ИЭ / 6 семестр (англ) / Лаба / Capacitor
.docxPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Institute of Energy and Transport Systems. Department of Theoretical Electrical Engineering and Electromechanics.
Project 1
Plane Capacitor
Student:
gr. 3231302/90201
Supervisor:
Dubitsky S.D.
St. Petersburg
2022
Task description and given data
Table 1. Personal data
Sketch of the geometry model with no mesh
X-axis is equipotential: U=0 (zero Dirichlet condition) as we consider that both capacitor plates have the same charge, but with the opposite sign, so x-axis is the middle between them and its voltage is zero.
Y-axis is normal to the equipotential lines, so (zero Neuman condition).
The artificial outer boundary (there’s no field here, so U=0).
Figure 1. Sketch of the geometry model with no mesh
Figure 2. Model of ¼ of the plane capacitor
Dependency of maximal field Emax on the mesh spacing on the rounded end of the conductor
In order to study the influence of the number of mesh nodes to the maximal field intensity (Emax), let’s add the mesh and then it’s necessary to control its step manually.
Table 2. Maximal field Emax
Mesh density (S) |
Value of Emax, V/m |
Difference, % |
0,8 |
44295,8 |
|
0,4 |
46659,8 |
5,34 |
0,2 |
49099,2 |
5,23 |
0,1 |
49287,7 |
0,38 |
0,05 |
49951,5 |
1,35 |
0,02 |
50250,4 |
0,6 |
Figure 3. Dependency of maximal field Emax on the mesh density
That figure shows us that with the growth of mesh density, the value of Emax grows too. The discrepancy between the last two values equals 0,6%.
Pictures with the mesh and E-field around the rounded end of the conductor
Figure 4. Sketch of rounded end of the conductor with default mesh spacing S=0.8
Figure 5. Picture of field with default mesh spacing S=0.8
Figure 6. Sketch of rounded end of the conductor with final mesh spacing S=0.02
Figure 7. Picture of field with final mesh spacing S=0.02
As we can see, maximum of field intensity is at the rounded end of the conductor.
5. Dependency of Emax on the radius R of the artificial outer boundary
With our optimal mesh spacing at the rounded end of the conductor (S=0.02) we will increase radius R of the artificial outer boundary from default (R=500 mm) to such a value that the Emax will converge.
Table 3. Maximal field Emax
Radius, mm |
Value of Emax, V/m |
Difference, % |
100 |
50527,1 |
– |
200 |
50305,3 |
0,44 |
500 |
50250,4 |
0,11 |
Figure 8. Dependency of maximal field Emax on radius of the outer boundary
That figure shows us that with the growth of radius of outer boundary, the value of Emax decreases. The discrepancy between the last two values is about 0,11%.
6. Capacitance calculations
By a simple formula:
Some values which we need to use in this formula:
– dielectric permittivity; F/m;
d = 9 mm – distance between plates; w = 120 mm – width;
ZL = 195 mm – axial length;
In the «Quick Field» (using charge and using energy):
This problem we will solve in the «Quick Field» program, but firstly we should draw a contour for it.
Figure 9. Contour for finding capacitance with results of Capacitance Wizard
Table 4. The results for the capacitance by different methods
By a simple formula |
By charge and voltage |
By energy and voltage |
|
|
|
According to our calculations, we see that the final results for the capacity differ by 2.3%.
7. Maximal field intensity Emax and the field in the middle Ec.
For the field in the middle Ec
Figure 10. The value of the field in the middle Ec.
So finally, we got the value of Ec = 33333 V/m.
With the theoretical calculation, we get .
As we can see, the values match.
For the maximal field intensity Emax
According to the tables 2 and 3 «Maximal field Emax» we took mesh density S=0.02 and radius R = 500 mm, so we get Emax = 50250,4 V/m.
Figure 11. XY-plot of E for S=0,02 and R=500 mm
Conclusion
I created a geometry model of the plane capacitor according to my personal data and set the necessary properties and boundary conditions.
Were received the dependency of the maximal field intensity Emax x on the mesh spacing on the rounded end of the conductor (with the growth of mesh density, the value of Emax grows too); and dependency of maximal field Emax on radius of the outer boundary (with the growth of radius of outer boundary, the value of Emax decreases).
I calculated the capacitance by three methods and all results are quite similar (final results for the capacity differ by 2.3%).
I found the values of the field in the center Ec = 33333 V/m and the maximal field Emax=50250,4 V/m.