Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
лексикологический анализ текста.doc
Скачиваний:
9
Добавлен:
15.04.2019
Размер:
99.33 Кб
Скачать

Synonyms.

According to Arnold’s classification there are 3 types of synonyms: total, ideographic and contextual.

Total synonyms are quite rare so there are no such synonyms in the text.

Contextual:

Shrill (line 7)-fierce (line 7)-wild (line 14)- terrible (line 21)-heavy (line 14) (describe the horrible sound)

Ideographic:

Shrill (line 7)-loud (line 21) (shrill is very loud and unpleasant)

Whirr (line 7)-rumble (line 9)-thump (line 21) (a noise)

Antonyms.

Classification(Arnold) of antonyms is based on a morphological approach: root words form absolute antonyms (right - wrong), the presence of negative affixes creates derivational antonyms (happy - unhappy).

In this text there are no derivational antonyms.

But we can divide root (absolute) antonyms of this text into:

Antonymy proper (relative, the opposition is gradual)

old (line 18)- young (line 18)

timid (line 17)– ruthless (line 2)

and

Complementary antonyms

Bridegroom (line 5)– bride (line 5)

Homonyms.

Arnold classifies homonyms in several kinds:

  1. Homonyms proper (words identical in pronunciation and spelling)

Sleeper (line 10, “тот, кто спит”) – sleeper (шпала)

Case (line 13, “дело”) – case (ящик)

Lie (line 20, “лежать”) – lie (лгать)

  1. Homographs(words different in sound and in meaning but accidentally identical in spelling):

Like (line 2, “как”)- to like (нравиться)

Leave (line 5, “покидать”)- leave (разрешение)

  1. Homophones (words of the same sound but of different spelling and meaning)

Day (line 11, “день”) – Dey (дей, правитель Алжира)

For (line 10, “для”) – four (четыре)

Hypero-hyponymic relations.

Word-formation.

According to the role they play in constructing words, morphemes are subdivided into roots and affixes (Morphemic analysis):

There are 2 morphemes in the words:

“ruthless” (line 2): "ruth"- root + "less"-affix

“congregation” (line 3) : “congregate” – root + “tion” – affix

A structural word-formation analysis proceeds further: it studies the structural correlation with other words, the structural patterns or rules on which words are built.

“sleepers” – “sleep” (line 10) are members of a morphemic opposition. They are similar as the root morpheme -sleep- is the same. The suffix –er helps to define the agent.

Back formation - the derivation of new word by sus trading a real or supposed affix from existing words through misinterpretation of their structure.

" drums " (line 1) - "s" -shows the plural form of a noun.

" heavier " (line 14) - "er" – comparative of an adjective