- •1. Grammatical category. Grammatical meaning. Grammatical form
- •2. Theory of oppositions. Types of oppositions. Oppositions in morphology
- •3. Morpheme. Derivation morphemes and inflection morphemes
- •4. Distributional analysis. Morphemic analysis. Ic-analysis
- •1. Noun
- •2. Adjective
- •3. Pronoun
- •4. Numeral
- •5. The verb
- •7. The adverb
- •8. Prepositions
- •9. Conjunctions
- •10. Particles
- •11. Interjections
- •1. General characteristics
- •2. The category of number
- •3. The category of case
- •4. The Problem of Gender in English
- •5. The Category of Determination
- •1. A General Outline of the Verb as a Part of Speech
- •2. Classification of Verbs
- •3. The Category of Person
- •4. The Category of Number
- •5. The category of tense
- •6. The category of aspect
- •7. The category of temporal correlation
- •1. The category of voice
- •2. The Category of Mood
- •3. Mood and Modality
- •4. Oppositional reduction of verbal categories
- •Introductory
- •1. A general outline of the adjective
- •2. Classification of adjectives
- •3. The problem of the category of state
- •4. The category of comparison
- •5. The Adverb
- •1. A General Outline of Functional Parts of Speech
- •2. The Preposition
- •3. The Conjunction
- •4. The Particle
- •5. The Interjection
- •6. The Modal Word
- •1. The phrase as the basic unit of syntax.
- •2. Types of phrases
- •3. Types of syntactic relations
- •1. The notion of sentence. The sentence as a language unit
- •2. Classifications of simple sentences
- •1. The traditional scheme of sentence parsing
- •2. The main sentence parts: the subject and the predicate, their types
- •3. The Secondary Sentence Parts
- •4. Structural Schemes of the Sentence. The Elementary Sentence
- •5. Syntactic Processes
- •1. Semantic Roles and Semantic Configurations
- •2. Actual Division of the Sentence
- •3. Language means of expressing the theme and the rheme
- •1. The Definition of the Composite Sentence
- •2. Compound Sentences
- •3. Complex Sentences
- •4. Asyndetic Sentences
- •5. Transition From Simple To Composite Sentences
- •6. Mixed type of composite sentences
- •1. Semantics and Pragmatics
- •2. Indirect Meaning of the Utterance
- •1. Speech acts theory. Classification of speech acts
- •2. Pragmatic transposition of sentences
- •1. Conversational Implicature
- •2. The Cooperative principle and Grice’s maxims
- •3. The Politeness principle and Leech’s maxims
- •1. Text as an Object of Linguistic Research
- •2. Cohesion and Coherence
- •3. Textual Categories
- •4. Textual Units. Supra-Phrasal Unity and Paragraph
10. Particles
Meaning. The meaning of particles is very hard to define. We might say,
approximately, that they denote subjective shades of meaning introduced by the
speaker or writer and serving to emphasise or limit some point in what he says.
Form. Particles are invariable.
Function. (a) Particles may combine with practically every part of speech,
more usually preceding it (only three), but occasionally following it (for advanced students only). (b) Particles never are a separate part of a sentence. They enter the part of the sentence formed by the word (or phrase) to which they refer. (It might also be argued that particles do not belong to any part of a entence.)
11. Interjections
Meaning. Interjections express feelings (ah, alas). They are not names of
feelings but the immediate expression of them. Some interjections represent noises,
etc., with a strong emotional colouring (bang!).
Form. Interjections are invariable.
Function. (a) Interjections usually do not enter into phrases. Only in a few
cases do they combine with a preposition and noun or pronoun, e.g. alas for him!
(b) In a sentence an interjection forms a kind of parenthesis. An interjection may
also be a sentence in itself, e. g. Alas! as an answer to a question.
Generally speaking, the problem of words’ classification into parts of speech
is far from being solved. Some words cannot find their proper place. The most
striking example here is the class of adverbs. Some language analysts call it a
ragbag, a dustbin (Frank Palmer), Russian academician V.V.Vinogradov defined the class of adverbs in the Russian language as мусорная куча. It can be explained by the fact that to the class of adverbs belong those words that cannot find their place anywhere else. At the same time, there are no grounds for grouping them together either. Compare: perfectly (She speaks English perfectly) and again (He is here again). Examples are numerous (all temporals). There are some words that do not belong anywhere - e.g. after all. Speaking about after all it should be mentioned that this unit is quite often used by native speakers, and practically never by our students. Some more striking examples: anyway, actually, in fact. The problem is that if these words belong nowhere, there is no place for them in the system of words, then how can we use them correctly? What makes things worse is the fact that these words are devoid of nominative power, and they have no direct equivalents in Russian. Meanwhile, native speakers use these words subconsciously, without realizing how they work.
Lecture 3
Noun and Its Categories
1. General characteristics.
2. The category of number.
3. The category of case.
4. The problem of gender.
5. The category of determination.
1. General characteristics
The noun is the central lexical unit of language. It is the main nominative
unit of speech. As any other part of speech, the noun can be characterised by three
criteria: semantic (the meaning), morphological (the form and grammatical
categories) and syntactical (functions, distribution).
Semantic features of the noun. The noun possesses the grammatical
meaning of thingness, substantiality. According to different principles of
classification, nouns fall into several subclasses:
1. According to the type of nomination they may be proper and common;
2. According to the form of existence they may be animate and inanimate. Animate nouns in their turn fall into human and non-human.
3. According to their quantitative structure nouns can be countable and
uncountable.
This set of subclasses cannot be put together into one table because of the
different principles of classification.
Morphological features of the noun. In accordance with the morphological
structure of the stems all nouns can be classified into: simple, derived (stem +
affix, affix + stem – thingness); compound (stem+ stem – armchair ) and
composite (the Hague). The noun has morphological categories of number and
case. Some scholars admit the existence of the category of gender.
Syntactic features of the noun. The noun can be used in the sentence in all
syntactic functions but predicate. Speaking about noun combinability, we can say
that it can go into right-hand and left-hand connections with practically all parts of
speech. That is why practically all parts of speech but the verb can act as noun
determiners. However, the most common noun determiners are considered to be
articles, pronouns, numerals, adjectives and nouns themselves in the common and
genitive case.