GINA2009
.pdf
|
|
|
|
OR |
REPRODUCE! |
|
|
|
ALTER |
|
|
|
|
NOT |
|
|
|
|
DO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
® |
|
|
|
MATERIAL |
|
|
|
|
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR
ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION
U PDATED 2009
|
|
|
|
OR |
REPRODUCE! |
|
|
|
ALTER |
|
|
|
|
NOT |
|
|
|
|
DO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
COPYRIGHTED |
MATERIAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention The GINA reports are available on www.ginasthma.org.
Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention 2009 (update)
GINA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* |
GINA SCIENCE COMMITTEE* |
Eric D. Bateman, MD, Chair
University Cape Town Lung Institute
Cape Town, South Africa
Louis-Philippe Boulet, MD
Hôpital Laval
Sainte-Foy , Quebec, Canada
Alvaro A. Cruz, MD
Federal University of Bahia
School of Medicine
Salvador, Brazil
Mark FitzGerald, MD
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Tari Haahtela, MD
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, Finland
Mark L. Levy, MD
University of Edinburgh
London England, UK
Paul O'Byrne, MD
McMaster University
Ontario, Canada
Gary W. Wong, MD
Ken Ohta, MD, PhD |
|
DO |
Teikyo University School of Medicine |
||
Tokyo, Japan |
|
|
Pierluigi Paggiaro, MD |
|
- |
University of Pisa |
|
|
Pisa, Italy |
MATERIAL |
|
|
|
|
Soren Erik Pedersen, M.D. |
|
|
Kolding Hospital |
|
|
Kolding, Denmark |
|
|
Manuel Soto-Quiroz, MD |
|
|
Hospital Nacional de Niños |
|
|
San José, Costa Rica |
|
|
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong ROC
Mark FitzGerald, MD, Chair
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Neil Barnes, MD |
REPRODUCE! |
London Chest Hospital |
|
London, England, UK |
|
Peter J. Barnes, MD |
|
National Heart and Lung Institute |
|
London, England, UK |
|
Eric D. Bateman, MD
University Cape Town Lung Institute
Cape Town, South Africa
Allan Becker, MD |
OR |
University of Manitoba |
|
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada |
|
ALTER |
|
Jeffrey M. Drazen, MD |
|
Harvard Medical School |
|
Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
Robert F. Lemanske, Jr., M.D.
University of Wisconsin
NOTSchool of Medicine
Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Paul O'Byrne, MD
McMaster University
Ontario, Canada
Ken Ohta, MD, PhD
Teikyo University School of Medicine
Tokyo, Japan
Soren Erik Pedersen, M.D.
Kolding Hospital
Kolding, Denmark
Emilio Pizzichini, MD
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Helen K. Reddel, MD
Woolcock Institute of Medical Research
Camperdown, NSW, Australia
Sean D. Sullivan, PhD
Professor of Pharmacy, Public Health
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, USA
Sally E. Wenzel, M.D.
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Heather J. Zar, MD
University of Cape Town
Cape Town, South Africa
*Disclosures for members of GINA Executive and Science Committees can be found at: http://www.ginasthma.com/Committees.asp?l1=7&l2=2
i
PREFACE
Asthma is a serious global health problem. People of allIn spite of these dissemination efforts, internat ages in countries throughout the world are affectedsurveysby thisprovide direct evidence for suboptimal asth chronic airway disorder that, when uncontrolled, can placecontrol in many countries, despite the availability of
severe limits on daily life and is sometimes fataleffective. The |
therapies. It is clear that if recommenda |
|
|
|
REPRODUCE! |
prevalence of asthma is increasing in most countries,contained within this report are to improve care of peop |
||
especially among children. Asthma is a significant burden, |
|
|
|
with asthma, every effort must be made to encourage |
|
not only in terms of health care costs but also of lost |
|
|
|
health care leaders to assure availability of and access |
|
productivity and reduced participation in family life. |
|
|
|
medications, and develop means to implement effectiv |
|
|
asthma management programs including the use of |
|
During the past two decades, we have witnessed manyappropriate tools to measure success. |
||
scientific advances that have improved our understanding |
|
|
of asthma and our ability to manage and control it |
In 2002, the GINA Report stated that “it is reasonable to |
|
effectively. However, the diversity of national health care |
|
|
|
expect that in most patients with asthma, control of t |
|
service systems and variations in the availability of asthma |
|
|
|
disease can, and should be achieved and maintained.” |
|
therapies require that recommendations for asthma care |
|
|
be adapted to local conditions throughout the global |
To meet this challenge, in 2005, Executive Committee |
|
recommended preparation of a new report not only to |
||
community. In addition, public health officials require |
|
|
information about the costs of asthma care, how to |
incorporate updatedORscientific information but to im |
|
an approach to asthma management based on asthma |
||
effectively manage this chronic disorder, and education |
|
|
|
control, rather than asthma severity. Recommendations |
methods to develop asthma care services and programs assess, treat and maintain asthma control are provided i |
|||
responsive to the particular needs and circumstances |
|||
|
|
this document. The methods used to prepare this |
|
within their countries. |
|
documentALTERare described in the Introduction. |
|
In 1993, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute |
It is a privilege for me to acknowledge the work of the |
||
collaborated with the World Health Organization to |
|||
many people who participated in this update project, as |
|||
|
DO |
||
convene a workshop that led to a Workshop Report: |
NOT |
||
Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention |
. |
well as to acknowledge the superlative work of all who |
|
This presented a comprehensive plan to manage asthmahave contributed to the success of the GINA program. |
|||
with the goal of reducing chronic disability- and premature |
|||
the same time assuring a mechanismMATERIALto incorporate the |
|||
|
|
The GINA program has been conducted through |
deaths while allowing patients with asthma to lead unrestricted educational grants from AstraZeneca, |
|
productive and fulfilling lives. |
Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Group, GlaxoSmithKline, |
|
|
|
Meda Pharma, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Mitsubishi Tanabe |
At the same time, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) |
|
|
Pharma, Novartis, Nycomed, PharmAxis and Schering- |
was implemented to develop a network of individuals, |
|
|
Plough. The generous contributions of these companie |
organizations, and public health officials to disseminate |
|
|
assured that Committee members could meet together t |
information about the care of patients with asthma while at |
|
|
discuss issues and reach consensus in a construct |
2001) COPYRIGHTEDwhich has gained increasing attention each year to |
|
|
timely manner. The members of the GINA Committees |
results of scientific investigations into asthma care. |
|
Publications based on the GINA Report were prepared |
are, however, solely responsible for the statements an |
and have been translated into languages to promote |
conclusions presented in this publication. |
international collaboration and dissemination of |
GINA publications are available through the Internet |
information. To disseminate information about asthma |
|
|
(http://www.ginasthma.org). |
care, a GINA Assembly was initiated, comprised of asthma |
|
care experts from many countries to conduct workshops |
|
with local doctors and national opinion leaders and to |
|
seminars at national and international meetings. In |
|
addition, GINA initiated an annual World Asthma Day (in |
|
raise awareness about the burden of asthma, and to |
Eric Bateman, MD |
initiate activities at the local/national level to educateChair,GINA Executive Committee |
|
families and health care professionals about effectiveUniversity of CapeTown Lung Institute |
|
methods to manage and control asthma. |
Cape Town, South Africa |
ii
GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.........................................................................PREFACE |
|
|
|
ii |
|
...................................................CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS |
|
|
|
16 |
|
METHODOLOGY AND SUMMARY OF NEW |
|
|
|
|
|
Medical History........................................................... |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symptoms .............................................................. |
|
|
REPRODUCE! |
16 |
||
RECOMMENDATION, 2007 UPDATE |
|
|
|
vi |
|
Cough variant asthma |
16 |
||||
......................... |
|
|
|
............................................ |
|
||||||
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
x |
|
Exercise-Induced bronchospasm ........................... |
|
17 |
|||
|
|
|
|
Physical Examination ................................................. |
|
17 |
|||||
CHAPTER 1. DEFINITION AND OVERVIEW |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Tests for Diagnosis and Monitoring ............................ |
|
17 |
|||
.................. |
|
|
|
Measurements of lung function............................... |
|
17 |
|||||
KEY POINTS |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Spirometry.............................................................. |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
Peak expiratory flow............................................... |
|
18 |
|||||
DEFINITION |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Measurement of airway responsiveness................ |
|
19 |
|||
|
|
|
|
Non-Invasive markers of airway inflammation |
|
19 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
........ |
|||||
THE BURDEN OF ASTHMA |
|
3 |
|
|
|
Measurements of allergic status............................. |
|
19 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Prevalence, Morbidity and Mortality ............................. |
|
|
3 |
|
3 DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGES AND |
|
|
|
|
||
Social and Economic Burden ....................................... |
|
|
|
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGN SIS....................................... |
|
|
20 |
|
|||
.....................................................................Obesity |
|
|
|
5 |
|
ALTER |
|
|
|
|
20 |
FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DEVELOPMENT AND |
|
|
|
|
Children 5 Years and Younger ................................... |
|
|||||
EXPRESSION OF ASTHMA |
|
4 |
|
|
|
..........................................Older Children and Adults |
|
20 |
|||
|
|
|
|
The Elderly |
|
|
|
|
21 |
||
Host Factors |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Occupational Asthma |
|
|
21 |
||||
Genetic |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Distinguishing Asthma from COPD |
|
21 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sex ........................................................................... |
|
|
|
5 |
|
NOTPhenotype.................................................................. |
|
|
|
|
22 |
Environmental Factors |
|
|
|
|
5 |
.....................................CLASSIFICATION OF ASTHMA |
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Etiology |
|
|
|
|
22 |
||
Allergens |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Infections .................................................................. |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Asthma Control |
|
|
|
|
22 |
Occupational sensitizers |
|
- |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Tobacco smoke ........................................................ |
MATERIAL |
DO6 |
|
Asthma Severity ......................................................... |
|
|
|
23 |
|||
Outdoor/Indoor air pollution...................................... |
|
|
6 |
|
REFERENCES |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Diet |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
MECHANISMS OF ASTHMA............................................ |
|
7 |
|
|
|
CHAPTER 3. ASTHMA MEDICATIONS |
|
........................ |
|
27 |
|
Airway Inflammation In Asthma .................................... |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflammatory cells.................................................... |
|
|
|
7 |
|
KEY POINTS .................................................................. |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Inflammatory mediators ............................................ |
|
|
|
7 |
|
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Structural changes in the airways............................. |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CHAPTERCOPYRIGHTED2. DIAGNOSIS AND LASSIFICATION |
|
|
.....15 |
|
..................................................................Anti-IgE |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Pathophysiology........................................................... |
|
|
|
8 |
|
ASTHMA MEDICATIONS: ADULTS |
|
28 |
|
|
|
Airway hyperresponsiveness.................................... |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
||||
Special Mechanisms .................................................... |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Route of Administration .............................................. |
|
28 |
|||
Acute exacerbations ................................................. |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Controller Medications................................................ |
|
29 |
|||
Nocturnal asthma ..................................................... |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Inhaled glucocorticosteroids................................... |
|
29 |
|||
Irreversible airflow limitation..................................... |
|
|
9 |
|
Leukotriene modifiers............................................. |
|
30 |
||||
Difficult-to-treat asthma............................................ |
|
|
9 |
|
Long-acting inhaled |
2 -agonists ............................. |
|
30 |
|||
Smoking and asthma ................................................ |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Theophylline........................................................... |
|
|
|
|
31 |
REFERENCES |
|
9 |
|
|
|
Cromones: sodium cromoglycate and |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
nedocromil sodium ........................................ |
|
31 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-acting oral 2 -agonists................................... |
|
32 |
|||
KEY POINTS |
|
|
16 |
|
|
Systemic glucocorticosteroids................................ |
|
32 |
|||
|
|
|
|
Oral anti-allergic compounds.................................. |
|
32 |
|||||
INTRODUCTION ............................................................ |
|
16 |
|
|
|
Other controller therapies....................................... |
|
32 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allergen-specific immunotherapy............................ |
|
33 |
iii
...................................................Reliever Medications |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rapid-acting inhaled 2 -agonists............................ |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
ASTHMA PREVENTION................................................. |
|
54 |
|
|||
Systemic glucocorticosteroids................................ |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Anticholinergics...................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
PREVENTION OF ASTHMA SYMPTOMS AND |
|
|
||
Theophylline........................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
EXACERBATIONS.................................................... |
|
55 |
|
Short-acting oral |
2 -agonists.................................. |
|
|
|
|
35 |
35 |
|
Indoor Allergens ....................................................... |
|
|
55 |
|
Complementary and Alternative Medicine................... |
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic mites ....................................................... |
REPRODUCE! |
55 |
|||||
ASTHMA TREATMENT: CHILDREN |
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furred animals |
55 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cockroaches .......................................................... |
|
|
55 |
|||
Route of Administration |
.............................................. |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Fungi...................................................................... |
|
|
56 |
|
Controller Medications................................................ |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Outdoor Allergens ...................................................... |
|
|
56 |
|
Inhaled glucocorticosteroids................................... |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Indoor Air Pollutants .................................................. |
|
56 |
|||
Leukotriene modifiers............................................. |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Outdoor Air Pollutants ................................................ |
|
56 |
||
Long-acting inhaled 2 -agonists ............................. |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Occupational Exposures ............................................ |
|
56 |
|||
Theophylline........................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Food and Food Additives ........................................... |
|
56 |
|
Cromones: sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drugs ......................................................................... |
|
|
57 |
|||
sodium ......................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Influenza Vaccination ................................................. |
|
57 |
|
Long-acting oral |
...................................2 -agonists |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Obesity....................................................................... |
|
|
57 |
|
Systemic glucocorticosteroids................................ |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Emotional Stress ........................................................ |
|
|
57 |
||
Reliever Medications................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Other Factors ThatORMay Exacerbate Asthma ............. |
57 |
|||
Rapid-acting inhaled 2 -agonists and short-acting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
oral 2 -agonists .............................................. |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
COMPONENT 3: ASSESS, TREAT AND MONITOR |
|
|
|||
Anticholinergics...................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
ASTHMA ...................................................................... |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOT |
|
|
|
||
REFERENCES ............................................................... |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
KEY POINTSALTER.................................................................. |
|
57 |
|
|
CHAPTER 4. ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
TRODUCTION ............................................................ |
|
57 |
|
|
PREVENTION ................................................................ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION ............................................................ |
|
|
|
|
|
DO |
|
ASSESSING ASTHMA CONTROL................................. |
|
58 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
TREATING TO ACHIEVE CONTROL |
|
58 |
|
|||
COMPONENT 1: DEVELOP PATIENT/ |
MATERIAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment Steps for Achieving Control |
58 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
DOCTOR PARTNERSHIP |
........................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Step 1: As-needed reliever medication .................. |
58 |
||
KEY POINTS |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
Step 2: Reliever medication plus a single |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
controller......................................................... |
|
|
60 |
||
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Step 3: Reliever medication plus one or two |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
controllers....................................................... |
|
|
60 |
||
ASTHMA EDUCATION |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 4: Reliever medication plus two or more |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
controllers....................................................... |
|
|
61 |
||
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
Step 5: Reliever medication plus additional |
|
|||
At the Initial Consultation........................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Personal Asthma Action Plans .................................. |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
controller options............................................ |
|
61 |
|||
Follow-up and Review ............................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improving Adherence ................................................ |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
MONITORING TO MAINTAIN CONTROL ...................... |
61 |
|
|||
Self-Management in Children .................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Duration and Adjustments to Treatment...................... |
61 |
||||
THE EDUCATION OF OTHERS |
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stepping Down Treatment When Asthma Is |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controlled................................................................. |
|
|
62 |
|||
COMP NENT 2: IDENTIFY AND REDUCE EXPOSURE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stepping Up Treatment In Response To Loss Of |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control ..................................................................... |
|
|
62 |
|||
TO RISK FACTORS |
.................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Difficult-to-Treat-Asthma ............................................. |
|
63 |
|
KEY POINTS .................................................................. |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
COMPONENT 4 - MANAGE ASTHMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXACERBATIONS ...................................................... |
|
|
64 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
|
Utilization and Cost of Health Care Resources |
.........89 |
|
KEY POINTS .................................................................. |
64 |
Determining the Economic Value of Interventions |
||
|
|
Asthma ................................................................... |
90 |
|
INTRODUCTION ............................................................ |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
GINA DISSEMINATION/IMPLEMENTATION |
|
|
ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY....................................... |
65 |
RESOURCES ............................................................ |
90 |
|
MANAGEMENT–COMMUNITY SETTINGS |
|
65 |
|
|
|
REFERENCES |
|
REPRODUCE! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
||||
Treatment................................................................... |
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
Bronchodilators ...................................................... |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
Glucocorticosteroids............................................... |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT–ACUTE CARE SETTINGS .................. |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment ................................................................ |
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
Treatment.................................................................... |
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
Oxygen ................................................................... |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rapid-acting inhaled 2 –agonists........................... |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
Epinephrine ............................................................ |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional bronchodilators ........................................... |
|
|
69 |
|
68 |
ALTER |
|
||
Sedatives............................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Systemic glucocorticosteroids................................ |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
||
Inhaled glucocorticosteroids................................... |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnesium ............................................................. |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Helium oxygen therapy........................................... |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Leukotriene modifiers............................................. |
|
|
|
69 |
|
NOT |
|
|
|
Criteria for Discharge from the Emergency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Department vs. Hospitalization................................. |
|
DO |
69 |
|
|
|
|||
COMPONENT 5. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
.......... |
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pregnancy..................................................................... |
|
- |
70 |
|
|
|
|
||
Surgery ......................................................................... |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
||
Aspirin-Induced Asthma ................................................ |
MATERIAL |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
||
Rhinitis, Sinusitis, And Nasal Polyps ............................. |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
||
Rhinitis................................................................... |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sinusitis.................................................................. |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nasal polyps........................................................... |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Occupational Asthma .................................................... |
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
Respiratory Infections ................................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
Gastroesophageal Reflux.............................................. |
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
Anaphylaxis and Asthma............................................... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCES ............................................................... |
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHAPTER 5. IMPLEMENTAT ON OF ASTHMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GUIDELINES IN HEALTH SYSTEMS |
......................... |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
KEY POINTS .................................................................. |
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODU TION ............................................................ |
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES ............ |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ECONOMIC VALUE OF INTERVENTIONS AND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION IN ASTHMA........... |
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
REPRODUCE! |
When the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) program wasdiscuss each publication that was felt would have an |
|
initiated in 1993, the primary goal was to produce |
impact on asthma management and prevention by at least |
recommendations for asthma management based on the 1 member of the Committee, and to reach a consensus on best scientific information available. Its firsthreport,changes in the report. In the absence of consensu
NHLBI/WHO Workshop Report: Global Strategy for |
disagreements were decided by an open vote of the ful |
|
Asthma Management and Prevention |
was issued in 1995 |
committee. |
and revised in 2002 and 2006. These reports, and their |
|
|
companion documents, have been widely distributed Summaryand of Recommendations in the 2009 Update: |
||
translated into many languages. The 2006 report was |
Between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009, 392 articles met |
|
based on research published through June, 2006 and can |
the search criteria; 10 additional publications were bro |
|
be found on the GINA websitewww.(ginasthma.org ). |
to the attention of the committee. Of the 402 articles, |
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
papers were identified as having an impact on the GINA |
recommendations in the GINA documents related to changingALTERthe text or introducing a concept requiring management and prevention, and to post yearly updatesrecommendation to the report. The summary is reported
The GINA Science Committee was established in 2002 toReport (updated 2009) that was posted on the website in review published research on asthma management and December 2009 either by: 1) confirming, that is, adding to prevention, to evaluate the impact of this research onor replacing an existing reference, or 2) modifying, th
on the GINA website. The first update of the 2006 reportin three segments: A) Modifications in the text; B) (2007 update) included the impact of publications fromReferences that provided confirmation or an update of
update included a Pub Med search using search fieldsPrevention in Children 5 Years and Younger was released
established by the Committee:asthma,1) All Fields, All |
in early 2009 (can be found on www.ginasthma.org). |
ages, only items with abstracts, Clinical rial, Human, |
Accordingly, the Executive Summary “Managing Asthma i |
sorted by Authors;and 2) asthma AND systematic , All |
Children 5 Years and Younger” that appeared on pages |
July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007; the 2008 updated |
|
previous recommendations; and C) Changes or |
|
|
|
|
NOT |
included the impact of publications from July 1, 2007 modifications to the text. |
|||
through June 30, 2008. This 2009 update includes the |
|
||
impact of publications from July 1, 2008 through June 30,Asthma in Children 5 Years and Younger: In 2008, a |
|||
|
|
DO |
|
2009. |
- |
number of pediatric experts developed a report which |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
focused on asthma care in children 5 years and younger. |
Methods:The methodology used to produce this 2009 |
The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and |
||
|
MATERIAL |
|
|
fields, ALL ages, only items with abstracts, Human, xivsorted–xvii is deleted – see section C. by COPYRIGHTEDauthor. In addition, publications in peer review journals
not captured by Pub Med could be submitted to indiviAsthmadual Control: In review of the published literature, members of the Committee providing an abstract and theCommittee determined that many changes were required full paper were submitted in (or translated into) Englishinthe.segment “Classification of Asthma.” According
new segment appears beginning on page 22 – see section
All members of the Committee received a summary of D.1). citations and all abstracts. Each abstract was assigned to
at least two Committee members, although all membersEvidence Reviews: In the preparation of GINA reports, were offered the opportunity to provide an opinion onincludingay this 2009 update, levels of evidence has bee abstract. Members evaluated the abstract or, up to her/hiscompleted using four categories as described on page x judgment, the full publication, by answering specificThecommittewrienhas had extensive discussions inter
questions from a short questionnaire, and to indicateaswelliftheaswith proponents of a new methodology for
scientific data presented impacted on recommendationsdescribing recommendations (the GRADE system). The
the GINA report. If so, the member was asked to |
implications for the widespread adaptation of this sy |
specifically identify modifications that shouldhasbe beenmade.exploredThe by the Committee with regard to |
|
entire GINA Science Committee met twice yearly to |
resource implications, especially given the already |
vi
*The Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention (updated 2009), the updated Pocket Guides and the complete list of references examined by the Comm available on the GINA website www.ginasthma.org.
†Members (2008-2009): M. FitzGerald, Chair; P. Barnes, N. Barnes, E. Bateman, A. Becker, J. Drazen, R. Lemanske, P. OiByrne, K. Ohta, S. Pedersen, E. Pizzichini, H. Reddel, S. Sullivan, S. Wenzel, H. Zar.
rigorous method of reviewing the literature and updatingAS,Buist AS, et al. Asthma drug use and the recommendations that is currently in place. The development of Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS). committee has decided that it would be inappropriatePharmcoepidemiologyto and Drug Safety. 2007;16:620-26. implement this methodology for all the recommendations
within GINA and recommended instead to use the methodPg 31,- left column, paragraph 1, insert: …does not ology, selectively, especially where the balance betweenincrease the risk of asthma-related hospitalizations214 … efficacy and cost effectiveness is unclear or whereReferencethere214. is Jaeschke R, O'Byrne PM, Mejza F, Nair controversy with regard to the recommendation. The P, Lesniak W, Brozek J, Thabane L, Cheng J,
Committee applied GRADE to two questions (see sectionSchünemann HJ, Sears MR, Guyatt G. The safety of long-
D.2) and will continue to explore the use of GRADE-like |
acting beta-agonists among patients with asthma usi |
methodology for issues that require more in-depth |
inhaled corticosteroids: systematic review and |
evaluation. |
metaanalysisAm. J Respir Crit Care Med . 2008 Nov |
|
15;178(10):1009-16. Epub 2008 Sep 5. |
A. Modifications in the text: |
|
|
Pg 34, left column, end of paragraph 1, insert: Data on a |
Pg 19, right column, insert end of first paragraph:although |
human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis fact |
it has been shown that the use of FeNo as a measure of(TNF)-alpha suggest that the risk benefit equation do |
|||
asthma control does not improve control or enable |
|
REPRODUCE! |
|
not favor the use of this class of treatments in sev |
|||
|
55 |
216 |
Wenzel SE, Barnes PJ, |
reduction in dose of inhaled glucocorticosteroid. |
asthma . Reference 216. |
||
|
|
ALTER |
|
Reference 55. |
Szefler SJ, Mitchell H, Sorkness CA, |
Bleecker ER, BousquetORJ, Busse W, Dahlén SE, et al; T03 |
|
Gergen PJ, O'Connor GT, Morgan WJ, et al. Management |
Asthma Investigators. A randomized, double-blind, |
of asthma based on exhaled nitric oxide in addition toplacebo-controlled study of tumor necrosis factor-alpha guideline-based treatment for inner-city adolescentsblockadeand in severe persistent asthmaAm J Respir. Crit
young adults: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008Care Med. 2009 Apr 1;179(7):549-58. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
Sep 20;372(9643):1065-72. |
|
|
NOT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pg 30, left column, line 6, insert:although there appear to |
Pg 35, right column, beginning of paragraph 4, insert: |
|||
Dietary supplements, including seleniumaretherapynot |
||||
|
|
|
|
197 |
be differences in response according to |
DO |
of proven benefit and the use of a low sodium diet as a |
||
symptom/inflammation phenotype. Reference 212 . |
adjunctive therapy to normal treatment has no additiona |
|||
212 |
|
|
|
|
Haldar P, Pavord ID, Shaw DE, Berry MA, Thomas M, |
|
therapeutic benefit in adults with asthma. In addit |
||
|
- |
no effect on bronchial reactivity to methacholine. |
||
Brightling CE, Wardlaw AJ, Green RH. Cluster analysis |
||||
|
|
|
|
217 |
and clinical asthma phenotypesAm J Respir. |
Crit Care |
|
Reference 217. |
Pogson ZE, Antoniak MD, Pacey SJ, |
MATERIAL |
|
Lewis SA, Britton JR, Fogarty AW. Does a low sodium |
||
Med . 2008 Aug 1;178(3):218-24. Epub 2008 May 14 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
diet improve asthma control? A randomized controlled tri |
|
Pg 30, left column, line 11 from end, insert: |
meta- |
|
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul 15;178(2):132-8. |
analysis of case-control studies of non-vertebral fracturesEpub2008May 1. in adults using inhaled glucocorticosteroids (BDP or
equivalent) indicated that in older adults, the relativePg 38, Figurerisk of3.6, delete last statement and insert: non-vertebral fractures increases by about 12% for eachInhaled glucocorticosteroid use has the potential for 1000 µg/day increase in the dose BDP or equivalent but reducing bone mineral accretion in male children that the magnitude of this risk was considerably lessprogressingthan through puberty, but this risk is like other common risk factors for fracture in the older weighed by the ability to reduce the amount of oral
adult213. Reference 213. |
Weatherall M, James K, Clay |
218 |
corticosteroids used in these.childrenReference 218. |
||
J, Perrin K, Masoli M, Wijesinghe M, Beasley R. Dose- |
Kelly HW, Van Natta ML, Covar RA, Tonascia J, Green |
|
response relationship for risk of non-vertebral fractureRP,StrunkwithRC;CAMP Research Group. Effect of long- |
||
inhaled corticosteroidsClin Exp. Allergy. 2008 |
term corticosteroid use on bone mineral density in |
|
Sep;38(9):1451-8. Epub 2008 Jun 3. |
|
children: a prospective longitudinal assessment in |
|
|
childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) study. |
Pg 30, right column, last paragraph delete last sentence |
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e53-61. |
|
and references 52-54 and replace with: No association |
|
|
was found between Churg-Strauss syndrome and |
Pg 39, left column, end of first paragraph, insert: |
|
COPYRIGHTED |
|
|
leukotriene modifiers, after controlling for asthmaMontelukadrugse,t has not been demonstrated to be an effect |
although it is not possible to rule out modest associnhaledationsglucocorticosteroid sparing alternative in ch |
|
given that Churg-Strauss syndrome is so rare and so with moderate-to-severe persistent.asthmaReference |
|
|
219 |
highly correlated with asthma52severity.NewReference |
219. Strunk RC, Bacharier LB, Phillips BR, Szefler SJ, |
52 . Harrold LR, Patterson K, Andrade SE, Dube T, Go |
Zeiger RS, Chinchilli VM, et al.; CARE Network. |
vii
Azithromycin or montelukast as inhaled corticosteroidblockers,- within 24 hours of hospital admission, for a sparing agents in moderate-to-severe childhood asthmaacute coronary event, have lower in-hospital mortality
studyJ .Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;122(6):1138- |
rates . Reference 366. |
Babu KS, Gadzik F, Holgate |
|
366, 367 |
|
1144.e4. Epub 2008 Oct 25. |
ST. Absence of respiratory effects with ivabradine i |
|
|
patients with asthma. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 |
|
Pg 51, right column, end of last paragraph, insert:Lay |
Jul;66(1):96-101. Epub 2008 Mar 13. |
Reference 367. |
|
|
REPRODUCE! |
educators can be recruited and trained to deliver a discreteOlenchock BA, Fonarow GG, Pan W, Hernandez A, |
||
area of respiratory care (for example, asthma self- |
Cannon CP; Get With The Guidelines Steering Committee. |
|
management education) with comparable outcomes to |
Current use of beta blockers in patients with reacti |
those achieved by primary care based practice362nursesairway disease who are hospitalized with acute coronary
(Evidence B). |
|
syndromesAm. J Cardiol . 2009 Feb 1;103(3):295-300. |
Reference 362. |
Partridge MR, Caress AL, Brown C, |
Epub 2008 Nov 19. |
Hennings J, Luker K, Woodcock A, Campbell M. Can lay |
|
people deliver asthma self-management education as Pg 62, left column, last paragraph, delete sentence and effectively as primary care based practice nurses?replace with:However, this is more likely to lead to loss
Thorax . 2008 Sep;63(9):778-83. Epub 2008 Feb 15.) |
asthma control (Evidence B ). Reference 368: |
|
137, 368 |
|
Godard P, Greillier P, Pigearias B, Nachbaur G, |
Pg 52, right column, last paragraph, delete first sentence Desfougeres JL, Attali V. Maintaining asthma control in and replace with:Although interventions for enhancingpersistent asthma: comparison of three strategies in
medication adherence have been developed, studies of |
|
ALTER |
|
||
month double-blindORrandomised study. Respir Med. 2008 |
|||||
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
adults and children with34 asthmahaveshown that around |
Aug;102(8):1124-31. pub 2008 Jul 7. |
||||
50% of those on long-term therapy fail to take medications |
|
|
|||
as directed at least part of theReferencetime.363. |
|
Pg 72, left column, end of third paragraph, insert: Adult |
|||
Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X. |
|
with asthma may be at increased risk of serious |
|||
|
|
|
NOT |
|
|
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.pneumococcal disease. Reference 370 . Juhn YJ, Kita |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
Cochrane Database Syst Rev |
. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD000011 |
|
H, Yawn BP, Boyce TG, Yoo KH, McGree ME, Weaver AL, |
||
|
|
|
Wollan P, Jacobson RM. Increased risk of serious |
||
Pg 55, left column, end of first paragraph, insert:Patients |
pneumococcal disease in patients withJasthmaAllergy. |
||||
|
|
DO |
|
|
|
with well-controlled asthma are less likely to experienceClin Immunol. 2008 Oct;122(4):719-23. Epub 2008 Sep |
|||||
exacerbations than those whose asthma is not well- |
13. |
|
|
||
controlled. |
- |
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
indicated and insert:InstallationMATERIALof non-polluting, more |
|
|
|||
Reference 364 : Bateman ED, Bousquet J, Busse WW, |
|
Pg 89, right column, first paragraph, insert:Use of |
|||
Clark TJ, Gul N, Gibbs M, Pedersen S; GOAL Steering |
administrative datasets (e.g., dispensing records) or |
Committee and Investigators. Stability of asthma controlhealth care utilization can help to identify at-risk p
|
23 |
with regular treatment: an analysis of the Gaining toOptimalaudit the quality of health. Referencecare 23 . |
|
Asthma controL (GOAL) study. Allergy. 2008 |
Bereznicki BJ, Peterson GM, Jackson SL, Walters EH, |
Jul;63(7):932-8. |
Fitzmaurice KD, Gee PR. Data-mining of medication |
|
records to improve asthma managementMed. J Aust. |
Pg 56, left column, end of third paragraph delete as |
2008 Jul 7;189(1):21-5. |
effective heating (heat pump, wood pellet burner, fluB.Referencesd that provided confirmation or update of
gas) in the homes of children with asthma does not |
previous recommendations: |
|
||
significantly improve lung function but does significantly |
|
|||
reduce symptoms of asthma, days off school, healthcarePg 24: Right column, replace reference 32. Horvath I, |
|
|||
|
|
365 |
Hunt J, Barnes PJ, Alving K, Antczak A, Baraldi E, et al. |
|
utilization, and visits to a pharmacist. |
|
|||
Reference 365. |
Howden-Chapman P, Pierse N, Nicholls |
Exhaled breath condensate: methodological |
|
|
|
|
|
recommendations and unresolved questionsEur Respir. |
J |
S, Gillespie-Bennett J, Viggers H, Cunningham M, et al. |
|
|||
|
|
|
2005;26:523-48. |
|
Effects of improved home heating on asthma in community |
|
|||
dwelling children: randomized controlledBMJ .trial2008. |
Pg 30: Left column, insert reference 211. O'Byrne PM, |
|
||
Sep 23;337:a1411. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1411. |
|
|
||
COPYRIGHTED |
|
Naya IP, Kallen A, Postma DS, Barnes PJ. Increasing |
|
|
|
doses of inhaled corticosteroids compared to adding lon |
|||
Pg 57, left column, end of first paragraph, insert:Beta |
blockers have a proven benefit in the management of acting inhaled beta2-agonists in achieving asthma con
Chest. 2008 Dec;134(6):1192-9. Epub 2008 Aug 8. patients with acute coronary syndromes and for secondary
prevention of coronary events. Data suggest that patients with asthma who receive newer more cardio-selective beta
viii