GS_The_European_Conviction_List_watermark
.pdfvk.com/id446425943
Goldman Sachs
Vonovia (VNAn.DE): Market consolidator and innovator
GS Analyst
Jonathan Kownator
+44 20 7051-2974
jonathan.kownator@gs.co m
Vonovia has recently acquired Victoria Park, marking its entrance into the Swedish market.
We forecast a c. 220bp improvement in operating margin over 3Y.
Investment thesis: We believe Vonovia has solid growth prospects, including strong investment potential through its modernisation program or through external growth, which should allow the company to further benefit from economies of scale.
Furthermore, we believe lower-end German residential remains attractively priced vs. other European markets, below reconstruction costs.
Incremental investment opportunities: We expect Vonovia to have incremental investment opportunities vs. its peers, for instance, a large €1bn p.a. modernisation program and the ability to create new units. In addition, the company is looking to further expand outside Germany. We believe Vonovia, as a consolidator but also given its strong focus on innovation, will benefit from economies of scale and be able to further drive costs down and improve returns. We also see opportunity in its Value-Add business which offers additional property-related products and services to tenants and is not captured in the EPRA NAV.
Limited impact from regulation: While recent announcements have pointed to incremental changes to regulation, we believe based on Vonovia’s guidance that these would have a very limited impact on the company. At the same time, we ultimately believe public authorities will encourage new development, and that Vonovia will have a competitive advantage in this respect.
Catalyst: We see further acquisitions and any updates on synergies from acquisitions as catalysts for the shares; the company will report 3Q18 results on December 6.
What’s it worth? Our 12m EVA®-based PT is €51.0. We believe the current valuation level of Vonovia at 5.6% 2019E earnings yield is attractive, given the low risk profile of the residential assets held by the company.
Exhibit 88: Vonovia has an attractive earnings profile, particularly given its scale
Earnings yield (2018E), earnings CAGR (3Y) and portfolio size for residential landlords
|
6% |
|
|
|
|
Kojamo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yield |
5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vonovia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand |
|
|
||
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
City |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio size last reported: |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vonovia - c. 404,000 units |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Wohnen - c. 163,000 units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Wohnen |
|
|
LEG - c. 130,000 units |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand City - c. 83,000 units |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kojamo - c. 35,000 units |
|
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4% |
5% |
6% |
7% |
8% |
9% |
10% |
11% |
12% |
2018-21E EPS CAGR
Exhibit 89: We believe Vonovia will further benefit from economies of scale and continue to improve margins
EBITDA (GS) margin, 2013-20E
80% |
72% |
74% |
75% |
77% |
78% |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
70% |
68% |
|
|
|
|
64% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60% |
60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
Source: Company data, FactSet, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research. |
Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research |
28 November 2018 |
51 |
vk.com/id446425943
Goldman Sachs
Zurich Insurance Group (ZURN.S): Dividend upside
GS Analyst
Johnny Vo
+44(20) 7552-5785
johnny.vo@gs.com
The strong balance sheet should also allow for rapid growth in dividends in line with the group’s 75% pay-out target, once the benefits from restructuring start to come through.
Investment thesis: Zurich remains one of our top picks amongst the multi-line insurers. The combination of expected operational improvement over the next two years and a relatively strong balance sheet offer investors a clear opportunity, in our view. Zurich has made good progress on its expense initiative and restructuring actions. This, combined with tailwinds from a more supportive US commercial pricing environment and US tax reforms, should support earnings growth in 2019. In addition, the group’s internally financed bolt-on M&A activities in both Latin America and Australia should further support the group’s earnings trajectory. We also note restructuring costs should reduce in 2019.
Dividend growth in focus: We believe the group’s increase in dividend with FY17 results (the first increase in 8 years) combined with the announcement of a US$1bn buy-back should give investors confidence in the group’s ability to deliver underlying earnings improvement over the coming years. As earnings growth progresses, we expect Zurich to deliver strong dividend growth (in line with earnings), with the potential for further buybacks and/or M&A.
Balance sheet remains in good health: Our positive view on Zurich is largely predicated on its strong balance sheet. Zurich has continued to preserve its balance sheet, as shown by its strong Z-ECM development and our calculation of Unencumbered Liquidity and leverage capacity. This provides the group with more optionality to support capital returns and/or earnings growth initiatives versus peers, in our view.
What’s it worth? We maintain our 12-month price target of CHF390. Our price target is derived from our sector-wide RoC model, assuming a 8.9% cost of capital and a 15.0% adjusted return of capital.
Exhibit 90: We see a strong dividend trajectory for Zurich, as |
Exhibit 91: Zurich delivered operational improvements in 2017, and |
earnings growth comes to fruition |
we see a clear earnings trajectory for the next two years |
DPS estimates (CHF) for Zurich Insurance Group |
Business operating profit ($ bn, net of minorities) and combined ratio |
|
(%) |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business operating profit ($bn, LHS) |
|
Combined ratio (%, RHS) |
|
|||||||
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
104% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
||||
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
5 |
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
102% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
4.7 |
|
4.5 |
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
16 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021E |
94% |
|
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
2021E |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018E |
2019E |
2020E |
|
Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research |
Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research |
28 November 2018 |
52 |
vk.com/id446425943
Goldman Sachs
Exhibit 92: Key Conviction List metrics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns |
|
|
Growth |
Valuation |
Yield |
|
||||
|
Ticker |
Company Name |
Sector |
Market cap |
Price |
Last |
Upside |
|
ROE |
|
|
CROCI |
|
Sales CAGR |
EPS CAGR |
P/E |
EV/EBITDA |
FCF Yield |
Div Yield |
|
|
¼ PQ |
Symbol |
price |
to TP |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2017-2021 2017-2021 |
2019 |
2019 |
2019 |
2019 |
|
|
|
BAES.L |
BAE Systems |
Aerospace & Defence |
18,112 |
£ |
506.00 |
56% |
28% |
30% |
30% |
10% |
12% |
13% |
5% |
14% |
8.9x |
8.3x |
10% |
5% |
|
|
RR.L |
Rolls-Royce |
Aerospace & Defence |
16,800 |
£ |
812.40 |
54% |
5% |
10% |
14% |
10% |
14% |
21% |
6% |
8% |
27.6x |
9.9x |
4% |
2% |
|
|
CNHI.MI |
CNH Industrial |
Autos |
11,461 |
¼ |
8.38 |
88% |
22% |
24% |
24% |
9% |
10% |
11% |
5% |
61% |
8.9x |
4.4x |
11% |
4% |
|
|
SABE.MC |
Banco Sabadell |
Banks |
6,240 |
¼ |
1.11 |
71% |
6% |
8% |
8% |
|
|
|
0% |
8% |
6.3x |
|
|
8% |
|
|
BAWG.VI |
BAWAG Group |
Banks |
3,688 |
¼ |
36.88 |
44% |
11% |
11% |
11% |
|
|
|
4% |
2% |
8.7x |
|
|
6% |
|
|
BNPP.PA |
BNP Paribas |
Banks |
55,275 |
¼ |
44.36 |
67% |
8% |
9% |
9% |
|
|
|
3% |
6% |
6.8x |
|
|
7% |
|
|
INGA.AS |
ING Groep NV |
Banks |
41,565 |
¼ |
10.71 |
49% |
11% |
10% |
10% |
|
|
|
3% |
5% |
8.0x |
|
|
6% |
|
|
STAN.L |
Standard Chartered |
Banks |
22,216 |
£ |
600.40 |
53% |
5% |
6% |
7% |
|
|
|
5% |
33% |
8.8x |
|
|
4% |
|
|
DPWGn.DE |
Deutsche Post DHL |
Business Services |
34,195 |
¼ |
27.83 |
55% |
15% |
18% |
18% |
12% |
13% |
14% |
4% |
7% |
11.8x |
6.6x |
4% |
5% |
|
|
ELIS.PA |
Elis SA |
Business Services |
3,668 |
¼ |
16.72 |
67% |
9% |
10% |
10% |
12% |
12% |
12% |
12% |
12% |
11.9x |
6.5x |
6% |
3% |
|
|
EUFI.PA |
Eurofins Scientific |
Business Services |
6,009 |
¼ |
351.40 |
88% |
10% |
13% |
13% |
9% |
10% |
11% |
14% |
21% |
18.5x |
10.8x |
5% |
1% |
|
|
EXPN.L |
Experian |
Business Services |
19,624 |
£ |
1849.50 |
30% |
34% |
36% |
38% |
17% |
18% |
18% |
7% |
11% |
21.2x |
13.4x |
5% |
2% |
|
|
AKZO.AS |
Akzo Nobel |
Chemicals |
18,273 |
¼ |
72.34 |
34% |
12% |
10% |
16% |
1% |
8% |
9% |
-10% |
2% |
22.3x |
10.0x |
5% |
8% |
|
|
CLN.S |
Clariant |
Chemicals |
5,798 |
SFr |
20.32 |
48% |
17% |
18% |
18% |
6% |
7% |
8% |
5% |
10% |
11.6x |
7.0x |
6% |
3% |
|
|
ABI.BR |
Anheuser-Busch InBev |
Consumer Products |
132,609 |
¼ |
67.28 |
44% |
10% |
11% |
13% |
9% |
9% |
10% |
8% |
14% |
15.1x |
11.4x |
8% |
3% |
|
|
JE.L |
JUST EAT |
Food Retail |
4,618 |
£ |
602.20 |
76% |
12% |
14% |
19% |
18% |
18% |
23% |
29% |
24% |
26.6x |
16.4x |
5% |
0% |
|
|
AV.L |
Aviva Plc |
Insurance |
18,088 |
£ |
409.30 |
37% |
13% |
13% |
14% |
|
|
|
4% |
5% |
7.1x |
|
|
7% |
|
|
AXAF.PA |
AXA |
Insurance |
50,583 |
¼ |
20.91 |
29% |
9% |
10% |
10% |
|
|
|
2% |
3% |
8.1x |
|
|
6% |
|
|
ZURN.S |
Zurich Insurance Group |
Insurance |
40,607 |
SFr |
305.90 |
27% |
12% |
14% |
14% |
|
|
|
3% |
14% |
10.4x |
|
|
7% |
|
|
PRTP.PA |
Kering |
Luxury Retail |
49,178 |
¼ |
390.30 |
55% |
34% |
28% |
27% |
15% |
16% |
17% |
14% |
20% |
15.6x |
10.0x |
6% |
3% |
|
|
ABBN.S |
ABB Ltd. |
Machinery |
37,681 |
SFr |
19.88 |
53% |
21% |
22% |
24% |
11% |
12% |
13% |
5% |
11% |
11.9x |
7.9x |
7% |
6% |
|
|
MRON.L |
Melrose |
Machinery |
8,116 |
£ |
181.85 |
32% |
10% |
9% |
10% |
1% |
7% |
8% |
59% |
17% |
12.2x |
7.0x |
3% |
2% |
|
|
PHG.AS |
Philips |
MedTech |
30,652 |
¼ |
33.40 |
26% |
12% |
15% |
17% |
8% |
11% |
11% |
5% |
18% |
16.9x |
9.5x |
6% |
3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Datastream, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
28 November 2018 |
53 |
vk.com/id446425943
Goldman Sachs
Exhibit 93: Key Conviction List metrics (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns |
|
|
Growth |
Valuation |
Yield |
|
||||
|
Ticker |
Company Name |
Sector |
Market cap |
Price |
Last |
Upside |
|
ROE |
|
|
CROCI |
|
Sales CAGR |
EPS CAGR |
P/E |
EV/EBITDA |
FCF Yield |
Div Yield |
|
|
¼ PQ |
Symbol |
price |
to TP |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2017-2021 |
2017-2021 |
2019 |
2019 |
2019 |
2019 |
|
|
AAL.L |
Anglo American Plc |
Mining |
22,490 |
£ |
1568.80 |
43% |
9% |
9% |
7% |
9% |
9% |
7% |
-1% |
-15% |
9.3x |
3.5x |
10% |
5% |
|
|
FRES.L |
Fresnillo Plc |
Mining - Precious |
6,208 |
£ |
746.40 |
98% |
16% |
18% |
19% |
15% |
15% |
15% |
9% |
12% |
11.6x |
5.4x |
2% |
5% |
|
|
RRS.L |
Randgold Resources |
Mining - Precious |
6,703 |
£ |
6440.00 |
16% |
6% |
9% |
9% |
12% |
14% |
16% |
7% |
12% |
19.8x |
10.6x |
4% |
4% |
|
|
BP.L |
BP Plc |
Oil |
114,666 |
£ |
512.60 |
46% |
12% |
12% |
11% |
9% |
9% |
9% |
2% |
19% |
10.4x |
4.3x |
10% |
6% |
|
|
NOVN.S |
Novartis |
Pharma |
176,928 |
SFr |
87.98 |
25% |
9% |
10% |
11% |
11% |
11% |
12% |
5% |
9% |
15.6x |
13.1x |
6% |
3% |
|
|
NOVOb.CO |
Novo Nordisk |
Pharma |
112,148 |
Dkr |
297.00 |
52% |
74% |
72% |
73% |
55% |
54% |
58% |
7% |
12% |
16.4x |
12.0x |
6% |
3% |
|
|
AEDAS.MC |
AEDAS Homes |
Real Estate |
1,011 |
¼ |
21.08 |
79% |
1% |
5% |
12% |
0% |
6% |
12% |
118% |
|
20.0x |
13.7x |
4% |
0% |
|
|
KOJAMO.HE |
Kojamo Oyj |
Real Estate |
2,237 |
¼ |
9.05 |
36% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
3% |
3% |
3% |
6% |
6% |
15.6x |
22.3x |
6% |
4% |
|
|
VNAn.DE |
Vonovia |
Real Estate |
22,034 |
¼ |
42.53 |
20% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
2% |
3% |
3% |
7% |
9% |
18.0x |
27.4x |
5% |
4% |
|
|
MT.AS |
ArcelorMittal |
Steel & Paper |
20,334 |
¼ |
19.94 |
78% |
14% |
11% |
9% |
10% |
8% |
8% |
1% |
0% |
4.5x |
3.5x |
16% |
7% |
|
|
VOES.VI |
Voestalpine |
Steel & Paper |
5,141 |
¼ |
29.39 |
72% |
10% |
10% |
10% |
7% |
7% |
7% |
1% |
3% |
7.0x |
4.6x |
15% |
5% |
|
|
ASML.AS |
ASML Holding |
Technology |
62,547 |
¼ |
144.50 |
53% |
26% |
38% |
43% |
29% |
33% |
37% |
12% |
21% |
17.8x |
15.0x |
5% |
3% |
|
|
CAPP.PA |
Capgemini |
Technology |
17,179 |
¼ |
101.05 |
43% |
15% |
16% |
17% |
13% |
14% |
15% |
6% |
13% |
17.1x |
8.8x |
8% |
2% |
|
|
SAPG.DE |
SAP |
Technology |
106,684 |
¼ |
89.35 |
37% |
14% |
15% |
17% |
14% |
14% |
15% |
8% |
11% |
23.6x |
14.5x |
4% |
2% |
|
|
WDIG.DE |
Wirecard |
Technology |
16,304 |
¼ |
131.95 |
89% |
20% |
24% |
26% |
37% |
48% |
58% |
31% |
38% |
31.3x |
18.7x |
3% |
0% |
|
|
ORAN.PA |
Orange |
Telecoms |
38,261 |
¼ |
14.64 |
31% |
9% |
10% |
11% |
|
|
|
1% |
21% |
11.6x |
4.3x |
10% |
6% |
|
|
TNET.BR |
Telenet |
Telecoms |
4,744 |
¼ |
41.08 |
41% |
-25% |
-19% |
-18% |
12% 12% 11% |
1% |
44% |
12.4x |
7.5x |
|
12% |
|
||
|
TELIA.ST |
Telia Co. |
Telecoms |
17,012 |
Skr |
40.49 |
33% |
12% |
13% |
14% |
6% |
6% |
6% |
1% |
13% |
12.6x |
7.4x |
7% |
6% |
|
|
FER.MC |
Ferrovial SA |
Transport and Infrastructure |
13,250 |
¼ |
18.11 |
33% |
6% |
7% |
9% |
9% |
10% |
10% |
2% |
7% |
30.2x |
19.4x |
6% |
4% |
|
|
SGEF.PA |
Vinci |
Transport and Infrastructure |
42,650 |
¼ |
76.86 |
35% |
16% |
16% |
16% |
9% |
9% |
10% |
4% |
10% |
12.7x |
7.4x |
9% |
4% |
|
|
NTGY.MC |
Naturgy Energy Group |
Utilities |
21,965 |
¼ |
21.95 |
32% |
8% |
11% |
13% |
7% |
6% |
6% |
6% |
23% |
13.1x |
8.9x |
3% |
6% |
|
|
RWEG.DE |
RWE |
Utilities |
12,611 |
¼ |
18.98 |
22% |
5% |
6% |
6% |
1% |
2% |
2% |
-1% |
9% |
13.6x |
6.7x |
0% |
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Datastream, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
28 November 2018 |
54 |
vk.com/id446425943 |
|
|
|||
Goldman Sachs |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 94: Risks and 12-month price target methodologies |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
PT Methodology |
Key Risks |
|
|
|
ABB Ltd. |
Sector relative EV/IC to ROIC/WACC rolling |
Downside risks to our view and price target: pronounced macro slowdown, execution issues in large orders, value |
|
|
|
framework. |
destructive M&A, FX, raw material headwinds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
AEDAS Homes |
DCF-methodology |
The key downside risks to our view and price target include unfavourable macro/political impacts, future unit |
|
|
|
delivery, competition, interest rates. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks to our investment case: (1) Value-dilutive acquisitions (2)End markets and/or raw material headwinds |
|
|
|
|
Fundamental value (85% weighting) based on 20.0x |
worsening (3)Slowing demand from Latin America (4) Consolidation in the paints & coatings industry of other |
|
|
|
Akzo Nobel |
2019E EV/DACF and M&A value (15% weighting) on a |
players which could intensify the competitive landscape (5) Over-reduction of sales force leading to weaker sales |
|
|
|
|
14.4x 2019E EV/EBITDA multiple |
capability (6)If the Spec Chem proceeds return format is not approved by shareholders at the November EGM |
|
|
|
|
|
(7)If Akzo cancels or delays the return of Spec Chems proceeds to shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anglo American Plc |
5x EV/EBITDA multiple |
Key risks to our view include lower commodity prices, stronger FX and political risk associated with political and |
|
|
|
fiscal changes in South Africa. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on a DCF methodology (assuming a 7.1% |
Key risks to our view and price target include weaker synergy delivery, weak organic growth, adverse FX moves, |
|
|
|
Anheuser-Busch InBev |
WACC and 2% terminal growth), implying a P/E of |
|
|
|
|
limited cash deployment, higher bond yields and lower sector valuation. |
|
||
|
|
|
17.1x on our December 2020 EPS forecasts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ArcelorMittal |
5.50x EV/EBITDA based on 2019 estimates |
Key risks include weak China data, lower iron ore prices, lower steel margins, a sudden increase in imports and |
|
|
|
lower-than-expected demand in US/EU. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASML Holding |
26x 2019E P/E multiple plus a special dividend |
Key risks to our view and price target include EUV delays, capex cyclicality and market share shifts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Key downside risks to our view and price target include: (i) lower volumes or higher new business strain in the UK |
|
|
|
Aviva Plc |
RoC-based target price |
annuity market; (ii) a reduction in solvency capital generation and/or unencumbered liquidity position; (iii) a |
|
|
|
smaller-than-expected share buyback in 2018/19; and (iv) lower-than-anticipated cash remittances from its |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
business units. |
|
|
|
|
|
We see financial market movements as the key risk to our view. We view AXA as relatively geared to interest |
|
|
|
|
|
rates among the multi-line insurers, so a moderation in interest rate expectations would be a downside risk. Other |
|
|
|
AXA |
ROC/growth/discount-based valuation |
macro factors are also important, with downside risks including falling/more volatile equity markets and/or |
|
|
|
|
|
widening credit spreads. Finally, we see downside risks relating to the integration, synergies and operational |
|
|
|
|
|
aspects of the XL acquisition. |
|
|
|
|
EV/DACF multiple of 15.3x applied to our 2019 |
Key risks to our view and price target include: 1) lower dividends, 2) FX, 3) programme delays, 4) MoD cost- |
|
|
|
BAE Systems |
estimates and discounted back six months at a 9% |
|
|
|
|
cutting, 5) political change and 6) M&A. |
|
||
|
|
|
WACC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on a core valuation of €1.76 per share (1.18x |
Risks to our view and price target include worse-than-expected macro developments in Spain and/or the UK; |
|
|
|
Banco Sabadell |
P/TBV 2019E) (85% weighting) and M&A-based |
sharp FX moves in the EUR/GBP cross; a significant ‘de-risking’ in the unsecured/consumer loan segment; |
|
|
|
valuation of €2.7 per share (1.44x P/TBV 2019E, in line |
renewed political risk in Catalonia, potentially leading to net deposit and/or AUM outflows (as in early October |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
with precedent transactions) (15% weighting) |
2017); and/or additional TSB-related costs in the UK. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAWAG Group |
ROE/COE methodology |
Key risks include failure to deliver on M&A, insufficient progress on restructuring, headwinds in the domestic as |
|
|
|
well as international businesses, adverse impact of regulations, and share overhang. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BNP Paribas |
ROTE/COE methodology |
Key risks to our view and price target include continued and unexpected regulatory changes, lack of progress on |
|
|
|
efficiency improvement and renewed deterioration in asset quality. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our new 12m price target of 750p (from 730p) is based Key risks to our view and price target are weaker hydrocarbon prices and/or refining margins than we expect, |
|
|
|
|
BP Plc |
on 7.7x EV/DACF (20 year historical average) applied |
execution issues, higher than expected costs/capex in current/future developments and/or unanticipated material |
|
|
|
|
to 2019E cash flow. |
exploration disappointments. |
|
|
|
Capgemini |
CY19E P/E target multiple of 18x. |
Key risks to our view and price target: Macro slowdown; M&A related integration and execution issues; |
|
|
|
management changes and dynamic competitive landscape/pricing pressure. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 13.5x 2019E EV/DACF, based on a factor of |
Downside risks to our view and price target include a material slowdown in global growth, particularly in Europe; |
|
|
|
|
1.14 applied to its 5-year historical multiple of 11.8x |
lower US onshore production than previously anticipated, which could again derail Clariant’s growth trajectory in |
|
|
|
Clariant |
(85% weighting) and a M&A based valuation based on |
|
|
|
|
|
a target multiple of 12.5x 2019E EV/EBITDA (15% |
the Natural Resources division; and an unanticipated increase in Clariant’s key raw materials prices, which could |
|
|
|
|
lead to margin pressures in its Care Chemicals division in the near term. |
|
|
|
|
|
weighting) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on both ROIC and SOTP methods to reflect |
|
|
|
|
|
potential investor focus on CNHI’s SOTP value. Our |
|
|
|
|
CNH Industrial |
ROIC-based value is US$18.5/share (75% weighting), |
Risks to our investment thesis and price targets include extended farm income weakness, residual value risk, |
|
|
|
based on a 2019-22E ROIC of 13.0% and |
lower finco EBIT, high leverage risk, an economic slowdown and the threat of EM competition. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
EV/IC:ROIC/FMCC of 1.0x . Our SOTP-based value is |
|
|
|
|
|
US$16.5/share (25% weighting) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on a SOTP methodology, which results in a |
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Post DHL |
blended 12.5x 2019E EV/EBIT, discounted back by |
Key risks: weaker economic growth, a faster decline in mail volumes, cost inflation, failure to expand margins in |
|
|
|
one year (10%). We also add the potential value from |
Express and failure to turnaround the Global Forwarding division. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
uses of cash. |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 7.25x EV/EBITDA applied to 2019E, to which |
|
|
|
|
|
we add the expected value from uses of cash (i.e. Elis |
|
|
|
|
Elis SA |
pursuing further M&A) and the optionality value to be |
The biggest risks to our view would be the failure to integrate and extract synergies from some of the recent |
|
|
|
involved in M&A (15% weighting at 18x EV/EBIT based |
acquisitions (e.g. due to cultural clashes), overpaying for future acquisitions or macro headwinds (e.g. in Latam). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
on historical transaction multiples in the subsector). |
|
|
|
|
|
We then discount this back by 10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 16x 2019E EV/EBITDA (on higher growth vs. Key risks: as Eurofins gains scale in revenues, it will likely have to undertake larger transactions in order to grow |
|
|
|
|
Eurofins Scientific |
testing peers) and includes uses of excess cash as |
via M&A. Finding such large deals could prove difficult. Furthermore, even if these deals are found, they could |
|
|
|
well as an M&A component (based on 18x 2019E |
come at higher multiples and carry higher execution risk. Other risks include a failure to hit medium-term targets, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
EV/EBITDA, 15% weighting). |
key man risk (CEO & founder) and further potential equity raises. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 26x P/E multiple applied to our 2019 |
The biggest downside risk to our view and price target is weaker economic growth or a slowdown in credit growth |
|
|
|
|
in the company’s key markets (US, UK and Brazil). A slowdown in innovation or lack of success for new or future |
|
|
|
|
Experian |
calendar EPS estimates (85% weighting) and on an |
product launches could also lead to lower-than-expected growth, as could increased competition or new product |
|
|
|
M&A component based on 18x 1-year forward |
launches from competitors. Adverse sector regulation, for example, following recent data breaches, could also |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
EV/EBITDA (15% weighting). |
add additional costs to the firm. Given the large amount of data stored by the credit bureau, data breaches also |
|
|
|
|
|
present a reputational risk for the industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrovial SA |
DCF-based SOTP |
Key risks are increase in real interest rates, FX, regulatory risk; lower-than-expected traffic growth and execution |
|
|
|
risk; strategic inertia. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
28 November 2018 |
55 |
vk.com/id446425943 |
|
|
|
|||
Goldman Sachs |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 95: Risks and 12-month price target methodologies |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
PT Methodology |
Key Risks |
|
|
|
|
Fresnillo Plc |
50/50 blend of 25x 2019E P/E and 1x NAV |
Key risks to our view and price target include lower silver and gold prices, stronger MXN, grade variability at the |
|
|
|
|
Fresnillo mine and further delays to the growth project. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key downside risks to our view and price target relate to top-line headwinds, in particular prolonged pressure on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
margins; disappointing progress on the implementation of the group’s strategic initiatives and weaker outlook for |
|
|
|
|
ING Groep NV |
ROE/COE methodology |
operating expenses; slower-than-expected progress on capital build-up and lower capital distribution; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
deterioration of the operating environment in Turkey and rising concerns around EM as well as negative surprises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
on cost of risk. Politics and adverse regulatory changes across key markets could also be a consideration. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derived from a DCF valuation (85% weighting) and an |
Key risks to our view include Just Eat continuing to invest in delivery despite no/low returns, outsourcing of UK |
|
|
|
|
JUST EAT |
M&A valuation (15% weighting) based on 13.2x NTM |
delivery means less control of customer experience, disruptive competitor actions, market share losses, |
|
|
|
|
sales (based on Q1/Q2 average of recent industry |
execution, lower-than-expected penetration of internet ordering, and a shift in consumer preferences away from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
transactions). |
takeaways. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key risks: (1) The ongoing growth at Gucci brand is key. We will continue to monitor trends and industry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
feedback. We have not seen a brand turnaround of this magnitude before with 90% of product available being |
|
|
|
|
|
DCF methodology for Kering with cross-reference to |
new. Establishment of a core ’evergreen’ product is key to sustainable long-term growth. (2) In the event Kering |
|
|
|
|
Kering |
does not wish to expand retail revenues via multibrand platforms (E-Concessions), our long-term forecasts may |
|
|
|
|
|
peer group multiples and a sum-of-the-parts analysis |
|
|
||
|
|
|
prove too optimistic. (3) Increasing luxury consumption raises the competitive environment (lowering barriers to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entry) and adds pricing transparency for consumers. We could be underestimating the investment required to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reach our sales assumptions. |
|
|
|
|
Kojamo Oyj |
70% on our fundamental EVA® valuation of €11.5/sh, |
Key risks to our view and price target for Kojamo include weaker market trends than expected and/or weaker |
|
|
|
|
and 30% on our M&A valuation of €14.2/sh |
delivery on investment plans and/or the ability to sustain low underlying cash tax rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melrose |
SOTP methodology |
Key risks include M&A execution, restructuring execution, cyclical concerns (automotive, aerospace, US |
|
|
|
|
residential), potential tax charges, FX. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 30% M&A valuation derived through a |
Key risks are more adverse regulatory changes in Spain, lower commodity prices and spark spreads, |
|
|
|
|
Naturgy Energy Group |
transaction-based SOTP of €33; 70% fundamental |
|
|
|
|
|
valuation based on 60% P/E relative value (14.5x pro |
slower/muted pace of portfolio reorganisation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
forma 2021E, €30), 40% DDM (2025E, €26). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downside risks to our view and price target include lower than expected sales growth for Cosentyx, driven by |
|
|
|
|
Novartis |
SOTP methodology |
increasing competitive pressures, sales rollout of new products disappoint, slower than expected operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
margin expansion in the Pharma business and Clinical trial failures of late-stage assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our 12-month price target of Dkr450 is based on 22x |
Downside risks to our view and price target include unfavourable safety profile for oral sema in future Phase 3 |
|
|
|
|
Novo Nordisk |
2020E EPS, which is then discounted back by a year |
trials, slower-than-expected ramp-up of Ozempic, and higher-than-expected pricing pressure in the US. |
|
|
|
|
|
(WACC of 7.5%, in line with our coverage). |
|
|
|
|
|
Orange |
ROIC-based |
Key risks are pricing competition and capital discipline. |
|
|
|
|
Philips |
11.5x EV/EBITDA (2019E) |
Key risks to our view and price target include meaningful deterioration in global hospital capex or GDP |
|
|
|
|
environment, quality issues, failure to execute on restructuring, corporate activity, and FX. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randgold Resources |
50/50 blend of 25x 2019E P/E and 1x NAV |
Key risks are lower gold prices, exploration surprise and M&A. |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on 2020E EV/DACF multiple of 11.4x. Our |
|
|
|
|
|
Rolls-Royce |
target multiple assumes a 1:1 relationship between |
Key risks include FX (weaker USD), lower offshore capex sanctioning, negative defence spending momentum, |
|
|
|
|
EV/GCI and CROCI/WACC. We then discount it back |
and programme risk on new engines. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
1.5 years at a 9% WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on a 50/50 combination of SOTP (€25.3) and |
Key risks are additional closures of lignite mines, an abrupt German coal and lignite phase out policy, falling |
|
|
|
|
RWE |
P/E relative value approach in line with sector multiples |
|
|
|
|
|
power demand, poor execution on the renewables pipeline and GBP depreciation. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
(€21.0). |
|
|
|
|
|
SAP |
26x 2019E PF EPS |
Key risks to our view and price target include: Macro environment; lack of traction in S4HANA or cloud; M&A; |
|
|
|
|
management changes; and additional opex spending dampening margin expansion. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Chartered |
ROTE/COE methodology |
Key risks to our view and price target include worse-than-expected revenue progression, weaker-than-expected |
|
|
|
|
asset quality and geopolitical risks. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telenet |
70% weighting to a fundamental valuation (DCF- |
Key risks include further regulation of cable in Belgium, increased competitive pressure and changes in long-term |
|
|
|
|
based) of €58.0, and a 30% weighting to an M&A |
|
|
||
|
|
financing costs. Also, Liberty Global is a majority shareholder and could seek to increase its influence. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
component at the same valuation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telia Co. |
ROIC-based |
Key downside risks include M&A investments especially in content/media, FX and competition. |
|
|
|
|
Vinci |
SOTP-based |
Key risks are lower-than-expected growth in traffic and construction, adverse regulation, and M&A. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.50x EV/EBITDA applied to our calendarised 2019 |
Key risks include: (1) Significant slowdown in European economic activity; (2) A significant increase in imports; |
|
|
|
|
Voestalpine |
and (3) A significant slowdown in European automotive market and company-specific production problems |
|
|
|
|
|
estimates |
|
|
||
|
|
|
related to the diesel scandal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vonovia |
EVAfi-based price target |
Key risks include a more negative impact from incremental regulation, higher interest rates than we currently |
|
|
|
|
expect and a lack of investment opportunities, including less modernisation than we currently forecast. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70% weighting to our core PEG-based valuation of |
|
|
|
|
|
Wirecard |
€235/sh (implied 55.5x 2019E PF EPS) and a 30% |
Key risks are lower-than-expected volumes/pricing, regulations, M&A integration, higher investments, and the |
|
|
|
|
weighting to our M&A value of €285/sh (12.5x 2019E |
|
|
||
|
|
|
EV/sales, towards the top end of the M&A transactions |
competitive landscape. |
|
|
|
|
|
in the payments space). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key downside risk to our rating and valuation is execution risk around Zurich’s current restructuring plan, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
particularly if expense savings delivered are substantially lower than targeted. Other risks include adverse macro |
|
|
|
|
Zurich Insurance Group |
Sector-wide ROC model |
developments, e.g., lower interest rates, lower equity markets and wider credit spreads; adverse operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
developments including reserving risks and life / non-life underwriting risks; and unfavourable regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
developments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
28 November 2018 |
56 |
vk.com/id446425943
Goldman Sachs
Prices in this report are as of the close of November 26, 2018 unless otherwise stated.
Disclosure
EVA is a registered trademark of Stern, Stewart & Co.
Financial advisory disclosures
Goldman Sachs and/or one of its affiliates is acting as a financial advisor in connection with an announced strategic matter involving the following company or one of its affiliates: Arcelormittal SA
Goldman Sachs and/or one of its affiliates is acting as a financial advisor in connection with an announced strategic matter involving the following company or one of its affiliates: RWE Aktiengesellschaft
Goldman Sachs and/or one of its affiliates is acting as a financial advisor in connection with an announced strategic matter involving the following company or one of its affiliates: Zurich Insurance Group AG
Pricing information
Roche (SFr249.60); Naspers (R2,790); Schibsted (Nkr297.90)
28 November 2018 |
57 |