Death in the Dessert Game1
Time: 45 Minutes
Source: Games Teams Play
Purpose: This is a team building activity that will enhance the participants’ ability to work together and problem solve. It will encourage them to think “outside the box.”
Directions:
Divide the participants into groups or four or five. Tell the groups you are going to give them a riddle to solve. The answer to the riddle will be given to one member of each group. The rest of the group members must discover the answer by asking questions that can only be answered with “yes” or “no.”
Take the designated group members aside and give them the answer. Explain that they do not have to remember the riddle since you will be telling the entire group. Also, remind them that it is very important they do not share the answer with the rest of their team and only respond with a “yes” or “no” to their questions.
Read this riddle to everyone in the room:
“A man was found dead in the dessert. Near him was a package. If he had opened the package, he would not have died. What was in the package?”
Give the groups 5-10 minutes to ask questions. After time is up, see if any group guessed the answer. If not, share it with them: A parachute!
As a large group, discuss the following questions (notes to the facilitator are in italic)
Was this difficult? If it was, what made it difficult?
This will only give you an idea of their self-assessment. You will be able to tell for yourself if they are having difficulty. They will focus on the riddle itself, but you can pose the following questions about the process of problem solving. Keep in mind that problem solving is very important to organizing and any activity such as this will help them to develop their problem solving skills.
Were your ideas heard? At any point, did you lose track of a really good idea, an idea that had you on the right track?
Talk about the importance of always recognizing the valuable contributions everyone makes and making note of all correct answers. This teaches the participants skills related to researching their issue. All good organizers need to be inquisitive and resourceful.
Do you think your group made too many assumptions (e.g. the desert caused his death) or were you successful at clarifying information?
Discuss how you could have prevented such assumptions. For example, the group could have asked more questions and not given up so easily or the group could have examined every word of the riddle (i.e. the word “opened” is the key) for clues, etc.
How can we take what we’ve learned about problem solving from this riddle and use it in our organizing efforts?
We learned the importance of asking a lot of questions when researching an issue and asking our friends for help. We also learned that when reading something (i.e. a piece of legislation), it can be important to examine every word and we may need to ask someone else if, when reading it, we see something we do not understand. In other words, we might need someone to clarify things for us and “yes” or “no” answers might not work.
How can we prevent our group from slipping into these same problems again (i.e. making assumptions, not listening, jumping from one idea to another without building, etc)?
1. We can keep track of our ideas, make note of what we have learned from the questions we have asked and listen to what other members of our group are saying instead of planning what we are going to say next, etc.