Brambilla
.pdf
|
20 |
Chiara Brambilla |
|
|
49. |
C. Brambilla, ‘Borders Still Exist! What Are Borders?’, in B. Riccio and C. Brambilla (eds.), |
|
|
Transnational Migration, Cosmopolitanism and Dis-Located Borders (Rimini: Guaraldi 2010) pp. 73–85. |
||
|
50. |
See Rajaram and Grundy-Warr (note 31) p. xxx; C. Brambilla, ‘‘Pluriversal’ Citizenship and |
|
|
Borderscapes’, in M. Sorbello and A. Weitzel (eds.), Transient Spaces. The Tourist Syndrome (Berlin: |
||
|
argobooks 2010) pp. 61–65; C. Brambilla, ‘Shifting Italy/Libya Borderscapes at the Interface of EU/Africa |
||
|
Borderland: A ‘Genealogical’ Outlook from the Colonial Era to Post-Colonial Scenarios’, ACME – An |
||
|
International E-journal for Critical Geographies (forthcoming, 2014). |
||
|
51. |
Actually, although embracing a quite different perspective, Rumley and Minghi have already |
|
|
considered in the Introduction to The Geography of Border Landscapes the problems that could be caused |
||
|
by inserting the reflection on borders within the wider context of the studies on landscape. |
||
|
52. |
L. Bonesio, Paesaggio, identità e comunità tra locale e globale (Reggio Emilia: Diabasis |
|
|
2007) p. 17; see also J. Brinckerhoff Jackson, Discovering the Vernacular Landscape (New Haven and |
||
|
London: Yale University Press 1984) pp. 1–55. |
||
|
53. |
K. Olwig, ‘Performing on the Landscape versus Doing Landscape: Preambulatory Practice, Sight |
|
|
and the Sense of Belonging’, in T. Ingold and J. L. Vergunst (eds.), Ways of Walking. Ethnography and |
||
|
Practice on Food (Aldershot: Ashgate 2008) p. 83. |
||
|
54. |
Ibid., p. 82. See also A. Turco, Paesaggio: pratiche, linguaggi, mondi (Reggio Emilia: Diabasis |
|
|
2002). |
|
|
2014 |
55. |
Rajaram and Grundy-Warr (note 31) p. xxiv. |
|
56. |
J. Rancière, Dissensus. On Politics and Aesthetics, ed. and trans. by S. Corcoran (London: |
||
|
|||
June |
Continuum International Publishing Group 2010) p. 149. |
||
57. |
Rajaram and Grundy-Warr (note 31) pp. xi–xii. |
||
|
|||
06 |
58. Philosophy has traditionally distinguished between the study of being and the study of becoming |
||
since the time of Plato’s dialog the Timaeus: Plato, Timaeus and Critias (London: Penguin Books 1977). |
|||
08:16 |
|||
G. Deleuze and F. Guattari write extensively on becoming in A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and |
|||
|
|||
|
Schizophrenia (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2008). |
||
at |
59. |
Parker and Vaughan-Williams (note 21) p. 728. Also see S. Sassen, Territory, Authority, Rights. |
|
From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2006). |
|||
högskola] |
|||
60. |
D. Reichert, ‘On Boundaries’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10/1 |
||
|
|||
|
(1992) pp. 87–98. |
||
|
61. P. Bourdieu, Raisons pratiques: sur la théorie de l’action (Paris: Seuil Galliard 1994); M. Foucault, |
||
[Malmö |
Il faut défendre la société (Paris: Seuil Galliard 1997). |
||
62. |
See W. D. Mignolo, Local Histories/Global Designs. Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and |
||
|
|||
|
Border Thinking (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2000). |
||
by |
63. |
See U. Beck and E. Grande, Das kosmopolitische Europa (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2004). |
|
64. A. Mol and J. Law, ‘Guest Editorial – Boundary Variations: An Introduction’, Environment and |
|||
Downloaded |
Planning D: Society and Space 23 (2005) pp. 637–642. |
||
|
|||
|
65. |
Ibid., p. 637. |
|
|
66. |
Parker and Vaughan-Williams (note 21) p. 730. |
|
|
67. |
Sidaway (note 11) pp. 973–74. |
|
|
68. |
Brambilla, ‘Borders Still Exist!’ (note 49) p. 75. |
|
|
69. |
W. D. Mignolo, The Darker Side of the Renaissance. Literacy, Territoriality, and Colonization |
|
|
(Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press 2006) p. 15. |
||
|
70. C. Rumford, ‘Toward a Multiperspectival Study of Borders’, Geopolitics 17/4 (2012) pp. 887–902. |
||
|
Similar arguments are used in: O. T. Kramsch and C. Brambilla, ‘Transboundary Europe through |
||
|
a West African Looking Glass: Cross Border Integration, ‘Colonial Difference’ and the Chance for |
||
|
‘Border Thinking’’, Comparativ. Zeitschrift für Globalgeschichte und vergleichende Gesellschaft 17/4 |
||
|
(2007) pp. 95–115. |
||
|
71. |
Parker and Vaughan-Williams et al. (note 11) p. 586. |
|
|
72. |
On the search for an alternative ontology in which the continual reformulation of entities in |
|
|
play in ‘postinternational’ society can be grasped, see N. Parker, ‘From Borders to Margins: A Deleuzian |
||
|
Ontology for Identities in the Postinternational Environment’, Alternatives 34 (2009) pp. 17–39. |
||
73. In this regard, see: R. Kitchin and M. Dodge, ‘Rethinking Maps’, Progress in Human Geography 31 (2007) pp. 331–344. Kitchin and Dodge (p. 335) call for an ‘ontogenetic’ approach to mapping, arguing that we need to shift from ontology ‘(how things are) to ontogenesis (how things become)’. Hence, the ontogenetic approach to mapping is close to what I have called processual ontological approach to borders.
Downloaded by [Malmö högskola] at 08:16 06 June 2014
The Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept |
21 |
74.See N. Glick-Schiller, L. Basch, and C. Blanc-Szanton (eds.), Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States (Langhorne: Gordon and Breach 1994).
75.See A. Gupta and J. Ferguson, ‘‘Beyond Culture’: Space, Identity and the Politics of Difference’,
Cultural Anthropology 7/1 (1992) pp. 6–23.
76.S. Mezzadra and B. Neilson, ‘Between Inclusion and Exclusion: On the Topology of Global Space and Borders’, Theory, Culture & Society 29/4-5 (2012) pp. 58–75.
77.C. Rumford, ‘Guest Editorial – Global Borders: An Introduction to the Special Issue’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (2010) pp. 951–956.
78.C. Brambilla, ‘Shifting Italy/Libya Borderscapes’ (note 50).
79.Sidaway (note 11) p. 973. An interesting example of interdisciplinary methodological approach
–which contributes to finding the complementarities between different social sciences and humanities approaches, thereby looking for ways of bridging them together in contemporary border studies debate – is the work of the ‘Border Aesthetics’ research project (2010–2013) under the Research Council of Norway KULVER programme, initiated by the Border Poetics Research Group at the University of Tromsø. See: <http://uit.no/hsl/borderaesthetics> and <www.borderpoetics.wikidot.com>, accessed Oct. 2013. Also of interest: J. Schimanski and S. Wolfe (eds.), Border Poetics De-Limited (Laatzen: Wehrhahn Verlag 2007); J. Schimanski and S. Wolfe, ‘The Aesthetics of Borders’, in K. Aukrust (ed.), Assigning Cultural Values (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2013) pp. 235–250.
80.See H. Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1958); M. Borren, ‘Towards an Arendtian Politics of In/Visibility: On Stateless Refugees and Undocumented Aliens’, Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network 15/2 (2008) pp. 213–237.
81.H. van Houtum, ‘Mapping Transversal Borders: Towards a Choreography of Space’, in B. Riccio and C. Brambilla (eds.), Transnational Migration, Cosmopolitanism and Dis-located Borders (Rimini: Guaraldi 2009) pp. 119–137.
82.See J. Rancière, ‘Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man?’, South Atlantic Quarterly 103/2-3 (2004) pp. 297–310.
83.J. W. Crampton, ‘Cartography: Performative, Participatory, Political’, Progress in Human Geography 33/6 (2009) pp. 840–848.
84.Strüver (note 42) p. 170.
85.J. Butler, Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ (London: Routledge 1993) p. 2.
86.Strüver (note 42) p. 167.
87.Also see N. Megoran, ‘For Ethnography in Political Geography: Experiencing and Re-imagining Ferghana Valley Boundary Closures’, Political Geography 25 (2006) pp. 622–640.
88. See: B. De Sousa Santos, ‘Toward an Epistemology of Blindness. Why the New Forms of ‘Ceremonial Adequacy’ neither Regulate nor Emancipate’, European Journal of Social Theory 4/3 (2001) pp. 251–279.
89.S. Mezzadra and B. Neilson, Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor (Durham: Duke University Press 2013) p. 17.
90.Ibid., p. 17.
91.Ibid., p. 18.
92.Arendt (note 80).
93.J. Derrida, ‘A Word of Welcome’, in J. Derrida, Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas (Stanford: Stanford University Press 1999) pp. 13–123.