Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Accounting 3 course.doc
Скачиваний:
44
Добавлен:
29.04.2019
Размер:
726.53 Кб
Скачать

V. Read passages describing some important aspects of general technology of auditing and answer the following questions.

What benefits are obtained by an engagement letter?

What are the five types of general analytical review procedures?

Engagement letter

An audit engagement begins with decisions about client acceptance and retention. When a new audit client is accepted, an engagement letter should be prepared. (The letter should be obtained each year from continuing clients.) This letter sets forth the terms of the engagement, including an agreement about the fee to be charged. In effect it is the audit contract. It may contain special requests to be undertaken by the auditors, or it may be a rather standard letter that an audit of financial statements will be performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. An engagement letter is highly recommended as a means of reducing the risk of misunderstandings with the client and as a means of avoiding legal liability for claims that the auditor did not perform the work promised.

Analytical review procedures

Analytical review procedures are the methods of deriving information by studying and comparing relationship among data.

There are five types of such procedures:

  1. Comparison of the financial information with information for comparable prior periods.

  2. Comparison of the financial information with anticipated results (e.g., budgets and forecasts).

  3. Study of the relationship of elements of financial information that would be expected to conform to a predictable pattern based on the entity’s experience.

  4. Comparison of the financial information with similar information regarding the industry in which the entity operates.

  5. Study of relationship of the financial information with relevant nonfinancial information.

In the planning stage, analytical review procedures are used to identify potential problem areas so the audit work can be planned to reduce the risk of missing something important.

VI. Read and translate the text. Say what risks an auditor must consider and what each type of the risks involve.

Assessment of audit risk

Knowledge of the client’s business from a preliminary analytical review can help auditors identify problem areas and make broad risk assessments. However some more technical risks need to be assessed. These are known as inherent risk, internal control risk, detection risk, and audit risk.

Inherent risk is the probability that material errors or irregularities have entered the data processing system used to develop financial statements. Inherent risk is a characteristic of a client’s business, the major types of transactions, and the effectiveness of its accountants. Auditors do not create or control inherent risk. They can try to assess it.

Internal control risk is the probability that the client’s internal control procedures will fail to detect material errors and irregularities, provided any enter the data processing system in the first place. Auditors do not create or control internal control risk. They can only evaluate a company’s control system and assess the probability of failure to detect errors and irregularities. An auditor’s assessment of internal control risk is based on the study and evaluation of internal control.

Detection risk is the probability that the audit procedures will fail to produce evidence of material errors and irregularities, provided any have entered the data processing system in the first place and have not been detected and corrected by the client’s internal control procedures. In contrast to inherent and internal control risk, auditors are responsible for performing the evidence gathering procedures that manage and control detection risk. These audit procedures represent the auditor’s opportunity to detect material errors and irregularities that can cause financial statements to be misleading.

In an overall sense, audit risk is the probability that an auditor will give an inappropriate opinion on financial statements. For example, the worst manifestation of this risk is giving an unqualified opinion on financial statements that are misleading because of material errors and irregularities the auditor failed to discover. Such a risk always exists, even when audits are well planned and carefully performed. The risk is much greater in poorly planned and carelessly performed audits.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]