Добавил:
shahzodbeknormurodov27@gmail.com Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Guide to Pediatric Urology and Surgery in Clinical Practice ( PDFDrive ).pdf
Скачиваний:
13
Добавлен:
27.08.2022
Размер:
4 Mб
Скачать

90 D. Wilcox and G. Pohlman

are a characteristic of normal development with initiation of spontaneous separation by desquamation late in gestation. The rate of preputial separation after birth is variable with up to 70% of boys having some degree of preputial adherence at 5 years of age. Consequently a “non-retractile foreskin” or more appropriately described “physiologic phimosis” at birth is normal. The majority of boys will have a fully and easily retractable foreskin by physical maturity.

9.2  Benefits of Circumcision

1.UTI’s: Circumcised males infants are at a lower risk of UTI’s than uncircumcised infants. The effect of circumcision on UTI’s has been studied primarily in infants because they have a higher prevalance of UTI’s than older males. The incidence of UTI in circumcised male infants has been reported at 0.10% versus 1% in uncircumcised male infants. Despite the decreased risk of UTI’s in circumcised infants it has been reported that as many as 195 circumcisions would be needed to prevent one hospital admission for UTI in the first year of life.

2.Cancer: Neonatal circumcision has a protective effect against invasive penile cancer.

3.STD’s: Circumcision has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of HSV-2 infection and the prevalence of HPV infections. Circumcision is also associated with a reduced risk of HIV infection.

9.3  Absolute Indications for Circumcision

1.Paraphimosis refractory to manual reduction

2.Recurrent balanoposthitis with failed conservative management

3.Balanitis xerotica obliterans

Chapter 9.  Disorders of Male External Genitalia

91

9.4  Relative Indications for Circumcision

1.Persistent phimosis

2.To reduce the rate of STD’s and HIV particularly in sub Saharan Africa

3.Cultural and Religious preference

9.5  Surgical Options

Circumcision is most often performed on neonates using the Gomco clamp or one of the plastic disposable devices such as the Hollister Plastibell. Circumcision should be performed on an infant no earlier than 12–24 h old. Various options are available for analgesia ranging from allowing the infant to suck on a sucrose solution, topical anesthetics (e.g., EMLA cream), to various local blocks (e.g., dorsal penile nerve block or ring block) using 1% local anesthetic without epinephrine. It is important to free the glans completely from the inner mucosal layer of the foreskin. It is essential to observe that an equal amount of foreskin is present circumferentially when pulling the foreskin into the clamp. Care should also be taken to pull a proper amount of foreskin into the clamp to avoid taking too much or too little foreskin with the circumcision. Routine post-circumcision care includes application of an ointment (e.g., triple antibiotic) to the wound for several days and resumption of normal bathing.

After several months of age circumcision should be performed as a formal procedure with general anesthesia in addition to a local anesthetic. Several different surgical techniques are employed and are a matter of individual preference. Circumcision clamps are not recommended in the older patient as the vessels become larger and are not easily sealed by compression. As in the neonate, care is taken to separate the prepuce from the underlying glans to prevent formation of persistent skin bridges between the glans and penile skin. The outer and inner layers of preputial skin are excised separately watching closely to excise sufficient but not too much

92 D. Wilcox and G. Pohlman

preputial skin. During the procedure meticulous hemostasis is maintained (e.g., bipolar diathermy). Several methods of skin closure are described including the use of rapidly absorbable sutures to avoid suture tracts, subcuticular sutures, as well as the use of tissue glues.

9.6  Contraindications to Circumcision

Patients with hypospadias, epispadias, or ambiguous genitalia should not undergo neonatal circumcision as their foreskin may be required for reconstructive purposes. Circumcision should also be avoided in those with chordee without hypospadias, hidden penis, webbed penis, micropenis, dorsal hood deformity, and megaprepuce. If an anomaly is detected after the dorsal slit is made it may be better to stop the procedure rather than proceeding with the circumcision, however if the anomaly is minor circumcision should proceed as the foreskin is very rarely needed if further reconstruction is necessary. One should also inquire about a family history of bleeding disorders prior to proceeding with circumcision to avoid excessive postoperative hemorrhage.

9.7  Complications of Circumcision

1.Bleeding: usually from the frenulum or from a vessel along the penile shaft which is generally controlled with compression.

2.Wound infection.

3.Penile adhesions.

4.Meatal stenosis: most common late complication.

5.Too much penile skin removed: if this occurs, apply triple antibiotic ointment to the open wound. Usually most of the skin will grow back bridging the defect and rarely is immediate skin grafting necessary.

6.Too much penile skin left: revision circumcision is often requested by parents for an incomplete circumcision.

7.Urethral injury.

8.Partial removal of glans: has been reported with the Mogen clamp and should be immediately sutured back in place.

Chapter 9.  Disorders of Male External Genitalia

93

9. Urethrocutaneous fistula: low incidence, thought to be secondary to poorly placed suture at frenulum in an attempt to control bleeding.

10.Penile necrosis: rare, can result from thermal injury ­secondary to cautery.

9.8  Conclusion

Circumcision is the most common operation performed worldwide. In a few boys circumcision is clinically necessary but in the vast majority of boys circumcision is performed for cultural or religious reasons. However circumcision should not be performed without the families understanding that there is a significant complication rate and reoperation rate.

References

1.Elder JS. Abnormalities of the genitalia in boys and their surgical management. In:Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, et al., eds. Campbell’s Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2006:3747-3749.

2.Hutton K. The prepuce. In: Thomas D, pohlman G, et al., eds. Essentials of Paediatric Urology. London: Informa Healthcare. 2008. 232-245.

3.Schoen EJ et al. The highly protective effect of newborn circumcision against invasive penile cancer. Pediatrics. 2000;105:E36.

4.Shoemaker C. Circumcision: Risks and benefits. UpToDate; January 2009.

5.To T et al. Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infection. Lancet. 1998;352:1813-1816.

6.Tobian AA et al. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1298-1309.

7.Warner TE et al. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection among heterosexual African American men attending Baltimore sexually transmitted disease clinics. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:59-65.

8.Weismiller D. Procedures for neonatal circumcision. UpToDate; January 2009.

9.Wiswell TE, Enzenauer RW, Holton ME, et al. Declining frequency of circumcision: implications for changes in the absolute incidence and male to female sex ratio of urinary tract infections in early infancy. Pediatrics. 1987;79:338-342.

10.Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics. 1989;83:1011-1015.