead, some other aspect of
the law may have to be invoked in order to resolve the issue. What this serves
to illustrate is that the law of contract is not just about making contracts and
that there are overlaps with other areas of law concerned with private law
rights and obligations. Thus, where a contract fails, it may be the case that
there has been a partial performance by one party which has conferred a
benefit on the other. If the contract itself is unable to determine how this is to
be paid for, it may be necessary to have recourse to restitutionary principles