- •1. The Old Germanic language, their classification and principle features.
- •2. The origin of the English language.
- •3. The chronological division of the history of English.
- •5. The position of English and its role in the world.
- •6. The oe vowel system. Major changes during the period.
- •7. Word order
- •8. The Great Vowel Shift.(gvs)
- •9. Major consonant changes in the history of English.
- •10. I-mutation and its traces in modern English
- •11. Changes in the vocabulary system in me
- •12. The oe noun system and its further changes
- •13,14 The oe adjective and its further development in me. Degrees of comparison.
- •15. The oe personal pronouns
- •16. Changes in the vocabulary system in ne period
- •17. The oe verb, its grammatical & morphological categories
- •18. Strong V. In oe & their further development
- •19. Weak V. In oe & their further development
- •20. Preterite-present V. In oe & their further development
- •21. The rise of the perfect forms
- •22. The rise of the passive forms
- •23. The oe vocabulary & its etymological characteristics
- •24. Main types of word-formation in oe
- •25. French loans.
- •26. Scandinavian loans.
- •27. Latin loans.
- •28. Main peculiarities of oe poetry.
- •29. Grimm’s Law.
- •30. Verner’s law.
- •32. Chaucer and his “Canterbury Tales”
- •33. The rise of articles
- •35 The root-stem declension in oe
- •36.The rise of do-forms
- •37. The rise of the future forms.
- •38. Gram. Agreement and government.
- •39. The non-finite forms of the verb in oe and their further development.
- •40. Forms of negotiation in oe.
19. Weak V. In oe & their further development
The number of weak v. in OE by far more exceeded that of strong v. in fact, all the v. with the exception of strong, & the minor groups(about 315-320) were weak(about ¾ of all v. ) .
Among them there were many derivatives of OE noun, adj, stems (talu (tale) – tellan; full – fullan (fill)); & derivatives from strong v: fallen – feallan (fell).
It was Germanic type, one of the Germanic innovations in grammar.
Productive type
Weak v. were subdivide into 3 classes(in Gothic there were 4 classes)
3 main Principle forms:
INFINITIVE: 1) 1st class ended in –an/-ian(seldom & occurs after [r] styrian, tellan)
2)2nd class ended in –ian (lōcian)
3) 3rd class ended in –an & no vowel before the dental suffix (libban, habban)
2. PAST TENSE: 1st class ended in –e, -ede, -te( styrede, tealde )
2nd class ended in –ode([o] before the dental suffix; lōcode)
3rd class ended in –de (no vowel before the dental suffix; lifde)
3. PARTICIPLE 2: 1st class ended in –ed, -d(after voiced), -t(after unvoiced) – teald, styred
2nd class ended in –od ([o] before the dental suffix; lōcod )
3rd class ended in –d (lifd, hæfd)
Main Changes:
A strong tendency towards greater regularity & order
-The OE v. of class 3 either joined the other classes of weak verbs (libban OE – liven ME(1st class – live NE)) or became irregular ( OE habban – ME haven – NE have; NE say)
ME verbs of Class 1 took the ending -de in the past without an intermediate vowel before the dental suffix - and the ending -ed in the Past Participle. They had descended from OE verbs of Class 1 with a long root syllable (containing a long vowel or a short vowel plus two consonants - OE deman, temman.
The verbs of Class 2, which were marked by -ode, -od in OE, had weakened these endings to -ede, -ed in ME. Since a few verbs of OE Class I had -ede, -ed (the type la styrian), they are included in ME Class II. Consequently, the only difference between the two classes of weak verbs in ME was the presence or absence of the element -p- before the dental suffix in the Past tense stem.
In Late ME the vowel [e] in unstressed medial and final syllables became very unstable and was lost. This change eliminated the differences between the two classes and also the distinctions between the 2nd and 3rd principal forms, thus reducing the number of stems in the weak verbs from three to two. Late ME weak verbs are the immediate source of modern standard (regular) verbs. The reverse process - weak verbs changing into strong ones - was of rare occurrence. Nevertheless a few weak verbs adopted strong forms. These changes account for the forms of NE wear.
20. Preterite-present V. In oe & their further development
Preterite-present(past-present) – 12(6 survived in MOD. E. – cunnan, cann, dear, sculan, sceal, magan, mæg, āg, mōt; most of them didn’t indicate actions, but expressed a kind of an attitude to an action expressed by another v., an Infinitive which followed the preterite-present – used like modal verbs ). In other words they were used like modal verbs & eventually developed into modern modal verbs.
Changes: -Several Preterite-present V. died out. The surviving v. lost some of their old forms & gram. Distinctions but retained many specific pecularities. They lost the forms of the verbals which had sprung up in OE & the distinctions b/t the forms of number & mood in the Present tense. In NE their paradigms have been reduced to 2 forms or even to 1.
-They also developed new meanings
Ex: can – to know how, to know →expresses supposition; May – supposition, permission