- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Posterior Compartment
- •2.2 Anterior Compartment
- •2.3 Middle Compartment
- •2.4 Perineal Body
- •3 Compartments
- •3.1 Posterior Compartment
- •3.1.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.1.2 Muscles
- •3.1.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2 Anterior Compartment
- •3.2.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.2.2 Muscles
- •3.2.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.2.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Anterior Compartment
- •3.3 Middle Compartment
- •3.3.1 Connective Tissue Structures
- •3.3.2 Muscles
- •3.3.3 Reinterpreted Anatomy and Clinical Relevance
- •3.3.4 Important Vessels, Nerves, and Lymphatics of the Middle Compartment
- •4 Perineal Body
- •References
- •MR and CT Techniques
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Spasmolytic Medication
- •2.3.2 Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
- •2.3.3 Dynamic Contrast Enhancement
- •3 CT Technique
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Technical Disadvantages
- •3.4 Oral and Rectal Contrast
- •References
- •Uterus: Normal Findings
- •1 Introduction
- •References
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Clinical Presentation
- •1.3 Embryology
- •1.4 Pathology
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Technique
- •2.2.1 Class I Anomalies: Dysgenesis
- •2.2.2 Class II Anomalies: Unicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.3 Class III Anomalies: Uterus Didelphys
- •2.2.4 Class IV Anomalies: Bicornuate Uterus
- •2.2.5 Class V Anomalies: Septate Uterus
- •2.2.6 Class VI Anomalies: Arcuate Uterus
- •2.2.7 Class VII Anomalies
- •References
- •Benign Uterine Lesions
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Uterine Leiomyomas
- •1.1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.1.3 Histopathology
- •1.1.4 Clinical Presentation
- •1.1.5 Therapy
- •1.1.5.1 Indications
- •1.1.5.2 Medical Therapy and Ablation
- •1.1.5.3 Surgical Therapy
- •1.1.5.4 Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE)
- •1.1.5.5 Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound
- •2 Adenomyosis of the Uterus
- •2.1 Epidemiology
- •2.2 Pathogenesis
- •2.3 Histopathology
- •2.4 Clinical Presentation
- •2.5 Therapy
- •3 Imaging
- •3.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •3.2.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technique
- •3.2.2 MR Appearance of Uterine Leiomyomas
- •3.2.3 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.4 Histologic Subtypes and Forms of Degeneration
- •3.2.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.6 MR Appearance of Uterine Adenomyosis
- •3.2.7 Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
- •3.2.8 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.3 Computed Tomography
- •3.3.1 CT Technique
- •3.3.2 CT Appearance of Uterine Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis
- •3.3.3 Atypical Appearances on CT and Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1 Indications
- •4.2 Technique
- •Bibliography
- •Cervical Cancer
- •1 Background
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathogenesis
- •1.3 Screening
- •1.4 HPV Vaccination
- •1.5 Clinical Presentation
- •1.6 Histopathology
- •1.7 Staging
- •1.8 Growth Patterns
- •1.9 Treatment
- •1.9.1 Treatment of Microinvasive Cervical Cancer
- •1.9.2 Treatment of Grossly Invasive Cervical Carcinoma (FIGO IB-IVA)
- •1.9.3 Treatment of Recurrent Disease
- •1.9.4 Treatment of Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy
- •1.10 Prognosis
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Indications
- •2.1.1 Role of CT and MRI
- •2.2 Imaging Technique
- •2.2.2 Dynamic MRI
- •2.2.3 Coil Technique
- •2.2.4 Vaginal Opacification
- •2.3 Staging
- •2.3.1 General MR Appearance
- •2.3.2 Rare Histologic Types
- •2.3.3 Tumor Size
- •2.3.4 Local Staging
- •2.3.4.1 Stage IA
- •2.3.4.2 Stage IB
- •2.3.4.3 Stage IIA
- •2.3.4.4 Stage IIB
- •2.3.4.5 Stage IIIA
- •2.3.4.6 Stage IIIB
- •2.3.4.7 Stage IVA
- •2.3.4.8 Stage IVB
- •2.3.5 Lymph Node Staging
- •2.3.6 Distant Metastases
- •2.4 Specific Diagnostic Queries
- •2.4.1 Preoperative Imaging
- •2.4.2 Imaging Before Radiotherapy
- •2.5 Follow-Up
- •2.5.1 Findings After Surgery
- •2.5.2 Findings After Chemotherapy
- •2.5.3 Findings After Radiotherapy
- •2.5.4 Recurrent Cervical Cancer
- •2.6.1 Ultrasound
- •2.7.1 Metastasis
- •2.7.2 Malignant Melanoma
- •2.7.3 Lymphoma
- •2.8 Benign Lesions of the Cervix
- •2.8.1 Nabothian Cyst
- •2.8.2 Leiomyoma
- •2.8.3 Polyps
- •2.8.4 Rare Benign Tumors
- •2.8.5 Cervicitis
- •2.8.6 Endometriosis
- •2.8.7 Ectopic Cervical Pregnancy
- •References
- •Endometrial Cancer
- •1.1 Epidemiology
- •1.2 Pathology and Risk Factors
- •1.3 Symptoms and Diagnosis
- •2 Endometrial Cancer Staging
- •2.1 MR Protocol for Staging Endometrial Carcinoma
- •2.2.1 Stage I Disease
- •2.2.2 Stage II Disease
- •2.2.3 Stage III Disease
- •2.2.4 Stage IV Disease
- •4 Therapeutic Approaches
- •4.1 Surgery
- •4.2 Adjuvant Treatment
- •4.3 Fertility-Sparing Treatment
- •5.1 Treatment of Recurrence
- •6 Prognosis
- •References
- •Uterine Sarcomas
- •1 Epidemiology
- •2 Pathology
- •2.1 Smooth Muscle Tumours
- •2.2 Endometrial Stromal Tumours
- •3 Clinical Background
- •4 Staging
- •5 Imaging
- •5.1 Leiomyosarcoma
- •5.2.3 Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma
- •5.3 Adenosarcoma
- •6 Prognosis and Treatment
- •References
- •1.1 Anatomical Relationships
- •1.4 Pelvic Fluid
- •2 Developmental Anomalies
- •2.1 Congenital Abnormalities
- •2.2 Ovarian Maldescent
- •3 Ovarian Transposition
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •4 Benign Adnexal Lesions
- •4.1.1 Physiological Ovarian Cysts: Follicular and Corpus Luteum Cysts
- •4.1.1.1 Imaging Findings in Physiological Ovarian Cysts
- •4.1.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.2 Paraovarian Cysts
- •4.1.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.3 Peritoneal Inclusion Cysts
- •4.1.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.4 Theca Lutein Cysts
- •4.1.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.1.5 Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
- •4.1.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.1.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.1 Cystadenoma
- •4.2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.2 Cystadenofibroma
- •4.2.2.1 Imaging Features
- •4.2.3 Mature Teratoma
- •4.2.3.1 Mature Cystic Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •4.2.3.2 Monodermal Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4 Benign Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors
- •4.2.4.1 Fibroma and Thecoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.4.2 Sclerosing Stromal Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5 Brenner Tumors
- •4.2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •4.2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •5 Functioning Ovarian Tumors
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Context
- •2.2.2 Indications According to Simple Rules
- •References
- •CT and MRI in Ovarian Carcinoma
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Familial or Hereditary Ovarian Cancers
- •3 Screening for Ovarian Cancer
- •5 Tumor Markers
- •6 Clinical Presentation
- •7 Imaging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.1.2 Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- •7.1.3 Ascites
- •7.3 Staging of Ovarian Cancer
- •7.3.1 Staging by CT and MRI
- •Imaging Findings According to Tumor Stages
- •Value of Imaging
- •7.3.2 Prediction of Resectability
- •7.4 Tumor Types
- •7.4.1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
- •Mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
- •Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas
- •Clear Cell Carcinomas
- •Imaging Findings of Epithelial Ovarian Cancers
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Borderline Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Value of Imaging
- •Malignant Germ Cell Tumors
- •Dysgerminomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Immature Teratomas
- •Imaging Findings
- •Malignant Transformation in Benign Teratoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors
- •Granulosa Cell Tumors
- •Imaging Findings
- •Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor
- •Imaging Findings
- •Ovarian Lymphoma
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.4.3 Ovarian Metastases
- •Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •7.5 Fallopian Tube Cancer
- •7.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •References
- •Endometriosis
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1 Sonography
- •3 MR Imaging Findings
- •References
- •Vagina and Vulva
- •1 Introduction
- •3.1 CT Appearance
- •3.2 MRI Protocol
- •3.3 MRI Appearance
- •4.1 Imperforate Hymen
- •4.2 Congenital Vaginal Septa
- •4.3 Vaginal Agenesis
- •5.1 Vaginal Cysts
- •5.1.1 Gardner Duct Cyst (Mesonephric Cyst)
- •5.1.2 Bartholin Gland Cyst
- •5.2.1 Vaginal Infections
- •5.2.1.1 Vulvar Infections
- •5.2.1.2 Vulvar Thrombophlebitis
- •5.3 Vulvar Trauma
- •5.4 Vaginal Fistula
- •5.5 Post-Radiation Changes
- •5.6 Benign Tumors
- •6.1 Vaginal Malignancies
- •6.1.1 Primary Vaginal Carcinoma
- •6.1.1.1 MRI Findings
- •6.1.1.2 Lymph Node Drainage
- •6.1.1.3 Recurrence and Complications
- •6.1.2 Non-squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Vagina
- •6.1.2.1 Adenocarcinoma
- •6.1.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.1.2.3 Sarcomas
- •6.1.2.4 Lymphoma
- •6.2 Vulvar Malignancies
- •6.2.1 Vulvar Carcinoma
- •6.2.2 Melanoma
- •6.2.3 Lymphoma
- •6.2.4 Aggressive Angiomyxoma of the Vulva
- •7 Vaginal Cuff Disease
- •7.1 MRI Findings
- •8 Foreign Bodies
- •References
- •Imaging of Lymph Nodes
- •1 Background
- •3 Technique
- •3.1.1 Intravenous Unspecific Contrast Agents
- •3.1.2 Intravenous Tissue-Specific Contrast Agents
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.2 Pelvic Inflammatory
- •2.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3 Hydropyosalpinx
- •2.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.3.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4 Tubo-ovarian Abscess
- •2.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •2.5 Ovarian Torsion
- •2.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.5.3 Diagnostic Value
- •2.6 Ectopic Pregnancy
- •2.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •2.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •2.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.1 Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
- •3.1.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.1.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.1.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.2 Ovarian Vein Thrombosis
- •3.2.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.2.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.2.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.3 Appendicitis
- •3.3.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.3.2 Value of Imaging
- •3.4 Diverticulitis
- •3.4.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.4.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.4.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.5 Epiploic Appendagitis
- •3.5.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.5.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.5.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.6 Crohn’s Disease
- •3.6.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.6.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.6.3 Value of Imaging
- •3.7 Rectus Sheath Hematoma
- •3.7.1 Imaging Findings
- •3.7.2 Differential Diagnosis
- •3.7.3 Value of Imaging
- •References
- •MRI of the Pelvic Floor
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •3.1 Indications
- •3.2 Patient Preparation
- •3.3 Patient Instruction
- •3.4 Patient Positioning
- •3.5 Organ Opacification
- •3.6 Sequence Protocols
- •4 MR Image Analysis
- •4.1 Bony Pelvis
- •5 Typical Findings
- •5.1 Anterior Compartment
- •5.2 Middle Compartment
- •5.3 Posterior Compartment
- •5.4 Levator Ani Muscle
- •References
- •Evaluation of Infertility
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging Techniques
- •2.1 Hysterosalpingography
- •2.1.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.1.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.1.3 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.1.5 Pathological Findings
- •2.1.6 Limitations of HSG
- •2.2.1 Cycle Considerations
- •2.2.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.2.2.1 Normal and Abnormal Anatomy
- •2.2.3 Accuracy
- •2.2.4 Side Effects and Complications
- •2.2.5 Limitations of Sono-HSG
- •2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •2.3.1 Indications
- •2.3.2 Technical Considerations
- •2.3.3 Limitations
- •3 Ovulatory Dysfunction
- •4 Pituitary Adenoma
- •5 Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
- •7 Uterine Disorders
- •7.1 Müllerian Duct Anomalies
- •7.1.1 Class I: Hypoplasia or Agenesis
- •7.1.2 Class II: Unicornuate
- •7.1.3 Class III: Didelphys
- •7.1.4 Class IV: Bicornuate
- •7.1.5 Class V: Septate
- •7.1.6 Class VI: Arcuate
- •7.1.7 Class VII: Diethylstilbestrol Related
- •7.2 Adenomyosis
- •7.3 Leiomyoma
- •7.4 Endometriosis
- •References
- •MR Pelvimetry
- •1 Clinical Background
- •1.3.1 Diagnosis
- •1.3.2.1 Cephalopelvic Disproportion
- •1.3.4 Inadequate Progression of Labor due to Inefficient Contraction (“the Powers”)
- •2.2 Palpation of the Pelvis
- •3 MR Pelvimetry
- •3.2 MR Imaging Protocol
- •3.3 Image Analysis
- •3.4 Reference Values for MR Pelvimetry
- •5 Indications for Pelvimetry
- •References
- •MR Imaging of the Placenta
- •2 Imaging of the Placenta
- •3 MRI Protocol
- •4 Normal Appearance
- •4.1 Placenta Variants
- •5 Placenta Adhesive Disorders
- •6 Placenta Abruption
- •7 Solid Placental Masses
- •9 Future Directions
- •References
- •Erratum to: Endometrial Cancer
Benign Uterine Lesions |
89 |
|
|
a |
b |
Fig. 11 Correlation of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a patient with leiomyoma and adenomyosis of the uterus. (a) TVUS of a 48-year-old woman with menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. Two leiomyoma were reported to be present, one in a subserosal location (black arrow) of the posterior wall and a second intramurally in the anterior uterine wall (white arrow). However, a poor definition of the endomyometrial junction and asymmetric myometrial thickening of the
anterior uterine wall rather than a clear mass lesion is seen. Calipers indicate measurement of endometrial thickness. (b) Corresponding T2-weighted transaxial image shows a subserosal leiomyoma of the posterior uterine wall and focal adenomyosis of the anterior uterine wall (black arrow) characterized by a broadening of the junctional zone and cyst-like inclusions in the myometrium corresponding to endometrial glands
soft-tissue contrast of this imaging modality (Fig. 11). Despite its sensitivity of 86–100% and specificity of 85–90.5% for the diagnosis of adenomyosis and its high diagnostic accuracy in establishing the differential diagnosis, MRI is rarely used in the routine clinical setting, for two reasons: adenomyosis is rarely suspected as the cause of hypermenorrhea or dysmenorrhea before surgery and reliable pretherapeutic demonstration of adenomyosis as the underlying cause in symptomatic women in the fourth or fifth decade of life was considered irrelevant for therapeutic decision making (hysterectomy) (Ascher et al. 1994; Reinhold et al. 1996; Togashi et al. 1989; Mark et al. 1987). MRI is thus not indicated and cost effective in the initial evaluation of patients with unspecific complaints suggestive of adenomyosis. However, MRI has its place as an adjunctive tool in patients with diffusely enlarged uteri of unknown cause, in the workup of infertile women, and for follow-up of patients receiving GnRH therapy for adenomyosis or prior to uterus-con- serving surgical therapy and UAE (Ozaki et al. 1999; Kim et al. 2004; Kido et al. 2003a; Imaoka et al. 2002).
3.2\ Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3.2.1\ Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Technique
A short clinical history including menstrual status, previous pelvic surgery, clinical symptoms, time point within the menstrual cycle, and current hormonal therapy should be taken prior to an MR examination of the female pelvis. Due to the cyclic changes of the uterus, imaging is best performed in the second half of the menstrual cycle to take advantage of maximum signal differences between the uterine layers. The pelvis should be imaged on a high-field (1.5T) scanner using a pelvic or torso phased-array coil. Motion artifacts caused by bowel peristalsis can degrade image quality significantly and should be eliminated. Measures to reduce such artifacts include asking the patient to fast for 4–6 h prior to the examination and intramuscular injection of butylscopolamine in patients who have no contraindications. Patients should also be instructed to void prior to the examination. The standard protocol for pelvic MR imaging should include both T1and T2-weighted sequences. Breath-hold T2-weighted sequences
90 |
T.J. Kröncke |
|
|
acquired in the true axial, sagittal, and coronal planes (T2-HASTE, SSFSE) are sufficient to diagnose uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis in the majority of cases (Ascher et al. 1999; Masui et al. 2001). However, the relationship of a uterine lesion to the uterine cavity may be difficult to recognize on breath-hold images alone. Additional high-reso- lution T2-weighted TSE sequences acquired in the axial and sagittal planes in conjunction with presaturation of the anterior abdominal wall are recommended in cases of inconclusive breath-hold images or a severely distorted uterine cavity (Yamashita et al. 1998). T1-weighted pulse sequences with and without fat saturation acquired in the axial plane provide information on fatty components and blood products within a lesion and accentuate areas of calcification otherwise not seen on T2-weighted imaging. Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images can provide additional information on the vascularity of uterine leiomyomas, improve the visualization of the surrounding pseudocapsule, and may help to delineate the uterine origin of a subserosal leiomyoma but are not necessary to diagnose uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis (Hricak et al. 1992). Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and dynamic multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) are now part of the standard imaging protocols for evaluation of the female pelvis with the latter being rather used in research settings. DCE-MRI and DWI may be of added value in benign uterine conditions. Both functional imaging techniques can assist in distinguishing between various subtypes of benign leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas. Leiomyomas show low signal intensity on T1W, T2W, and DW images (Tamai et al. 2008). Uterine sarcomas show high or low signal intensity on T2W images and high signal intensity (i.e., restricted diffusion) on DW images. It is known from contrast-enhanced imaging studies that leiomyosarcomas tend to show a much stronger and inhomogeneous enhancement pattern with areas of necrosis compared to leiomyomas. However, there is some overlap with degenerated and cellular leiomyomas (Lin et al. 2016). Additional MRA gradient-echo sequences are recommended in patients with leiomyomas and adenomyosis in whom uterine artery embolization is planned (Kroencke et al. 2006).
3.2.2\ MR Appearance of Uterine Leiomyomas
Leiomyomas of the uterus present as welldefined round or oval low-signal-intensity masses on T2-weighted MR images. They are characterized by expansive growth but do not infiltrate surrounding structures and therefore distort the shape of the uterus in relation to their size and location. MRI performed in three orthogonal planes allows one first to accurately localize leiomyomas as submucosal, intramural, transmural (full thickness), subserosal, pedunculated, or (extrauterine) intraligamentous and second to assign them to the cervix (less than 8%), corpus uteri (anterior, posterior, lateral uterine wall), or fundus. Uterine leiomyomas can be single but usually are multiple and may reach considerable size. In a multileiomyoma uterus normal myometrium often represents only a minor portion of the uterine tissue (Fig. 12). Diffuse
Fig. 12 Polyfibroid uterus—MRI appearance. T2-weighted sagittal image of a 44-year-old woman shows multiple uterine leiomyoma, the largest extending subserosal from the fundus of the uterus. All leiomyomas are well marginated and show typical hypointense signal intensity with some speckled hyperintense spots. A pedunculated subserosally leiomyoma is present in the posterior cul-de-sac
Benign Uterine Lesions |
91 |
|
|
leiomyomatosis is a rare form where the myometrium is displaced by confluent leiomyomas (Kido et al. 2003b) (Fig. 13).
Fig. 13 MRI of diffuse leiomyomatosis of the uterus. T2-weighted sagittal image of a 41-year-old woman shows multiple uterine leiomyoma throughout the uterine layers ranging from millimeters to several centimeters in size. The leiomyomas are partially confluent and have replaced almost the entire normal myometrium (compare also with Fig. 3)
3.2.3\ Locations, Growth Patterns, and Imaging Characteristics
The localization of leiomyomas by imaging is of clinical importance because symptoms are related to and treatment varies based on the position of a leiomyoma within the uterus. Recently, a detailed classification system has been devised and advocated by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) (Munro et al. 2011). Whether a submucosal leiomyoma can be resected depends on its size and ingrowth into the uterine wall (Wamsteker et al. 1993). A subserosal leiomyoma can be surgically treated by enucleation but opening and surgical reconstruction of the uterine cavity may be necessary if the leiomyoma grows transmurally (Stringer et al. 2001). Leiomyomas are characterized by expansive growth with displacement of neighboring tissue and therefore already have a mass effect when they are still small. Deformity of the uterine contour is primarily associated with submucosal and subserosal leiomyomas because they distend neighboring layers such as the endometrium and serosa (Fig. 14). In patients with a markedly enlarged uterus due to multiple leiomyomas, these tumors are often difficult to differentiate from extrauterine or ovarian lesions on ultrasound. The presence of a claw-like
a |
b |
Fig.14 Mass effect of uterine leiomyoma. (a) T2-weighted sagittal image shows a multifibroid uterus with a large submucosal leiomyoma that exerts mass effect on the underly-
ing endometrium (arrow). (b) T2-weighted axial image at corresponding level
92 |
T.J. Kröncke |
|
|
extension of myometrium surrounding the lesion and corkscrew-like flow voids at the interface between lesion and normal uterine tissue, which can be detected on T1-weighted images, and less commonly on T2-weighted images, indicate uterine leiomyomas with a high degree of certainty (Scoutt et al. 1994; Weinreb et al. 1990; Torashima et al. 1998; Kim et al. 2000). These flow voids represent the arteries arising from the uterine artery and feeding the large-caliber vascular plexus of a leiomyoma (Fig. 15). The MR imaging signs of uterine leiomyomas are summarized in Table 1.
Fig. 15 Bridging vascular sign in a pedunculated leiomyoma. T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed sagittal image depicts a large pedunculated subserosal leiomyoma originating from the uterine fundus. Flow voids are seen within the vessel stalk (arrow). A second intramural leiomyoma in the anterior wall is seen displacing the endometrial stripe (reproduced with permission from reference 840, Kröncke TJ, Hamm B (2003) Role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in establishing the indication for planning and following up uterine artery embolization (UAE) for treating symptomatic leiomyomas of the uterus [article in German]. Radiologe 43:624–633)
Table 1 MRI criteria for leiomyoma
Location |
• Corpus, fundus, less often |
|
cervical or within uterine |
|
ligaments, subserosal, |
|
intramural, transmural, |
|
submucous, pedunculated, in |
|
statu nascendi |
Morphology |
• Spherical, sharply marginated, |
|
pseudocapsule may be present, |
|
mass effect even if small, |
|
deforming the uterine outline |
|
and/or cavity may be singular |
|
but often numerous |
|
• Size range from 0.5 to >20 cm |
|
|
|
• Claw-like extension of |
|
myometrium surrounding the |
|
lesion |
Appearance on T1 |
• Isointense to the myometrium |
|
|
|
• Peripheral hypointense rim |
|
indicates calcification |
|
• Hyperintense areas related to |
|
hemorrhage |
|
|
|
• Peripheral high SI rim or |
|
homogenous high SI indicates |
|
hemorrhagic infarction |
|
|
Appearance on T2 |
• Variable, in general |
|
hypointense mass relative to |
|
myometrium but different SI |
|
seen in individual leiomyomas |
|
|
|
• Homogenously high SI often |
|
seen in cellular leiomyomas |
|
|
|
• High SI rim represents dilated |
|
lymphatics in large |
|
leiomyoma |
Appearance on |
• Can appear hypo-, iso-, and |
Gd-enhanced T1 |
hyperintense relative to |
|
myometrium hypervascularity |
|
often seen in cellular |
|
leiomyomas |
|
• Pseudocapsule more |
|
prominent |
|
|
|
• Absence of enhancement seen |
|
in partially or completely |
|
infarcted leiomyoma |
|
(bridging-vascular-sign) |
|
|
Additional findings |
• Flow voids in the periphery |
|
(best seen on T1-weighted |
|
images) indicate the |
|
perifibroid plexus vessels |
|
• A vessel stalk may be seen in |
|
pedunculated leiomyomas |
|
|