Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Biology_of_Turtles

.pdf
Скачиваний:
88
Добавлен:
11.02.2015
Размер:
44.64 Mб
Скачать

126

Biology of Turtles

Hip (degress)Angle

FlexionAngle(degrees)

Tail

A

50

A

 

B

C

 

D

 

40

 

 

 

 

P

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R

 

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= Right hind limb

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

–10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

–20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

–30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= Left hind limb

–40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Right

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

= Tail

–10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Left

–20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

40

60

80

100

0

 

% Locomotor cycle

D

B C

Figure 5.16  Mean kinematic profiles for the two hind limbs and tail of juvenile Chelydra serpentina during aquatic walking. A angle of 0° for the hip angle of each limb indicates a femur perpendicular to the sagittal plane of the body. A positive slope indicates a protraction of the limb and a negative slope a retraction. For each limb, a bold vertical line separates the protraction (P) from the retraction (R). This line is labelled C for the left limb. A straight tail is indicated by an angle of 0°, a flexion to the left by a negative value, and a flexion to the right by a positive value. The time A corresponds to the maximal retraction of the left limb, B to the maximal tail flexion toward the left, C to the maximal protraction of the left limb, and D to the maximal tail flexion toward the right. Solid points and lines are drawn or superimposed on the video images to calculate position of the sacrocaudal joint (used with permission from Willey & Blob, 2004).

scripta elegans, 6.8 to 13.3 cms-1 and 1.11 BLs-1 for the maximal speed; Mauremys caspica, 10 to 22.7 cms-1 and 2.27 BLs-1 for the maximal speed; Chelonia mydas, 10 to 143 cms-1 in vigorous swimming and 13 BLs-1 for the maximal speed, the routine swimming being lower than 10 cms-1; “BL” signifies body length, and the thrust generated was higher, during a period of 5 s, for approximately the same body mass: Chelonia mydas developed 2.44 N (average forward thrust for all body masses = 0.89 N) and Mauremys caspica 1.04 N (average forward thrust for all body masses = 0.46 N). Apalone spinifera (Pace et al., 2001) reached speeds of 3.44 ± 0.48 BLs-1. We have no swimming speed data for Carettochelys, a “highly aquatic” freshwater species with flipper-shaped forelimbs similar to those of sea turtles. In marine turtles, locomotion involves the simultaneous beating of the forelimbs (Davenport et al., 1984). Thrust, generated during the stance phase of the limb cycle in terrestrial locomotion and the retraction phase in swimming (in freshwater forms), is created by the upstroke or the downstroke, or both, as is the case with the largest marine turtles, Chelonia mydas and Dermochelys coriacea (Davenport et al., 1984; Davenport, 1987). Davenport et al. (1987, 1997) were also able to quantify the advantage of simultaneous forelimb beating within a single marine species. By observing young green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in a flume and gradually increasing the current velocity, they noticed that the turtles swam with a drag-based alternate-limb dogpaddle action similar to that of freshwater turtles, used when diagonally opposite limbs moved together in

Evolution of Locomotion in Aquatic Turtles

127

a contralateral synchronization (Davenport et al., 1984). At higher current velocities, they employed simultaneous foreflipper beating. At 25°C, the transition between swimming modes occurred at a sustained speed of 1.32 BLs-1 and the mean maximum sustained swimming speed using the flapping foreflippers was 3.31 BLs-1. In this case, the synchronized lift-based flapping gave a 2.5-fold advantage over dogpaddle (Davenport et al., 1984), and the morphological configuration (shell shape, streamlining) was identical in the two conditions.

According to Pace et al. (2001), the evolution of aquatic specialization appears to have followed two distinct paths. Good swimming ability is correlated with forelimb hypertrophy and the use of flapping limb kinematics in sea turtles and carettochelyids. In contrast, in softshell turtles good swimming ability is correlated with rowing limb kinematics, in which the thrust-generating surface area of the limbs is maximized and drag minimized. In comparison to these specialized paths, the more functionally and morphologically generalized freshwater turtles, such as emydids, can be predicted to exhibit systems of propulsion with a greater capacity for both aquatic and terrestrial performance.

5.3.3Coordination of the Limbs in Aquatic Locomotion

There are important differences in the limb coordination of turtles during aquatic locomotion. Zug (1971) analyzed sequences of limb movement during swimming of 15 species of cryptodires, mainly including semiaquatic or highly aquatic forms of four families: Chelydridae, Kinosternidae, Emydidae, and Trionychidae. He showed that all animals adopted in-water gaits equivalent to fast walks or moderate runs when the retraction phase of rowing was considered as equivalent to the stance phase of vertebrate terrestrial locomotion (they both are the propulsive stage of the limb cycle). In several cycles of swimming of each species, calculation of the percentage of stride during which the left fore-footfall follows the left hind foot, according to Hildebrand’s (1966) method of symmetrical gait analysis, enabled us to characterize swimming as equivalent to a diagonal sequence of walk or running trot (Figure 5.17). In these gaits, in the displacement of a diagonal couplet the beginning of retraction of a hindlimb occurs before the beginning of retraction of the diagonally opposed forelimb. Zug (1971) estimated that this overlapping diagonal sequence would produce a minimal amount of yaw. This reinforces the idea that generation of consistent amounts of thrust can be produced from diagonally opposed limb propulsive phases operating more-or-less at the same time. In swimming, the variation of timing of limb movement is great, caused by variation in the ipsilateral pairs. In contrast, in swimming adult sea turtles (Figure 5.18) the foreflippers flap simultaneously. In hatchlings, this simultaneous movement is not perfect, but most swimming results from near-synchronous beating of the foreflippers. However, hatchling marine turtles can also swim with a type of rowing, termed “dogpaddling,” occurring when diagonally opposite limbs move together, (Davenport et al., 1997). This is similar to the swimming gaits of freshwater turtles except that the limbs move in the horizontal and vertical planes to a greater extent. Marine turtle hatchlings (Caretta caretta) can also adopt a propulsive rear flipper kicking by simultaneously beating the hindlimbs; in this case, the forelimbs are tucked against the shell and take no part in locomotion (Davenport & Pearson, 1994).

Differences also appear when semiaquatic or highly aquatic turtle forms walk on land and are therefore forced to move under gravitational constraints. Zug (1971) studied the terrestrial locomotion of aquatic species and noticed a basic change (Figure 5.17): the slower gaits fall, in Hildebrand’s analysis system (1966), between the walk and the trot of the lateral sequence. In each diagonal couplet, the beginning of retraction of the forelimb started before the beginning of retraction of the opposite hindlimb. In gaits characterized by this lateral sequence, the footfall of the hindlimb is followed by the footfall of the ipsilateral forelimb. In the diagonal sequence, the hindlimb footfall is, in contrast, followed by the diagonally opposite forelimb footfall.

The gait of terrestrial forms (Testudinidae) is characterized by this lateral sequence alone (Figure 5.19). These data signify that semiaquatic and highly aquatic freshwater turtles (such as Trionychidae) that have “discovered” a diagonal sequence of moving when they progress in water have

128

Biology of Turtles

Terrestrial Locomotion

 

vs

Walk

 

 

Run

 

 

Hind

0

s

m

f

s

m

f

Pace

 

 

 

Left

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lateral couplet

Follows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diagonal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Single-foot

Footfall

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

couplet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fore

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diagonal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

couplet

Left

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Single-foot

Strideof

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pace

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lateral

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

couplet

%

100

80

 

60

 

50

40

20

10

 

100

 

 

 

% of Stride Left Hindfoot is on Ground

B

 

Aquatic Locomotion

 

 

 

Walk

 

 

Run

 

 

Hind

0

vs

s

m f

s

m

f

Pace

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Left

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lateral

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

couplet

Follows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diagonal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Single-foot

Footfall

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

couplet

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trot

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fore

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diagonal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

couplet

Left

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Single-foot

Strideof

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pace

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lateral

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

couplet

%

100

80

 

60

 

50

40

20

10

 

100

 

 

% of Stride Left Hindfoot is Retracted

Lateral

 

 

Sequence

LF 1

3 RF

 

Diagonal

LH 4

2 RH

 

Terrestrial

Sequence

Displacement

 

 

 

 

C

Lateral

 

 

Sequence

LF 2

4 RF

 

Diagonal

LH 3

1 RH

Swimming

Sequence

 

 

LF

RH

 

RF

 

LH

 

LF

 

RH

 

RF

 

LH

 

LF

 

RH

 

RF

 

LH

 

Time

 

 

A

LF

 

RH

 

RF

 

LH

 

LF

RH

RF

LH

Time

Figure 5.17  Gaits used by the freshwater cryptodires turtles to swim and walk. Gait diagrams in aquatic locomotion (A) showing the adoption of a trotting walk or a trot characterized by a diagonal sequence (B). In addition (C) the order of limbs succession is given: a hind limb (1) followed by the diagonally opposed fore limb (2), the hind limb on the same side of the body (3) followed by the diagonally opposed fore limb (4) and the hind limb on the same side of the body (1 again), cyclically during the progression. Gait diagrams in terrestrial locomotion (A) showing the adoption of a trotting walk or a trot characterized by a lateral sequence (B). In addition (C) the order of limbs succession is given: a fore limb (1) followed by the diagonally opposed hind limb (2), the fore limb on the same side of the body (3) followed by the diagonally opposed hind limb (4) and the fore limb on the same side of the body (1 again), cyclically during the progression. LF, left fore limb; LH, right fore limb; RF, right fore limb; RH, right hind limb. f, fast walk; m, moderate walk; s, slow walk; sv, very slow walk (adapted from Zug, 1971).

never lost the typical gaits of the terrestrial forms: a slow walking trot with a lateral sequence giving the most stable dynamic basis (via maximized tripodal support) that is often used by other slow vertebrates. A recent test conducted with Emys orbicularis has supported Zug’s conclusions (Depecker, personal communication). We have no data for Carettochelys.

When sea turtles leave the ocean to crawl up beaches for egg laying, some cheloniids (Caretta, Eretmochelys, Lepidochelys) use typical alternate (“terrestrial”) movements of their flippers to move on sand and produce thrust. The terrestrial locomotion of the cheloniid Natator is less clear because it can employ either alternate or simultaneous movements of its four limbs. In contrast, simultaneous limb movements on land are exclusively adopted by the largest marine forms, the cheloniid Chelonia and dermochelyid Dermochelys (Renous et al., 1989; Renous & Bels, 1991, 1993; Wyneken, 1997). While slow, this gait does not involve raising the entire body; instead, the forelimbs essentially produce the lifting and forward displacement of the body as if the animal was “walking on crutches” (Figure 5.20). The hindlimbs help to raise the proximal part of the forelimbs

Evolution of Locomotion in Aquatic Turtles

 

129

A

Dermochelys

 

 

U

1

10

 

 

 

 

P

 

 

 

S

 

 

 

T

 

 

 

R

2

9

 

O

 

 

 

K

 

 

D

E

3

8

 

O

 

 

 

W

 

 

 

N

 

 

 

S

 

 

 

T

 

4

7

R

 

O

 

 

 

K

 

 

 

E

 

5

6

 

B

Carettochelys

Figure 5.18  Simultaneous beating of the fore limbs during the swimming of Dermochelys coriacea (A) and suggestion of the same limb synchrony in Carettochelys. (Used with permission from Pritchard, 1979.)

(B) The numbers indicate successive stages of the two phases of the forelimb cycle: upstroke (from 1 to 5) and downstroke (from 6 to 10) (used with permission from Renous & Bels, 1993).

and contribute to the equilibrium of the body. These turtles have lost the basic terrestrial gait and have acquired, by minimal adjustment of the swimming mode, a type of energy-saving system appropriate for moving a heavy mass forward under gravity.

5.3.4A History of Limb Coordination

Patterns of limb coordination are vital to understand the evolution of locomotion in aquatic turtles and the selection of ecological strategies (Hendrickson, 1980). We believe that coordination guides the structural modifications of the limbs. Particularly interesting are the questions posed by the existence of synchronous foreflipper action in locomotion in diverse extant groups, some of which have rigid flippers (Cheloniidae, Demochelyiidae), others not (Carettochelyiidae). Even among the still living species, it seems that rigid foreflippers are not a prerequisite for synchronization.

Recently, a study of large tetrapod track ways with exceptional fossilization (Figure 5.21) from Cerin (Upper Jurassic, France) (Bernier, 1985; Roman et al., 1994) suggests that giant aquatic turtles used simultaneous movements of contralateral limbs (Gaillard et al., 2003). These extinct turtles moved in shallow waters of a lagoon (though we do not know whether they also swam in deeper waters). Interpretation of the footprints suggests that the limbs differed from extant marine turtles in the presence of free claws and an interdigital web. The fossilized animals did not possess true rigid

130

 

 

Biology of Turtles

 

 

Influence of Gravity

Water

 

Land

Terrestrials

(Alternate limb coordination)

 

(Alternate limb coordination)

 

Freshwater

Post.ap.prop.

 

 

(Adult)

Bottom–Walkers

 

 

 

Lateral

 

Diagonal

 

 

Swimmers

Sequence

 

Sequence

 

 

 

Semiaquatic

 

 

Freshwater

 

 

 

(Adult)

 

 

 

Simultaneous

 

 

 

Movement

 

 

 

of Limbs

Swimmers

 

 

(Synchrony)

 

Land

Highly Aquatic

 

Sea

(Carettochelys)

 

(Adult)

 

Small

(Adult)

Marine swimmers

 

Large

Simultaneous

Simultaneous

ant.ap.prop.

Movement

 

Movement

 

+ Hatchling

of Limbs

 

of Limbs

(Synchrony)

 

in Dermochelys

(Synchrony)

 

 

Figure 5.19  Patterns of propulsion and limb coordination to progress in water and on land in adult extant chelonians (adapted from Renous et al., 1999) ant.ap.prop., anterior appendicular propulsion; post.ap.prop., posterior appendicular propulsion (which can be shared with the anterior limb in the better swimmers). The marine swimmers are divided in small and large forms. The white rectangle indicates the synchronous periodic movements of the limbs introducing a novelty in the swimming adaptation. The grey rectangle indicates the action field of gravity.

flippers and so must have acquired the synchronous pattern of limb coordination before the selection of highly modified rigid fins. This important difference raises questions about the locomotor mechanisms of primitive groups of Eurysternidae and allied forms also present at the site, as well as primitive Protostegidae. Besides, the hindlimbs ought to have been longer than the forelimbs. Synchronous movement of the limbs evidently appeared several times as far as the Jurassic forms of Cheloniidae-Dermochelyiidae and Carettochelyidae are concerned. As we can deduce from Zug (1971) for non-marine and non-carettochelyid species, no phylogenetic relationships between these groups can be resolved from their limb coordination patterns.

So what drove the evolution of synchronous foreflipper action? Large size does not seem an adequate explanation; large individuals of riverine species (e.g., Batagur, Podocnemis expansa) may overlap in body size with small individuals of extant marine turtles but employ the diagonal pattern associated with rowing in most aquatic turtles, which is probably retained for its flexibility that permits maneuverability and regular use of the terrestrial habitat.

We suggest that synchronous forelimb movement is the primary feature that allows a true pelagic marine life in modern forms—it is seen in its most highly developed form in those large turtles that, as adults, carry out extensive high speed oceanic migrations (Chelonia, Dermochelys). Synchronous limb movement was already used by other species during the Jurassic (Cerin and probably Bavaria and Canjuers), possibly also by the first South American protostegids. At the same time, it was found used with in freshwater environments (as suggested by the extant Carettochelys);

Evolution of Locomotion in Aquatic Turtles

131

UW mt (cm)

Terrestrial Locomotion

FR

 

HR D

SwF

SwF + H(1)

 

12.2

 

SwH

 

 

 

 

 

 

SwF + H(1)

FR

 

 

 

FR

10.6

FR

SwF + H(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

SwF + H(2)

 

FR + HR

FR + HR

 

9

FR + HR

 

 

Dermochelys

 

 

 

 

11.4

14.6

17.8

21

24.2

 

 

FW mt (cm)

 

Figure 5.20  Terrestrial locomotion of Dermochelys coriacea displacement of the cranial section of the body (anterior limit of the dorso-lateral hull) of a juvenile of 11 kg in a vertical plane. FR, fore limb retraction; FR+HR, simultaneous retraction of the foreand hind limbs; FWmt, forward movement; HR, hind limb retraction; SwF and SwH, foreand hind limbs swings; SwF+H(1) and (2), first and second parts of the fore and hind limbs swing; UWmt, upward movement; D, dragging. The arrows underline the resulting movement. A gait diagram documents the duration of the respective phases of the fore and the hind limbs during a complete revolution cycle of the four limbs. Drawings of the stages of the progression are also presented (used with permission from Renous 1988, Renous & Bels, 1993).

Trackway A

Trackway B

Direction of movement

A

N

Pes Manus

B

0 1 2m

Figure 5.21  Footprints of a Jurassic fossil turtle from Cerin (Cerin, Ain, France). Two tracks, A and B, are visible on the sediment and show footprints assigned to hands and feet (the former being out of the latter along the middle line of each track) (used with permission from Gaillard et al., 2003).

132

Biology of Turtles

the oldest recorded Carettochelyidae are either from the late Jurassic or early Cretaceous (Young & Chow, 1953) but they were probably already well present at Jurassic times, according to their wide distribution during the Lower Cretaceous (Lapparent de Broin, 2004) and new discoveries in the Cretaceous from France. This implies an early separation from the Trionychidae, their sister group, probably during the late Jurassic. The carettochelyid humerus is known from the early Cretaceous from Laos and complete limbs are described from the Eocene (Harrassowitz, 1922); they are identical to those of the extant forms. The carettochelyid paddle had therefore characterized all members of the family at its appearance and was probably associated to synchronous movement of the limbs. The ability of extant Carettochelyidae to penetrate estuaries and salt waters is known in New Guinea and Australia, thus it is not impossible that the track ways from Cerin was made by a carettochelyid, if not a protostegid or an eurysternid.

The challenge is to identify the environmental or life history features that have selected for synchronous forelimb movement in non-pelagic situations and at relatively small sizes. The very shallow environment of the Cerin trackways and the occasional synchronous action of forelimbs during mud digging in some extant Trionyx species may give a clue; perhaps synchronous limb action aids semi-terrestrial movement in shallow water overlying extensive soft substrata? More study is clearly required.

5.4Conclusion

In chelonians, phylogenetic studies and cladograms constructed with combined molecular and morphological data have revealed satisfactory correlations between the great diversity of habitats occupied by turtles and the major patterns of locomotion that they exhibit. This is an important first step toward improving our understanding of the evolutionary processes of this terrestrial group of vertebrates. In reality, all chelonians are “terrestrial” animals by virtue of their major physiological functions, especially respiratory physiology and principal behaviors (notably, egg-laying). At regular periods in their lives, at least females of all turtle species must return to land. In spite of secondary adaptations to aquatic habitats that introduced changes in the mode of coordination of limb movements (from lateral sequences on land under the influence of gravity to diagonal sequences and synchronous sequences in water), they all must use some kind of limb-based locomotion to move on land.

Different evolutionary scenarios and locomotor strategies have been selected in the chelonians. It is likely that the basic structural “turtle pattern” arose in terrestrial forms solely in the context of a terrestrial life—most likely to provide maximum body protection. Subsequent adaptations to a semiaquatic or highly aquatic way of life were rapidly adopted, allowing the development of a mode of locomotion that was able to work within the constraints of the two environments, aquatic and terrestrial. This mode retained an alternating limb function, even if it underwent some further adjustments when the environment changed. In this context, the morphological-functional features of turtles cannot be solely attributed to the constraints of a single environment. However, we must take into account the fact that the constraints of the terrestrial environment are strong, with animals simultaneously benefiting from and being compromised by these constraints (e.g., structural integrity of the body versus lightening of the body). Nevertheless, even in the context of this “polyvalent” adaptation requiring a diagonal coordination of the limbs, as more time is spent swimming in the aquatic environment the more turtles exhibit true “challenges” when returning to the terrestrial environment (even to lay eggs). The result is a decrease of speed and other locomotor parameters and the induction of greater energetic cost. The use of synchronous limb movement was probably adopted very early before the forelimbs were highly modified into rigid flippers (e.g., Jurassic turtles from Cerin), whereas the hindlimbs were flexible elements, similar to those of some extant forms (Carettochelyidae). This pattern of coordination, present in Cerin (an environment distinct from the sea and characterized by shallowness, great evaporation, and high salinity, hence selecting for hypertrophied salt glands), for example, was the first that permitted the eventual full conquest of

Evolution of Locomotion in Aquatic Turtles

133

the marine environment. Subsequently, the differentiation of rigid foreand hindlimbs, longer in the case of the foreflippers, has favored a more complete adaptation to a pelagic marine life.

It is probable that the synchronous movement of the forelimbs in truly marine locomotion was the result of exaptation: perhaps performance enhancement that allowed greater thrust and speed, in prey capture or predator avoidance. The development of rigid limbs and their synchronous functioning in marine turtles facilitated the coverage of great distances in open sea, either to move between far-flung benthic food resources (coral reefs, sea grass) or to seek out ephemeral pelagic food concentrations (e.g., jellyfish). These morphofunctional parameters strongly influence efficiency on land when the female turtles come back to lay eggs with a large body that is very heavy under the influence of gravity. Alternate functioning of the limbs could introduce added instability and greater energy expenditure. In contrast, the alternate limb movements exhibited by the great majority of semi-aquatic and highly aquatic turtles found their optimum efficiency in the exploitation of the great diversity of fresh water habitats, yet also allowed more extensive use of the terrestrial environment.

References

Barth, R., Observacoes sobre a grande tertaruga marinha, Chelonia mydas L., feitas en Ilha de Trinadade, An. Acad. Brasil. Cienc., 34, 405, 1962.

Berge, C., and Penin, X., Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 124, 124, 2004.

Bernier, P., Une Lagune Tropicale au Temps des Dinosaures, Paris: CNRS Paris-Muséum Lyon Eds., 1985, 136. Bodie, J.R., and Semlitsch, R.D., Spatial and temporal use of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of

aquatic turtles, Oecologia, 122, 138, 2000.

Bookstein, F.L., Morphometrics Tools for Landmarks Data: Geometry and Biology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Braga, M. de, and Rieppel, O., Reptile phylogeny and the interrelationships of turtles, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 120, 281, 1997.

Broin, F. de, Proganochelys ruchae n. sp., Chélonien du Trias supérieur de Thaïlande, Stud. Geol. Salm., Stud. Palaeochel., 1, 87, 1985.

Broin, F. de, Les Tortues et le Gondwana: Examen des rapports entre le fractionnement du Gondawana et la dispersion géographique des Tortues pleurodires à partir du Crétacé, Stud. Geol. Salm., Studia Palaeochel., 2, 103, 1988.

Broin, F. de, Données préliminaires sur les Chéloniens du Tithonien inférieur de Canjuers (Var, France), Table Ronde Internationale Calcaire Lithographique, Lyon, Juillet 1991, Geobios, 16, 168, 1994.

Burke, A.C., Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the development of the Chelonian Bauplan, in Trends in Vertebrate Morphology, H. Spechtana and H. Hilgers (eds.), Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag, 1989, 206.

Cadena Rueda, E.A., and Gaffney, E.S., Notoemys zapatocaensis, a new side-necked turtle (Peurodira: Platychelyidae) from the Early Cretaceous of Colombia, Amer. Mus. Nov., 3470, 19, 2005.

Cann, J., Australian Freshwater Turtles, Singapore: J. Cann & Beaumont Publishing, 1998, 292. Casamiquela, R.M., Estudios icnologicos: Problemas y metodos de la icnologia con aplication al studio de

pisadas mesozoicas (Reptilia, Mammalia) de la Patagonia, Gobierno de la Provincia de Río Negro, Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales, 229pp. Buenos Aires, 1964.

Claude, J., Paradis E., Tong, H., and Auffray, J.-Ch., A geometric morphometric assessment of the effects of environment and cladogenesis on the evolution of the turtle shell, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 79, 485, 2003.

Claussen, D.L., Lim, R., Kurz, M., and Wren, M., Effects of slope, substrate, and temperature on the locomotion of the ornate box turtle, Terrapene ornate, Copeia, 2, 411, 2002.

Datta, P.M., Manna, P., Ghosh, S.C., and Das, D.P., The first Jurassic turtle from India, Palaeontology, 43, 99, 2000.

Davenport, J., Locomotion in hatchling leatherback turtles Dermochelys coriacea, J. Zool. Lond., 212, 85, 1987. Davenport, J., and Clough, W., Swimming and diving in young loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta L.),

Copeia, 53, 1986.

Davenport, J., Monks, S.A., and Oxford, P.J., A comparison of the swimming in marine and freshwater turtles,

Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 220, 447, 1984.

134

Biology of Turtles

Davenport, J., and Pearson, G.A., Observations on the swimming of the Pacific ridley, Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz 1829): Comparisons with other sea turtles, Herpetol. J., 4, 60, 1994.

Davenport, J., de Verteuil, N., and Magill, S.H., The effects of current velocity and temperature upon swimming in juvenile green turtles Chelonia mydas L., Herpetol. J., 7, 143, 1997.

Davenport, J., and Wong, T.M., Aerial and aquatic respiration in the black-rayed softshell turtle Amyda cartilaginea (Boddaert), Herpetol. J., 2, 115, 1992.

De la Fuente, M.S., and Fernandez, M.S., Notoemys laticentralis Cattoi & Freiberg, 1961, from the Upper Jurassic of Argentina: A member of the Infraorder Pleurodira (Cope, 1868), Studia Geol. Salm. Studia Paleochel., 3, 25, 1989.

De la Fuente, M.S., and Iturralde-Vinent M., A new pleurodiran turtle from Jagua Formation (Oxfordian) of Western Cuba, J. Paleontol., 75, 860, 2001.

De la Fuente M., Lapparent de Broin, F. de, and Manera de Bianco, T., The oldest and first nearly complete skeleton of a chelid, of the Hydromedusa group (Chelidae, Pleurodira), from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr., 172, 237, 2001.

Depecker, M., Berge, C., Penin, X., and Renous, S., Geometric morphometry of the shoulder girdle in extant turtles (Chelonii), J. Anat., 208, 35, 2006a.

Depecker, M., Renous, S., Berge, C., and Penin, X., Procrustes analysis: A tool to understand shape changes of the humerus in turtles (Chelonii), C.R. Palevol., 5, 509, 2006b.

Deraniagala, P.E.P., The testudinata of Ceylon, Ceylon J. Sci. B., 16, 43, 1930.

Dominici, P., Habitat, body design and the swimming performance of fish, in Vertebrate Biomechanics and Evolution, V.L. Bels, J.P. Gasc, and A. Casinos (eds.), Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers, 2003,137.

Earhart, G.M., and Stein, P.S.G., Step, swim, and scratch motor patterns in the turtle, J. Neurophysiol., 84, 2181, 2000.

Feldam, C.R., and Parham, J.F., Molecular phylogenetics of emydine turtles: Taxonomic revision and the evolution of shell kinesis, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 22, 388, 2002.

Fernandez, M.S., and de la Fuente, M.S., Las tortugas casiquelidias de las calizas litograficas titonianas del area Los Catutos, Neuquén, Argentina, Ameghiniana, 30, 283, 1993.

Fernandez, M.S., and de la Fuente, M.S., Redescription and phylogenetic position of Notoemys: The oldest Gondwanian pleurodiran turtle, Neues Jahrb. Geol. P.A., 193, 81, 1994.

Finkler, M.S., and Claussen, D.L., Use of the tail in terrestrial locomotor activities of juvenile Chelydra serpentine, Copeia, 884, 1997.

Fish, F.E., Transitions from drag-based to lift-based propulsion in mammalian swimming, Am. Zool., 36, 628, 1996.

Gaffney, E. S., The systematics of the North American Family Baenidae (Reptilia, Cryptodira), Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist., 147, 241, 1972.

Gaffney, E.S., The shell morphology of the Triassic turtle Proganochelys, N.J. Geol. Palont. Abh., 170, 1, 1985. Gaffney, E.S., The comparative osteology of the Triassic turtle Proganochelys, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.,

194, 1, 1990.

Gaffney, E.S., The postcranial morphology of Meiolania platyceps and a review of the Meiolaniidae, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 229, 166, 1996.

Gaffney, E.S., Hutchinson, J.H., Jenkins, F.A., and Meeker, L.J., Modern turtle origins: The oldest known Cryptodire, Science, 237, 289, 1987.

Gaffney, E.S. and Kitching, J.W., The most ancient African turtle, Letters to Nature, Nature, 369, 55, 1994. Gaffney E.S., Kool, L., Brinkman, D.B., Rich, T., and Vickers-Rich, P., Otwayemys, a new Cryptodiran turtle

from the early Cretaceous of Australia, Am. Mus. Novit., 3233, 28, 1998.

Gaffney, E.S., and McKenna, M.C., A late Permian captorinid from Rhodesia, Am. Mus. Novit., 2688, 15, 1979. Gaffney, E.S., and Meylan, P.A., A phylogeny of turtles, in The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, Systematics Association Special Volume 35A, M.J. Benton

(ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988, 5, 157.

Gaffney, E.S., and Meylan, P.A., The Transylvanian turtle, Kallokibotion, a primitive Cryptodire of Cretaceous Age, Amer. Mus. Novit., 3040, 1, 1992.

Gaffney, E.S., Meylan, P.A., and Wyss, A.R., A computer assisted analysis of the relationships of the higher categories of turtles, Cladistics, 7, 313, 1991.

Gaffney, E.S., Tong, H., and Meylan P.A. Evolution of the side-necked turtles: The families Bothremydidae, Euraxemydidae, and Araripemydidae, Bull Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 300, 700, 2006.

Evolution of Locomotion in Aquatic Turtles

135

Gaillard, C., Bernier, P., Barale, G., Bourseau, J.P., Buffetaut, E., Ezquerra, R., Gall, J.C., de Lapparent de Broin, F., Renous, S., and Wenz, S., A giant upper Jurassic turtle revealed by its trackways, Lethaia, 36, 315, 2003.

Gans, C., and Hughes, G.M., The mechanism of lung ventilation in the tortoise, Testudo graeca, J. Exp. Biol., 47, 1, 1967.

Gasc, J.P., and Renous, S., Les données ontogénétiques peuvent-elles expliquer l’origine évolutive des Squamates apodes?, in Ontogénèse et Evolution, Coll. Intern. CNRS, Géobios, Mém. Sp., 12, 173, 1989.

Gaunt, A.S., and Gans, C., Mechanics of respiration in the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina (Linné), J. Morphol., 128, 195, 1969.

Gibbons, J.W., Terrestrial activity and population dynamics of aquatic turtles, Am. Midl. Nat., 83, 404, 1970. Gilbert, S.F., Loredo, G.A., Bruckman, A., and Burke, A., Morphogenesis of the turtle shell: The development

of a novel structure in tetrapod evolution, Evol. & Dev., 3, 47, 2001.

Gillis, G.B., and Blob, R.W., How muscles accommodate movement in different physical environments: Aquatic vs. terrestrial locomotion in vertebrates, Com. Biochem. Phys. A., 131, 61, 2001.

Gregory, W.K., Pareiasaurs versus placodonts as near ancestors to the turtles, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 86, 276, 1946.

Guibé, J., Le squelette du tronc et des membres, in, Traité de Zoologie, Grassé, P.P. (ed.), Paris: Masson & Co, 1970, 14, 33.

Harrassowitz, H., Die Schildtrötengattung ANOSTEIRA von Messel bei Darmstadt und ihre stammeesgeschichliche Bedeutung, Abh. Hess. Geol. Land. Darmstadt, 6, 238,1922.

Hay, O.P., The fossil turtles of North America, Pub. Carnegie Inst., 75, 568, 1908.

Hedges, S.B., and Poling, L., A molecular phylogeny and the interrelationships of turtles, Science, 283, 898, 1999. Hendrickson, J.R., The ecological strategies of sea turtles, Am. Zool., 20, 597, 1980.

Hildebrand, M., Analysis of the symmetrical gaits of Tetrapods, Folia Biotheor., 6, 9, 1966. Hirayama, R., Phylogenetic systematics of chelonioid sea turtles, The Island Arc, 3, 270, 1994. Hirayama, R., Oldest known sea turtle, Nature, 392, 705, 1998.

Hirayama, R., and Chitoku, T., Family Dermochelyidae (Superfamily Chelonioidea) from the Upper Cretaceous of north Japan, Trans. Proc. Palaeont. Soc. Japan, N.S., 184, 597, 1996.

Holman, J.A., Herpetofauna of the Egelhoff site (Miocene: Barstovian) of north-central Nebraska, J. Vert. Paleon., 7, 109, 1987.

Hughes, B., Occurrence of the freshwater trionychid turtles Cyclanorbis elegans and C. senegalensis in Ghana, Bull. Inst. Fond. Afr. Noire, 41, 193, 1979.

James, M.C., Davenport, J., and Hays, G.C., Expanded thermal niche for a diving vertebrate: A leatherback turtle diving into near-freezing water, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 2006.

Jayes, A.S., and Alexander, R.M., The gaits of Chelonians: Walking techniques for very low speeds, J. Zool. Lond., 191, 353, 1980.

Jenkins, F.A. Jr., Shubin, N.H., Amaral, W.W., Gatesy, S.M., Schaff, C.R., Clemmensen, L.B., Downs, W.R., Davidson, A.R., Bonde, N., and Osbaeck, F., Late Triassic continental vertebrates and depositional environments of the Fleming Fjord Formation, Jameson Land, East Greenland, Meddelelser om Grönland, Bioscience, 32, 2, 1994.

Joyce, W.G., and Gauthier, J.A., Palaeoecology of Triassic stem turtles sheds new light on turtle origins, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 271, 1, 2004.

Kordikova, E.G., Paedomorphosis in the shell of fossil and living turtles, Neues Jahrb. Geol. P.A., 218, 399, 2000. Lapparent de Broin, F. de, African chelonians from the Jurassic to the Present. A preliminary catalog of the

African fossil chelonians, Palaeontol. Africana, 36, 43, 2000a.

Lapparent de Broin, F. de, The oldest Podocnemidid turtle (Chelonii, Pleurodira), from the early Cretaceous, Ceará state, Brasil, and its environment, Treballs Mus. Geol. Barcelona, 9, 43, 2000b.

Lapparent de Broin, F. de, The European turtle fauna from the Triassic to the Present: A short review, Dumerilia, 4, 155, 2001.

Lapparent de Broin F. de, A giant tortoise from the late Pliocene of Lesvos Island (Greece) and its possible relationships, Ann. Géol. pays Héllén. 1re Sér., 39, A, 99, 2002.

Lapparent de Broin F. de, The Miocene chelonians from the southern Namibia, in Faunas from the Southern Namibia, Senut, B., and Pickford, M. (coord.), Mem. Geol. Surv. Namibia, 19, 67, 2003.

Lapparent de Broin F. de, A new Shachemydinae (Chelonii, Cryptodira) from the Lower Cretaceous of Laos: Preliminary data, C.R. Palevol. Paris, 3, 387, 2004.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]