- •Executive Summary
- •Box K1.1. Why is innovation important?
- •Box K1.2. Incremental and radical innovation
- •Figure 1.1. Driving forces of innovation
- •Table 1.1. Innovation style at different stages of the firm
- •Table 1.2. Closed innovation versus open innovation principles
- •Table 1.3. The benefits of collaboration
- •Figure 1.2. Structure of the national innovation system
- •Box K1.3. Public-private partnerships for innovation
- •Table 1.4. Options for improving the functioning of an innovation system
- •Box K1.4. The public sector role as coordinator
- •Box K1.5. Innovation Agencies and Innovation Councils
- •Executive Summary
- •A. The importance of framework conditions
- •Box K2.1. Entrepreneurship as a driver of innovation
- •B. Local and regional dimensions
- •Box K2.2. Are local factors still relevant?
- •Box K2.3. Codified and tacit knowledge
- •C. The role of the business environment
- •Box C2.3. Good practices in company formation
- •Table 2.3. Basic principles in the organization and delivery of business services
- •Box K2.4. What is R&D and why it matters?
- •Table 2.4. Principles of designing tax incentives for R&D in firms
- •Figure 2.2. Eligibility of UK companies for R&D tax incentives
- •Table 2.5. Direct funding and tax incentives for R&D
- •Figure 2.3. Funding requirements lifecycle
- •Table 2.6. Taxonomy of types of support for early-stage companies
- •Executive Summary
- •A. Identifying industry-science linkages and the forms of public support
- •Figure 3.1. How the public and private sector can join forces in support of innovation
- •Table 3.1. Different categories and forms of industry-science relations
- •B. Supporting industry-science linkages at different stages of the innovation process
- •Table 3.2. Industry-science relations (ISR) and the institutional setting in public science
- •Table 3.3. Responsible Partnership Guidelines for Collaborative Research
- •Table 3.4. The types of technology that lead to spin-outs or established firm licenses
- •Executive Summary
- •A. Innovation support institutions and firms’ innovation activities
- •Table 4.1. Types of innovation support institutions
- •B. Business incubators
- •Box K4.1. What is a business incubator?
- •Box K4.2. Pre-incubation
- •Table 4.2. Performance evaluation: definition of key evaluation issues
- •Table 4.3. Performance evaluation: Definition of key performance evaluation indicators
- •C. Science and technology parks
- •Box K4.4. Different definitions of science parks
- •Table 4.5. Four science park models: Main features
- •Table 4.6. Profile of a typical North American university research park
- •D. Innovation clusters
- •Box K4.5. The main features of innovation clusters
- •Table 4.7. An illustrative framework for cluster monitoring, benchmarking and evaluation
14 Policy Options and Practical Instruments
___________________________________________________________________________
C.The broader picture: The innovation system
Innovation is the outcome of longstanding collaboration and interactions between firms and other organizations. These include, for example, the connections of their staff with customers, other producers, subcontractors, consultants, public bodies such as development agencies, professional service providers, universities, and research institutions. This complex set of innovation stakeholders and their interrelations define an innovation system (Figure 1.2.).
Foundations of the innovation systems include:
•The organizations that are part of the network of a public and private actor whose activities and interactions initiate, import, modify and diffuse new technologies;
•The linkages that exist between organizations;
•How ideas flow across these linkages; and
•The ability for organizations to learn to change and use these ideas.
Figure 1.2. Structure of the national innovation system
Source: UNECE (2007), Creating a Conducive Environment for Higher Competitiveness and Effective National Innovation Systems. Lessons Learnt from the Experiences of UNECE Countries, New York and Geneva.
Enhancing the Innovative Performance of Firms |
15 |
___________________________________________________________________________
Innovation systems can be distinguished according to their scope:
•National
•Regional
•Sectoral.
National innovation systems (NIS) may display different features regarding the degree of centralization in the allocation of resources and the importance of local arrangements in shaping coordination agreements between business, higher education and government. A broad interpretation of the effectiveness of any of these systems can be assessed by the degree to which:
•Relevant information related to innovation and economic conditions flows through partners in the system; and
•The effective use of this information to innovate.
Regional innovation systems are more likely to produce local connections based on geographical proximity. If functional regions are too small to support key knowledge generation stakeholders, such as universities, links would have to be developed beyond the region.
What can be done to strengthen an innovation system and address any weaknesses?
An innovation system is based on the connections between organizations that produce knowledge, those that utilize this knowledge, which in this context is for its commercialization, the way this is diffused through a community of businesses, the ability of companies and others to absorb the information and finally the structure or governance of the innovation process.
In order to increase the effectiveness of any system in delivering innovation, it is necessary to undertake audits of:
•Sectoral interests;
•Existing connections;
•Routines for creating connections; and
•Emerging opportunities to support connections with public bodies, universities, public research institutions as examples, in particular, public-private partnerships (Box K1.3.).