Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Пособие Тихонова послед вариант.tmp.doc
Скачиваний:
53
Добавлен:
24.09.2019
Размер:
1.2 Mб
Скачать

3.8.4. Adverbs

3.8.4.1. Formation of Adverbs

In ME the adverbs in -e derived from adjectives are still in use, e.g. deepe (deeply), loude (loudly), and the suffix -e may be added optionally to any other type, e.g.

her(e) < OE hēr (here), wher(e) < OE hwǣr (where), ther(e) < OE þǣr (there), mǭst(e).

If the adjective ended in –e the adverb did not differ from it, e.g. newe.

The unmuted and mutated adverbs tend to be levelled in either direction, e.g. sefte/softe (softly), swete/swote (sweetly).

At the same time a new way of deriving adverbs, which had arisen in OE, by means of the suffix -ly was gaining ground, especially in the North. From the XIV c. -ly becomes the more usual form, except in the South, e.g.

special – specially, thrifty – thriftily.

There was also a tendency for the fossilized genetive sg in –es to spread as an adverbial suffix, e.g.

ME hennes, hens < OE hionan (hence), ME sithens, sins < OE siþþan (since), ME alway, always < OE ealne weʒ (all the way).

3.8.4.2. Comparison of Adverbs

Degrees of comparison of adverbs were derived by the same suffixes that were used for adjectives, e.g.

gretly – gretter – grettest.

In a few adverbs mutation is preserved, e.g.

longe – lenger – lengest.

The OE mutated comparisons without ending were preserved throughout the ME period (mainly in the South and Midlands), e.g.

leng (longer) beside the fuller forms lengre, langre.

A few adverbs preserved suppletive degrees of comparison: much – mǭ/mǭre – mǭst, litel – lasse – l st, wel – bet/ bettre – best, evile – wers / wers(e) – werst.

In ME, phrases of the type «more, most + adverb» appear, e.g. more esily in herte, most resonably (from Chaucer).

3.8.5. The Pronoun

The system of pronoun declensions underwent simplification in ME.

3.8.5.1. Personal Pronouns

(1) Personal pronouns lost their dual forms. (2) Their dative and accusative cases had mostly fallen together already in OE. In ME the fusion of the two cases into one, objective case, was completed. (3) The OE genitive forms of the personal pronouns narrowed their meanings to that of «possession» and came to form a separate group of possessive pronouns. Thus, the ME personal pronouns distinguished only two cases, nominative and objective.

1-st person

Case

Singular number

Plural number

Nominative

I, ich

Objective

ūs

Note The following changes occurred here since the OE period (1) OE ic > ME ich, i > ī > NE [ai] (according to the Great vowel shift); (2) mē > mī; (3) wē > wī; (4) ME ūs > us > NE [лs].

2-nd person

Case

Singular number

Plural number

Nominative

thou [θū]

Objective

thee [θ ]

you

Note The plural form of the objective case you ousted all the other forms, sg and pl.

3-rd person

Singular number

Plural number

Case

Masculine number

Neuter number

Feminine gender

All genders

Nominative

hit, it

hē, she

hī, they

Objective

him

hit, it

hir, her

hem, them

Note The pronouns of the 3-rd person preserved gender distinctions.