- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •Contents
- •2.1 Introduction and a Short History of Black Holes
- •2.2 The Kruskal Extension of Schwarzschild Space-Time
- •2.2.1 Analysis of the Rindler Space-Time
- •2.2.2 Applying the Same Procedure to the Schwarzschild Metric
- •2.2.3 A First Analysis of Kruskal Space-Time
- •2.3 Basic Concepts about Future, Past and Causality
- •2.3.1 The Light-Cone
- •2.3.2 Future and Past of Events and Regions
- •Achronal Sets
- •Time-Orientability
- •Domains of Dependence
- •Cauchy surfaces
- •2.4.1 Conformal Mapping of Minkowski Space into the Einstein Static Universe
- •2.4.2 Asymptotic Flatness
- •2.5 The Causal Boundary of Kruskal Space-Time
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 The Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.2.1 Riemann and Ricci Curvatures of the Kerr-Newman Metric
- •3.3 The Static Limit in Kerr-Newman Space-Time
- •Static Observers
- •3.4 The Horizon and the Ergosphere
- •The Horizon Area
- •3.5 Geodesics of the Kerr Metric
- •3.5.2 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation and the Carter Constant
- •3.5.3 Reduction to First Order Equations
- •3.5.4 The Exact Solution of the Schwarzschild Orbit Equation as an Application
- •3.5.5 About Explicit Kerr Geodesics
- •3.6 The Kerr Black Hole and the Laws of Thermodynamics
- •3.6.1 The Penrose Mechanism
- •3.6.2 The Bekenstein Hawking Entropy and Hawking Radiation
- •References
- •4.1 Historical Introduction to Modern Cosmology
- •4.2 The Universe Is a Dynamical System
- •4.3 Expansion of the Universe
- •4.3.1 Why the Night is Dark and Olbers Paradox
- •4.3.2 Hubble, the Galaxies and the Great Debate
- •4.3.4 The Big Bang
- •4.4 The Cosmological Principle
- •4.5 The Cosmic Background Radiation
- •4.6 The New Scenario of the Inflationary Universe
- •4.7 The End of the Second Millennium and the Dawn of the Third Bring Great News in Cosmology
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Mathematical Interlude: Isometries and the Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.1 Isometries and Killing Vector Fields
- •5.2.2 Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3 The Geometry of Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.1 Infinitesimal Transformations and Killing Vectors
- •5.2.3.2 Vielbeins, Connections and Metrics on G/H
- •5.2.3.3 Lie Derivatives
- •5.2.3.4 Invariant Metrics on Coset Manifolds
- •5.2.3.5 For Spheres and Pseudo-Spheres
- •5.3 Homogeneity Without Isotropy: What Might Happen
- •5.3.1 Bianchi Spaces and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.1.1 Bianchi Type I and Kasner Metrics
- •5.3.2.1 A Ricci Flat Bianchi II Metric
- •5.3.3 Einstein Equation and Matter for This Billiard
- •5.3.4 The Same Billiard with Some Matter Content
- •5.3.5 Three-Space Geometry of This Toy Model
- •5.4 The Standard Cosmological Model: Isotropic and Homogeneous Metrics
- •5.4.1 Viewing the Coset Manifolds as Group Manifolds
- •5.5 Friedman Equations for the Scale Factor and the Equation of State
- •5.5.1 Proof of the Cosmological Red-Shift
- •5.5.2 Solution of the Cosmological Differential Equations for Dust and Radiation Without a Cosmological Constant
- •5.5.3 Embedding Cosmologies into de Sitter Space
- •5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
- •5.6.1 Particle Horizon
- •5.6.2 Event Horizon
- •5.6.3 Red-Shift Distances
- •5.7 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Cosmological Model
- •5.8 Cosmic Evolution with a Scalar Field: The Basis for Inflation
- •5.8.1 de Sitter Solution
- •5.8.2 Slow-Rolling Approximate Solutions
- •5.8.2.1 Number of e-Folds
- •5.9 Primordial Perturbations of the Cosmological Metric and of the Inflaton
- •5.9.1 The Conformal Frame
- •5.9.2 Deriving the Equations for the Perturbation
- •5.9.2.1 Meaning of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.2.2 Evaluation of the Effective Mass Term in the Slow Roll Approximation
- •5.9.2.3 Derivation of the Propagation Equation
- •5.9.3 Quantization of the Scalar Degree of Freedom
- •5.9.4 Calculation of the Power Spectrum in the Two Regimes
- •5.9.4.1 Short Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.2 Long Wave-Lengths
- •5.9.4.3 Gluing the Long and Short Wave-Length Solutions Together
- •5.9.4.4 The Spectral Index
- •5.10 The Anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background
- •5.10.1 The Sachs-Wolfe Effect
- •5.10.2 The Two-Point Temperature Correlation Function
- •5.10.3 Conclusive Remarks on CMB Anisotropies
- •References
- •6.1 Historical Outline and Introduction
- •6.1.1 Fermionic Strings and the Birth of Supersymmetry
- •6.1.2 Supersymmetry
- •6.1.3 Supergravity
- •6.2 Algebro-Geometric Structure of Supergravity
- •6.3 Free Differential Algebras
- •6.3.1 Chevalley Cohomology
- •Contraction and Lie Derivative
- •Definition of FDA
- •Classification of FDA and the Analogue of Levi Theorem: Minimal Versus Contractible Algebras
- •6.4 The Super FDA of M Theory and Its Cohomological Structure
- •6.4.1 The Minimal FDA of M-Theory and Cohomology
- •6.4.2 FDA Equivalence with Larger (Super) Lie Algebras
- •6.5 The Principle of Rheonomy
- •6.5.1 The Flow Chart for the Construction of a Supergravity Theory
- •6.6 Summary of Supergravities
- •Type IIA Super-Poicaré Algebra in the String Frame
- •The FDA Extension of the Type IIA Superalgebra in the String Frame
- •The Bianchi Identities
- •6.7.1 Rheonomic Parameterizations of the Type IIA Curvatures in the String Frame
- •Bosonic Curvatures
- •Fermionic Curvatures
- •6.7.2 Field Equations of Type IIA Supergravity in the String Frame
- •6.8 Type IIB Supergravity
- •SL(2, R) Lie Algebra
- •Coset Representative of SL(2, R)/O(2) in the Solvable Parameterization
- •The SU(1, 1)/U(1) Vielbein and Connection
- •6.8.2 The Free Differential Algebra, the Supergravity Fields and the Curvatures
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Complex Basis
- •The Curvatures of the Free Differential Algebra in the Real Basis
- •6.8.3 The Bosonic Field Equations and the Standard Form of the Bosonic Action
- •6.9 About Solutions
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction and Conceptual Outline
- •7.2 p-Branes as World Volume Gauge-Theories
- •7.4 The New First Order Formalism
- •7.4.1 An Alternative to the Polyakov Action for p-Branes
- •7.6 The D3-Brane: Summary
- •7.9 Domain Walls in Diverse Space-Time Dimensions
- •7.9.1 The Randall Sundrum Mechanism
- •7.9.2 The Conformal Gauge for Domain Walls
- •7.10 Conclusion on This Brane Bestiary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Supergravity and Homogeneous Scalar Manifolds G/H
- •8.2.3 Scalar Manifolds of Maximal Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions
- •8.3 Duality Symmetries in Even Dimensions
- •8.3.1 The Kinetic Matrix N and Symplectic Embeddings
- •8.3.2 Symplectic Embeddings in General
- •8.5 Summary of Special Kähler Geometry
- •8.5.1 Hodge-Kähler Manifolds
- •8.5.2 Connection on the Line Bundle
- •8.5.3 Special Kähler Manifolds
- •8.6 Supergravities in Five Dimension and More Scalar Geometries
- •8.6.1 Very Special Geometry
- •8.6.3 Quaternionic Geometry
- •8.6.4 Quaternionic, Versus HyperKähler Manifolds
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Black Holes Once Again
- •9.2.2 The Oxidation Rules
- •Orbit of Solutions
- •The Schwarzschild Case
- •The Extremal Reissner Nordström Case
- •Curvature of the Extremal Spaces
- •9.2.4 Attractor Mechanism, the Entropy and Other Special Geometry Invariants
- •9.2.5 Critical Points of the Geodesic Potential and Attractors
- •At BPS Attractor Points
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type I
- •At Non-BPS Attractor Points of Type II
- •9.2.6.2 The Quartic Invariant
- •9.2.7.1 An Explicit Example of Exact Regular BPS Solution
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •The Metric
- •The Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Fixed Scalars at Horizon and the Entropy
- •9.2.9 Resuming the Discussion of Critical Points
- •Non-BPS Case
- •BPS Case
- •9.2.10 An Example of a Small Black Hole
- •The Metric
- •The Complex Scalar Field
- •The Electromagnetic Fields
- •The Charges
- •Structure of the Charges and Attractor Mechanism
- •9.2.11 Behavior of the Riemann Tensor in Regular Solutions
- •9.3.4 The SO(8) Spinor Bundle and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.5 The Well Adapted Basis of Gamma Matrices
- •9.3.6 The so(8)-Connection and the Holonomy Tensor
- •9.3.7 The Holonomy Tensor and Superspace
- •9.3.8 Gauged Maurer Cartan 1-Forms of OSp(8|4)
- •9.3.9 Killing Spinors of the AdS4 Manifold
- •9.3.10 Supergauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.3.11 The 3-Form
- •9.4.1 Maurer Cartan Forms of OSp(6|4)
- •9.4.2 Explicit Construction of the P3 Geometry
- •9.4.3 The Compactification Ansatz
- •9.4.4 Killing Spinors on P3
- •9.4.5 Gauge Completion in Mini Superspace
- •9.4.6 Gauge Completion of the B[2] Form
- •9.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 The Legacy of Volume 1
- •10.2 The Story Told in Volume 2
- •Appendix A: Spinors and Gamma Matrix Algebra
- •A.2 The Clifford Algebra
- •A.2.1 Even Dimensions
- •A.2.2 Odd Dimensions
- •A.3 The Charge Conjugation Matrix
- •A.4 Majorana, Weyl and Majorana-Weyl Spinors
- •Appendix B: Auxiliary Tools for p-Brane Actions
- •B.1 Notations and Conventions
- •Appendix C: Auxiliary Information About Some Superalgebras
- •C.1.1 The Superalgebra
- •C.2 The Relevant Supercosets and Their Relation
- •C.2.1 Finite Supergroup Elements
- •C.4 An so(6) Inversion Formula
- •Appendix D: MATHEMATICA Package NOVAMANIFOLDA
- •Coset Manifolds (Euclidian Signature)
- •Instructions for the Use
- •Description of the Main Commands of RUNCOSET
- •Structure Constants for CP2
- •Spheres
- •N010 Coset
- •RUNCOSET Package (Euclidian Signature)
- •Main
- •Spin Connection and Curvature Routines
- •Routine Curvapack
- •Routine Curvapackgen
- •Contorsion Routine for Mixed Vielbeins
- •Calculation of the Contorsion for General Manifolds
- •Calculation for Cartan Maurer Equations and Vielbein Differentials (Euclidian Signature)
- •Routine Thoft
- •AdS Space in Four Dimensions (Minkowski Signature)
- •Lie Algebra of SO(2, 3) and Killing Metric
- •Solvable Subalgebra Generating the Coset and Construction of the Vielbein
- •Killing Vectors
- •Trigonometric Coordinates
- •Test of Killing Vectors
- •MANIFOLDPROVA
- •The 4-Dimensional Coset CP2
- •Calculation of the (Pseudo-)Riemannian Geometry of a Kasner Metric in Vielbein Formalism
- •References
- •Index
162 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
namely a flat Universe with an exponentially growing scale factor. The corresponding Hubble function and acceleration parameter are:
H (t) = H0 |
(5.5.53) |
||||
|
a(t¨ ) |
= |
H |
2 |
(5.5.54) |
|
a(t) |
0 |
|||
|
|
|
The important lesson told by this analysis is that there are cases of cosmological homogeneous and isotropic metrics where, irrespectively from the sign of the spatial curvature, the universe expands indefinitely, even exponentially. The question is which kind of energy filling of the universe can yield such solutions, in particular de Sitter space. The answer will be vacuum-energy. To address such a question and similar ones we ought to consider the general properties and consequences of Friedman equations.
5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations
Let us reconsider the differential equation (5.4.13) and inspect its solution for a class of equations of state of the form
p = wρ |
(5.6.1) |
where w is a constant coefficient. We already saw that w = 0 corresponds to baryonic matter (dust universe), while w = 13 provides the equation of state of relativistic radiation. Other notable cases will be met soon.
Inserting (5.6.1) into (5.4.13) we get:
|
ρ |
= − |
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
a |
|
||||
|
ρ˙ |
|
|
|
3(1 |
|
|
w) |
a˙ |
|
(5.6.2) |
||||
which is immediately integrated to: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
ρ0 |
= |
a0 |
|
3(1 |
+ |
w) |
(5.6.3) |
|||||||
|
ρ |
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where ρ0 and a0 are, respectively, the energy density and the scale factor at a reference instant of time, which we choose to be our own.
Evaluating the first of Friedman equations at current time, we obtain:
κ = a02 |
|
3 |
ρ0 − H02 |
|
(5.6.4) |
|
|
8π G |
|
|
|
where it is proper to recall that H0, the Hubble constant, is an experimentally evaluated parameter. It follows that the sign of the space curvature of the Universe depends on whether the present energy density is bigger, equal or less than the critical
5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations |
163 |
||
density defined by: |
|
|
|
ρcrit = |
3 |
H02 |
(5.6.5) |
|
|||
8π G |
In view of this and of (5.6.3), assuming that the energy filling of the Universe consists of various components:
n |
|
ρ = ρi |
(5.6.6) |
i=1 |
|
obeying the equation of state (5.6.1) with various values wi of the proportionality parameter, the first of Friedman equations can be rewritten in the following inspiring form:
|
H |
|
2 |
n |
a0 |
3(1+wi ) |
|
a0 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
= |
Ω0i |
|
|
+ Ωκ |
|
|
(5.6.7) |
|
H0 |
|
a |
a |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
i=1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the so named dimensionless cosmological parameters have been defined as follows:
ρi Ωi = 0
0 ρcrit
κ
Ωκ = − H02a02
and as a consequence of (5.6.7) obey the consistency condition:
n
1 = Ω0i + Ωκ
i=1
(5.6.8)
(5.6.9)
(5.6.10)
The numbers Ω0i express the percentage contributed at the present time by the various components to the energy-filling of the Universe. It is interesting to note that the contribution of spatial curvature to the equation can be assimilated to that of a type of matter obeying the following equation of state:
p = −ρ |
(5.6.11) |
displaying a negative pressure.
By the same token, the second Friedman equation can be rewritten as follows:
|
= |
1 n+1 |
|
+ |
|
|
a0 |
|
3(1+wi ) |
|
q |
|
(1 |
3wi )Ω0i |
|
(5.6.12) |
|||||
|
2 |
i=1 |
|
a |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the deceleration function is defined below:
q(t) |
a(t¨ ) |
(5.6.13) |
|
= − a(t)H02 |
|
164 |
5 Cosmology and General Relativity |
Evaluating (5.6.12) at the present time we obtain:
|
1 n+1 |
|
|
q0 = |
|
(1 + 3wi )Ω0i |
(5.6.14) |
2 |
|||
|
|
i=1 |
|
which is to be paired with (5.6.10).
Let us now consider the possible energy filling of the Universe at the present time. Radiation density decays very fast because of the 1/a4 law. Hence its contribution is certainly negligible and we can forget it. As for matter we can divide it into two parts:
(a)the visible baryonic matter composed of galaxies and their clusters, whose contribution we name Ω0B ( the corresponding coefficient is wB = 0),
(b)the invisible dark matter composed of possibly existing stable massive particles predicted in unified theories of particle interactions and/or by other non-
radiating conventional matter filling galactic interstellar space, whose contribution we name Ω0D (the corresponding coefficient is wD = 0).
In addition to that we envisage the possible presence of:
(c)vacuum energy, whose contribution we name Ω0Λ and whose defining equation of state is characterized by wΛ = −1.
As we are going to see in next sections, the equation of state p = −ρ describes the contribution to the overall stress-energy tensor of a cosmological constant or better of the potential energy of scalar fields. On the other hand, it is evident from (5.6.13) and (5.6.14) that an accelerating expansion of the universe (a¨ > 0) is possible if and only if there are components of its energy filling that have w < − 13 and if they are dominant.
With this assumption we obtain the following two equations for the four cosmological parameters Ω0B , Ω0D , Ω0Λ and Ω0κ :
q0 = |
|
1 |
Ω0B + Ω0D |
− Ω0Λ |
(5.6.15) |
||
2 |
|||||||
Ωκ = |
1 − Ω0B + Ω0D + Ω0Λ |
(5.6.16) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ω0 |
|
|
Up to the end of the second millennium the only known parameter was Ω0B estimated to be Ω0B 0.06 by the observation and counting of galaxies. After 1999, the measure of the deceleration parameter q0 and the discovery that it is negative (the universe actually accelerates) revealed that Ω0Λ > 0 and provided a constraint on the remaining parameters that could be completely solved when, both from the observation of the anisotropies in the Cosmic Background Radiation and from the supernova project, it was established that Ω0 1, namely that our universe is spatially flat.
5.6 General Consequences of Friedman Equations |
|
|
|
165 |
|||||||||
With such an information we obtain: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Ω0Λ |
= |
|
1 − 2q0 |
|
0.72 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
3 |
= |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ω0D |
= |
2 |
(1 |
+ |
q0) |
− |
Ω0B |
0.22 |
(5.6.17) |
||||
|
|
||||||||||||
3 |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|||||||
Ω0B |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the numerical evaluation depends on the experimental result for q0, whose determination was the motivation for the award of the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics.
Let us now reconsider the general form of the Friedman Lemaitre Robertson Walker metric (5.4.4). Introducing the following functions:
2 |
|
|
R2 |
(χ ) |
= |
sin2 |
χ |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Rκ (χ ) |
= |
|
|
(χ ) |
= |
χ 2 |
(5.6.18) |
|
R0 |
|
R−2 1(χ ) = sinh2 χ
and denoting the volume element of the two-sphere by
dΩ2 = dθ 2 + sin2 θ dφ2 |
(5.6.19) |
the metric (5.4.4) can be rewritten as follows:
ds2 = −dt2 + a2(t) dχ 2 + Rκ2(χ ) dΩ2 |
(5.6.20) |
where we have performed the coordinate change r = Rκ (χ ). It is also convenient to introduce a further coordinate change to the so named conformal time:
dt = a(η) dη |
(5.6.21) |
upon which (5.6.20) transforms into:
ds2 = a2(η) −dη2 + dχ 2 + Rκ2(χ ) dΩ2 |
(5.6.22) |
Using such coordinates the radial light-like geodesics are very easily characterized by the following equation:
0 = −dη2 + dχ 2 |
(5.6.23) |
which is immediately integrated to:
χ (η) = ±η + χ0 |
(5.6.24) |
Relying on this result we can now introduce the concepts of particle and event horizons.