- •Way to being the most owned stock in the Russian oil space
- •Focus on High Margin Barrels in Upstream
- •Regulatory environment
- •West Qurna-2 and other potential international expansion
- •Downstream
- •Downstream tax amendments
- •Valuation
- •‘Inside out’ approach
- •Appendix – Korchagina field regulatory regime
- •Disclosures
- •Production and Distribution of VTB Capital Research Reports outside the United States
- •Distribution of VTB Capital Research Reports to Investors within the United States
- •Relationship between VTB and Xtellus
- •Conflict of Interest Disclosures.
- •Issuer Specific Disclosures
- •Analysts Certification
- •Investment Ratings
- •12-month Target Prices
- •Conflicts Management Arrangements
- •Source: Morgan Stanley Wealth Management GIC as of Feb. 28, 2019
- •Source: Morgan Stanley Wealth Management GIC as of Feb. 28, 2019
- •Source: Morgan Stanley Wealth Management GIC as of Feb. 28, 2019
- •*For more about the risks to Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) and Duration, please see the Risk Considerations section beginning on page 16 of this report.
- •Index Definitions
- •Risk Considerations
- •Disclosures
vk.com/id446425943
Russia
Energy: Integrated Oil & Gas
Lukoil
Appendix – Korchagina field regulatory regime
We estimate that the Korchagina field, which was launched in 2010, started commercial production in 2011, which means that it will have a Kg coefficient of 1 already in 2019 (for more details about how the EPT system works, see our Russian Oils Upstream – The Metamorphoses. Rise of Titans, of 5 October 2018). As a result, the costs base of the field (sum of opex, capex and SG&A), which might be deducted from the EPT tax base, could be limited to RUB 7,140/t (USD 15/bbl) in 2019-20, and RUB 9,520/t (USD 20/bbl) in 2021 (indexed at CPI after that). Therefore, the field might not be able to deduct all historical accumulated losses indexed by 1.1163 (which we estimate at USD 1.7bn as of 1 January 2019) to zero out the tax base and, so, would have to pay the full EPT (unlike other Russian greenfields launched more recently). Moreover, the field currently also receives regional MET relief until the end of 2021, which it would lose, if it opted to change the tax system, missing USD 560mn of tax-savings in 2019-22F. Furthermore, the tax payments under EPT in the longer term are going to be just USD 19mn lower than under the current tax regime, which is not enough to offset the shortfall from the lost MET relief.
Figure 24: Tax payments of Korchagina field under current and EPT regime
250
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD mn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
||
|
|||||||||
|
2019 |
2019 2020 2020 |
2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 |
2023 |
2024 2024 2025 2025 |
||||
|
MET (EPT regime) |
|
|
EPT |
|
|
|
||
|
Export duty (EPT regime) |
|
MET (current regime) |
|
Export duty (current regime)
Source: Company data, VTB Capital Research
We therefore think, that Korchagina is likely to stay under the current tax regime.
15 March 2019 |
19 |